Commons:Featured picture candidates

Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Skip to: Add a nomination Guidelines for evaluating photographs Current candidates Delisting a featured picture Rules Contents

Formal things Nominating Guidelines for nominators Please read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates: Scope – In addition to falling within the Commons scope, candidates must be static two-dimensional images. All other types of files should be nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates. Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses. Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs). Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information. Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful. General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality. Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive. For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates. For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison. Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that: almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others, night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime, beautiful does not always mean valuable. Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable: Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy. Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art. Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject. Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards. Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." Photographs On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field. Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp. Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element. Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image. Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head). Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph. Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF. On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc. Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects. Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon. Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good. Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch. Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image. Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side. Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales. Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc. Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition. Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph. Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations … You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audio Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominations If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types: Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist. A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same). A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes. A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that). Simple tutorial for new users Tutorial: Nominate on COM:FPC How to nominate in 8 simple steps STEP 1 STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 5 STEP 6 STEP 6 STEP 7 STEP 7 STEP 8 STEP 8 (last step) NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you. Adding a new nomination If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2 All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination". Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page. Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}} Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories. Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~. Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. Voting Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates: {{Support}} ( Support), {{Oppose}} ( Oppose), {{Neutral}} ( Neutral), {{Comment}} ( Comment), {{Info}} ( Info), {{Question}} ( Question), {{Request}} ( Request). You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include: No reason "I don't like it" and other empty assessments "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidates Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote: Text to use Displays as Meaning {{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture {{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore. This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote: Text to use Displays as Meaning {{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP. {{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement. If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include: Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader); A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page); Your reasons for nominating the image and your username. After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policy General rules The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5): Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum. Featuring and delisting rules A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions: Appropriate license (of course) At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations. The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be polite Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also To edit the list of nominations go to: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list For a chronological list, see Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological For an archive of previous nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished Basic list of photography-related terms Quality image candidates Valued image candidates Photo challenge Photography critiques Help:Scanning

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity). Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft
•  Info Saab MFI-15 Safari of the Yellow Sparrows display team, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Outstanding panning shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Bahrain
•  Info Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain. The archaeological site, also known as the “Fort of Bahrain”, was the capital of the Dilmun civilization and a place of consistent human settlement and occupation from c. 2300 BC to the present. A Portuguese fort stands today atop the site and it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2005. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
•  Info created by Lubomír Dajč – uploaded by Lubomír Dajč – nominated by Draceane
•  Info White stork (Ciconia ciconia) mating five ten to twelve, Nové Veselí, Czechia — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very eye-catching and pleasing composition, great capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 06:50:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
•  Info created by Максат79 - uploaded by Максат79 - nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment It's my first try to nominate image to FP, so I ask for help from experienced nominators If I made any mistakes. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 07:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• You did everything right, thank you for the nomination. About the picture: Great subject, the sky is a bit noisy which could be fixed. Unfortunately, there is a probable stitching error in the lower area that has created a blurred part (please see annotation). Suggested solution: Either contact the author and ask for help, or carry out extensive retouching on this file. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks a lot for your review. I'll try to contact the author. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 21:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 05:23:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hypericaceae
•  Info Ripe berries of a (Hypericum androsaemum) Focus stack of 23 photos.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
•  Info: the Ameca River, forming the natural border between the states of Jalisco and Nayarit, taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia
•  Info: a woman is waving at the departing Moskva-112 cruise ship at the confluence of the Om and Irtysh rivers in Omsk; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose I'm not seeing any big wow factor here, sorry. --Peulle (talk) 09:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
•  Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
•  Info created by The People's Internet - uploaded by The People's Internet Legacy Assets - nominated by User:The People's Internet -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Paris
•  Info Very high quality church interior with a special atmosphere. Note that the darkness of this church is correct for a photo taken at 5:47pm in October, I would not want it brightened because I think the twilight lighting conditions make it special. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Niiiicceee :) thank you Poco a poco (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Bangladesh
•  Info Yes I know that the quality of this image is a little flawed but I think it should be FP anyway because of the composition, colours, wonderful high-key and minimalist surroundings, and the fact that it is a lovely portrait of personal devotion and prayer. created by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - uploaded by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 20:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 09:34:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Egretta
•  Info One nice recent FP of a bird in non-breeding plumage. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Even though I know that there surely will be accusations of revenge voting, this is a matter of principle for me: as long as the categories aren't properly fixed, oppose. --A.Savin 15:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which categories should be fixed @A.Savin: ? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone else tell me what I need to do on categories please? The oppose vote could be inhibiting other voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't give a shit, right? Exactly same problem as back in Jan 2020 --A.Savin 12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have found one error. I created a new Category:Pelecaniformes of the Cook Islands and placed it Category:Pelecaniformes by country. I did not categorize it under Category:Birds of the Cook Islands. Naughty me. I have now done so. I do wonder why the category structure places the Cook Islands under New Zealand. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 21:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 02:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Sensitive, beautiful, and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 04:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 11:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 21:22:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)
•  Info Camel en route, Bidiyah, Oman. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry but for me this one is QI but not FP. The power lines and reflections in the shop windows are just too distracting, and you can't see enough of the camel - a photo from the side of the truck would be better than one from the back, although I have no idea what the background would have been like then. Cool photo but not featured material IMO Cmao20 (talk) 04:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  I withdraw my nomination Ok, never mind, I tried something else. Poco a poco (talk) 12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 20:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
•  Info created by Bwag – uploaded by Bwag – nominated by Draceane — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Big wow for me Cmao20 (talk) 04:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Beautiful veduta. – Aristeas (talk) 11:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support – The People's Internet (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 15:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)
•  Info Happy Halloween!
  Created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Really a huge bunch! But is the white balance correct? Kind of orange cast -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Beautiful Cmao20 (talk) 04:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Nice diverse texture. – Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
•  Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak oppose Great composition but I think the focus has been missed on the head Cmao20 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Class : Cephalopoda (will need a new subsection if promoted)
•  Info created by Edward Weston, uploaded and nominated by Yann
•  Support "One of the most famous photographs ever made" and "a benchmark of modernism in the history of photography", according to Nautilus. -- Yann (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Another famous work by Weston. A pity that the resolution is relatively low. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose This image could look much better from another photo angle, the best 90 °, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Karelj: This is a notable work by a notable photographer who died in 1958, so you cannot choose another angle. Yann (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yann: Anyway it is not good enough from my point of view. --Karelj (talk) 11:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support More than “good enough”. It’s a classic, and for a good reason. – Aristeas (talk) 11:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 08:41:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
•  Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Not sure this is the perfect crop but I definitely find this interesting and unusual enough for FP Cmao20 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I think the framing is good, the open door on the left and the pigeons flying up on the bottom right are part of the story and form a whole. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Interesting and kind image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --A.Savin 15:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Unusual, different from other nominations, nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Basile and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 02:07:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Clouds
•  Info 2 FPs of this island, but none on that day and none with these clouds.. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 09:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 17:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support This one is really impressive, I have to admit. Suitable for a whole wall as a photo wallpaper :) -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment The light is absolutely stunning but doesn't it need a perspective correction? Particularly when you look at the horizon on the left it looks like it's leaning to me. Cmao20 (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done I agree, Cmao20, because of the reflection that should be vertical. Thank you very much for your enthusiasm and constructive suggestion -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Thanks! Cmao20 (talk) 12:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Stunning. – Aristeas (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 12:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
•  Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose A truck, like here, or something is missing, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Resolution could be higher, but I like the scene. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• It's 24 megapixels, this seems pretty high to me Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Interesting landscape Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Agree with Basile, something is missing here, but I'd rather see the road vanishing in the far back Poco a poco (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 10:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
•  Info Taj Mahal and crowd of people to see magnificent Taj Mahal. created by Sdnphotoholic - uploaded by Sdnphotoholic - nominated by Sumit Surai -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support The resolution could be higher, but I love the composition, excellent framing --Kritzolina (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Off-centered, unfortunate crop of the towers, disturbing heads, frindge around the frame, and yes, far too low res. Poco a poco (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I do not generally like pictures where people are ahead of the main subject, but in this case they are clearly part of the composition. The viewer becomes part of that crowd. Effective choice of the silhouette effect. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose per Poco. BigDom (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose I don't get the reasons for the support here, honestly. I agree with all of Poco's criticisms. The building is of course amazing and the picture is fine but it isn't FP in either composiiton or quality, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose very off-centre – not even a QI to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose per others. --Yann (talk) 09:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 04:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Atmospheric street scene at night. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Lovely capture of the night scene. --Sumit Surai (talk) 11:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment Good, but I would crop most of the road. Please see note. Yann (talk) 11:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, Yann! I've uploaded a new version in 16×10 ratio. @Radomianin, Sumit Surai: hope this works for you! Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Support I would crop even more, but yes, definitely better. Yann (talk) 16:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Yann for the suggestion and Frank for the update. The new cropping has emphasized the striking impression of the photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is looking better. Sumit Surai (talk) 14:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support very low-key atmospheric. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Special mood. Agree the new framing is better with less road, but I would keep it as is now, because the reflection with gradient colors is great -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 04:04:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#India
•  Info The Tomb of Hazrat Salim Chishti, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, is a mausoleum. It enshrines the burial place of the Sufi saint Salim Chisti, a descendant of Baba Farid, who lived in a cavern on the ridge at Sikri. Considered one of the finest examples of Mughal architecture in India, the mausoleum was built during the years 1580 and 1581 by Akbar, along with the imperial complex at Fatehpur Sikri near Zenana Rauza. created by Sharvarism - uploaded by Sharvarism - nominated by Sumit Surai -- Sumit Surai (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Sumit Surai (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:28, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Great interplay of light and shadow. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 08:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Info I took the liberty of refining the gallery link: …/Interiors/…. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 10:50, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Really excellent Cmao20 (talk) 12:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:34, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support This is dreamlike and beauftiful. Great find, thanks for nominating it, Sumit! --Kritzolina (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --BigDom (talk) 01:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Crop is a bit tight at the top, and slightly too large at the left, in my view. But architecture and light are very nice -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I would make a horizontal perspective correction --Llez (talk) 15:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Radomianin and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Alaa :)..! 12:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 15:32:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Oman
•  Info Panoramic view of the Wadi Bani Khalid, Ash Sharqiyah Region, Oman. Wadi is an arabic word that stands for "river valley", of which there are very few in this arid country. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Definitely one that you have to view in full size. I thought the light was a bit grey at first but looking at it for longer, i really like the colours Cmao20 (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Well done panorama and the icing on the cake is a photographer who takes pictures :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 13:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
•  Info Theyyam is a ritual art form of Kerala. Live performance.

All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Harsh lights. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:15, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose poor lighting, poor framing, busy background; not even a QI, IMO. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 11:30:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco
•  Info Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Compared to your other recent FP I find this one less satisfying. The entrance itself is obviously a lot less eye-catching, but the main issue for me is that the half-pedestrian here gives the impression that she just wandered across your shot. To me, she is blocking our view of the subject, rather than being part of the composition like in the previous photo. BigDom (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose per BigDom. --Yann (talk) 09:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 09:40:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Science#Astronomy
•  Info created by Anonymous - uploaded by Sette-quattro - nominated by Sette-quattro -- Sette-quattro (talk) 09:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Info This is one of the best available scans of the Flammarion engraving, a wood engraving by an unknown artist that first appeared in Camille Flammarion's L'atmosphère: météorologie populaire (1888). The image depicts a man crawling under the edge of the sky, depicted as if it were a solid hemisphere, to look at the mysterious Empyrean beyond. The caption translates to "A medieval missionary tells that he has found the point where heaven and Earth meet..."
•  Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 09:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Notable work of art, good reproduction. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Felino Volador (talk) 04:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I have loved this picture since my childhood because it shows human curiosity (it was printed in an astronomy encyclopaedia). — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support as per Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support for the same reason as Draceane. – Aristeas (talk) 10:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 08:42:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Other portraits
•  Info created by Jodocus Hondius I, uploaded and nominated by Yann
•  Info Contemporary portrait of Sir Francis Drake, celebrating his circumnavigation of the world, engraved by Jodocus Hondius during his residency in London, and later finished by George Vertue in the early 18th century.
•  Support -- Yann (talk) 08:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 09:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Peulle (talk) 12:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Questionable personality, but without question a good and typical portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 10:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 21:20:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
•  Info Vines on the wine island near Sommerach. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 04:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 08:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Graphically appealing composition! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 10:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 19:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Radomianin and for the long shadows -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Party-poop oppose. No wow for me, with a drone such views are very easy to capture. Sorry --A.Savin 12:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 21:00:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
•  Info Carpenter working on a concrete formwork of a bridge. All by me Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 21:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:36, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 08:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Doesn't look safe to me, though Poco a poco (talk) 15:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Carpentry is not a harmless profession. The blue safety net can be seen at the bottom. He also works more upwards than forwards. The almost vertical angle makes it look more dangerous than it is.--Ermell (talk) 20:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    This is definitely not en:OSHA-compliant for those of us in the US, but occupational safety standards vary greatly by country and this is a worldwide project... Buidhe (talk) 03:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support As a bridge engineer: yes! — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 17:59:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support The columns and staircase create a well-composed, harmonious flow of lines. The turquoise steps appear almost painted, forming a sculptural contrast to the white columns. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 21:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Some denoising would help though. Poco a poco (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --BigDom (talk) 01:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Does anyone know what architectural style is this? --Gnosis (talk) 01:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• As described on the article page, it's the International Style. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support. This architecture is like music, it has rhythm -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Radomianin. Photographs of this style of architecture can appear a bit boring; this is an excellent example how to show its subdued beauty. – Aristeas (talk) 13:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 14:10:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Helicopters
•  Info British Army Westland WG-13 Lynx AH7 (ZX616) at RIAT 2024, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 14:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Julian H.^✈ 14:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 06:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:40, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --BigDom (talk) 01:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support High level of detail for a moving subject at a distance -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 13:22:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Morocco (section doesn't exist yet)
•  Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:22, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:22, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

Cmao20 (talk) 13:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment If you want to nominate these you will have to explicitly withdraw the previous two. You can't just open two new ones because the others don't look like they are going to pass. Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Cmao20 Done Thanks  Done Mounir Neddi (talk) 18:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose Composition doesn't work in my view, with the red roof at the bottom and the distracting foreground. Moreover, light and subject are not really impressive -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 13:16:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Morocco
•  Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose Not a QI, in my opinion. Like this one, the picture should pass COM:QIC first, before being nominated here. Perspective issue, DoF, noise, and blown highlights -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 21:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
•  Info created by Paramount Pictures - uploaded by WFinch - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment There seems to be a weird join in the middle of the poster. Is that accurate to the source material? Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's in the original Ezarateesteban 00:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment Please remove the white line at the left. Yann (talk) 08:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done thanks!!! --Ezarateesteban 13:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:52:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. I'm not sure if it also could fit into the FP gallery "Sculptures", as the Tetrahedron is somehow both – one and a tower. -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: This is a renomination. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Great motif and good light Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:27, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose per Ikan Kekek and Daniel Case here. And it should be mentioned somewhere that it is the third nomination of this structure after this one and that one -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be complete at this point: One nomination did not reach the necessary total number of votes and the other was a different version of this picture, whose nomination I had withdrawn after less than a day. Without going any further into the discussion here, I should have included the reference above (as I subsequently did) when I nominated it. I didn't have in mind at the time that the photo had already been here before. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no strict rule about it but it is generally the case that we don't renominate a picture that has failed unless significant improvements have been made to it since the previous nomination. My support still stands in this case, but it isn't normally something we would do. Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, see this case for example, a few days ago -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't have in mind that the structure had already been nominated twice? It's surprising. Anyway, too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The brief nomination that I withdrew after less than a day and the subsequent one felt like a single attempt to me and this was over a year ago – and quite a lot has happened since then. So yes, it simply slipped my mind. There's no reason to be surprised by that. It was pointed out, the reference was added, and that should suffice. As for the image, I understand that it might indeed appear a bit too dark. Whilst it can always change, at the moment it's just right for me, whether it's enough for an excellence rating or not. I appreciate your perspective and the time you've taken to review it. -- A. Öztas 16:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to discuss here. "Brief nomination" but still three oppose, one question and one comment during this short time. Thus quite a logical withdrawal, in my opinion. We can of course AGF, but reciprocally, we, reviewers, remember that the two similar nominations failed not so long ago, for assumed fair reasons. As Ikan Kekek rightly said in a similar case "Not voting also counts as a lack of interest". Usually, it is obvious to the nominators that a photo has already been nominated, because they need to add "/2" at the end of the file name to create a new FPC, but here the file page has been renamed twice recently. With still no metadata. Of course, since the voters are not always the same at FPC every month, it can happen that a picture which failed the first time is finally promoted by insisting. But you should also understand, as you wrote after the first nomination "I will nominate the original as FP with the reasonable assumption that it will be rejected anyway", that the picture will struggle to pass, even though several of us reiterate their efforts to evaluate again. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss about what? After the first answer from you and me, everything was already said, or am I wrong? Of course, we are welcome to deepen the discussion, precisely because it is a topic that affects many aspects of the FP nomination processes and often offers room for different perspectives. In this context, I would like to address a few points that touch on both the past of previous nominations and the general guidelines for repeat submissions. As I mentioned, the first nomination was over a year ago. This distance in the time frame plays a role in my opinion, as it makes it clear that I did not submit the nomination of the structure out of a constant repetition so that it would, as you wrote, "finally be promoted by insisting". The motivation lies more in the fact that I continued to reflect on the image over time and adapted my own view of it. As a photographer, I often experience such processes; a certain development of my own view of the image. Photography, after all, is a medium through which we capture not just what we see, but what we feel at a given moment. And as those feelings evolve, so too can our interpretations of our own work. This growth is natural and, I believe, valuable to the community's understanding of a work as it evolves through the eyes of its creator. At the same time, I understand that for reviewers like you and others who regularly participate in the discussions, there is a certain habit and reminder value when similar or identical images are up for discussion again. What this has to do with AGF here is beyond me. I'm not as familiar with the practice in this area, I'm only on my fourth photo here. I see your references to a previous nomination as a helpful addition and not a criticism per se. The process of weighing up between a possible repetition and the search for new qualities in an image is essential and is shown in the current case by the different feedback and views. I would also like to note that my decision to quickly withdraw the previous nomination should not be understood as an endorsement of a "logical withdrawal". There were several factors at the time, including personal considerations, that led me to withdraw the nomination. It is true that this first nomination was - albeit briefly - on the table and led to reactions, but the circumstances were more complex than they appear at first glance. In my opinion, such a withdrawal should not be seen as a weakening factor for the quality of the picture itself, but as part of the individual process that each artist has to deal with. Furthermore, I would suggest having a broader discussion about the weighting of nominations that have already failed. Of course, there is no doubt that a clear majority should decide the relevance and quality of an image, but there may be cases where an image changes its relevance and quality over time. This could be due to technical improvements, a change in the community's perspective or simply time showing the work in a new light. Such an approach may well make sense for some FPC nominations, particularly for those images that have failed in the past but could potentially find new appreciation. After all, everything and nothing is set in stone here. With regard to the question about the brightness of the image, I agree that this is a subjective judgement and certainly open to discussion. The incidence of light and the colour scheme reflect the mood that I wanted to capture when taking the photograph and are not just technical parameters for me, but part of the aesthetic that I want to convey. Of course, the comment that the image may be perceived as too dark is justified and a question of personal taste - however, it is precisely this difference between subjective perception and objective quality that often leads to divergent assessments. Light plays a powerful role in shaping the emotional resonance of an image, influencing how viewers perceive and connect with it on a deeper level. By intentionally choosing a darker, more subdued lighting, I aimed to create an atmosphere that goes beyond a straightforward representation of the structure itself. This darkness, though perhaps unconventional, allows subtle textures and contrasts to emerge, lending the image a mysterious quality that invites viewers to look closer and consider the piece in a contemplative way. The interplay between shadows and faint highlights, in my view, captures a sense of introspection and draws attention to the sculptural lines of the structure. While brighter lighting may provide more clarity or detail, this more moody approach aligns with the feeling I experienced when taking the photograph, reflecting a quieter, almost meditative atmosphere. Shadows add depth and a sense of timelessness to the scene, suggesting that the image captures not just a single moment but a feeling that could exist outside of time. This play of light and shadow is a deliberate choice, one intended to evoke curiosity and to invite viewers into the scene, allowing them to experience the piece not merely as an architectural object but as a structure with an almost enigmatic presence. At least that's how I feel about this one. In the end, I understand that every image will resonate differently with each person who views it, and I fully respect the diverse perspectives within this community. The beauty of these discussions lies in their ability to reveal new interpretations and insights, both for the artist and for those who critique the work. I look forward to read more of your perspectives in other discussions as well, as these exchanges are invaluable not only for our individual growth but also for enriching the shared vision of what we seek to highlight here. -- A. Öztas 05:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invaluable also is novelty :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose per above, sorry --A.Savin 08:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Per Basile Poco a poco (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 11:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Per others.--Ermell (talk) 10:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 09:57:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Galicia (section doesn't exist yet)
•  Info all by me -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment I realise this may have been unavoidable, but the out of focus rocks in the foreground bother me a little, especially because they are not symmetrical. Cmao20 (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 08:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 20:42:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
•  Info A New Zealand endemic. Both males and females have two distinctive white throat tufts which often appear to be just one tuft. No FPs. of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Crown is blurry. White feathers near neck overexposed. --Tagooty (talk) 04:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I don't think it's overexposed. I'm not a big fan of reducing bright white highlights so that they are a dull grey. There is a tiny bit of colour fringing around that area that you could work on but really a very minor point. Cmao20 (talk) 10:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak oppose I agree with Tagooty Poco a poco (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Great composition Henrysz (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Per Tagooty. - Karelj (talk) 15:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Cmao20. Beautiful composition and colours, excellent posture and background. – Aristeas (talk) 13:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:37:46

•  Info - Reason to delist and replaceː Last year I took some photos in this very dark abbey from the year 1000 located in Assisi, but in the past I had no idea how to stitch two pictures into one. Only recently have I been able to propose what I really had in mind: to see great part of the austere medieval internal apse of the Abbey of St. Peter (Assisi, Italy). (Original nomination)
•  Delist and replace -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delist and replace Really better. --Yann (talk) 09:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delist and replace –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delist and replace --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delist and replace --GRDN711 (talk) 05:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delist and replace --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delist and replace per Yann. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:54:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
•  Info created by George Grantham Bain - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 03:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support The informtion on this image should note that this is an image of James Keir Hardie (15 August 1856 – 26 September 1915), a Scottish trade unionist and politician, taken in 1909 by the photographer, George Grantham Bain. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @GRDN711: I added a little more information about Hardie (and linked to his Wikipedia page for any further info), but other than a description of him, I'm not sure what of that isn't in the file description page. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support No obvious artifacts from the cloned-out text. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 08:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:44:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco (section doesn't exist yet)
•  Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose The subject doesn' really stand out, I'd have probably cropp a chunk at the bottom. Pretty but I don't consider that architecture extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak oppose Nice weather but according to the shadows of the bushes at the right, and my overall impression, the orientation of the light was not so cooperative, like a bit dull or hazy. Also the bottom-up viewpoint is highlighting a lot of the foreground with shadowy sides and not so much of the buildings. The houses at the right are in the shadow, hard to distinguish. I think another viewpoint, more from the left, and perhaps also higher in altitude, would have improved content enhancement -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose As per Poco a Poco. --Fernando (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak oppose per Basile Morin –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support The so called "foreground" is what this image is about - for me this is an excellent documentation of an agricultural method for arid climates. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Kritzolina. – Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Algeria (section doesn't exist yet)
•  Info The ceiling adornment at the Emir Abdelkader Mosque (built in 1994). It's the second-largest mosque in Algeria. Created by Dan Sloan - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very cool, although I wish it was more perfectly centered. Cmao20 (talk) 13:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak support Indeed really cool, quality degrades a bit towards the borders, but all in all very impressive. I took the liberty to change the gallery link to our special gallery for ceilings of religious buildings. I will add a section for Algeria there if this nomination succeeds. – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Strong oppose Below the quality bar I'd expect for FP and the bottom crop is unfortunate causing also a lack of symmertry. If the subject would be complete I'd have gone for a square crop Poco a poco (talk) 17:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 22:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment A tripod would have helped, here. Unfortunately, a hand shot with high ISO and low depth of field impacts the quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Per Poco a poco. If you don't have a tripod at hand, simply place the camera on the floor, select ISO100 and a medium aperture. Je-str (talk) 11:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak support crop sucks but this will do. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak oppose In addition to the technical problems caused by the absence of tripod, the viewpoint was not in the center. As a consequence, the circles are not concentric. And the crop is tighter at the bottom than at the top, making the composition unbalanced -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support At least crop sides - shadow part. It could be better, but tripod in Mosque, normally not possible. Even camera-photo can be problem. --Mile (talk) 11:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• No need for a tripod to a get a HQ shot from a ceiling. I have done it so many times... I'm surprised and disappointed by the support this image is getting. The camera was off-centered, so that the arches on left and right are not symmetrical at all, the cop is a mess and the quality low. Poco a poco (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Weak oppose In the top left corner (please see annotation) there is a yellow coloration on the white surface, which indicates a subsequent coloring within a poorly made selection. However, this is only an assumption. Also, the saturation of the image seems too high to me. I would also suggest a square crop in favor of a more balanced composition. Also, I have to partially agree with the opponents above that the FP standard for church interiors is higher than this one. Nevertheless, the subject is great, and with careful reworking it would have a chance of becoming FP. I am very sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Addendum: If you look at the original version, you can see a more natural coloring. Another indication of subsequent editing, which in my opinion was not done carefully enough. I would like to ask the nominator/editor to place a retouching template with the done work on the file page. Many thanks in advance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi, feel free to edit the image and add the template. I have done my best to ensure that the picture aligns with the FP standards. Riad Salih (talk) 21:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for your reply, Riad Salih. I am sure you have done your best to meet the FP standard. For this, the community thanks you, because every volunteer is needed to keep this project alive. And your work is just as valuable as that of any other volunteer. But participation in this forum thrives on constructive criticism that helps the volunteers maintain the professional standards of the FP project. I too have evolved over the past few years by trying to accept criticism and develop my skills. My suggestion was only meant as an advice to provide with the template the necessary transparency on the file page. If my criticism was perceived as disrespectful, I sincerely apologize. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
•  Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment Nice compo but unsharp. Probably f/11 is a bit to much for 1 inch. --Mile (talk) 09:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak support I agree with Mile, but the composition is great Cmao20 (talk) 10:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Better sharpness. Gzen92 (talk) 12:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 12:20:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_sports
•  Info Human running gait - terminal swing to heel strike (runner with Asics Metaspeed Edge "Paris"; 2024 Ljubljana Marathon). My shot. --Mile (talk) 12:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Info 2 I had luck with this shot. Showing running gait: runner going from terminal swing to heel strike. Hard part was to get at this focal, right angle in perfect background-foreground, fluorescent colors of (new ?!) footwear. Actually croped OOC, AdobeRGB (⇔ Uncalibrated). Good Educational value.
•  Support --Mile (talk) 12:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment
  • Is the picture free of any copyright issue concerning the Asics logo on the shoes?
  • What gender and what age is the runner? I think you should include these kind of details in the file description. -- Wikisquack (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment Male, but those Asics are Unisex. De minimis and its logo on 3D, shoes. Gender and runner, perhaps for winner, here is about tehnic. --Mile (talk) 09:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Good focus, colour/brightness contrast etc. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose I rarely oppose, but I don't want FPC to become QIC. This image is technically well made, nothing to complain here, but it does not give me any kind of wow. --Granada (talk) 14:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment @Granada I wanted to write at Info, actually what friend asked me "How many tries did i have ?", he is profesional, i told 1/100, with new shoes 1/500. With Zuiko 50-200 mm + adapter, Single Focus maybe even less. Try it. Your sport shot are more by sharp angle, thats is easy shot. This angle is "worst" for photographer. That is big Wow for me...and obviously some profesionals too. --Mile (talk) 10:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You're absolutely right, I take it the easy way. That's the reason I never get shots with a wow and never nominate at FPC. Granada (talk) 14:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Unusual, and the short being black, like the background, makes the legs popping up within the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Per Granada, just two legs... -- Karelj (talk) 11:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 11:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
•  Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Too small, level of detail not the best, the paintings here are not so interesting like in the last candidate. Poco a poco (talk) 17:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Light, contrasts and drawings were better here in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 10:38:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
•  Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by TAPAN1412 -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mon 28 Oct → Sat 02 Nov
Tue 29 Oct → Sun 03 Nov
Wed 30 Oct → Mon 04 Nov
Thu 31 Oct → Tue 05 Nov
Fri 01 Nov → Wed 06 Nov
Sat 02 Nov → Thu 07 Nov

Thu 24 Oct → Sat 02 Nov
Fri 25 Oct → Sun 03 Nov
Sat 26 Oct → Mon 04 Nov
Sun 27 Oct → Tue 05 Nov
Mon 28 Oct → Wed 06 Nov
Tue 29 Oct → Thu 07 Nov
Wed 30 Oct → Fri 08 Nov
Thu 31 Oct → Sat 09 Nov
Fri 01 Nov → Sun 10 Nov
Sat 02 Nov → Mon 11 Nov

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Any experienced user may close requests.

1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
   Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
   featured or not featured
   For example:
   === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
   becomes
   === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
3. Save your edit.
4. If it is featured:
   • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
   • Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
   • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
     • If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
     • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
   • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
     • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
     • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
   • Add == FP promotion ==
     {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
   {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
   Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
   Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
   '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
   (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
   delisted or not delisted
   For example:
   === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024.
4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
   1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
   2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
   3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
   In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}

2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
   not featured
   For example:
   === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
   becomes
   === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
3. Save your edit.
4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
   {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
   Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.