Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Web site accessibility and quality in use: a comparative study of government Web sites in Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Government Web sites aim to provide information to the citizens of the country; therefore, they should be accessible, easy to use and visible via search engines. Based on this assumption, in this paper, the ministry Web sites of four countries namely the Kyrgyz Republic, the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Republic of Turkey were analyzed in terms of accessibility and quality in use. Tests were carried out utilizing online automated tools. Results indicate that the usage rate of Information and Communication Technologies by the government is higher in Turkey, which affects the visibility of government Web sites but not their quality in use. Very few ministry Web sites of the four countries achieved AA conformance level on accessibility, many failed to pass conformance level A and AA checkpoints for accessibility errors. In order to ensure equal access to all their citizens, the countries in this study need to put more emphasis on designing government Web sites to be more accessible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abanumy, A., Al-Badi, A., Mayhew, P.: e-Government website accessibility: in-depth evaluation of Saudi Arabia and Oman. Electron. J. e-Gov. 3(3), 99–106 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abou-Zahra, S.: Web accessibility evaluation tools: overview. http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/ (2006)

  3. AbuAli, A.N., Obedidat, A., Abu-Addose, H.Y.: Accessibility as an indicator of Jordanian e-Government website quality. In: 4th International Conference on e-Learning Best Practices in Management, Design and Development of e-Courses: Standards of Excellence and Creativity, 156–160. (2013)

  4. Akgul, Y., Vatansever, K.: Web accessibility evaluation of government websites for people with disabilities in Turkey. J. Adv. Manag. Sci. 4(3), 201–210 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Radaideh, M., Nuser, M., Wahbeh, A.: Evaluating accessibility of Jordanian E-Government websites for people with disabilities. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Communication Systems, 127–131. (2011)

  6. Baker, D.L.: Advancing E-Government performance in the United States through enhanced usability benchmarks. Gov. Inf. Quart. 26, 82–88 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brajnik, G.: Automatic web usability evaluation: what needs to be done? In: Proceedings Human Factors and the Web, 6th Conference. (2000)

  8. Brooks, L., Persaud, A.: Comparing local e-Government websites in Canada and the UK. In: Electronic Government pp. 291–304. Springer International Publishing. (2015)

  9. Committee on Statistics of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Key indicators of the governance organizations’ ICT usage by economic activity. Report at http://stat.gov.kz/getImg?id=ESTAT100275 (2016). Accessed 10 February 2016)

  10. Committee on Statistics of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Refinement of the population size in the Republic of Kazakhstan at the beginning of 2009-2015. Report at http://stat.gov.kz/getImg?id=ESTAT100234 (accessed February, 10, 2016)

  11. Convention of the Republic of Turkey “On the Rights of Persons with Disabilities” from 29/09/2009 at http://www.uhdigm.adalet.gov.tr/sozlesmeler/coktaraflisoz/bm/bm_48.pdf (2016). Retrieved 2 May 2016)

  12. Fang, X., Holsapple, C.W.: An empirical study of web site navigation structures’ impacts on web site usability. Decis. Support Syst. 43, 476–491 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Federal Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities” from 25.04.2012 at http://egov.kz/wps/portal/!ut/p/b0/04_Sj9CPykssy0xPLMnMz0vMAfIjc7PyChKtUvKTS3NT80r0w_Wj9KNgPM8U_cgoQ1MDEDCysABJ5STmpZcmpqfqRxaV6hfk5lqUOyoqAgACDrXa/ (2016). Retrieved 2 May 2016)

  14. Garcia, A.C.B., Maciel, C., Pinto, F.B.: A quality inspection method to evaluate E-Government sites. EGOV 2005, LNCS 3591, 198–209, (2005)

  15. Harper, K.A., DeWaters, J.: A Quest for website accessibility in higher education institutions. Internet High. Educ. 11, 160–164 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Homola, G.A., Höltje, J., Brüning, R.: Analyse zur Internetpräsenz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neuroradiologie. Clin. Neuroradiol. 25(2), 137–141 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Isa, W.A.R.W.M., Suhami, M.R., Safie, N.I., Semsudin, S.S.: Assessing the usability and accessibility of Malaysia E-Government website. Am. J. Econ. Bus. Adm. 3(1), 40–46 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ISO/IEC 40500: 2012 Information technology—W3C web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. from http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=58625 Retrieved 11 March 2016

  19. Karkin, N., Janssen, M.: Evaluating websites from a public value perspective: a review of Turkish local government websites. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 34, 351–363 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kollár, I., Kráľ, P., Laco, P. Methodology for assessing website improvement in corporate environment. Applications of Mathematics and Statistics in Economics. In: 17th International Scientific Conference, Poland, pp. 131–140, August 2014

