Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences. (2019). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
In: IZA Discussion Papers.
RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12494.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 13

Citations received by this document

Cites: 40

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Gender Differences in Peer Recognition by Economists. (2022). Iriberri, Nagore ; Funk, Patricia ; DellaVigna, Stefano ; Della Vigna, Stefano ; Card, David.
    In: Econometrica.
    RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:90:y:2022:i:5:p:1937-1971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Gender Differences in Reference Letters: Evidence from the Economics Job Market. (2022). Rueda, Valeria ; Facchini, Giovanni ; Eberhardt, Markus.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15055.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Innovative ideas and gender inequality. (2021). Koffi, Marlene.
    In: CLEF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:clefwp:35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Family Ties, Geographic Mobility and the Gender Gap in Academic Aspirations. (2021). Farre, Lidia ; Ortega, Francesc.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14561.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Gender differences in the academic career of economics in Brazil. (2021). Borges, Bruna ; Narita, Renata ; Montoya, Maria Dolores ; Matsunaga, Liz ; Fabiana, Paula Pereda.
    In: Revista Cuadernos de Economía.
    RePEc:col:000093:020188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Remote talks: changes to economics seminars during Covid-19. (2021). Biermann, Marcus .
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1759.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Testing the Presence of Implicit Hiring Quotas with Application to German Universities. (2021). Janys, Lena.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2109.14343.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Does Economics Make You Sexist?. (2020). Paserman, M. Daniele ; Pino, Francisco ; Paredes, Valentina A.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27070.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Women in Economics: A UK Perspective. (2020). Sevilla, Almudena ; Gamage, Danula K ; Smith, Sarah.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13477.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Does Economics Make You Sexist?. (2020). Pino, Francisco J ; Paserman, Daniele M ; Paredes, Valentina.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13223.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Does Economics Make You Sexist. (2020). Pino, Francisco ; Paserman, M. Daniele ; Paredes, Valentina A.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:14723.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Gender Gaps and the Role of Bosses. (2020). Holub, Felix ; Drechsel-Grau, Moritz.
    In: CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2020_237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Who presents and where? An analysis of research seminars in US economics departments. (2020). Minondo, Asier.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2001.10561.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abrevaya, J. and D. S. Hamermesh (2012). Charity and favoritism in the field: Are female economists nicer (to each other)? Review of Economics and Statistics 94(1), 202–207.

  2. American Economic Association (2019). AEA professional climate survey: Main findings. The American Economic Association (AEA), available at: https://www.aeaweb.org/resources/memberdocs /climate-survey-results-mar-18-2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. Bagues, M. and B. Esteve-Volart (2010). Can gender parity break the glass ceiling? Evidence from a repeated randomized experiment. The Review of Economic Studies 77(4), 1301–1328.

  4. Bagues, M. and P. Campa (2017). Can gender quotas in candidate lists empower women? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. CEPR Discussion Paper 12149.

  5. Bagues, M., M. Sylos-Labini, and N. Zinovyeva (2017). Does the gender composition of scientific committees matter? American Economic Review 107(4), 1207–38.

  6. Bertrand, M. (2013). Career, family, and the well-being of college-educated women. American Economic Review 103(3), 244–50.

  7. Bertrand, M., S. E. Black, S. Jensen, and A. Lleras-Muney (2018). Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labour market outcomes in Norway. The Review of Economic Studies 86(1), 191–239.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Blackaby, D., A. L. Booth, and J. Frank (2005). Outside offers and the gender pay gap: Empirical evidence from the UK academic labour market. The Economic Journal 115(501), F81–F107.

  9. Blank, R. M. (1991). The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the American Economic Review. American Economic Review, 1041–1067.

  10. Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics 145, 27–41.

  11. Boschini, A. and A. Sjögren (2007). Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns. Journal of Labor Economics 25(2), 325–365.

  12. Broder, I. E. (1993). Review of NSF economics proposals: Gender and institutional patterns. American Economic Review 83(4), 964–970.

  13. Buser, T., M. Niederle, and H. Oosterbeek (2014). Gender, competitiveness, and career choices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129(3), 1409–1447.

  14. Card, D., S. DellaVigna, P. Funk, and N. Iriberri (2018). Are referees and editors in economics gender neutral? Unpublished Manuscript.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Ceci, S. J., D. K. Ginther, S. Kahn, and W. M. Williams (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 15(3), 75–141.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Chari, A. and P. Goldsmith-Pinkham (2018). Gender representation in economics across topics and time: Evidence from the NBER Summer Institute. NBER Working Paper No. 23953.

  17. Combes, P.-P., L. Linnemer, and M. Visser (2008). Publish or peer-rich? The role of skills and networks in hiring economics professors. Labour Economics 15(3), 423–441.

  18. Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession (2017). Annual report. The American Economic Association (AEA), available at: https://www.aeaweb.org/content/file?id=6388.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. De Paola, M. and V. Scoppa (2015). Gender discrimination and evaluators gender: Evidence from Italian academia. Economica 82(325), 162–188.

  20. Dolado, J. J., F. Felgueroso, and M. Almunia (2012). Are men and women-economists evenly distributed across research fields? Some new empirical evidence. SERIEs 3(3), 367–393.

  21. Ductor, L., S. Goyal, and A. Prummer (2018). Gender and collaboration. Working Paper, School of Economics and Finance, Queen Mary University of London.

  22. Durante, R., G. Labartino, and R. Perotti (2011). Academic dynasties: decentralization and familism in the Italian academia. NBER WP 17572.

  23. Goldin, C. and C. Rouse (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review 90(4), 715–741.

  24. Hengel, E. (2018). Publishing while female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. Unpublished Manuscript.

  25. Hilmer, C. and M. Hilmer (2007). Women helping women, men helping women? Same-gender mentoring, initial job placements, and early career publishing success for economics PhDs. American Economic Review 97(2), 422–426.

  26. Krawczyk, M. and M. Smyk (2016). Author’s gender affects rating of academic articles: Evidence from an incentivized, deception-free laboratory experiment. European Economic Review 90, 326– 335.

  27. Lee, C. J., C. R. Sugimoto, G. Zhang, and B. Cronin (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(1), 2–17.

  28. Lundberg, S. and J. Stearns (2019). Women in economics: Stalled progress. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33(1), 3–22.

  29. Mengel, F., J. Sauermann, and U. Zölitz (2018). Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association 17(2), 535–566.

  30. Niederle, M. and L. Vesterlund (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(3), 1067–1101.

  31. Perotti, R. (2002). The Italian university system: rules vs. incentives. In first conference on Monitoring Italy, ISAE, Rome.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Price, J. and J. Wolfers (2010). Racial discrimination among NBA referees. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(4), 1859–1887.

  33. Sandström, U. and M. Hällsten (2007). Persistent nepotism in peer-review. Scientometrics 74(2), 175– 189.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Sarsons, H. (2017). Recognition for group work: Gender differences in academia. AEA Papers and Proceedings 107(5), 141–45.

  35. Shayo, M. and A. Zussman (2011). Judicial ingroup bias in the shadow of terrorism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(3), 1447–1484.

  36. Tang, C., K. Ross, N. Saxena, and R. Chen (2011). What’s in a name: A study of names, gender inference, and gender behavior in Facebook. In International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, pp. 344–356. Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Van der Lee, R. and N. Ellemers (2015). Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(40), 12349–12353.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. We can observe regular versus job-market submissions for years 2013 to 2017. In these years, 39% of submissions were job-market. Some job-market papers may be co-authored, but this is not frequent. In our job-market subsample, 79% of papers are single-authored, compared with 46% in the rest of the sample. In particular, if the gap is driven by stereotypes, it is not clear why there is no gap in job-market sessions. Similarly, if the gap is driven by some heterogeneity in unobserved aspects of papers, it is not clear why such heterogeneity is not present (or not valued by referees) in job-market sessions.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Wennerds, C. and A. Wold (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature 387.

  40. Zinovyeva, N. and M. Bagues (2015). The role of connections in academic promotions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 7(2), 264–92.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Male Gatekeepers: Gender Bias in the Publishing Process?. (2022). Kvasnicka, Michael ; Bransch, Felix.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:202:y:2022:i:c:p:714-732.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Innovative ideas and gender inequality. (2021). Koffi, Marlene.
    In: CLEF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:clefwp:35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Women in research in economics in Uruguay. (2021). Moraes, María Inés ; Bucheli, Marisa ; AMARANTE, VERONICA ; Perez, Tatiana.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ulr:wpaper:dt-01-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Women in Research in Economics in Uruguay. (2021). AMARANTE, VERONICA ; Perez, Tatiana ; Moraes, Ines ; Bucheli, Marisa.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ude:wpaper:0221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Scapegoating in evaluation decisions. (2021). Zussman, Asaf.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:186:y:2021:i:c:p:152-163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Gender differences in the academic career of economics in Brazil. (2021). Borges, Bruna ; Narita, Renata ; Montoya, Maria Dolores ; Matsunaga, Liz ; Fabiana, Paula Pereda.
    In: Revista Cuadernos de Economía.
    RePEc:col:000093:020188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Women in Research in Economics in Uruguay. (2021). Perez, Tatiana ; Moraes, Maria Ines ; Bucheli, Marisa ; Amarante, Veronica.
    In: Revista Cuadernos de Economía.
    RePEc:col:000093:020186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences. (2021). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics.
    RePEc:bla:obuest:v:83:y:2021:i:3:p:590-618.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Are women less persistent? Evidence from submissions to a nationwide meeting of Economics. (2020). Matsunaga, Diaz ; Pereda, Paula.
    In: Working Papers, Department of Economics.
    RePEc:spa:wpaper:2020wpecon19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?. (2019). Iriberri, Nagore ; Funk, Patricia ; DellaVigna, Stefano ; Card, David.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Variation in Women’s Success Across PhD Programs in Economics. (2019). Langan, Andrew ; Boustan, Leah.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences. (2019). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12494.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?. (2019). Iriberri, Nagore ; Funk, Patricia ; Dellavigna, Stefano ; Della Vigna, Stefano ; Card, David.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13789.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Gender gaps in the evaluation of research: evidence from submissions to economics conferences. (2019). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bde:wpaper:1918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?. (2018). Deschamps, Pierre.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7bucmgmilh9ul9ogmiku5legh5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?. (2018). Deschamps, Pierre.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03393117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?. (2018). Deschamps, Pierre.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03393117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations. (2018). Zölitz, Ulf ; Sauermann, Jan ; Zolitz, Ulf ; Mengel, Friederike.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Gender bias in teaching evaluations. (2017). Zölitz, Ulf ; Sauermann, Jan ; Mengel, Friederike ; Zolitz, Ulf Zoelitz.
    In: ROA Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umaror:2017007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Promotions and Earnings – Gender or Merit? Evidence from Longitudinal Personnel Data. (2017). Pehkonen, Jaakko ; Jokinen, Juho.
    In: Journal of Labor Research.
    RePEc:spr:jlabre:v:38:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s12122-017-9254-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Gender quotas or girls networks? Towards an understanding of recruitment in the research profession in Italy. (2017). Cicognani, Simona ; Checchi, Daniele ; Kulic, Nevena .
    In: Working Paper series.
    RePEc:rim:rimwps:17-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Male Gatekeepers Gender Bias in the Publishing Process?. (2017). Kvasnicka, Michael ; Bransch, Felix.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11089.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations. (2017). Zölitz, Ulf ; Sauermann, Jan ; Mengel, Friederike ; Zolitz, Ulf.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11000.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Tourism’s lost leaders: Analysing gender and performance. (2017). Pritchard, Annette ; Morgan, Nigel.
    In: Annals of Tourism Research.
    RePEc:eee:anture:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:34-47.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Publishing while Female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review.. (2017). Hengel, Erin.
    In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cam:camdae:1753.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?. (2017). Zinovyeva, Natalia ; Sylos-Labini, Mauro ; Bagues, Manuel.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:107:y:2017:i:4:p:1207-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Field Experiments on Discrimination. (2016). Duflo, Esther ; Bertrand, Marianne.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2016). Do, Quoc-Anh ; Tran, Anh ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Field Experiments on Discrimination. (2016). Bertrand, Marianne ; Duflo, Esther.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2016). Do, Quoc-Anh ; Tran, Anh N ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1409.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Age, Cohort and Co-Authorship. (2015). Hamermesh, Daniel.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:20938.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?. (2015). Zinovyeva, Natalia ; Sylos-Labini, Mauro ; Bagues, Manuel.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Age, Cohort and Co-Authorship. (2015). Hamermesh, Daniel.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8828.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination. (2015). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Gender quotas or girls networks? Towards an understanding of recruitment in the research profession in Italy. (2015). Cicognani, Simona ; Checchi, Daniele ; Kulic, Nevena .
    In: FBK-IRVAPP Working Papers.
    RePEc:fbk:wpaper:2015-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Gender quotas or girls’ networks? Towards an understanding of recruitment in the research profession in Italy. (2015). Cicognani, Simona ; Checchi, Daniele ; Kulic, N.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bol:bodewp:wp1047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Do gender quotas pass the test ? Evidence from academic evaluations in Italy. (2014). Zinovyeva, Natalia ; Sylos-Labini, Mauro ; Bagues, Manuel.
    In: LEM Papers Series.
    RePEc:ssa:lemwps:2014/14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Endophilia or exophobia: beyond discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan ; Feld J. F., ; Salamanca Acosta N., ; Hamermesh D., .
    In: ROA Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umaror:2013008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Endophilia or exophobia: beyond discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan ; Feld J. F., ; Salamanca Acosta N., ; Hamermesh D., .
    In: Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umagsb:2013026.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2013). Do, Quoc-Anh ; Tran, Anh N. ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6ggbvnr6munghes9ocpp7f52o.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2013). Tran, Anh N. ; Do, Quoc-Anh ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/6ggbvnr6munghes9ocpp7f52o.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19471.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2013). Tran, Anh ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang ; Do, Quoc-Anh.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03460977.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. How well do urban growth boundaries contain development? Results for Oregon using a difference-in-difference estimator. (2013). Plantinga, Andrew J. ; Dempsey, Judith A..
    In: Regional Science and Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:regeco:v:43:y:2013:i:6:p:996-1007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Gender complementarities in the labor market. (2013). Pellizzari, Michele ; Paccagnella, Marco ; De Giorgi, Giacomo ; DeGiorgi, Giacomo .
    In: Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers).
    RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_183_13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-26 23:48:56 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.