Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Factors to Improve Publication Productivity in Russian Universities. (2021). Ponkratov, Vadim V ; Osipov, Gennady V ; Vasiljeva, Arina V ; Dudnik, Olesya V ; Gardanova, Zhanna R ; Karepova, Svetlana G ; Ivleva, Marina I ; Ju, Vitali.
In: Publications.
RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:21-:d:554174.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 51

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The Research Environment in a Developing Economy: Reforms, Patterns, and Challenges in Kazakhstan. (2022). Kussaiyn, Meruyert ; Narbaev, Timur ; Amirbekova, Diana.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:37-:d:932873.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Research Productivity in Emerging Economies: Empirical Evidence from Kazakhstan. (2021). Amirbekova, Diana ; Narbaev, Timur.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:51-:d:672931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Akhmetova Y.M.; Mukhametzyanova L.K. Youth in Science: Development of a Young Scientist. Theory Pract. Soc. Dev. 2013, 6, 48-50.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Baker S. Research Publications: Does Piling Them High Sell Them Short?. Times Higher Education; 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. Ball P. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature 2005, 436, 900.

  4. Becker G. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Birkmaier D.; Wohlrabe K. The Matthew effect in economics reconsidered. J. Inform. 2014, 8, 880-889.

  6. Bohdan N. Education and science for innovative development of the Eurasian Economic Union countries (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan). The Essence of Academic Performance; Nchindila B.; Corrigan T. IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Bordons M.; Fernández M.T.; Gómez I. Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance. Scientometrics 2002, 53, 195-206.

  8. Bornmann L. Does the normalized citation impact of universities profit from certain properties of their published documents—Such as the number of authors and the impact factor of the publishing journals? A multilevel modeling approach. J. Inform. 2019, 13, 170-184.

  9. Butler L. What happens when funding is linked to publication counts. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research; Moed H.F.; Glänzel W.; Schmoch U. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 389-405.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Carayol N.; Matt M. Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists’ productivity. Inf. Econ. Policy 2006, 18, 55-72.

  11. Delgado R.-M.; Tarango J.; Machin-Mastromatteo J.D. Scientific evaluation models in Latin America and the criteria for assessing researchers. Inf. Dev. 2020, 36, 457-467.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Draft Order “On the Approval of Performance Indicators for Federal Budget and Autonomous Educational Institutions of Higher Education, Subordinate to the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, and the Work of Their Leaders”. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Erokhina E. Russian Science at Scopus and WoS: Quantity or Quality. Indicator; 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Fox M.F. Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2005, 35, 131-150.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Gardanova Z.; Ponkratov V.; Kuznetsov N.; Nikitina N.; Dudnik O.; Latypova E.; Shcherbatykh S. A model for optimizing the structure of teaching techniques for distance learning in the Russian higher education system. J. Open Innov. 2020, 6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Grebennikova V.M.; Bonkalo T.I.; Nikitina N.I.; Gardanova Z.R.; Grebennikov O.V. A Study of Personality Factors in Inclusive Vocational Education: The Case of Russia. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Hermanowicz J.C. What does it take to be successful?. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2006, 31, 135-152.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Hesli V.L.; Lee J.M. Faculty research productivity: Why do some of our colleagues publish more than others?. PS Political Sci. Politics 2011, 44, 393-408.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Hicks D. Performance-based university research funding system. Res. Policy 2012, 41, 251-261.

  20. Hicks D.; Wouters P.; Waltman L.; de Rijcke S.; Rafols I. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 2015, 520, 429-431.

  21. Jump P. Metrics: How to Handle Them Responsibly. Times Higher Education; 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Katchanov Y.L.; Shmatko N.A. Complexity-based modeling of scientific capital: An outline of mathematical theory. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2014, 785058.

  23. Klein P.G.; Cook M.L.T.W. Schultz and the human-capital approach to entrepreneurship. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2006, 28, 344-350.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Kolesnikov S.; Fukumoto E.; Bozeman B. Researchers’ risk-smoothing publication strategies: Is productivity the enemy of impact?. Scientometrics 2018, 116, 1995-2017.

  25. Kosyakov D.; Guskov A. Impact of national science policy on academic migration and research productivity in Russia. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 146, 60-71.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Kühn D.; Osthus D.; Townsend T.; Zhao Y. On the structure of oriented graphs and digraphs with forbidden tournaments or cycles. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B 2017, 124, 88-127.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  27. Larivière V.; Costas R. How many is too many? On the relationship between research productivity and impact. PLoS ONE 2016, 11.

  28. Lee S.; Bozeman B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2005, 35, 673-702.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Matthews D. Academics Who Publish Frequently Have More Highly Cited Articles. Times Higher Education; 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Menke W. Factor analysis. Geophysical Data Analysis; Menke W. Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 207-222.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Moed H.F. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. AITE 2009, 57, 13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Orbay K.; Miranda R.; Orbay M. Building Journal Impact Factor Quartile into the Assessment of Academic Performance: A Case Study. Particip. Educ. Res. 2020, 7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Osipov G.; Karepova S.; Ponkratov V.; Karaev A.; Masterov A.; Vasiljeva M. Economic and mathematical methods for ranking Eastern European universities. IEMS 2020, 19, 273-288.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Pavelieva T.Y. About the Prestige of a Scientist Profession. Socio-Political Sci. 2016, 3, 145-147.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Podtserob M. Why Russian Universities Do Not Raise High in International Rankings. Vedomosti; 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Publication Productivity in Russia: What Do Scopus and Web of Science Say?. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. QS Rating: 10 Russian Universities Entered the Top 100 in Selected Specializations. Indicator; 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Reid N. Statistical sufficiency. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences; Wright J.D. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 418-422.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Robert K. Merton and Contemporary Sociology; Mongardini C.; Tabboni S. Routledge: London, UK, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Roshchina Ya. M.; Yudkevich M.M. Factors of research activities of university teachers: Administration policy, contract incompleteness or environmental impact?. Educ. Issues 2009, 3, 203-228.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Rousseau R.; Egghe L.; Guns R. Statistics. Becoming Metric-Wise; Rousseau R.; Egghe L.; Guns R. Chandos Publishing: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 67-97.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  42. Ryan J.C.; Berbegal-Mirabent J. Motivational recipes and research performance: A fuzzy set analysis of the motivational profile of high performing research scientists. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 5299-5304.

  43. Rybakov A.V. The role of young scientists in strengthening the scientific potential of the academy. Sci. Educ. Probl. Civ. Secur. 2019, 1, 1-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Sathianathen N.J.; Lane R.; Murphy D.G.; Loeb S.; Bakker C.; Lamb A.D.; Weight C.J. Social media coverage of scientific articles immediately after publication predicts subsequent citations—Some_Impact Score: Observational analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e12288.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Silman F. Work-related basic need satisfaction as a predictor of work engagement among academic staff in Turkey. S. Afr. J. Educ. 2014, 34, 1-5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Stephan P. Perverse incentives. Nature 2012, 484, 29-31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Tarango J.; Machin-Mastromatteo J.D. Chapter 4—An Academic Model to Support Scientific Production and Communication. The Role of Information Professionals in the Knowledge Economy. Chandos Publ. 2017, 103-128.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Van Norman G.A.; Eisenkot R. Technology transfer: From the research bench to commercialization: Part 2: The commercialization process. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2017, 2, 197-208.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Weingart P. Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?. Scientometrics 2005, 62, 117-131.