  21. Kopacka, H., Michalek, K.: Accessibility and findability of local e-government websites in the Czech Republic. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 9, 51–61 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurt, S.: The accessibility of university web sites: the case of Turkish universities. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10, 101–110 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuzma, J.M.: Accessibility design issues with UK e-government sites. Gov. Inf. Quart. 27, 141–146 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuzma, J.M., Weisenborn, G., Philippe, T., Gabel, A., Dolechek, R.: Analysis of U.S. Senate web sites for disability accessibility. Int. J. Bus. Res. 9(6), 174–181 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Latif, M.H.A., Masrek, M.N.: Accessibility Evaluation on Malaysian E-Government Websites. J. e-Gov. Stud. Best Pract. 2010(2010).http://ibima.net/articles/JEGSBP/2010/935272/935272.pdf

  26. Lee, S., Koubek, R.J.: The effects of usability and web design attributes on user preference for e-commerce web sites. Comput. Ind. 61, 329–341 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Luján-Mora, S., Navarrete R., Peñafiel, M. (2014). Egovernment and web accessibility in South America. In: Proceedings of the 2014 First International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment (ICEDEG), pp. 77–82

  28. Nagy, Z.: Improved speed on intelligent web sites. In: Recent Advances in Computer Science, pp. 215–220. Rhodes Island, Greece (2013)

  29. Nam, T.: Determining the type of e-government use. Gov. Inf. Quart. 31, 211–220 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. National Statistical Committee. 26.06.2015/Information and Communication Technologies in Kyrgyz Republic 2010–2014; http://stat.kg/media/publicationarchive/fdd015ba-8a4f-47ad-95db-fcfc47d6a7f1.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2016)

  31. National Statistical Committee. 26.06.2015/Resident population as of the beginning of the year; http://stat.kg/media/statisticsdynamic/fe55b8f0-5e6e-4c9b-b9aa-2e34ce97516d.xlsx. Accessed 10 February 2016)

  32. Patel, M.C., Gulati, R.: Software performance testing tools—a comparative analysis. Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev, 3(9), 58–61 (2012)

  33. Patra, M.R., Dash, A.R., Mishra, P.K.: A quantitative analysis of WCAG 2.0 compliance for some Indian web portals. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. Appl. (IJCSEA) 4(1), 9–24 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ismailova, R.: Website accessibility, usability and security: a survey of government websites in Kyrgyz Republic. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2015). doi:10.1007/s10209-015-0446-8

    Google Scholar 

  35. Resilution on the set of measures to ensure the rights and improve the quality of life of persons with disabilities in the Kyrgyz Republic for 2014–2017, 2 December 2013 at http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/view/ru-ru/94852. Retrieved May 2 2016

  36. Shawgi, E., Noureldien, N.A.: Usability measurement model (umm): a new model for measuring websites usability. Int. J. Inf. Sci. 5(1), 5–13 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  37. SimilarWeb.com-Competitive Intelligence Tool. (n.d.). from http://www.similarweb.com/ Retrieved 11 March 2016

  38. Sohaib, O., Kang, K.: The importance of web accessibility in business to-consumer (B2C) websites. In: 22nd Australasian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC 2013)

  39. The Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities” from 21/01/2009 at http://www.justice.gov.az/view_hr.php?id=19. Retrieved 2 May 2016

  40. The State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Information Society in Azerbaijan. Information and Communication Technologies Statistical Yearbook, 2015. Report at http://www.stat.gov.az/menu/6/statistical_yearbooks/source/i-society_en_2015.zip. Accessed 10 February 2016)

  41. The United Nations: Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Treaty Ser. 2515, 3 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Turkish Statistical Institute. Enterprises using Internet for interaction with public authorities by economic activity (NACE Rev.2) and size group. Report at http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=2346. Accessed 10 February 2016)

  43. Turkish Statistical Institute. Population by years, age group and sex, 1935–2015. Report at http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist# Accessed 10 February 2016

  44. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.: Research-based web design and usability guidelines. US Government Printing Office at http://www.usability.gov/guidelines/guidelines_book.pdf(2006). Retrieved 15 December 2015

  45. United Nations.: UN global E-government Survey 2003, [Online], United Nations Division for Public Administration and Development Management, http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan016066.pdf (2003). Retrieved 25 May 2015)

  46. United Nations.: UN E-government Survey 2014—E-government for the Future We Want, [Online] http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2014-Survey/E-Gov_Complete_Survey-2014.pdf(2014). Retrieved 25 May 2015

  47. Wang, L., Bretschneider, S, Gant, J.: Evaluating Web-based e-government services with a citizen-centric approach.In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. (2005)

  48. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 at https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ Retrieved 5 April 2016)

  49. Yuan, L., Xi, C., Xiaoyi, W.: Evaluating the readiness of government portal websites in China to adopt contemporary public administration principles. Gov. Inf. Quart. 29, 403–412 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang, M.: Internet use that reproduces educational inequalities: evidence from big data. Comput. Educ. 86, 212–223 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang, M.: Discovering the unequal interest in popular online educational games and its implications: a case study. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47(2), 358–371 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic

    Rita Ismailova

  2. TUBITAK BILGEM, Software Technologies Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey

    Yavuz Inal

Authors
  1. Rita Ismailova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yavuz Inal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yavuz Inal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ismailova, R., Inal, Y. Web site accessibility and quality in use: a comparative study of government Web sites in Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univ Access Inf Soc 16, 987–996 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0490-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0490-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation