Siamese Network Based Feature Learning for Improved Intrusion Detection

1. UNSW-NB15, May 2015. https://www.unsw.adfa.edu.au/unsw-canberra-cyber/cybersecurity/ADFA-NB15-Datasets/

2. Aljawarneh, S., Aldwairi, M., Yassein, M.B.: Anomaly-based intrusion detection system through feature selection analysis and building hybrid efficient model. J. Comput. Sci. 25, 152–160 (2018)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Axelsson, S.: The base-rate fallacy and the difficulty of intrusion detection. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. (TISSEC) 3(3), 186–205 (2000)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Bengio, Y., Courville, A., Vincent, P.: Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35(8), 1798–1828 (2013)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Botes, F., Leenen, L., De La Harpe, R.: Ant colony induced decision trees for intrusion detection (2017)

   Google Scholar 

6. Bromley, J., Guyon, I., LeCun, Y., Säckinger, E., Shah, R.: Signature verification using a “Siamese” time delay neural network. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 737–744 (1994)

   Google Scholar 

7. Elhag, S., Fernández, A., Bawakid, A., Alshomrani, S., Herrera, F.: On the combination of genetic fuzzy systems and pairwise learning for improving detection rates on intrusion detection systems. Expert. Syst. Appl. 42(1), 193–202 (2015)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Feurer, M., Klein, A., Eggensperger, K., Springenberg, J.T., Blum, M., Hutter, F.: Auto-sklearn: efficient and robust automated machine learning. In: Hutter, F., Kotthoff, L., Vanschoren, J. (eds.) Automated Machine Learning, pp. 113–134. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05318-5_6

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

9. Ghojogh, B., et al.: Feature selection and feature extraction in pattern analysis: a literature review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.02845 (2019)

10. Gulli, A., Pal, S.: Deep Learning with Keras. Packt Publishing Ltd. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

11. Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., Cheng, J.: Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, p. 552422 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

12. Khammassi, C., Krichen, S.: A GA-LR wrapper approach for feature selection in network intrusion detection. Comput. Secur. 70, 255–277 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Koch, G., Zemel, R., Salakhutdinov, R.: Siamese neural networks for one-shot image recognition. In: ICML Deep Learning Workshop, vol. 2 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

14. Kwon, D., Kim, H., Kim, J., Suh, S.C., Kim, I., Kim, K.J.: A survey of deep learning-based network anomaly detection. Cluster Comput. 22, 949–961 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Li, Z., Qin, Z., Huang, K., Yang, X., Ye, S.: Intrusion detection using convolutional neural networks for representation learning. In: Liu, D., Xie, S., Li, Y., Zhao, D., El-Alfy, E.-S.M. (eds.) ICONIP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10638, pp. 858–866. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70139-4_87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Marir, N., Wang, H., Feng, G., Li, B., Jia, M.: Distributed abnormal behavior detection approach based on deep belief network and ensemble SVM using Spark. IEEE Access 6, 59657–59671 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Mishra, P., Varadharajan, V., Tupakula, U., Pilli, E.S.: A detailed investigation and analysis of using machine learning techniques for intrusion detection. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21(1), 686–728 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Moustafa, N., Hu, J., Slay, J.: A holistic review of network anomaly detection systems: a comprehensive survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 128, 33–55 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Nicolau, M., McDermott, J., et al.: Learning neural representations for network anomaly detection. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 99, 1–14 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

20. Pérez, D., Alonso, S., Morán, A., Prada, M.A., Fuertes, J.J., Domínguez, M.: Comparison of network intrusion detection performance using feature representation. In: Macintyre, J., Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I., Jayne, C. (eds.) EANN 2019. CCIS, vol. 1000, pp. 463–475. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20257-6_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

21. Qi, Y., Song, Y.Z., Zhang, H., Liu, J.: Sketch-based image retrieval via Siamese convolutional neural network. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2460–2464. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

22. Riad, R., Dancette, C., Karadayi, J., Zeghidour, N., Schatz, T., Dupoux, E.: Sampling strategies in Siamese networks for unsupervised speech representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.11297 (2018)

23. Stephenson, N., Shane, E., Chase, J., Rowland, J., Ries, D., Justice, N., Zhang, J., Chan, L., Cao, R.: Survey of machine learning techniques in drug discovery. Curr. Drug Metab. 20(3), 185–193 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Taigman, Y., Yang, M., Ranzato, M., Wolf, L.: DeepFace: closing the gap to human-level performance in face verification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1701–1708 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

25. Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., Ghorbani, A.A.: A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set. In: 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

26. Tschannen, M., Bachem, O., Lucic, M.: Recent advances in autoencoder-based representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.05069 (2018)

27. Yousefi-Azar, M., Varadharajan, V., Hamey, L., Tupakula, U.: Autoencoder-based feature learning for cyber security applications. In: 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 3854–3861. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

28. Zhou, B., Buyya, R.: Augmentation techniques for mobile cloud computing: a taxonomy, survey, and future directions. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 51(1), 13 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references