default search action
10. IWDM 2010: Girona, Catalonia, Spain
- Joan Martí, Arnau Oliver, Jordi Freixenet, Robert Marti:
Digital Mammography, 10th International Workshop, IWDM 2010, Girona, Catalonia, Spain, June 16-18, 2010. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6136, Springer 2010, ISBN 978-3-642-13665-8
CAD
- Paul M. Taylor
, Henry W. W. Potts, Louise Wilkinson, Rosalind M. Given-Wilson:
Impact of CAD with Full Field Digital Mammography on Workflow and Cost. 1-8 - Neha Bhooshan, Maryellen L. Giger
Performance of Triple-Modality CADx on Breast Cancer Diagnostic Classification. 9-14 - Laurence Vancamberg, Anis Sahbani
Needle Path Planning Method for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Biopsy Based on Probabilistic Techniques. 15-22 - Thomy Mertzanidou
X-ray Mammography - MRI Registration Using a Volume-Preserving Affine Transformation and an EM-MRF for Breast Tissue Classification. 23-30
Image Processing and Analysis I
- Fabian Zöhrer, Markus Thorsten Harz, Anke Bödicker, Heike Seyffarth, Kathy J. Schilling, László K. Tabár, Horst K. Hahn:
Interactive Multi-scale Contrast Enhancement of Previously Processed Digital Mammograms. 31-38 - Joan Massich, Fabrice Mériaudeau, Elsa Pérez, Robert Marti
Lesion Segmentation in Breast Sonography. 39-45 - Jun Zheng, Olac Fuentes, Ming-Ying Leung
Mammogram Compression Using Super-Resolution. 46-53 - J. Michael O'Connor, Mini Das, Clay Didier, Mufeed Mah'd, Stephen J. Glick:
Development of an Ensemble of Digital Breast Object Models. 54-61 - Predrag R. Bakic
Analysis of Geometric Accuracy in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction. 62-69
Breast Imaging Physics
- Paola Baldelli, James B. McCullagh, Niall Phelan, Fidelma Flanagan:
Results of Comprehensive Dose Survey for Mammography. 70-77 - Mary Yip, Federica Zanca
Validation of a Simulated Dose Reduction Methodology Using Digital Mammography CDMAM Images and Mastectomy Images. 78-85 - James B. McCullagh, Paola Baldelli, Niall Phelan:
Measured Dose versus Organ Dose Performance in Digital Mammography Systems. 86-91 - Razvan Iordache, Maélène Lohezic, Giovanni Palma, Sylvie Puong, Serge Muller:
Noise Reduction in Dual-Energy Contrast Enhanced Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using Regularization. 92-99 - Kristin Pedersen, Ingrid D. Landmark, Kirsti Bredholt, Ingrid H. R. Hauge, Hilde M. Olerud:
Phantom Dose Levels Found at Annual Physics Surveys in a National Mammography Screening Program: Comparison of Doses from Analog and Digital Equipment and from Digital Equipment at Different Points in Time. 100-105
Poster Session 1
- Xinying Wang, James G. Mainprize
Task-Based Evaluation of Image Quality of Filtered Back Projection for Breast Tomosynthesis. 106-113 - Emily F. Conant, Diane Li, Sara Gavenonis, Predrag R. Bakic
A Comparative Study of the Inter-reader Variability of Breast Percent Density Estimation in Digital Mammography: Potential Effect of Reader's Training and Clinical Experience. 114-120 - Horst K. Hahn, Markus Thorsten Harz, Heike Seyffarth, Fabian Zöhrer, Tobias Böhler, Konstantinos Filippatos, Lei Wang, André Homeyer
Concepts for Efficient and Reliable Multi-modal Breast Image Reading. 121-128 - Paul Taylor:
Modeling the Impact of CAD on the Outcomes of the UK Breast Screening Programme. 129-136 - Satoru Matsuo, Hiroshi Fujita, Junji Morishita, Tetsuro Katafuchi:
Introducing a Novel Image Quality Measure for Digital Phase-Contrast-Image Evaluation. 137-144 - Michael Berks, Christopher J. Taylor
Modelling Structural Deformations in Mammographic Tissue Using the Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet. 145-152 - Zezhi Chen, Michael Berks, Susan M. Astley, Christopher J. Taylor
Classification of Linear Structures in Mammograms Using Random Forests. 153-160 - Richard Lederman, Isaac Leichter, Eli Ratner, Menahem Abramov, Alexandra Manevitch, Jonathan Stoeckel:
Should CAD Be Used as a Second Reader? - Exploring Two Alternative Reading Modes for CAD in Screening Mammography. 161-167 - Camilla Jeffries-Chung, Jennifer Diffey, Michael Berks, Joanna Morrison, Rosanne Verow, Julie Morris, Mary Wilson, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Nicky B. Barr, Anthony Maxwell
Automated Assessment of Area of Dense Tissue in the Breast: A Comparison with Human Estimation. 168-174 - Reyer Zwiggelaar:
Local Greylevel Appearance Histogram Based Texture Segmentation. 175-182 - Enrique Nava
Quantification of Vascular Calcifications on Digitized Mammograms. 183-190 - Michiel Kallenberg
Comparison of Tilt Correction Methods in Full Field Digital Mammograms. 191-196 - Christopher E. Tromans, Jennifer Diffey, Mary Cocker, Michael Brady:
Optimising Beam Quality Selection in Mammographic Acquisition Using the Standard Attenuation Rate. 197-204 - Christopher E. Tromans, Jennifer Diffey, Michael Brady:
Investigating the Replacement of the Physical Anti-scatter Grid with Digital Image Processing. 205-212 - Yoshifumi Kuroki, Katsuhiro Nasu, Seiko Kuroki, Ryuzo Sekiguchi, Shigeru Nawano, Mitsuo Satake:
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) for Breast Cancers; Challenging to Diagnose Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC). 213-218 - Dirk A. N. Vandenbroucke, Paul J. R. Leblans:
CR Mammography: Image Quality Measurement and Model Calculation for Needle vs. Powder Imaging Plate. 219-226 - Hilde Bosmans
Performance Assessment of Breast Tomosynthesis Systems: Concepts for Two Types of Phantoms. 227-234 - Eman Shaheen
Realistic Simulation of Microcalcifications in Breast Tomosynthesis. 235-242 - Gang Wu, James G. Mainprize
Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction Using a Grid of Blobs with Projection Matrices. 243-250 - Arnau Oliver
A Boosting Based Approach for Automatic Micro-calcification Detection. 251-258 - Noelia Vállez
Automatic Breast Tissue Classification Based on BIRADS Categories. 259-266 - Hui Li, Maryellen L. Giger
Validation of Mammographic Texture Analysis for Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk. 267-271 - Inna Stainvas
Towards Learning Spiculation Score of the Masses in Mammography Images. 272-279 - László K. Tabár, Alfredo S. Niño, Eric Schreiber, Richard Ellis, Cynthia Goralnik, Steven Scislaw, Raja Cheruvu, Deepa Masrani, Daoxian Zhang, Steve Muller, Patrick Heffernan:
Three Digital Mammography Display Configurations: Observer Performance in a Pilot ROC Study. 280-287 - Nachiko Uchiyama, Jonathan Stoeckel, Kyoichi Otsuka, Seiko Kuroki, Yukio Muramatsu, Noriyuki Moriyama:
How Can Image Quality Affect the Detection Performance of Breast CAD (Computer Aided Detection) in FFDM (Full Field Digital Mammography)? - A Comparative Study with Two Different FFDM Systems-. 288-295 - Weiwei Zhang, Michael Brady:
Feature Point Detection for Non-rigid Registration of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images. 296-303 - Pedro Collado-Chamorro, Camilo Sanz-Freire, José Gómez-Amez, Alejandro Vázquez-Galiñanes, Natalia Lopo-Casqueiro, Maria González-De La Puente:
Contrast Detail Curves on Digital Mammography: Performance Comparison of Raw and Filtered Images. 304-311 - Elizabeth A. Krupinski:
Reader Fatigue Interpreting Mammograms. 312-318 - Alistair Mackenzie
Adapting Clinical Images to Appear with Different Noise and Sharpness to Model a Different Detector. 319-326
Physics Models
- Ingrid S. Reiser, Robert M. Nishikawa
Human Observer Performance in a Single Slice or a Volume: Effect of Background Correlation. 327-333 - Margarita Chevalier
Influence of Geometrical Factors on Phase Contrast Fiber Images. 334-341 - Ralph Highnam, Michael Brady, Martin J. Yaffe, Nico Karssemeijer, Jennifer A. Harvey:
Robust Breast Composition Measurement - VolparaTM. 342-349
Clinical Experiences
- Nicholas Marshall
Technical Evaluation of a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System. 350-356 - Yan Chen, Alastair G. Gale:
Mammographic Interpretation Training: How Could Low Cost Display Devices Help? 357-364 - Jennifer M. Oduko, Kenneth C. Young, Anna Burch:
A Survey of Patient Doses from Digital Mammography Systems in the UK in 2007 to 2009. 365-370 - Koen Michielsen
Analysis of Mammography Quality Control Results: Evidence for a Change in Test Frequency? 371-377 - Despina Kontos, Predrag R. Bakic
A Comparative Study of Volumetric and Area-Based Breast Density Estimation in Digital Mammography: Results from a Screening Population. 378-385
Breast Density
- Jennifer Diffey, Joanna Morrison, Michael Berks, Joanne Greene, Julie Morris, Anthony Maxwell
Volumetric Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in a Screening Population. 386-393 - Mona Jeffreys
Determinants and Consequences of Change in Breast Density. 394-401 - Serghei Malkov
Comparison of Subregional Breast Density with Whole Breast Density. 402-407 - Mona Jeffreys
Comparing a New Volumetric Breast Density Method (VolparaTM) to Cumulus. 408-413 - Anisha Sukha, Michael Berks, Julie Morris, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Mary Wilson, Nicky B. Barr, Susan M. Astley:
Visual Assessment of Density in Digital Mammograms. 414-420
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
- Willi A. Kalender:
Concepts for High-Resolution CT of the Breast. 421-427 - Steve Naday, Edward F. Bullard, Spencer Gunn, James E. Brodrick, Eoin O. O'Tuairisg, Alan McArthur, Hamdan Amin, Mark B. Williams, Patricia Goodale Judy, Anastasios Konstantinidis:
Optimised Breast Tomosynthesis with a Novel CMOS Flat Panel Detector. 428-435 - Raymond Joseph Acciavatti
Calculation of OTF, NPS, and DQE for Oblique X-Ray Incidence on Turbid Granular Phosphors. 436-443 - Mark B. Williams, Patricia Goodale Judy, Zongyi Gong, Audrey E. Graham, Stan Majewski, Spencer Gunn:
Scanner for Integrated X-Ray Breast Tomosynthesis and Molecular Breast Imaging Tomosynthesis. 444-451 - Predrag R. Bakic
An Anthropomorphic Software Breast Phantom for Tomosynthesis Simulation: Power Spectrum Analysis of Phantom Projections. 452-458
Poster Session 2
- Nadia Oberhofer, Alessandro Fracchetti, Elvina Nassivera, Aldo Valentini, Ehrenfried Moroder:
Comparison of Two Novel FFDM Systems with Different a-Se Detector Technology: Physical Characterization and Phantom Contrast Detail Evaluation in Clinical Conditions. 459-466 - Olivier Alonzo-Proulx, James G. Mainprize
Development of a Peripheral Thickness Estimation Method for Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in Mammography Using a 3D Finite Element Breast Model. 467-473 - Isaac Leichter, Zahava Gallimidi, Asnat Heyman-Reiss, Nicolas Merlet, Eli Ratner, Menachem Abramov, Inna Stainvas
Is CAD Able to Assist in the Detection of Subtle Breast Findings - Lobular Cancers, and T1a/T1b Masses in Dense Breasts? 474-480 - Carolina Wessel, Julia A. Schnabel
Towards More Realistic Biomechanical Modelling of Tumours under Mammographic Compressions. 481-489 - Paul Taylor, Mark Hartswood, Lilian Blot, Rob Procter, Stuart Anderson
Scoring Systems in Computer-Based Training for Digital Mammography. 490-496 - Guido van Schie, Karin Leifland, Matthew Wallis, Elin Moa, Magnus Hemmendorff, Nico Karssemeijer:
The Effect of Slab Size on Mass Detection Performance of a Screen-Film CAD System in Reconstructed Tomosynthesis Volumes. 497-504 - Michael Berks, Christopher J. Taylor
Synthesising Malignant Breast Masses in Normal Mammograms. 505-512 - Nicola Barr, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Nicky B. Barr, Mary Wilson, Julie Morris, Michael Berks, Susan M. Astley:
Comparison of Microcalcification Detection Rates and Recall Rates in Digital and Analogue Mammography. 513-517 - Jürgen Jacobs, Nicholas Marshall
Constancy Checking of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems. 518-525 - Wenda He, Erika R. E. Denton, Reyer Zwiggelaar:
Mammographic Image Segmentation and Risk Classification Using a Novel Texture Signature Based Methodology. 526-533 - Robert M. Nishikawa
Stratified Sampling for Case Selection Criteria for Evaluating CAD. 534-539 - Christine Tanner, John H. Hipwell, David J. Hawkes, Gábor Székely:
Breast Shapes on Real and Simulated Mammograms. 540-547 - Anna K. Jerebko, Markus Kowarschik, Thomas Mertelmeier:
Regularization Parameter Selection in Maximum a Posteriori Iterative Reconstruction for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. 548-555 - Steven Raeymaeckers
Image Quality Phantom in Close Compliance with the ICRU-44 Breast Tissue Substitute Standard and Realistic Background Noise Pattern for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. 556-560 - Christopher E. Tromans, Michael Brady:
The Standard Attenuation Rate for Quantitative Mammography. 561-568 - Christian Moll, Andreas Jahnen
National Software Supported Quality Assurance Program in Digital Mammography: Experiences and Challenges. 569-575 - Rosanne Verow, Michael Berks, Jennifer Diffey, Camilla Chung, Joanna Morrison, Mary Wilson, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Nicky B. Barr, Julie Morris, Alan Hufton, Susan M. Astley:
Inter and Intra Observer Variability in a Semi-automatic Method for Measuring Volumetric Breast Density. 576-582 - Maki Yamada, Yuri Kato, Naotoshi Fujita, Yoshie Kodera:
Optimization of the Exposure Parameters with Signal-to-Noise Ratios Considering Human Visual Characteristics in Digital Mammography. 583-590 - John M. Boone, Nathan J. Packard, Craig K. Abbey:
Ideal Observer Comparison between Tomographic and Projection x-Ray Images of the Breast. 591-597 - Yue-Houng Hu, Michael Masiar, Wei Zhao:
Breast Structural Noise in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Its Dependence on Reconstruction Methods. 598-605 - Vjacheslav Gorshkov, Nadezhda Rozhkova, Sergey Prokopenko:
Dual-Energy Dividing Mammography. 606-613 - Antonio García-Manso
Effect of BI-RADS Assessment in Improving CAD of Masses. 614-621 - Ricardo Tortosa, Juan Ignacio Villaescusa
Analysis of the Benefit/Risk Ratio Obtained in the Valencian Breast Early Detection Program During 2007 and 2008. 622-627 - Oliver Díaz
Monte Carlo Simulation of Scatter Field for Calculation of Contrast of Discs in Synthetic CDMAM Images. 628-635 - Gobert N. Lee
Classifying Breast Masses in Volumetric Whole Breast Ultrasound Data: A 2.5-Dimensional Approach. 636-642 - Ruben E. van Engen, Kenneth C. Young, Hilde Bosmans
A supplement to the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. 643-650 - Baorui Ren, Andrew P. Smith, Julian Marshall:
Investigation of Practical Scoring Methods for Breast Density. 651-658 - Rafael Salvador, Rafael Salvador-Izquierdo, Leonardo Romero, Xavier Salvador-Izquierdo, Manuel Salvador:
Performance of the New Double Layer Amorphous Selenium Detector for Digital Mammography Compared to the FDA Approved CR System for Digital Mammography. 659-663
Image Processing and Analysis II
- Neil Mac Parthaláin
Machine Learning Techniques and Mammographic Risk Assessment. 664-672 - Fabián Narváez
Automatic BI-RADS Description of Mammographic Masses. 673-681 - Candy P. S. Ho, Christopher E. Tromans, Julia A. Schnabel
A Clustering Method for the Extraction of Microcalcifications Using Epipolar Curves in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. 682-688
Lesion Detection
- Federica Zanca
Software Framework for Simulating Clusters of Microcalcifications in Digital Mammography. 689-696 - Mini Das, Howard C. Gifford
Improved Microcalcification Detection for Breast Tomosynthesis Using a Penalized-Maximum-Likelihood Reconstruction Method. 697-703 - Candy P. S. Ho, Christopher E. Tromans, Julia A. Schnabel
Microcalcification Detection in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using an Epipolar Curve Approach. 704-711 - Giovanni Palma, Isabelle Bloch, Serge Muller:
Spiculated Lesions and Architectural Distortions Detection in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Datasets. 712-719 - Melissa L. Hill
An Observer Model for Lesion Detectability in Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. 720-727
Registration
- Lianghao Han
Fast Deformation Simulation of Breasts Using GPU-Based Dynamic Explicit Finite Element Method. 728-735 - Angela W. C. Lee, Julia A. Schnabel
Breast Image Registration by Combining Finite Elements and Free-Form Deformations. 736-743 - Andrew Melbourne, John H. Hipwell, David J. Hawkes:
The Effect of Motion Correction on Pharmacokinetic Parameter Estimation. 744-751 - Fei Ma, Mariusz Bajger
Improved Detection of Cancer in Screening Mammograms by Temporal Comparison. 752-759 - Guang Yang
Combined Reconstruction and Registration of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. 760-768
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2024-11-18 20:33 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by: