Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A user-centric game selection model based on user preferences for the selection of the best heterogeneous wireless network

  • Published:
annals of telecommunications - annales des télécommunications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Next-generation wireless networks offer Internet connection through various technologies anytime and anywhere. The selection of an optimal technology from these available technologies is essential to guarantee user mobility and service continuity in a heterogeneous wireless environment. This paper proposes a new network selection model which is based on the integration of simple additive weighting (SAW) method in the framework of trading market non-cooperative game theory and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was utilized to estimate the weights of the parameters that affect the network selection process. The proposed solution enables the mobile user to negotiate with competing networks by providing the user preference to be considered for the network selection process. The proposed solution is analyzed and tested through simulations. The results show the efficiency of proposed method which is able to optimize the user’s satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hesham El-Sayed SZ, Mellouk A, George L (2008) Quality of service models for heterogeneous networks: overview and challenges. Ann Telecommun - annales des télécommunications 63(11–12):639–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chamodrakas I, Martakos D (2012) A utility-based fuzzy TOPSIS method for energy efficient network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. Appl Soft Comput 12(7):1929–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Salih Y, See O, Yussof S (2012) A fuzzy predictive handover mechanism based on MIH links triggering in heterogeneous wireless networks. Ipcsit Conf 41:225–229

    Google Scholar 

  4. Trestian R, Ormond O, Muntean G-M (2012) Game theory-based network selection: solutions and challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 14(4):1212–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Q.-T. Nguyen-Vuong, Y. Ghamri-Doudane, and N. Agoulmine, “On utility models for access network selection in wireless heterogeneous networks,” NOMS 2008–2008 I.E. Network Operations and Management Symposium, pp. 144–151, 2008.

  6. Qian Lv GNR (2010) An economic model for pricing tiered network services. Ann Telecommun - annales des télécommunications 65(3–4):147–161

    Google Scholar 

  7. Atiq Ahmed DG, Merghem-Boulahia L (2011) An intelligent agent-based scheme for vertical handover management across heterogeneous networks. Ann Telecommun - annales des télécommunications 66(9–10):583–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vesna Radonjić VA-R (2010) Responsive pricing modeled with Stackelberg game for next-generation networks. Ann Telecommun - annales des télécommunications 65(7–8):461–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoang-Hai Tran BT (2012) Combinatorial double-sided auctions for network bandwidth allocation: a budget-balanced and decentralized approach. Ann Telecommun - annales des télécommunications 67(5–6):227–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sangki Ko KC (2014) A handover-aware seamless video streaming scheme in heterogeneous wireless networks. Ann Telecommun - annales des télécommunications 69(3–4):239–250

    Google Scholar 

  11. Savitha K, Chandrasekar C (2011) Vertical handover decision schemes using SAW and WPM for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. Glob J Comput Sci Technol 11(9):19–24

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nancy SB (2013) Performance evaluation and comparison of MADM algorithms for subjective and objective weights in heterogeneous networks. Int J Emerg Trends Electr Electron (IJETEE) 2(2):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Savitha K, Chandrasekar C (2011) Trusted network selection using SAW and TOPSIS Algorithms for heterogeneous wireless networks. Int J Comput Appl 26(8):22–29

  14. Q. I. S. Ong, A. B. J. Amalipour, U. N. O. F. S. Ydney, and A. Ustralia, “Network Selection in an Integrated Wireless LAN and UMTS Environment Using Mathematical Modeling and Computing Techniques,” Ieee Wireless Communications, no. June, pp. 42–48, 2005.

  15. Choongyong Shin BL, Cho J, Kim JG (2012) An AHP-based resource management scheme for CRRM in heterogeneous wireless networks. Ann Telecommunications - annales des télécommunications 67(11–12):511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vassaki S, Panagopoulos A. D, and Constantinou P, (Oct. 2009)“Bandwidth allocation in wireless access networks: Bankruptcy game vs cooperative game,” IEEE, International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications & Workshops, pp. 1–4

  17. Antoniou J, Papadopoulou V, Vassiliou V, Pitsillides A (2010) Cooperative user–network interactions in next generation communication networks. Comput Netw 54(13):2239–2255

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Trestian R, Ormond O, Muntean G-M (2011) Reputation-based network selection mechanism using game theory. Phys Commun 4(3):156–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Antoniou J, Koukoutsidis I, Jaho E, Pitsillides A, Stavrakakis I (2009) Access network synthesis game in next generation networks. Comput Netw 53(15):2716–2726

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu K, Niyato D, and Wang P, (Apr. 2010)“Network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks: evolution with incomplete information,” Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), IEEE, pp. 1–6

  21. Cesana M, Gatti N, and Malanchini I, (2008) “Game theoretic analysis of wireless access network selection: models, inefficiency bounds, and algorithms,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools

  22. M. A. Khan, U. Toseef, S. Marx, and C. Goerg, “Auction based interface selection with Media Independent Handover services and flow management,” 2010 European Wireless Conference (EW), pp. 429–436, 2010.

  23. Radhika K, Reddy A (2011) Vertical handoff decision using game theory approach for multi-mode mobile terminals in next generation wireless networks. Int J Comput Appl 36(11):31–37

    Google Scholar 

  24. Charilas D, Panagopoulos A (2009) Congestion avoidance control through non-cooperative games between customers and service providers. Mob Light Wirel Syst 13:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Niyato D, Hossain E (2008) A noncooperative game-theoretic framework for radio resource management in 4G heterogeneous wireless access networks. Mob Comput IEEE Trans 7(3):332–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khan M, Alam S, Khan M (2010) A network selection mechanism for fourth generation communication networks. J Adv Inf Technol 1(4):189–196

    Google Scholar 

  27. Trestian R, (2012) “User-Centric Power-Friendly Quality-based Network Selection Strategy for Heterogeneous Wireless Environments,”

  28. Quoc-Thinh Nguyen-Vuong LT, Agoulmine N, Cherkaoui EH (2013) Multicriteria optimization of access selection to improve the quality of experience in heterogeneous wireless access networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 62(4):1785–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Salih YK, See OH, Yussof S, Iqbal A, Mohammad Salih SQ (2013) A proactive fuzzy-guided link labeling algorithm based on MIH framework in heterogeneous wireless networks. Wirel Pers Commun 75(4):2495–2511

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the University Tenaga National, Malaysia, under Grant U-SN-CR-12-08 under project Smart Grid Test-Bed, 2012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, 43000, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia

    Yass K. Salih & Ong Hang See

  2. Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science Building, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Rabha W. Ibrahim

  3. College of Information Technology, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, 43000, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia

    Salman Yussof & Azlan Iqbal

Authors
  1. Yass K. Salih
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ong Hang See
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rabha W. Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salman Yussof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Azlan Iqbal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabha W. Ibrahim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salih, Y.K., See, O.H., Ibrahim, R.W. et al. A user-centric game selection model based on user preferences for the selection of the best heterogeneous wireless network. Ann. Telecommun. 70, 239–248 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-014-0443-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-014-0443-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation