Congratulations. On the other hand, I'm disappointed, because I've verified it and it seems to be available only for non-commercial use in Slovenia.[1] --Eleassar(t/p)20:01, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Since there is only one user taking care of slovenian FOPs at the moment, erasing images from Commons, it is more transparent to have all (ex or problematic) files listed in one place, rather than spread around the talk page. In future, please add names of deleted slovenian images to this list, without adding same template all over. Thank you.
I could find an article about this monument, but there is no evidence of authorship.. Perhaps in some non-web source? If it is to be deleted for some FOP reason, I am sure that the guy from previous section (see above) will delete it. Žiga (talk) 14:41, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:02-MostLivada1.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Apparently I forgot / added today. Acoording to image, IMHO it is not problematical as a FOP case, it is hardly a piece of art. Žiga (talk) 12:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:RTV-kukavica.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
File:KZRTVS-BBC.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Žiga, kao što napisah (oprosti što ne pišem na slovenskome), zaslužio si više nego jednu i jako mi je žao što ti je mnogo fotografija izbrisano. Ako neka od tvojih obrisanih fotografija može ilustrirati članak na hrvatskoj Wikipediji, slobodno ju stavi prema uvjetima poštene uporabe, a ako trebaš pomoć pri tome, rado ću ti pomoći. Lijep pozdrav :-) --Roberta F. (talk) 14:49, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hvala Roberta, uz sve to FOP brisanje sam trenutačno malo demotiviran za ekspeditivni rad na Commons, ali šta je tu je. Prije 2,3 godine nije kod nas u wp.sl. nitko znao (a Eleassar je tada tek počeo studirati zakon:) - da će biti takva zbrka zbog dozvola. No nadam se, da ćemo u nekoliko godina a./ promjeniti zakon:), b./ pronaći drugi način interpretacije zakona - inače Slovenija neće biti baš dobro reprezentirana u ovoj bazi. Ali ima još puno prirode… Hrvatska je mnogo lijepa, kad če se razpisati o otocima ili nekim drugim krajevima i naložiti slike, neću zaboraviti i na wp.hr. Evo ovaj na primer. lp., Žiga (talk) 09:39, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results:
We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks, the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Hello, please forgive me disturbing you but I have to ask something about this photo. Do you still remember who are the two persons in the painting in the background? Best regards, Roxanna (talk) 10:22, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, there is a great possibility that it would be someone from the en:Khevenhüller family, since there were many generations and it was their castle. I am sure that adressing the castle staff = turist info there is the best solution for getting the desired names.
Best Žiga (talk) 07:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]