Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia San Juan Kaneo, Ohrid, Macedonia del Norte, 2014-04-17, DD 22.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2014 at 12:35:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia San Juan Kaneo, Ohrid, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 22.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia San Juan Kaneo, Ohrid, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 22.JPG

•  Info The Macedonian Orthodox church of Saint John at Kaneo, located on the cliff over the Kaneo Beach at the Ohrid Lake nearby the city of Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia, is a pilgrimage iman in country. The age of the cruciform-shaped temple is uncertain but it was probably erected in the middle of the 14th century. All by me, Poco² 12:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco² 12:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Despite an interesting motive (the church), neither the composition or light brings any wow. QI but not FP imo.--ArildV (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  I have uploaded a new version following an advice of Kadellar. Thanks Carlos! Poco² 16:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The new version is better.--ArildV (talk) 16:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:19, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --DXR (talk) 16:44, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Caecilius Mauß (talk) 19:30, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Would love to see this on a clear sunny day. Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Joydeep _Talk 10:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Graphium 02:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Cancelled my support vote above after new version and  Oppose now because 1)Would have been better and more "wow" if full scenery is shown like in earlier version; just correct the tilt 2) Partly cloudy day became a cloudy day. Not a reflection of the reality --Graphium 11:55, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  I haven't understood your logic. The version that you supported and now opposed was uploaded 2 days before your supporting vote and didn't change since then. Poco² 14:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• @Poco a poco: I noticed the discussion over the new version just a few hours ago, and this brought my attention to the original version. My sincere apologies if this may have been a little unfair to you. Regards --Graphium 15:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• @Graphium: Well, whatever, no problem with that. To your comments: I see no tilt (I take the water see level as reference and it is pretty horizontal), and regarding the "transformation" of partly cloudy to cloudy, I guess that this is mainly due to the fact that in order to draw more attention to the church I cropped the sky and had to get rid of the blue part of it. Poco² 18:43, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• @Poco a poco: Tilt: I don't see any, but just responding to your "tilt" correction in the second version. Transformation: Did you adjust the exposure? The third version is darker than the previous two, hence my reason. --Graphium 02:34, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support .--M49314 (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose -- Sorry Poco a Poco but I find the composition unbalanced owing to the imposing and less interesting foreground. Image quality (detail, sharpness) is not on the excellent side either. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:54, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose The foreground is too bright (I'd say overexposed) in comparison to the subject. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 09:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  @Julian Herzog: If that was the main reason for your oppose, it believe that is  corrected now. Poco² 10:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose sorry Poco, but the uninteresting large foreground destroys the nice view. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]