Abstract
Monads and their composition via distributive laws have many applications in program semantics and functional programming. For many interesting monads, distributive laws fail to exist, and this has motivated investigations into weaker notions. In this line of research, Petrişan and Sarkis recently introduced a construction called the semifree monad in order to study semialgebras for a monad and weak distributive laws. In this paper, we prove that an algebraic presentation of the semifree monad \(M^{\mathrm {s}}\) on a monad M can be obtained uniformly from an algebraic presentation of M. This result was conjectured by Petrişan and Sarkis. We also show that semifree monads are ideal monads, that the semifree construction is not a monad transformer, and that the semifree construction is a comonad on the category of monads.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aczel, P., Adámek, J., Milius, S., Velebil, J.: Infinite trees and completely iterative theories: a coalgebraic view. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 300(1–3), 1–45 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(02)00728-4
Adamek, J., Rosicky, J.: Locally Presentable and Accessible Categories. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511600579
Adámek, J., Milius, S., Bowler, N.J., Levy, P.B.: Coproducts of monads on set. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2012, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 25–28 June 2012, pp. 45–54. IEEE Computer Society (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2012.16
Awodey, S.: Category Theory. Oxford Logic Guides. Ebsco Publishing (2006)
Barr, M., Wells, C.: Toposes, Triples and Theories. Comprehensive Studies in Mathematics. Springer, New York (1985)
Beck, J.: Distributive laws. In: Eckmann, B. (ed.) Seminar on Triples and Categorical Homology Theory. LNM, vol. 80, pp. 119–140. Springer, Heidelberg (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0083084
Bonchi, F., Santamaria, A.: Combining semilattices and semimodules. In: FOSSACS 2021. LNCS, vol. 12650, pp. 102–123. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71995-1_6
Bonchi, F., Sokolova, A., Vignudelli, V.: The theory of traces for systems with nondeterminism and probability. In: 34th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2019, pp. 1–14. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2019.8785673
Böhm, G.: The weak theory of monads. Adv. Math. 225, 1–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2010.02.015
Elgot, C.C., Bloom, S.L., Tindell, R.: On the algebraic structure of rooted trees. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 16, 361–399 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8177-8_7
Garner, R.: The vietoris monad and weak distributive laws. Appl. Categ. Struct. 28(2), 339–354 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-019-09582-w
Ghani, N., Uustalu, T.: Coproducts of ideal monads. RAIRO Theor. Inform. Appl. 38(4), 321–342 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1051/ita:2004016
Goy, A., Petrisan, D.: Combining probabilistic and non-deterministic choice via weak distributive laws. In: Hermanns, H., Zhang, L., Kobayashi, N., Miller, D. (eds.) LICS 2020: 35th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 454–464. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3373718.3394795
van Heerdt, G., Sammartino, M., Silva, A.: Learning automata with side-effects. In: Petrişan, D., Rot, J. (eds.) CMCS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12094, pp. 68–89. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57201-3_5
Hyland, M., Plotkin, G.D., Power, J.: Combining effects: sum and tensor. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 357(1–3), 70–99 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2006.03.013
Hyland, M., Tasson, C.: The linear-non-linear substitution 2-monad. In: Spivak, D.I., Vicary, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Applied Category Theory Conference 2020, ACT 2020. EPTCS, vol. 333, pp. 215–229 (2020). https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.333.15
Jacobs, B.: Semantics of weakening and contraction. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 69(1), 73–106 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0072(94)90020-5
Jacobs, B.: Convexity, duality and effects. In: Calude, C.S., Sassone, V. (eds.) TCS 2010. IAICT, vol. 323, pp. 1–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15240-5_1
Jacobs, B., Silva, A., Sokolova, A.: Trace semantics via determinization. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 81(5), 859–879 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2014.12.005
Jaskelioff, M.: Modular monad transformers. In: Castagna, G. (ed.) ESOP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5502, pp. 64–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00590-9_6
Katsumata, S., Rivas, E., Uustalu, T.: Interaction laws of monads and comonads. In: Hermanns, H., Zhang, L., Kobayashi, N., Miller, D. (eds.) LICS 2020: 35th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 604–618. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3373718.3394808
Klin, B., Salamanca, J.: Iterated covariant powerset is not a monad. In: Staton, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Conference on the Mathematical Foundations of Programming Semantics, MFPS 2018. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 341, pp. 261–276. Elsevier (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2018.11.013
Kupferman, O., Lustig, Y.: Lattice automata. In: Cook, B., Podelski, A. (eds.) VMCAI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4349, pp. 199–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69738-1_14
Liang, S., Hudak, P., Jones, M.P.: Monad transformers and modular interpreters. In: Cytron, R.K., Lee, P. (eds.) Conference Record of POPL 1995: 22nd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, San Francisco, California, USA, 23–25 January 1995, pp. 333–343. ACM Press (1995). https://doi.org/10.1145/199448.199528
MacLane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 5. Springer, New York (1971)
Manes, E.: Algebraic Theories. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 26. Springer, New York (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-9860-1
Métayer, F.: State monads and their algebras. arXiv:math/0407251, Category Theory (2004). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0407251
Milius, S., Pattinson, D., Schröder, L.: Generic trace semantics and graded monads. In: Moss, L.S., Sobocinski, P. (eds.) 6th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science, CALCO 2015. LIPIcs, vol. 35, pp. 253–269. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2015.253
Mio, M., Sarkis, R., Vignudelli, V.: Combining nondeterminism, probability, and termination: equational and metric reasoning. In: 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2021, pp. 1–14. IEEE (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS52264.2021.9470717
Mio, M., Vignudelli, V.: Monads and quantitative equational theories for nondeterminism and probability. In: Konnov, I., Kovács, L. (eds.) 31st International Conference on Concurrency Theory, CONCUR 2020. LIPIcs, vol. 171, pp. 28:1–28:18. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2020.28
Moggi, E.: Notions of computation and monads. Inf. Comput. 93(1), 55–92 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-5401(91)90052-4. Selections from 1989 IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
Petrisan, D., Sarkis, R.: Semialgebras and weak distributive laws. In: Sokolova, A. (ed.) Proceedings 37th Conference on Mathematical Foundations of Programming Semantics, MFPS 2021. EPTCS, vol. 351, pp. 218–241 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.351.14
Plotkin, G.D., Power, J.: Notions of computation determine monads. In: Nielsen, M., Engberg, U. (eds.) Foundations of Software Science and Computation Structures, vol. 2303, pp. 342–356. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45931-6_247
Power, J.: Discrete Lawvere theories. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Harman, N., Roggenbach, M., Rutten, J. (eds.) CALCO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3629, pp. 348–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11548133_22
Riehl, E.: Category Theory in Context. Dover Modern Math Originals, Dover Publications, Aurora (2017)
Rosset, A., Hansen, H.H., Endrullis, J.: Algebraic presentation of semifree monads. arXiv:cs.LO (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2205.05392
Street, R.: Weak distributive laws. Theory Appl. Categories 22, 313–320 (2009)
Varacca, D., Winskel, G.: Distributing probabililty over nondeterminism. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 16, 87–113 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960129505005074
Wadler, P.: The essence of functional programming. In: Sethi, R. (ed.) Conference Record of the Nineteenth Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 1–14. ACM Press (1992). https://doi.org/10.1145/143165.143169
Zwart, M., Marsden, D.: No-go theorems for distributive laws. In: 34th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2019, pp. 1–13. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2019.8785707
Acknowledgment
We thank Ralph Sarkis, and Roy Overbeek for useful discussion, suggestions and corrections. We also thank all anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback and suggestions. Aloïs Rosset and Jörg Endrullis received funding from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) under the Innovational Research Incentives Scheme Vidi (project. No. VI.Vidi.192.004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rosset, A., Hansen, H.H., Endrullis, J. (2022). Algebraic Presentation of Semifree Monads. In: Hansen, H.H., Zanasi, F. (eds) Coalgebraic Methods in Computer Science. CMCS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13225. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10736-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10736-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10735-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10736-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)