Culture Matters in HCI

• Ai He, H., Memarovic, N., Sabiescu, A., & De Moor, A. (2015). CulTech2015: Cultural diversity and technology design. C&T, 27–30-June, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768561.

• Airoldi. (2022). Machine habitus. Toward a sociology of algorithms. Polity.

  Google Scholar 

• Alexander, R., Murray, D., & Thompson, N. (2017a). Cross-cultural web design guidelines. In Proceedings of the 14th Web for All Conference, W4A 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3058555.3058574.

• Alexander, R., Thompson, N., & Murray, D. (2017b). Towards cultural translation of websites: A large-scale study of Australian, Chinese, and Saudi Arabian design preferences. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(4), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1234646.

• Alexander, R., Thompson, N., McGill, T., & Murray, D. (2021). The influence of user culture on website usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 154, 102688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102688.

• Alshehri, T., Kirkham, R., & Olivier, P. (2020). Scenario co-creation cards: A culturally sensitive tool for eliciting values. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings (Issue 1, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376608.

• Arawjo, I. (2020). To write code: The cultural fabrication of programming notation and practice. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings (pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376731.

• Aykin, N. (Ed.). (2005). Usability and internationalization of information technology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1109/memb.2006.1578651

• Baeza-Yates, R. (2018). Bias on the web. Commun. ACM 61, 6(June 2018), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209581.

• Bannon, L. J. (1991). From human factors to human actors the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in systems design. In Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 25–44).

  Google Scholar 

• Bannon, L. (2011). Reimagining HCI: Toward a more human-centered perspective. Interactions, 29, 50–57.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bell, G. (2006). The age of the thumb: A cultural reading of mobile technologies from Asia. Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, 19(2), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839404034-004.

• Benjamin, R (2019). Race after technology. Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity.

  Google Scholar 

• Bødker, S. (2006). When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. NordiCHI, October, 14–18.

  Google Scholar 

• Bourges-Waldegg and Scrivener, 1998 Bourges-Waldegg, P., & Scrivener S. A. R. (1998). Meaning, the central issue in cross-cultural HCI design. Interacting with Computers, 9(3), 287−309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(97)00032-5

• Breazeal, C., Dautenhahn, K., & Kanda, T. (2016). Social robotics. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Springer handbook of robotics (pp. 1935–1961). Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Bryan-Kinns, N., Wang, W., & Ji, T. (2022). Qi2He: A co-design framework inspired by eastern epistemology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 160, 102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102773.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Burke, P. (2009). Cultural hybridity. Polity Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Cannanure, V. K., Nemer, D., & Sturm, C. (2022). HCI across borders: Navigating shifting borders at CHI. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings.

  Google Scholar 

• Card, S., Moran, T., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Cave, S., & Dihal, K. (2020). The whiteness of AI. Philosophy & Technology, 33, 685–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00415-6.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chavan, A. L. (2005). Another culture, another method evaluation bollywood style. Human Factors.

  Google Scholar 

• Chien, S.-Y., Lewis, M., Sycara, K., Kumru, A., & Liu, J.-S. (2020). Influence of culture, transparency, trust, and degree of automation on automation use. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 50(3), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2019.2931755.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clemmensen, T. (2011). Templates for cross-cultural and culturally specific usability testing: Results from field studies and ethnographic interviewing in three countries. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(7), 634–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555303.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clemmensen, T., & Roese, K. (2010). An overview of a decade of journal publications about culture and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 316, 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11762-6_9.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cordella, M., & Poiani, A. (2021). Fulfilling ageing. Springer.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Del Galdo, E. M., & Nielsen, J. (Eds.). (1996). International user interfaces. Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Douglas, I., & Liu, Z. (Eds.). (2011). Global usability. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-304-6.

• Dourish, P. (2016). Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data and Society, 3(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716665128.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (2003). Doing cultural studies. The story of the Sony Walkman. Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Ekuan, K. (2000). The aesthetics of the Japanese lunchbox. The MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Fernandes, T. (1994). Global interface design: A guide to designing international user interfaces. In CHI (pp. 373–374).

  Google Scholar 

• Frandsen-Thorlacius, O., Hornbæk, K., Hertzum, M., & Clemmensen, T. (2009). Non-universal usability? A survey of how usability is understood by Chinese and Danish users. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings (pp. 41–50). https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518708.

• Friedman, T. (2005). The world if flat. A brief history of the 21st century.

  Google Scholar 

• Goulding, A., Campbell-Meier, J., & Sylvester, A. (2020). Indigenous cultural sustainability in a digital world: Two case studies from Aotearoa New Zealand. In A. Sundqvist, G. Berget, J. Nolin, & K. I. Skjerdingstad (Eds.), Sustainable digital communities (Vol. 12051, pp. 66–75). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_5.

• Grudin, J. (2012). A moving target: The evolution of human-computer interaction. In J. Jacko (Ed.), The human-computer interaction handbook. Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications. CRC Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Grudin, J. (2017). From tool to partner: The evolution of human-computer interaction. In Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics (Vol. 10, No. 1). Morgan and Claypool. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00745ED1V01Y201612HCI035.

• Hakken, D., & Maté, P. (2014). The culture question in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium Papers, and Keynote Abstracts (Vol. 2, pp. 87–91). https://doi.org/10.1145/2662155.2662197.

• Hao, C., Van Boeijen, A., & Stappers, P. J. (2017). Cultura: A communication toolkit for designers to gain empathic insights across cultural boundaries. In Proceedings of the IASDR Conference RE: Research (pp. 497–510). https://doi.org/10.7945/C2SD5J.

• Harper, R., Rodden, T., Rogers, Y., & Sellen, A (Eds.). (2007). Being human: Human computer interaction in the year 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/1467247.1467265.

• Harrison, S., Sengers, P., & Tatar, D. (2011). Making epistemological trouble: Third- paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.03.005.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hassenzahl, M. (2010). Experience design. Springer.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Hertzum, M. (2010). Images of usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(6), 567–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447311003781300.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hodgson, A., Siemieniuch, C. E., & Hubbard, E.-M. (2013). Culture and the safety of complex automated sociotechnical systems. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 43(6), 608–619. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2013.2285048.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations. McGraw Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. The MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Irani, L. (2010). HCI on the move: Methods, culture, values. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings (pp. 2939–2942). https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753890.

• Kamppuri, M., Bednarik, R., & Tukiainen, M. (2006). The expanding focus of HCI: Case culture. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 189(October), 405–408. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182523.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kimura-Thollander, P., & Kumar, N. (2019). Examining the “global” language of emojis: Designing for cultural representation. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300725.

• Lee, H. R., Sung, J., Sabanovic, S., & Han, J. (2012). Cultural design of domestic robots: A study of user expectations in Korea and the United States. In Proceedings—IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 803–808). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343850.

• Leiva, L. A., & Alabau, V. (2015). Automatic internationalization for just in time localization of web-based user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701422.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Linxen, S., Cassau, V., & Sturm, C. (2021). Culture and HCI: A still slowly growing field of research. Findings from a systematic, comparative mapping review. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3471391.3471421.

• Mankoff, J., Hayes, G. R., & Kasnitz, D. (2010). Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In ASSETS’10—Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 3–10). https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878807.

• Marcus, A., & Gould, E. W. (2000). Cultural dimensions and global web user-interface design. Interactions, 32–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Marcus, A. (2001). International and intercultural user interfaces. In Stephanidis, C (Ed.) User interfaces for all. Concepts, Methods, and Tools (pp. 47–65). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Marsden, G., Maunder, A., & Parker, M. (2008). People are people, but technology is not technology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3795–3804. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0119

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Merritt, S., & Stolterman, E. (2012). Cultural hybridity in participatory design. PDC, 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/2348144.2348168.

• Nielsen, J., Del Galdo, E. M., & Sprung, R. C. (1990). Designing for international use. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings, April (pp. 291–294). https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97298.

• Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design. Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2003). How users matter. The co-construction of users and technologies. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2006.0041.

• Pereira, R., & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2015). A value-oriented and culturally informed approach to the design of interactive systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 80, 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.04.001.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Recabarren, M., & Nussbaum, M. (2010). Exploring the feasibility of web form adaptation to users’ cultural dimension scores. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 20(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-010-9071-7.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reinecke, K., & Bernstein, A. (2011). Improving performance, perceived usability, and aesthetics with culturally adaptive user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/1970378.1970382.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Russo, P., & Boor, S. (1993). How fluent is your interface? Designing for international users. Interchi, 342–347.

  Google Scholar 

• Salgado, L., Faria, C., & Sieckenius de Souza, C. (2013). A journey through cultures. Springer Human-Computer Interaction Series.

  Google Scholar 

• Samani, H., Saadatian, E., Pang, N., Polydorou, D., Fernando, O. N. N., Nakatsu, R., & Koh, J. T. K. V. (2013). Cultural robotics: The culture of robotics and robotics in culture. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5772/57260.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sayago, S (Ed.) (2019). Perspectives on human-computer interaction research with older people. Springer Human-Computer Interaction Series.

  Google Scholar 

• Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Grand challenges for HCI researchers. Interactions, 23(5), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2977645.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Singh, N., & Pereira, A. (2005). The culturally customized web site. Elsevier.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sturm, C., Oh, A., Linxen, S., Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Dray, S., & Reinecke, K. (2015). How WEIRD is HCI? Extending HCI principles to other countries and cultures. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings (Vol. 18, pp. 2425–2428). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702656.

• Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. Identity in the age of the Internet. Simon & Schuster.

  Google Scholar 

• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together. Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Umoja, S (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. Oxford University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Vatrapu, R., & Perez-Quinones, M. (2006). Culture and usability evaluation: The effects of culture in structured interviews. Journal of Usability Studies, 1(4), 156–170. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.101.5837.

• Visescu, I. D. (2021). The impact of culture on visual design perception. In C. Ardito, R. Lanzilotti, A. Malizia, H. Petrie, A. Piccinno, G. Desolda, & K. Inkpen (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction—INTERACT 2021 (Vol. 12936, pp. 499–503). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85607-6_66.

• Winschiers, H. (2006). The challenges of participatory design in an intercultural context: Designing for usability in Namibia. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (pp. 73–76). http://ojs.ruc.dk/index.php/pdc/article/view/375.

• Winschiers, H., & Fendler, J. (2007). Assumptions considered harmful the need to redefine usability. In N. Aykin (Ed.), Usability and Internationalization, Part I, HCII 2007.

  Google Scholar 

• Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Chivuno-Kuria, S., Kapuire, G. K., Bidwell, N. J., & Blake, E. (2010). Being participated—A community approach. PDC, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900443.

• Wu, H., Gai, J., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Qiu, J., Wang, J., & Zhang, X. (2020). Influence of cultural factors on freehand gesture design. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 143(February 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102502.

• You, S., Kim, M., & Lim, Y. (2016). Value of culturally oriented information design. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(3), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0393-9.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references