default search action
Scientometrics, Volume 106
Volume 106, Number 1, January 2016
- Thed N. van Leeuwen
, Erik Van Wijk, Paul F. Wouters
Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university. 1-16 - Yutao Sun, Seamus Grimes
The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis. 17-40 - Xiaoxi Ling, Yu Liu, Zhen Huang, Parantu K. Shah, Cheng Li:
A graphical article-level metric for intuitive comparison of large-scale literatures. 41-50 - Henk F. Moed:
Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: the case of two SNIP versions. 51-65 - Finn Valentin, Maria Theresa Norn
Orientations and outcome of interdisciplinary research: the case of research behaviour in translational medical science. 67-90 - Darrin J. Griffin, San Bolkan, Jennifer L. Holmgren, Frank Tutzauer:
Central journals and authors in communication using a publication network. 91-104 - Grant Lewison, Philip Roe, Richard Webber, Richard Sullivan
Lung cancer researchers, 2008-2013: their sex and ethnicity. 105-117 - Giovanni Abramo
Gender bias in academic recruitment. 119-141 - Peter van den Besselaar
Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study. 143-162 - Marjan Cugmas, Anuska Ferligoj, Luka Kronegger
The stability of co-authorship structures. 163-186 - Jurriën Bakker, Dennis Verhoeven
Patent citation indicators: One size fits all? 187-211 - Philippe Mongeon
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. 213-228 - Laura Vana
Computing a journal meta-ranking using paired comparisons and adaptive lasso estimators. 229-251 - Mario De Marchi, Edoardo Lorenzetti
Measuring the impact of scholarly journals in the humanities field. 253-261 - Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri
Relationships between consumption, publication and impact in French universities in a value perspective: a bibliometric analysis. 263-280 - William A. Reiners
Differentiation of U.S. ecologists into professional guilds based on professional traits. 281-298 - Rajesh Kumar Bhardwaj:
Scientometric analysis and dimensions on international business literature. 299-317 - Krzysztof Klincewicz
The emergent dynamics of a technological research topic: the case of graphene. 319-345 - Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic
Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through Zipf's law. 347-368 - Lin Zhang
The Dynamic evolution of core documents: an experimental study based on h-related literature (2005-2013). 369-381 - Masatsura Igami
Decreasing diversity in Japanese science, evidence from in-depth analyses of science maps. 383-403 - Dragan Babic, Djuro Kutlaca, Lazar Zivkovic
Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe. 405-434 - Lili Wang
The structure and comparative advantages of China's scientific research: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. 435-452 - David Hsiehchen, Magdalena Espinoza:
Detecting editorial bias in medical publishing. 453-456 - Ivan Jaric
High time for a common plagiarism detection system. 457-459 - Boris Pritychenko
Fractional authorship in nuclear physics. 461-468 - Fabrício Benevenuto, Alberto H. F. Laender, Bruno Leite Alves:
The H-index paradox: your coauthors have a higher H-index than you do. 469-474
Volume 106, Number 2, February 2016
- Ming-yueh Tsay, Tung-mei Shen, Ming-hsin Liang:
A comparison of citation distributions of journals and books on the topic "information society". 475-508 - Ho Fai Chan
The first cut is the deepest: repeated interactions of coauthorship and academic productivity in Nobel laureate teams. 509-524 - Raymundo das Neves Machado
Intellectual structure in stem cell research: exploring Brazilian scientific articles from 2001 to 2010. 525-537 - Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez
A comparison of two ways of evaluating research units working in different scientific fields. 539-561 - Karmen Stopar
Citation analysis and mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology: identifying the scope and interdisciplinarity of research. 563-581 - Haiyun Xu, Ting Guo, Zenghui Yue, Lijie Ru, Shu Fang:
Interdisciplinary topics of information science: a study based on the terms interdisciplinarity index series. 583-601 - Qiang Zhi, Tianguang Meng
Funding allocation, inequality, and scientific research output: an empirical study based on the life science sector of Natural Science Foundation of China. 603-628 - Naomi Fukuzawa, Takanori Ida
Science linkages between scientific articles and patents for leading scientists in the life and medical sciences field: the case of Japan. 629-644 - Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti
Normalizing the g-index. 645-655 - Eleni Fragkiadaki, Georgios Evangelidis:
Three novel indirect indicators for the assessment of papers and authors based on generations of citations. 657-694 - Michail Kovanis
Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data. 695-715 - Massimiliano Ferrara
Looking for best performers: a pilot study towards the evaluation of science parks. 717-750 - Fenglian Liu, Aiwen Lin, Huanhuan Wang, Yuling Peng, Song Hong:
Global research trends of geographical information system from 1961 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis. 751-768 - Glenn D. Walters:
Adding authorship order to the quantity and quality dimensions of scholarly productivity: evidence from group- and individual-level analyses. 769-785 - Anne-Wil Harzing
Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. 787-804 - Jianlin Zhou, An Zeng, Ying Fan, Zengru Di:
Ranking scientific publications with similarity-preferential mechanism. 805-816 - James Hartley:
Is it true that papers written by joint-authors are cited more than papers written by single ones? What else matters? 817-818 - Towards standardisation, harmonisation and integration of data from heterogeneous sources for funding and evaluation purposes. 819
- Wolfgang Glänzel, Hans Willems:
Preface - Towards standardisation, harmonisation and integration of data from heterogeneous sources for funding and evaluation purposes. 821-823 - Wolfgang Glänzel, Raphael Beck
Data collection and use in research funding and performing organisations. General outlines and first results of a project launched by Science Europe. 825-835 - Sophie Biesenbender
The Research Core Dataset for the German science system: challenges, processes and principles of a contested standardization project. 837-847 - Gunnar Sivertsen
Data integration in Scandinavia. 849-855 - Cinzia Daraio, Maurizio Lenzerini
Data integration for research and innovation policy: an Ontology-Based Data Management approach. 857-871
Volume 106, Number 3, March 2016
- Hamid Bouabid, Adèle Paul-Hus
Scientific collaboration and high-technology exchanges among BRICS and G-7 countries. 873-899 - Christopher Zou, Jordan B. Peterson:
Quantifying the scientific output of new researchers using the zp-index. 901-916 - João Ricardo Faria
Human capital, collegiality, and stardom in economics: empirical analysis. 917-943 - George Masterton, Erik J. Olsson, Staffan Angere:
Linking as voting: how the Condorcet jury theorem in political science is relevant to webometrics. 945-966 - Jose A. García
Why the referees' reports I receive as an editor are so much better than the reports I receive as an author? 967-986 - Christina H. Drew
Automated Research Impact Assessment: a new bibliometrics approach. 987-1005 - José Willer do Prado
Multivariate analysis of credit risk and bankruptcy research data: a bibliometric study involving different knowledge fields (1968-2014). 1007-1029 - K. Brad Wray:
No new evidence for a citation benefit for Author-Pay Open Access Publications in the social sciences and humanities. 1031-1035 - Yuandi Wang, Ruifeng Hu
Does teaching benefit from university-industry collaboration? Investigating the role of academic commercialization and engagement. 1037-1055 - Seokbeom Kwon
Navigating the innovation trajectories of technology by combining specialization score analyses for publications and patents: graphene and nano-enabled drug delivery. 1057-1071 - Ana Fernández
Proximity dimensions and scientific collaboration among academic institutions in Europe: The closer, the better? 1073-1092 - Ashkan Ebadi
How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors. 1093-1116 - Yu-Wei Chang:
Influence of the principle of least effort across disciplines. 1117-1133 - Ashraf Uddin
A Sciento-text framework to characterize research strength of institutions at fine-grained thematic area level. 1135-1150 - Olesya Mryglod
Quantifying the evolution of a scientific topic: reaction of the academic community to the Chornobyl disaster. 1151-1166 - José-Antonio Ontalba-Ruipérez, Enrique Orduña-Malea
Identifying institutional relationships in a geographically distributed public health system using interlinking and co-authorship methods. 1167-1191 - Teemu Makkonen
Scientific collaboration between 'old' and 'new' member states: Did joining the European Union make a difference? 1193-1215 - Günter Krampen
Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? 1217-1238 - Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez
Benchmarking scientific performance by decomposing leadership of Cuban and Latin American institutions in Public Health. 1239-1264 - Mario De Marchi:
A taxonomy of S&T indicators. 1265-1268 - Weishu Liu
Comments on "a comparative analysis of scientific publications in management journals by authors from Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macau: 2003-2012". 1269-1272 - Weishu Liu
The probability of publishing in first-quartile journals. 1273-1276 - Tom Van der Stocken
Academic capacity building: holding up a mirror. 1277-1280 - Houcemeddine Turki
Usefulness of the single publication h-index. 1281-1282
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2024-11-11 21:18 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by: