User talk:emijrp

---

Wikipedia – Commons – Wikcionario – Wikilibros – Wikicitas – Wikinoticias – Wikisource – Wikiversidad – Meta

---

Babel user information
es-N Esta persona tiene una comprensión nativa del español. en-2 This user has intermediate knowledge of English. fr-1 Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances de base en français.
Users by language

You created the article 1901-- but every image you put there was NOT from year 1901. Why did you do this? I reverted the article to a redirect to the category. -- Infrogmation 17:29, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to your message on my talk page. As I disagree with your revert of 1901 to a version consisting completely of images from other years, I have listed 1901 on Commons:Deletion requests. -- Infrogmation 17:57, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please stop putting images from other years into articles about specific years, at least for now until there has been some discussion? I consider it wildly inappropriate. If you disagree, please let us discuss this and get input from others. In the mean time, please stop. I am trying to assume good will from you, but this is making it difficult. Thank you. -- Infrogmation 18:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you will do at least one of these options: remove the many images from the wrong year you have put into year pages, put an explanation and the actual year of image in descriptions for those images on those pages, and/or explain why on Commons talk:Wikiproject Time why you think many images from other years should go into the year pages rather than the actual year of the image. Thank you, -- Infrogmation 22:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I have started trying to clean all of these up. Your assistance would be appreciated, you too @Infrogmation: . Evrik (talk) 15:24, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep these old categories ? I cannot verify each weird category.

Notice that Category:American writers redirects to a bad category. --Juiced lemon 21:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, a renaming process was running. I knew the good name for this category, but the page was not still created. I have categorized hundreds of pages, and I cannnot waste time to wonder about each special case. When I rename categories, I always ask the deletion of the old and useless categories. --Juiced lemon 11:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message on my talk page. I started discussion at Commons talk:Wikiproject Time. I hope you will participate. Especially if you think decade categories should be removed from year categories (as I have seen you doing), please explain why you think this should be done. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 22:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Emijrp, to tag an empty article or category please use {{Speedydelete}}. If you use {{Delete}} you must list the pages on Commons:Deletion requests. Otherwise the pages would mostly not deleted! Thank you. --GeorgHH 17:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! How does your bot work, for providing image descriptions in different languages?

Regards, --Bdamokos 21:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its a very good idea, keep up the good work!--Bdamokos 13:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And could you please not put your text at the top? The uploader's description of the image should come ahead of an additional info bits. Stan Shebs 02:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for moving these translations from the hispanic Wikipedia to the commons. You have done this for at least three of my pictures now, for example here. Unfortunately you always seems to move it to the top of the image description page and always insert a Summary header. Could you improve your bot so that it respects the already existing page and just do it this way? -- Thanks and best regards, aka 08:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with the above. The bot is really useful, but it would save me having to manually edit its contributions if the descriptions were added to the bottom of existing text (but above the licensing information). Many thanks! - gobeirne 05:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Camisetamillonarios.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page. Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dodo 07:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1] You give houndrets of redundant information, almost the same description in the same language. Please improve or stop your bot.--Notschrei 17:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, modifying the original descriptions would be wrong, of course. But redundant descriptions, please compare Konstantin Wecker, Konzert 1986 (in Garching bei München) with

Deutsch: Konstantin Wecker (Konzert, 1986)

. That's really not neccessary, redundant and looks bad.--Notschrei 17:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this diff, you might need to run your bot again to fix those instances. Thanks, Yonatan ^talk 06:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your bot is just adding redudant information. The link to the gallery should always be the first listed item. Plus, if you were going to add such in it should be below the current description. Please remove all the {{Catmore}} --Pmsyyz 18:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Qué curioso: son siempre (casi) los mismos... --Dodo 09:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC) PD: ¿Viste esto?[reply]

It's inappropriate to use a bot to keep adding a template, when that template is being discussed for deletion. Please stop adding this template by bot until the discussion is finished. --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 02:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: The above... vote is very badly against you See {{Commons-gallery}}, but agree with the comments in the vfd that adding such per a BOT without seeing other effects on a possibly cluttered page is a bad idea; Submit, you might want to run your BOT in reverse and make some fixups. // FrankB 18:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry bout that non-preview! // FrankB 18:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• What is more it is adding non-information to some categories, eg Category:Emberizidae, it tells you to follow the link to see a gallery of images. That page of course contains no gallery, but a species list. Also it is relatively useless unless one just happens to wonder what the little blue arrow is for, and find a list with ones own language. But if one has learnt what the little arrow is for, then one has also also learnt what the message will be and might as well just click on the article/gallery link without looking at the translation!. Much better to just have an internationalised symbol indicating a gallery page, or more simply ensure the gallery page is the first page listed in the category. In short - STOP the bot! :-) --Tony Wills 23:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is stupid to force the use of the template making it appear in any upload page. This is my protest, Ciao --Sailko 19:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emijrp. Today the categories for paintings were renamed from X## Paintings to ##th century paintings. When I looked into changing Template:Paintingcat I found that it used some template magic I have never before messed around with and that I'm not comfortable changing. Could you please make the necessary changes so that the year categories end up in the correct location? I have placed below an overview of the changes. Thanks. Siebrand 14:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Siebrand 21:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename Category:XIII Painting to Category:13th century paintings (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. XIII Painting;13th century paintings;r;

Rename Category:XIV Painting to Category:14th century paintings (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. XIV Painting;14th century paintings;r;

Rename Category:XV Painting to Category:15th century paintings (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. XV Painting;15th century paintings;r;

Rename Category:XVI Painting to Category:16th century paintings (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. XVI Painting;16th century paintings;r;

Rename Category:XVII Painting to Category:17th century paintings (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. XVII Painting;17th century paintings;r;

Rename Category:XVIII Painting to Category:18th century paintings (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. XVIII Painting;18th century paintings;r;

Rename Category:XIX Painting to Category:19th century paintings (1 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. XIX Painting;19th century paintings;r;

Rename Category:XX Painting to Category:20th century paintings (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. XX Painting;20th century paintings;r;

Rename Category:XXI Painting to Category:21st century paintings (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. XXI Painting;21st century paintings;r;

Hi Emijrp; I notice that Emijrpbot is adding categories to images. You might wish to be aware that a number of editors who work on biota think that it is unhelpful to add genus, family or higher categories to an image, if it has been identified and appears on a species gallery page. The guidance at COM:TOL suggests not adding categories to such images. However, this is disputed at Commons_talk:WikiProject_Tree_of_Life#Again.2C_delete_all_categories. The argument of those opposing categories is that a large number of images identified by species in a genus or higher category makes it difficult to find those that need to be identified, and I think that those who do that work are deserving our support. Those favoring categories have various arguments including the view that all images on Commons should be categorized. I think that many of those objecting to categories are less troubled by the addition of the species category to an image. This is consistent with Commons:Categories. Perhaps Emijrpbot might either do that or ignore species images that appear on species gallery pages. Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Emjrip, while editing the text of my image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:7374_-_MI_-_San_Simpliciano_-_Corpo_S._Simpliciano%2C_vescovo_di_Milano_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto_25-Mar-2007.jpg you deleted the copyright information, so that the image was marked for deletion as "missing essential information". If you edit someone's pictures, you are supposed to recopy ALL of the information included in the page, otherwise your action is considered vandalism. Please take care. Thank you in advance. --User:G.dallorto 18:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, never mind.--User:G.dallorto 15:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emijrp,

Your bot recently "updated" some interwikis on some of my experimental species/genus pages that were never "active" as these interwikis were all commented out with the standard HTML comment markers. I do not mind your bot updating the inactive lists in my pages, but rather than updating the lists in between the comment tags the bot just added the updated lists to the bottom (also not replacing the old lists), thus also activating my personal test pages as valid general pages which also makes me worry if my pages are now maybe linked from various wikipedias or other projects as the corresponding page on commons. I did not check the latter, I just changed my own pages to have the interwikis commented out again. Pages concerned were: P4b_Vespa_crabro, P4b_Plodia_interpunctella, P4b_Harmonia_axyridis, P4b_Harmonia, P4b_Coccinella_septempunctata‎. Such mishaps could possibly be avoided if your bot would replace existing lists in their exact location rather than just adding a new one?? Thought you might want to know. Cheers! Pudding4brains 12:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning

Image:La_portada_es_un_harticulo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dodo 20:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning

Image:Wikipedia_va_a_cerrar.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dodo 12:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Silla_Barcelona.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Cecil (talk) 08:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Fluxcapacitor.JPG. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 07:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion notification

Category:Naval ships of the United States and Category:United States Navy ships have been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- Jmabel ! talk 06:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen the nice work of your bot for the interwiki updating. Can that bot also check on the wikipage whether there is a link to Commons and if not add one? For example to check on [[es:Souvenir]] whether there is a link {{commons|souvenirs}}. Regards, Wouter (talk) 22:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is possible, and som time ago I programmed a similar bot, but I disabled it due to some reason that now I can't remember. I will try to re-write that bot. Thanks for your ideas! Regards! --Emijrp (talk) 22:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your info my experience adding the links to Commons manually. The format of the link can be different. For example the link to a Commons category is often like {{Commonscat|Ohain}} but on other wikis that format is unknown and should be {{commons|:Category:Ohain|Ohin}}. For a link to a gallery there is also for example {{commonsklein|Hilversum}} Regards, Wouter (talk) 20:39, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By now I'm adding links only to galeries, not to categories. In Spanish Wikipedia bot has added about 1000 links (see). Now I'm trying to repeat it in eo:, hu:, pt:... --Emijrp (talk) 12:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BotMultichillT (talk) 20:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:Letrero de Firestone.jpg is uncategorized since 30 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 20:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Torrespaña - 2008.jpg is uncategorized since 30 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 20:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Museo Arqueológico Nacional de España - Sarcófago.jpg is uncategorized since 30 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 20:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Messier object 032.jpg is uncategorized since 14 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Paseo junto a la playa de La Calita, El Puerto de Santa María.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Detalle de unos tubos apilados.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Playa de la Muralla vista desde el mar.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Un montón de tubos apilados.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Playa de la Calita 3.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Grúas en el Puerto de la Bahía de Cádiz.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Feria del Caballo 2007.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Catedral del Cádiz vista desde el mar.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Playa de la Muralla, sin nadie.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Monumento Sevilla.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Plataforma en el Puerto de la Bahía de Cádiz.jpg is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Señal Precaución Niños.jpg is uncategorized since 4 May 2009.
• Image:Coche Pájaros.jpg is uncategorized since 4 May 2009.
• Image:Hormiguero Campus de Puerto Real.jpg is uncategorized since 4 May 2009.
• Image:Precaución Suelo Mojado.jpg is uncategorized since 4 May 2009.
• Image:Patos Parque Genovés, Cádiz.jpg is uncategorized since 5 May 2009.
• Image:Patos Parque Genovés, Cádiz 2.jpg is uncategorized since 5 May 2009.
• Image:Cierre automático puertas Cortafuego CP-200.jpg is uncategorized since 11 May 2009.
• Image:No a Bolonia.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Usuario Ganon.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Kodos.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Bydgoszcz Mapa.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Calc cordoba.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Dan Bricklin.jpg was uncategorized on 17 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Ayudamultimedia.png was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Guadaquiz example.png was uncategorized on 6 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You were once a contributor to the time project. I wonder if you might have an opinion on a navbox I constructed for place by decade categories. Commons_talk:Wikiproject_Time#navbox_for_time-place. Thanks -J JMesserly (talk) 04:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blocked_anonymous_per_country.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.97.149.44 20:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is that file still needed? As far as I can see it is unused. --MGA73 (talk) 17:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Emijrp,

I have seen that you have undone revision 21835945 I have done on 30 May 2009.

Alstroemeria aurantiaca is an obsolete name and considered currently as a synonym of Alstroemeria aurea in which I have put the pictures.

I thus propose to revert your change and to redirect Alstroemeria aurantiaca to Alstroemeria aurea. OK?

Best botanical regards, --Réginald (To reply) 10:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Emijrp, I saw you added an interwiki in the Dutch intro of this page. Do you mind if I remove it the next time I edit this page. I'm afraid that mixing up interwikis en wiklinks might cause confusion to the inexperienced user and the interwikis are listed to the left of the page anyway. Also it doesn't look that attractive, but that's my opinion. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 18:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those links are very commons, you can see examples in: Barack Obama or United States. Emijrp (talk) 18:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think a page without these links, such as Rembrandt, looks much cleaner. But is that a no to my request? Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that 7 links to 1606 years is unuseful. I think we have to ask to the community for a common manual of style. Emijrp (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With every language intro you have to start all over again, I think, but that's another discussion. It's up to you to address it to the community. Untill then I will keep your changes. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 20:10, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emijrp, could you please fix the add link at Images for bio? Thank you, Multichill (talk) 16:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm updating the tool, but from small Wikipedias to large ones, because my script crashes with last ones. emijrp (talk) 11:25, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I see your bot has converted some of my photos (e.g. this) to use yyyy-mm-dd format dates rather than d mmmm yyyy. I can see why this is necessary for photos that use the {{Information}} template directly, but if you look at the personalised template I use, User:Tivedshambo/Information, you'll see it automatically converts the date to the ISO format using {{#time:Y-m-d|{{{date|}}}}}. Therefore, unless there's some other reason I'm not aware of, further conversion isn't necessary. Would you agree with this? – Tivedshambo (talk) 05:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now, the bot skips images with your template. emijrp (talk) 08:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, would it be possible to incorporate {{#time:Y-m-d|{{{date|}}}}} directly into the {{Information}} template, thus removing the need to convert the dates individually? – Tivedshambo (talk) 08:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can request it on Template talk:Information. emijrp (talk) 08:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do some testing and see if it's viable. – Tivedshambo (talk) 16:27, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be fairly straightforward to create a template to convert standard date formats to Y-m-d format. However, can I ask how your bot deals with the following:-

• Foreign dates (e.g. date=27 Janvier 2009)
• Unambiguous dates in the format date=27/5/2004 or date=5/27/2004 (i.e. UK or American)
• Ambiguous dates (e.g. date=4/7/2009 - which could mean 4 July or 7 April)
• Unparseable dates (e.g. date=Probably some time during summer 1994)
• Also dates specifying month only - e.g. date=June 1985

 – Tivedshambo (talk) 17:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've created the template {{Ymd}} - do you think this could be used? – Tivedshambo (talk) 21:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How come, despite the templates we have on the Commons is it that with your bot's changes all the date remain back to front with the 2009th day to the nth month of year 8? Isn't {{Date}} meant to change the date format to the user's preferred date format rather than your bot's chosen one? Regards, Captain Scarlet (talk) 10:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please also replace self-made (and other translations) with {{Own}} in same edit as date internationalization? Just to reduce number of edits. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok. emijrp (talk) 09:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your bot. Template:information already has {{Parse source}} to show {{Own}}. You don't have to change that. Best regards.--Kwj2772 (msg) 03:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko requested me to change it (see message above). So? I think that "Parse source" is a hack, but really, we must to put "Own" to avoid translate from uploader-language to english and then to reader-language. emijrp (talk) 06:18, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A agree that {{Own}} is better solution then analyzing messages. Messages are also may be changed over time. Other bots are also replacing text with {{Own}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw that your bot change the dates. Could you please also modify the date of these files: Mohandas K. Gandhi/Sounds? The exact date is available in the title. Thanks for your help, Yann (talk) 19:56, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice to see a bot set up to switch images to the {{int:filedesc}} and {{int:license}} system. Well done :) — Huntster (t • @ • c) 19:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Localization is needed. emijrp (talk) 21:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emijrp, yes, this internationalization is a good idea, but I have a question: how can I as a user view for example template {{int:license}}? When I search for this template nothing shows up. Thank you. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Read this. Regards. emijrp (talk) 09:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you please rename this file? This is not general Dominique Vandamme, but general Francois Etienne Kellermann. Thanks. --Alexandru.demian (talk) 17:41, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You merit praise for your clean up work. Yet wouldn't it be still better to correct the template(s) in use for upload? They insert still more pages that are broken from the beginning? Eg., being under the rule of the german localization, I did create inadvertendly many pages which weren't internationalized at all. (Probably source parameter; header „== Beschreibung ==” instead of „== {{int:filedesc}} ==”.) Regards -- Hellerblech (talk) 06:08, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, upload templates must be fixed. I'm going to request it. emijrp (talk) 07:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do so. About 80% of edits to my watchlist are from your bot. I'd be much happier if the template was just right the first time, rather than have your bot edit every new image I upload. --GRuban (talk) 17:59, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would second that. What is the correct talk page to request changes to the Commons upload forms? I didn't find that page easily. BTW, thanks for your great work with bots, which are needed regardless of the upload form change! -- MattiPaavola (talk) 14:35, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Emilio, perdona que te moleste, pero como últimamente veo a tu bot corriendo por aquí supongo que estarás más o menos activo y leerás lo que a continuación te expongo.: Los últimos días he subido varias imágenes de flickr y el Flickr upload bot ha debido fallar en algo porque no se pueden visualizar y no sé cómo subsanarlo. No sé si está en tu mano poder arreglarlo, pero supongo que te podrás dirigir a alguien que sí podrá hacerlo. Te digo qué imágenes son: File:Engainion of an ancient greek house.jpg, File:Funerary stele of Proclos.jpg, File:Denkmal für die ermordeten Juden Europas 8.jpg, File:Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela 4 y File:Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela 1. Estas dos últimas les falta el jpg al final.

No sabía a quién recurrir, y si existe una manera de que pueda hacerlo yo sin tener que molestar a nadie me gustaría saberla. Alguna vez que he necesitado ayuda lo he expuesto en el Café de Commons, pero me he quedado sin respuesta. Kved, en varias ocasiones me ha ayudado con otros asuntos, pero a los últimos mensajes que le dejé hace algún tiempo no me contestó, supongo que porque no estaba activo. Disculpa si es una molestia y si te va suponer mucho tiempo y trabajo. De antemano te doy las gracias. Un abrazo. Dorieo (talk) 11:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I personally think that your bot edits way too fast. As long as there are concerns with your new task Commons:Bots/Requests/Emijrpbot you should reduce the speed drastically. --Schlurcher (talk) 12:56, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Emijrp: En una imagen que subí hace poco, vi que tu BOT reemplazó Sumario por int:filedesc, lo que me llevo a pensar que la página que te ayuda a subir archivos nuevos, no está colocando directamente int:filedesc y int:license. Como andas lidiando con esto, pensé que te podía interesar el dato. Saludos --Arcibel (talk) 13:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Emijrp,

As you might know Wikimedia is currently migrating from the GFDL to cc-by-sa-3.0. Wikimedia Commons is also migrating and we're down to less than 8000 files (started with about 1,8M files) . Unfortunatly this number keeps growing because Commonist contains outdated license templates. You appear to be running Commonist, could you please change the following lines in your license.txt?

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} should be changed to {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}}

{{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

Can I also fix the images you have already uploaded by adding {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}?

Thank you very much, Multichill (talk) 12:12, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can. Thanks for the commonist tip, I'm going to update the .txt file. Regards. emijrp (talk) 17:18, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, great. I changed your latest uploads. Multichill (talk) 18:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't comment on my talk page, but I changed my license.txt file too. Thank you for the instructions. Walter Siegmund (talk) 03:32, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Walter, you didn't show up in my list of people who recently uploaded under an old license. Thanks for changing. Multichill (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, You'd probably add your input here: Commons:Village pump#Internationalization or i18n. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hola yo subi el archivo marcello.jpg y he tenido algunos problemas para completar el asunto de los derechos podrias ayudarme ya que es la primera vez que utilizo esto y la verdad no se si lo estoy haciendo bien, ademas subi sin querer dos veces el mismo archivo y no lo he podido borrar, espero que me puedas ayudar y desde ya muchas gracias. --Principe kalender (talk) 03:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you have User:Emijrpbot update the interwikis for the day galleries? The bot did a run through earlier in the year, but now all the galleries have been completed. Each of the galleries is linked to the template {{Day}} and can be found here Category:Days. Thanks! Evrik (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hola,

puedes ver una de tus fotos en Epistemowikia. Muy buena, por cierto.

Saludos, --M Peinado (talk) 20:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por utilizarla, y por avisarme. El primero que lo hace, creo recordar :). emijrp (talk) 07:56, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Emijrp, thanks for the updating of the interwiki-links. One little question. Would it be able to sort the links by [2] like the sorting order of the english Wp? Saludos. Orchi (talk) 21:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why like en:wp? emijrp (talk) 18:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

en:wp = one of the samples. I think by order of alphabet, based on local language (by first word) like e.g.: Suomi (fi:) before Svenska or Magyar (hu:) not sorted by "h" but by "m". Orchi (talk) 19:59, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We use sorting by language code here at Commons. Multichill (talk) 20:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did'nt know that. Long time ago a User from the Netherlands gave me the information to sort by [3] (nl: before ja: etc.). Thanks. Orchi (talk) 20:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Emijrp, I noticed[4] your bot added something like: "....m.."; is it something you're working on?. Rgrds Tortillovsky (talk) 03:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can see that all those ',' and 'm' were on the left diff, between the interwikis. My bot just added a newline between every interwiki. emijrp (talk) 08:28, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see; sorry to have taken your time. Thnx. Tortillovsky (talk) 15:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering: when will it be done with the old images? Looks like A-Z was done, it's now at number 4? -- User:Docu at 04:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the changes your bot is making to most (maybe all) of my recent uploads. See, for example, File:Wollaston Unitarian Church Quincy MA 01.jpg. I'm uploading using the Commons page for own work -- is there something I should do differently to avoid this? Please understand that I'm not unhappy in any way, just confused -- Thanks, Jameslwoodward (talk) 16:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC) (respond here, please)[reply]

@Docu: Bot finished !-Z images. Now, it is re-running (for new uploads). emijrp (talk) 19:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you change the upload script instead? If you think that your code should be applied to every image, then it should be there from the start right? It's unnecessary to have a robot do the job afterwards. --Vogler (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because I'm not an admin, and I can't fix the form. emijrp (talk) 12:38, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So let's contact an admin? --Vogler (talk) 10:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

+1 I agree; I also was confused as well... --Sir James (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See [5]. --enomil 01:39, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, fix that template to allow localization. Localization is needed. emijrp (talk) 12:37, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protected template...?! --enomil 13:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I changed the template to support the dates. --The Evil IP address (talk) 00:16, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. emijrp (talk) 19:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Not that there would be too much difference, but your robot should be using {{int:license-header}} instead of {{int:license}} now. See mw:Special:Code/MediaWiki/55558#code-comments. --Mormegil (talk) 15:26, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested the community opinion in Village pump. emijrp (talk) 19:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your BOT replaces int:filedesc & int:license; that may be very useful. But: why creates the upload-page of the Commons still always the elder versions Summary & License? Is there one WP-division working against the other?

By the way, the mentioned upload-page would need a lot of fixes. Most of the times I need to edit the file immediately following the upload, because the upload-page does not allow some special entries. I will look for somebody to tell my intentions about. --Sarang (talk) 11:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, in the meantime i found 2 answers, first about the basic upload form that I can use to avoid my troubles, and second I saw at the Commons_talk:Upload#Update upload form that there is a request pending, but fixes seem necessary.

Another thing: How about removing something from your talk page into an archive? --Sarang (talk) 11:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Emijrp,

I see that you are changing the "travail personnel" of my last uploads by template "own".

I'm already using this template and "travail personnel" is the French outcome of this template.

Should I use the English language for my pages on Commons, so that "own" would appear as "own work"? Please advise, --Réginald (To reply) 13:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. My bot inserts some templates (example {{Own}}) and some special codes (example {{int:filedesc}}) for localization purposes. That things show text in the user prefered language (because of that you see text in French). You must use the template {{Own}} to help in the localization task. emijrp (talk) 14:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't understand. Since several months I'm using this template {{Own}}. I have in the meantime changed the language to English. Perhaps it will help... --Réginald (To reply) 16:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Find the differences between en, fr & nl. That's why we like {{Own}} ;-) Multichill (talk) 18:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no affect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching RecentChanges to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:21, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. emijrp (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emijrp,

Is there a place to list strings that could be added to your search and replace? e.g:

• Opera creata dall'uploader (own work by uploader) => {{Own}} in File:Ambulanza FIAT Ducato.jpg
• Own work by uploader => {{Own}} in File:Romanian Ambulance.jpg

If you want, I could list the ones I do manually here. This could avoid that I have to do the same more than once ;) -- User:Docu at 15:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Docu. Thanks for those two suggestions. I'm going to add them. emijrp (talk) 17:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To centralize this, I add a request at Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Changes_to_allow_localization. -- User:Docu at 16:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hola emijrp. He visto que tienes un bot y quería hacerte una petición personal. Hace un tiempo que cambié de nick para proteger mi identidad real, pero aún me falta por cambiar el campo "autor" de los archivos que he subido a commons. Como son muchos es un mucho trabajo hacerlo a mano y me pregunto si tú podrías hacerlo con el bot. Se trataría de cambiar donde diga Té y kriptonita por Tyk. Por otro lado, aún faltan cosas por cambiar en la es.wiki, ya que muchos artículos que inicié no aparecen con el nuevo nick. ¿Crees que se puede hacer algo sobre esto también?
La verdad es que no tengo ni idea de como funcionan los bots por lo que si requiere mucho trabajo para ti, no te preocupes si no puedes hacerlo ni te sientas presionado. Un saludo, tyk (talk) 12:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see this redirect. Please use the char ":" as prefix for exclude the redirect in the category (read here), i.e. see my edit. Bye.--B3t (talk) 22:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks, but it is really a problem of this bot edit. emijrp (talk) 12:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

done--B3t (talk) 10:50, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

High Contrast (talk) 10:15, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have a specific request of Task #1 for you bot.

I have insert many links for commons (respective gallery/category of an article) in it:WP, with the template w:it:Template:Interprogetto (a general form for links gallery/category in it:WP, instead of w:en:Template:Commons or w:en:Template:Commons category used in en:WP, and many others WP).

It is possible insert/fix/update interwikis in commons, for some category, from the value of the parameter "commons" of the Template:Interprogetto?

PS: I have request this in it:WP (here) but nobody do it, maybe is a little difficult...

Thanks.--B3t (talk) 12:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do this with bot flag. I have >100.000 items on my watchlist, presumably 60-70K of them are images and a lot of my own uploads has english descriptions and no {{En}}. If a bot will add this to all files and uses this long edit summary I can close my watchlist. --Martin H. (talk) 14:46, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--Kungfuman (talk) 13:03, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

File:WikiLeaks_2010-12-08.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 17:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Can your bot update interwiki links of subcategories (1 level only) and galleries in Category:Creator template home categories. I am unable to do it with my AWB based bot. Thanks --Jarekt (talk) 04:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:LAN_Party_Algeciras_2011_001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

–Tryphon^☂ 17:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr. Emilio!

Please would you be able to add the number of user names on the list and also the list at this time, namely from 1,000 to 2,000 or 5,000 even 10,000 if possible.

Thank you for your attention and your willingness. Greetings. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 05:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your approval to added to 5,000 list of usernames. Sincerely. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 07:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr. Emilio!

Why BOTijo not work for more than 1 week lately? Sincerely. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AcampadaEnSol-16-5-11-IMG_1105.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lymantria (talk) 21:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just thought you should know about this proposal: Commons:Village_pump#MLD_bot. Please comment there if you have any thoughts on whether it's a good or bad idea, implementation issues, etc. Rd232 (talk) 11:46, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/− Dear Emijrp, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Emilio, We will give coordinates to every photo from Wiki Loves Monuments in Hungary with help of a bot later. Thank you for your kind attention. Regards, Samat (talk) 16:43, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. emijrp (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. When I can, I do. Often, when there's no visible street address, or no detailed googlemap, it's no go - someone has to go there with a GPS receiver (snowball cnances..). NVO (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! --99of9 (talk) 09:34, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. emijrp (talk) 14:53, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like to notify you, that I'm using your photo on my website. Here is the link: Website with your photo. Greetings.

Hello, It may be a possible bug:
here are three files uploaded for WLM by the same uploader:
the first and third are appearing correctly in http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wlm/files.txt
The middle one does not seem to appear ?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vincennes_-_Chemise_du_donjon_-_PA00079920_-_001.jpg <- found in files.txt
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vincennes_-_Chemise_du_donjon_-_PA00079920_-_002.jpg <- not found in files.txt
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vincennes_-_Chemise_du_donjon_-_PA00079920_-_003.jpg -< found in files.txt

Thanks in advance. Esby (talk) 09:45, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Kahn has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gerbis (talk) 15:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emijrp, I notice that your bot has not made any edits in the last few months. Does this mean it has retired, or just on a break? As the highest edit count contributor to Commons, I feel we should have some kind of retirement party or something if that is the case. On a more serious note, are you aware of any tasks it was doing that have not been taken over by another bot? It would be nice to make sure any maintenance tasks are continued. All the best if you have moved on to new endeavours. --99of9 (talk) 14:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 99of9. The bot did two tasks mainly: interwikis and converting dates. I "stopped" the interwikis task waiting for Wikidata, I hope they enable interwikis for other projects and not only Wikipedia. The date conversion was "solved" for the most common cases, but after some months there are probably many new images with non-ISO date formats. I will check it as soon as possible. Regards. emijrp (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Giuseppe Prina has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— TintoMeches, 20:06, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I just wanted to ask if it would be possible to have a version of this (http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wlm/files.txt) with the files name containing the original accentuated caracters? I've tried to use it to create subpages of canadian pictures for each day but accentuated caracters in file names seem to be braking everything when creating a gallery. For example, your list contains the file name "Église_de_Péribonka.jpg" which doesn't work when called in file:Église_de_Péribonka.jpg. It should read "Église_de_Péribonka.jpg" and link to this image file:Église_de_Péribonka.jpg. Thanks in advance for your help! Have a nice day, Letartean (talk) 20:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The file codification is UTF-8. How are you opening the file? emijrp (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, to be clear, here's what I want to do and why.

Each day, I want to chose an canadian image that was uploaded for WLM2013. To do so, I wanted to use this tool which, if you click on a date, presents all pictures from the country and uploaded on this particular date. That tool seems to be based on your list (or at least claims to be). The problem is it doesn't show pictures with accentuated file name on any browser that I use (Chrome, IE or Modzilla). To go around this problem, and since it links to your source data, I downloaded a copy of the data on my computer. Then, I imported the file in Excel to filter and extracted the images from Canada. Still, I have the same problem but it is easier to fix: I searched and replaced all special caracters I could find then pasted the result in wiki pages (here for example). The result works but there are still some problems with caracters I don't know. Also, it requires that I do something by hand that surely could be done by some computerized way.

As you can see, I can work my way around with computers but I am not a botmaker or a programer. My question is: Is there anyway to do what I want to do (see pictures from Canada, arranged by upload date) with superzerocool's tool or by any other way and are you the person to talk with for help on the matter? Hope this is clearer and that you will forgive my english that is not my first language. Thank you! Letartean (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When you import into Excel you must choose UTF-8 or ISO-8859-1. Play a bit with codification in Excel. emijrp (talk) 07:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! It works fine. THanks for your help. Letartean (talk) 13:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Hodges has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heinrich Gustav Reichenbach has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

41.140.162.100 13:00, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adolph Wagner has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JuTa 00:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Axel von Fersen the Younger has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JuTa 22:20, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your bot User:Emijrpbot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag_3 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. --Dschwen (talk) 19:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Evelyn De Morgan has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Judithcomm (talk) 10:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Iceberg and titanic spanish.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Iceberg and titanic spanish.PNG]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot is offline with user rankings on particular wikipedias?--Ma▀▄Ga 16:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean the "List of wikipedians by number of edits", yes. emijrp (talk) 17:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily or not?--Ma▀▄Ga 20:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. Probably forever. emijrp (talk) 21:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks.--Ma▀▄Ga 15:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9244804551).jpg

And also:

• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9244806643).jpg
• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9244811321).jpg
• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9244813609).jpg
• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9244818897).jpg
• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9244830677).jpg
• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9244836943).jpg
• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9244840397).jpg
• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9247590376).jpg
• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9247597722).jpg
• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9247603004).jpg
• File:Aquarium de Barcelona (9247605700).jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 10:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Courage is contagious.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jonnymoon96 (talk) 21:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A.C. Milan has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Scipio83 (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escuela de verano NNGG Madrid 2010 - Esperanza Aguirre, Ángel Carromero.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hotalezano (talk) 10:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

català | Deutsch | English | español | galego | +/− Wiki Loves Monuments Spain 2016 is coming! Dear Emijrp, As every year, Wiki Loves Monuments in Spain, an international photographic contest about cultural heritage in the Spanish territory, will start on next September 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, or in other photographic contests organized by WM-ES, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2016 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again. We want to inform you about a substantial change in the rules of the contest: this year only images of monuments or municipalities without previous photograph in Wikimedia Commons are accepted. To facilitate hunting monuments and municipalities without a free image, we have prepared a set of specific lists, which can be checked in the contest websites: wikilov.es/monuments or wikilm.es If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here. We look forward to your free images! Sincerely, The team of Wiki Loves Monuments edition in Spain

Hello!!! I am Georgian wlm subscriber... I have a question: why this page isn't changing? Thanks!— Beqabai (talk) 16:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am checking it. Thanks for your message. emijrp (talk) 17:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is working again. Regards. emijrp (talk) 12:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I think it stop working again... :/— Beqabai (talk) 17:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Has the bot recently lost its bot flag? --Fæ (talk) 04:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag_3. If you are reusing this account, are you going to re-request the bot flag again? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 04:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done, Commons:Bots/Requests/Emijrpbot 9. emijrp (talk) 07:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked your bot indefinitely because it was running a task which was declined, and it is completely unflagged. No bot flag, no autopatrolled, should not be running. Guanaco (talk) 10:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Guanaco: I was editing my own files in small batches without doing any harm. My bot did over 3 million edits and was flagged for years. I accepted to deflag it in good faith. Now I have become active again. I opened a request for flag, as I was asked by User:Fæ to do so, but in his opinion User:Krd said I should use my main account. I guess I should waste my time adding the credit info by hand. This is nuts. emijrp (talk) 10:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Emijrp: I think Krd wanted you to edit your files using your main account, but was open to discussion about using the bot. I have no issue with you doing this with your main account, or with the bot if it's properly flagged. The bot is a problem, because it floods recent changes with unpatrolled edits. If you get it flagged again, I'm fine with it being unblocked. Guanaco (talk) 10:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also fine with anything that is result of a discussion and not the exact opposite. --Krd 10:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict) I'll add that Commons is generally okay with user scripts, like VisualFileChange and such. I've also used pywikibot for some tasks on the fly. The point is that if you run a "bot" account or do mass unsupervised edits, you need approval. Guanaco (talk) 10:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Guanaco, I am concerned about setting a precedent. Under current guidelines for bot accounts, anyone can run an alternative account and make tool-supported edits without using a bot flag so long as the edits are neither disruptive nor misleading. This includes accounts with "BOT" or similar in the name. If Emijrp assures us that the mass edits are being actively monitored by themselves, I see no reason to stop this from proceeding, though my first preference is for this to happen under their main account. With regard to the RC log, unless these are being highlighted as being in default of a standard tag, I doubt that is a rationale to judge the edits disruptive. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the actual edits, I also have to admit that I partly misunderstood the bot request (that it was license/attribution changes of own work), and I wish there had been some feedback from the operator. As it stands now, I'd suggest to reopen the bot request and get it approved shortly. Comments? --Krd 12:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am ok with reopening... I will only edit my own files to add the credit info.[6] Thanks emijrp (talk) 13:46, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reopened the request and unblocked the bot. If possible please wait a few days before running the task, just in case there arise objections at the bot request. --Krd 07:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:II Marcha contra las Violencias Machistas (26564652649).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Discasto _talk 20:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Callejeando por Madrid (34570312443).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Txitxo1 (talk) 11:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Victims of imperialism has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 18:00, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons IS NOT a platform for political agendas. This is a warning. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 18:10, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[[mi:All wrong aka BAD]] was left on the gallery for Sialia sialis. diff from 2010

I just removed it.

I am here trying to have second thoughts about removing it, but truthfully, I have no idea what it's purpose was/is.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 18:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Callejeando por Madrid (35250503201).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Discasto _talk 21:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emilio. Please consider using {{Rename}} in the future, rather than re-uploading duplicates and requesting speedy deletion. Thanks, Storkk (talk) 08:14, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Storkk: I know. I didn't want to reupload those files, but Flickr2Commons didn't checked for duplicates, weird. emijrp (talk) 09:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Shackleton has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Archie02 (talk) 11:08, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Archive Team another logo.png

And also:

• File:Archive Team collection screenshot 2018.png
• File:Archive Team logo.jpg
• File:Archive Team wiki screenshot 2018.png theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:14, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola Emilio!

Estoy traduciendo el artículo es:Paterna de Rivera al alemán. Para ello hice un derivado de tu foto File:Callejeando por Paterna de Rivera (35477067302).jpg cambiando la perspectiva: File:Callejeando por Paterna de Rivera (35477067302, mejor geometría).jpg. Espero que te guste.

Saludos cordiales desde Alemania, --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:35, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sagan Viking.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FunnyMath (talk) 04:45, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Eclipse from ISS.ogv, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mesa redonda sobre los trabajos en la fosa común realizados en el cementerio de San José (40734494144).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luces del Norte, manuscritos iluminados de la Biblioteca Nacional de España 29.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Prenticenauj (talk) 18:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luces del Norte, manuscritos iluminados de la Biblioteca Nacional de España 29.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Prenticenauj (talk) 18:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fritz Müller has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 03:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Clémentine of Orléans has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 04:52, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Faidherbe has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ChristianeB (talk) 10:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vistas desde la Torre de Poniente - Cádiz - DSC 0052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Emijrp, I really like your uploaded images. I also like your colorization of images of Malcolm X and Patrice Lumumba. However: these images are not a reflection of the historical reality, but they are artistic impressions, and the colours are chosen by you and probably not realistic. The colorized images are nice for usage in a blog, in Instagram or in a fancy article. In my view they are NOT useful in Wikipedia articles (unless clearly labeled as artistic expressions). That's why I removed them from Wikidata. I hope you understand. Vysotsky (talk) 23:17, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page has more than 100 items. If you want to keep oversight, it's easy to add an archival bot on your page that automatically moves items to an archival page after 4 weeks or so. Vysotsky (talk) 23:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. ~10000 files in the above category are also in their respective subcategories, possible for you to remove them from this category so it'll be easier for people to find files? --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas tardes Emijrp. Estaba ojeando esta fotografía y quería preguntarte si por casualidad tienes otra/s fotografía/s en la/s que aparezca el edificio de la derecha, que viene a ser este. Gracias de antemano. Saludos. CFA1877 (talk) 14:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Johan Adlercreutz has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 08:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Jakob Sundevall has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Ditters von Dittersdorf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Christian Rafn has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 09:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Borivoj Presl has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 09:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Abraham Pihl has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 09:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Anton Larsen has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 09:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carel Gabriel Cobet has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 10:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Madeleine Renaud has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 13:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen your edit Revision of 908574165. Mark Wahlberg isn't visible on this image, but there is already a qualifier with his name. I've reverted your edit. --XRay 💬 04:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have excluded it from now. emijrp (talk) 07:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Johan Adlercreutz has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ReneeWrites (talk) 10:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mart Stam has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 10:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Axel Olrik has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hjart (talk) 13:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hugo Egmont Hørring has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hjart (talk) 13:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thomasine Christine Gyllembourg-Ehrensvärd has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hjart (talk) 13:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wilhelm Johannsen has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hjart (talk) 14:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christen Berg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hjart (talk) 14:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have uploaded a few old photos taken by a Canon PowerShot A430 compact digital camera. Emijrpbot tagged one of them with the exposure time (virtual shutter speed) taken from the metadata in the file. However, the bot did not tag the same image with its ISO speed (virtual sensor sensitivity, how the raw sensor values are scaled to get the color values in the jpeg image file).

You can find the ISO speed for this image with the exiftool program, with a command like exiftool -ISO Marmot_fountain_in_Switzerland.jpg (assuming you downloaded the image to that filename). Note that the ISO speed may not be trivial to get from this file, I believe in this case exiftool computes it from two different pieces of camera-specific metadata in the file: see notes for the Canon:AutoISO tag and the Composite:ISO tag. You can use a command like exiftool -G1 -s -"*ISO*" Marmot_fountain_in_Switzerland.jpg to see both the original metadata and the computed value together.

From what I can tell, Emijrpbot does add the ISO speed from file metadata into wikidata for some other photos from a different camera, even when the camera was set to select the ISO speed automatically, see eg. this photo taken with a Panasonic camera. By analogy I think it may make sense for the bot to add the ISO speed for the Canon camera too. I don't consider this a bug, since the bot need not recognize all possible metadata in all image files, I just want to make sure that you know about this behavior.

I'll note that User:SchlurcherBot behaves exactly the same as Emijrpbot here.

– b_jonas 15:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello b_jonas, thanks for your detailed message. I will try to add support for models like this. As you say in this case getting the ISO value isn't trivial. Regards. emijrp (talk) 10:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas tardes Emilio. Mira, estaba mirando en Flickr una cosa y me he percatado de lo siguiente. Me encuentro esta foto, me meto en la categoría de Espera y me encuentro con esta otra foto tuya...soy yo, o se parecen mucho, muchísimo, que diría que son la misma? If you know what I mean... CFA1877 (talk) 18:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hola CFA1877. Es curioso, a simple vista parecen la misma foto, pero si te fijas en ciertos detalles se ve que son diferentes. He marcado dos diferencias que he visto, carga la imagen y al poner el ratón encima te saldrán las notas. La sombra de la izquierda y la placa amarilla de la derecha. También junto a la puerta hay una plaquita marrón en la mía. Saludos. emijrp (talk) 19:35, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cáspita, es verdad, no son la misma...pero por detalles pequeños. Bueno, pues mucho mejor así, la verdad. Una feliz coincidencia y no un plagio. CFA1877 (talk) 19:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]