Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
Gatekeepers of science—Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications. (2007). Bornmann, Lutz ; Daniel, Hans-Dieter.
In: Journal of Informetrics.
RePEc:eee:infome:v:1:y:2007:i:1:p:83-91.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 9

Citations received by this document

Cites: 34

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Language and socioeconomics predict geographic variation in peer review outcomes at an ecology journal. (2017). Fox, Charles W ; Burns, Sean C.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:113:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2517-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Improving the Peer review process: Capturing more information and enabling high-risk/high-return research. (2016). Linton, Jonathan D.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:9:p:1936-1938.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Understanding the selection processes of public research projects in agriculture: The role of scientific merit. (2015). Pascucci, Stefano ; Materia, Valentina Cristiana ; Kolympiris, C.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:56:y:2015:i:c:p:87-99.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Bias in peer review. (2013). Cronin, Blaise ; Zhang, Guo ; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. ; Lee, Carole J..
    In: Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology.
    RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:64:y:2013:i:1:p:2-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices. (2012). Alberti, Corinne ; Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle ; Gottot, Serge ; Tubach, Florence ; Amiel, Philippe ; Perrey, Christophe ; Abdoul, Hendy.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0046054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure. (2012). Gandelli, Claudio ; Squazzoni, Flaminio.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:265-275.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study. (2008). Bornmann, Lutz ; Daniel, Hans-Dieter ; Mutz, Rudiger.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:4:p:280-287.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review. (2008). Bornmann, Lutz ; Daniel, Hans-Dieter ; Mutz, Rudiger.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:3:p:217-228.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review. (2007). Bornmann, Lutz ; Mutz, Ruediger ; Daniel, Hans-Dieter.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:73:y:2007:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-006-1797-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Ball, P. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. 2005 Nature. 436 900-

  2. Bornmann, L. ; Daniel, H.-D. Committee peer review at an international research foundation: Predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications. 2005 Research Evaluation. 14 15-20

  3. Bornmann, L. ; Daniel, H.-D. Criteria used by a peer review committee for selection of research fellows—A boolean probit analysis. 2005 International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 13 296-303
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bornmann, L. ; Daniel, H.-D. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?. 2005 Scientometrics. 65 391-392

  5. Bornmann, L. ; Daniel, H.-D. Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review—A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants. 2006 Scientometrics. 68 427-440

  6. Bornmann, L. ; Daniel, H.-D. Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Analysis of reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees’ decisions. 2005 Scientometrics. 63 297-320

  7. Chapman, G.B. ; McCauley, C. Predictive validity of quality ratings of National Science Foundation graduate fellows. 1994 Educational and Psychological Measurement. 54 428-438
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Cole, J.R. ; Cole, S. Peer review in the National Science Foundation. Phase two of a study. 1981 National Academic Press: Washington, DC, USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Cole, S. Making science. Between nature and society. 1992 Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Cole, S. ; Fiorentine, R. Discrimination against women in science: The confusion of outcome with process. 1991 En : Zuckerman, H. ; Cole, J.R. ; Bruer, J.T. The outer circle. Women in the scientific community. W.W. Norton & Company: London, UK
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Fröhlich, H. It all depends on the individuals. Research promotion—A balanced system of control. 2001 B.I.F. Futura. 16 69-77
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Fröhlich, H. Pillars of wisdom—Interaction between trustees and reviewers. 2004 B.I.F. Futura. 19 227-228
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Hirsch, J.E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. 2005 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 102 16569-16572
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Jayasinghe, U.W. Peer review in the assessment and funding of research by the Australian Research Council. 2003 University of Western Sydney: Greater Western Sydney, Australia
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Jayasinghe, U.W. ; Marsh, H.W. ; Bond, N. Peer review in the funding of research in higher education: The Australian experience. 2001 Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 23 343-346
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Kliewer, M.A. ; Freed, K.S. ; DeLong, D.M. ; Pickhardt, P.J. ; Provenzale, J.M. Reviewing the reviewers: Comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology. 2005 American Journal of Roentgenology. 184 1731-1735
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Kruskal, W.H. ; Wallis, W.A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. 1952 Journal of the American Statistical Association. 47 583-621
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Lock, S. A difficult balance: Editorial peer review in medicine. 1985 ISI Press: Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Long, J.S. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. 1997 Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Long, J.S. ; Freese, J. . 2006 Stata Press, Stata Corporation: College Station, TX, USA

  21. Mander, A. ; Clayton, D. Hotdeck imputation. 1999 Stata Technical Bulletin. 51 16-18

  22. Moed, H.F. Citation analysis in research evaluation. 2005 Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Opthof, T. ; Coronel, R. ; Janse, M.J. The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: Priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias. 2002 Cardiovascular Research. 56 339-346
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Owen, R. Reader bias. 1982 Journal of the American Medical Association. 247 2533-2534
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Pruthi, S. ; Jain, A. ; Wahid, A. ; Mehra, K. ; Nabi, S.A. Scientific community and peer review system—A case study of a central government funding scheme in India. 1997 Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 56 398-407
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Ross, P.F. The sciences’ self-management: Manuscript refereeing, peer review and goals in science. 1980 The Ross Company, Todd Pond: Massachusetts, MA, USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Rubin, D.B. ; Schenker, N. Multiple imputation for interval estimation from simple random samples with ignorable nonresponse. 1986 Journal of the American Statistical Association. 81 366-374
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Schafer, J.L. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data by simulation. 2000 Chapman and Hall: London, UK
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Sharp, D.W. What can and should be done to reduce publication bias—The perspective of an editor. 1990 Journal of the American Medical Association. 263 1390-1391
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Siegelman, S.S. Assassins and zealots—Variations in peer review. Special report. 1991 Radiology. 178 637-642
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Sonnert, G. What makes a good scientist? Determinants of peer evaluation among biologists. 1995 Social Studies of Science. 25 35-55
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. StataCorp (2005). Stata statistical software: Release 9. College Station, TX, USA: StataCorp LP.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. United States General Accounting Office (1994). Peer review: Reforms needed to ensure fairness in federal agency grant selection. Washington, DC, USA: United States General Accounting Office.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Wilson, J.D. Peer review and publication. 1978 Journal of Clinical Investigation. 61 1697-1701
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Can expensive research equipment boost research and development performances?. (2021). Choi, Sunglok ; Lee, Kyoungmi ; Yang, Jae-Suk.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04088-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Factors to Improve Publication Productivity in Russian Universities. (2021). Ponkratov, Vadim V ; Osipov, Gennady V ; Vasiljeva, Arina V ; Dudnik, Olesya V ; Gardanova, Zhanna R ; Karepova, Svetlana G ; Ivleva, Marina I ; Ju, Vitali.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:21-:d:554174.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. A flexible approach for measuring author-level publishing performance. (2020). Simoes, Nadia ; Crespo, Nuno.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:122:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03278-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. ?-index: A new overall productivity index for actors of science and technology. (2020). Lathabai, Hiran H.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:14:y:2020:i:4:s1751157719305012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A quantitative analysis of researcher citation personal display considering disciplinary differences and influence factors. (2017). Wu, Qiang ; Li, Xingchen ; Liu, Yuan Yuan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:113:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2501-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Topic scientific community in science: a combined perspective of scientific collaboration and topics. (2017). Cao, Yujie ; Mao, Jin ; Li, Gang ; Lu, Kun.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2418-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Understanding the impact change of a highly cited article: a content-based citation analysis. (2017). Ding, Ying ; Lu, Chao ; Zhang, Chengzhi.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2398-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Quantifying the scientific output of new researchers using the zp-index. (2016). Zou, Christopher ; Peterson, Jordan B.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:106:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1807-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. (2016). Rey-Marti, Andrea ; Palacios-Marques, Daniel ; Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:5:p:1651-1655.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. On a statistical h index. (2014). Giudici, Paolo ; Cerchiello, Paola.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:99:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1194-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The academic social network. (2014). Song, Qianqian ; Chiu, Dah Ming .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1356-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. How to measure the quality of financial tweets. (2014). Giudici, Paolo ; Cerchiello, Paola.
    In: DEM Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:pav:demwpp:069.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Empirical study of L-Sequence: The basic h-index sequence for cumulative publications with consideration of the yearly citation performance. (2014). Yang, Yongliang ; Liu, YU.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:8:y:2014:i:3:p:478-485.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. H Index: A Statistical Proposal. (2013). Giudici, Paolo ; Cerchiello, Paola.
    In: DEM Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:pav:demwpp:039.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A bibliometric analysis of academic publication and NIH funding. (2013). Wang, Fang ; Liu, Yang ; Deng, Yan ; Vannier, Michael W. ; Yang, Jiansheng ; Bennett, James ; Ou, Fengrong .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:7:y:2013:i:2:p:318-324.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The h-bubble. (2013). Garcia-Zorita, Carlos ; Rousseau, Ronald ; Sanz-Casado, Elias.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:7:y:2013:i:2:p:294-300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Statistical inference on the h-index with an application to top-scientist performance. (2012). Baccini, A. ; Marcheselli, M. ; Pratelli, L. ; Barabesi, L..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:6:y:2012:i:4:p:721-728.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Three-feature model to reproduce the topology of citation networks and the effects from authors’ visibility on their h-index. (2012). da Fontoura Costa, Luciano, ; Oliveira, Osvaldo Novais ; Amancio, Diego Raphael .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:6:y:2012:i:3:p:427-434.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship. (2011). Abbas, Ash Mohammad.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:88:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0389-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. (2011). Sundberg, Carl Johan ; Mattsson, Pauline ; Laget, Patrice.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:87:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-010-0310-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The diffusion of H-related literature. (2011). Thijs, Bart ; Glanzel, Wolfgang ; Zhang, Lin.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:5:y:2011:i:4:p:583-593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A bibliometric index based on the collaboration distance between cited and citing authors. (2011). Domingo-Ferrer, Josep ; Torra, Vicen ; Bras-Amoros, Maria .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:5:y:2011:i:2:p:248-264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. A two-dimensional approach to evaluate the scientific production of countries (case study: the basic sciences). (2010). Hosseini, Seyyed Mehdi ; Nejati, Ammar .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:84:y:2010:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0103-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Tsallis q-exponential describes the distribution of scientific citations—a new characterization of the impact. (2010). Albuquerque, Marcelo P ; Anastasiadis, Aristoklis D ; Mussi, Diogo B.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:83:y:2010:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0023-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. (2010). Cabrerizo, F J ; Alonso, S ; Herrera, F ; Herrera-Viedma, E.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:82:y:2010:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0047-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The development of an AI journal ranking based on the revealed preference approach. (2010). Serenko, Alexander.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:4:y:2010:i:4:p:447-459.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Peer review and the h-index: Two studies. (2010). Oppenheim, Charles ; Norris, Michael .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:4:y:2010:i:3:p:221-232.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Characteristic scores and scales based on h-type indices. (2010). Egghe, L..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:14-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Ranking marketing journals using the Google Scholar-based hg-index. (2010). Touzani, Mourad ; Moussa, Salim .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:107-117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A new family of scientific impact measures: The generalized Kosmulski-indices. (2009). Woeginger, Gerhard J ; Deineko, Vladimir G.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:80:y:2009:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-009-2130-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Properties of Hirsch-type indices: the case of library classification categories. (2009). Rousseau, Ronald ; Liu, Yuxian.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:79:y:2009:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0415-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. (2009). Herrera-Viedma, E. ; Alonso, S. ; CABRERIZO, F. J..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:3:y:2009:i:4:p:273-289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. (2008). Bordons, Maria ; Costas, Rodrigo.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:77:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1997-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index. (2008). Molinari, Jean-Francois .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:75:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1872-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics. (2008). Guan, Jiancheng ; Gao, Xia.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:75:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1871-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. (2008). Molinari, Alain .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:75:y:2008:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1853-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Generalizing the h- and g-indices. (2008). Waltman, L. ; van Eck, N. J. P., .
    In: ERIM Report Series Research in Management.
    RePEc:ems:eureri:13210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-index. (2008). Woeginger, Gerhard J..
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:56:y:2008:i:2:p:224-232.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. An axiomatic analysis of Egghe’s g-index. (2008). Woeginger, Gerhard J..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:4:p:364-368.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. A symmetry axiom for scientific impact indices. (2008). Woeginger, Gerhard J..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:4:p:298-303.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Generalizing the h- and g-indices. (2008). Waltman, Ludo ; van Eck, Nees Jan.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:4:p:263-271.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Examples of simple transformations of the h-index: Qualitative and quantitative conclusions and consequences for other indices. (2008). Egghe, L..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:2:p:136-148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. On material transfer agreements and visibility of researchers in biotechnology. (2008). de Moor, Bart ; Rodriguez, Victor ; Debackere, Koenraad ; Janssens, Frizo .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:1:p:89-100.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Soil science and the h index. (2007). Hartemink, Alfred E ; Minasny, Budiman ; McBratney, Alex.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:73:y:2007:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1811-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. (2007). Pecharroman, Carlos ; Iglesias, Juan E.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:73:y:2007:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1805-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. (2007). Bordons, Maria ; Costas, Rodrigo.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:1:y:2007:i:3:p:193-203.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Gatekeepers of science—Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications. (2007). Bornmann, Lutz ; Daniel, Hans-Dieter.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:1:y:2007:i:1:p:83-91.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Hirschs h-index: A stochastic model. (2007). Burrell, Quentin L..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:1:y:2007:i:1:p:16-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. (2006). , Anthony.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:67:y:2006:i:3:d:10.1556_scient.67.2006.3.10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance. (2006). Elgar, Mark A ; Gorringe, Kylie L ; Braisher, Tamsin L ; Gemmell, Neil J ; Re, Matthew.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0000127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-01 21:41:31 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.