  50. Yusuf F.N.; Omolayo B.O.; Azikiwe J.C. Influence of gender, work environment, length of service and age of academic staff on attitude to work. People: Int. J. Soc. Sci. 2015, 2, 1481-1489.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  51. Zhang M.; Zhang G.; Liu Y.; Zhai X.; Han X. Scientists’ genders and international academic collaboration: An empirical study of Chinese universities and research institutes. J. Informetr. 2020, 14, 101068.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Can expensive research equipment boost research and development performances?. (2021). Choi, Sunglok ; Lee, Kyoungmi ; Yang, Jae-Suk.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04088-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Factors to Improve Publication Productivity in Russian Universities. (2021). Ponkratov, Vadim V ; Osipov, Gennady V ; Vasiljeva, Arina V ; Dudnik, Olesya V ; Gardanova, Zhanna R ; Karepova, Svetlana G ; Ivleva, Marina I ; Ju, Vitali.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:21-:d:554174.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. A flexible approach for measuring author-level publishing performance. (2020). Simoes, Nadia ; Crespo, Nuno.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:122:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03278-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. ?-index: A new overall productivity index for actors of science and technology. (2020). Lathabai, Hiran H.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:14:y:2020:i:4:s1751157719305012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A quantitative analysis of researcher citation personal display considering disciplinary differences and influence factors. (2017). Wu, Qiang ; Li, Xingchen ; Liu, Yuan Yuan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:113:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2501-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Topic scientific community in science: a combined perspective of scientific collaboration and topics. (2017). Cao, Yujie ; Mao, Jin ; Li, Gang ; Lu, Kun.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2418-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Understanding the impact change of a highly cited article: a content-based citation analysis. (2017). Ding, Ying ; Lu, Chao ; Zhang, Chengzhi.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2398-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Quantifying the scientific output of new researchers using the zp-index. (2016). Zou, Christopher ; Peterson, Jordan B.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:106:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1807-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. (2016). Rey-Marti, Andrea ; Palacios-Marques, Daniel ; Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:5:p:1651-1655.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. On a statistical h index. (2014). Giudici, Paolo ; Cerchiello, Paola.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:99:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1194-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The academic social network. (2014). Song, Qianqian ; Chiu, Dah Ming .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1356-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. How to measure the quality of financial tweets. (2014). Giudici, Paolo ; Cerchiello, Paola.
    In: DEM Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:pav:demwpp:069.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Empirical study of L-Sequence: The basic h-index sequence for cumulative publications with consideration of the yearly citation performance. (2014). Yang, Yongliang ; Liu, YU.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:8:y:2014:i:3:p:478-485.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. H Index: A Statistical Proposal. (2013). Giudici, Paolo ; Cerchiello, Paola.
    In: DEM Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:pav:demwpp:039.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A bibliometric analysis of academic publication and NIH funding. (2013). Wang, Fang ; Liu, Yang ; Deng, Yan ; Vannier, Michael W. ; Yang, Jiansheng ; Bennett, James ; Ou, Fengrong .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:7:y:2013:i:2:p:318-324.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The h-bubble. (2013). Garcia-Zorita, Carlos ; Rousseau, Ronald ; Sanz-Casado, Elias.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:7:y:2013:i:2:p:294-300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Statistical inference on the h-index with an application to top-scientist performance. (2012). Baccini, A. ; Marcheselli, M. ; Pratelli, L. ; Barabesi, L..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:6:y:2012:i:4:p:721-728.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Three-feature model to reproduce the topology of citation networks and the effects from authors’ visibility on their h-index. (2012). da Fontoura Costa, Luciano, ; Oliveira, Osvaldo Novais ; Amancio, Diego Raphael .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:6:y:2012:i:3:p:427-434.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship. (2011). Abbas, Ash Mohammad.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:88:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0389-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. (2011). Sundberg, Carl Johan ; Mattsson, Pauline ; Laget, Patrice.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:87:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-010-0310-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The diffusion of H-related literature. (2011). Thijs, Bart ; Glanzel, Wolfgang ; Zhang, Lin.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:5:y:2011:i:4:p:583-593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A bibliometric index based on the collaboration distance between cited and citing authors. (2011). Domingo-Ferrer, Josep ; Torra, Vicen ; Bras-Amoros, Maria .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:5:y:2011:i:2:p:248-264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. A two-dimensional approach to evaluate the scientific production of countries (case study: the basic sciences). (2010). Hosseini, Seyyed Mehdi ; Nejati, Ammar .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:84:y:2010:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0103-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Tsallis q-exponential describes the distribution of scientific citations—a new characterization of the impact. (2010). Albuquerque, Marcelo P ; Anastasiadis, Aristoklis D ; Mussi, Diogo B.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:83:y:2010:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0023-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. (2010). Cabrerizo, F J ; Alonso, S ; Herrera, F ; Herrera-Viedma, E.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:82:y:2010:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0047-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The development of an AI journal ranking based on the revealed preference approach. (2010). Serenko, Alexander.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:4:y:2010:i:4:p:447-459.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Peer review and the h-index: Two studies. (2010). Oppenheim, Charles ; Norris, Michael .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:4:y:2010:i:3:p:221-232.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Characteristic scores and scales based on h-type indices. (2010). Egghe, L..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:14-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Ranking marketing journals using the Google Scholar-based hg-index. (2010). Touzani, Mourad ; Moussa, Salim .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:107-117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A new family of scientific impact measures: The generalized Kosmulski-indices. (2009). Woeginger, Gerhard J ; Deineko, Vladimir G.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:80:y:2009:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-009-2130-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Properties of Hirsch-type indices: the case of library classification categories. (2009). Rousseau, Ronald ; Liu, Yuxian.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:79:y:2009:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0415-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. (2009). Herrera-Viedma, E. ; Alonso, S. ; CABRERIZO, F. J..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:3:y:2009:i:4:p:273-289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. (2008). Bordons, Maria ; Costas, Rodrigo.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:77:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1997-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index. (2008). Molinari, Jean-Francois .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:75:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1872-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics. (2008). Guan, Jiancheng ; Gao, Xia.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:75:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1871-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. (2008). Molinari, Alain .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:75:y:2008:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1853-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Generalizing the h- and g-indices. (2008). Waltman, L. ; van Eck, N. J. P., .
    In: ERIM Report Series Research in Management.
    RePEc:ems:eureri:13210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-index. (2008). Woeginger, Gerhard J..
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:56:y:2008:i:2:p:224-232.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. An axiomatic analysis of Egghe’s g-index. (2008). Woeginger, Gerhard J..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:4:p:364-368.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. A symmetry axiom for scientific impact indices. (2008). Woeginger, Gerhard J..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:4:p:298-303.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Generalizing the h- and g-indices. (2008). Waltman, Ludo ; van Eck, Nees Jan.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:4:p:263-271.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Examples of simple transformations of the h-index: Qualitative and quantitative conclusions and consequences for other indices. (2008). Egghe, L..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:2:p:136-148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. On material transfer agreements and visibility of researchers in biotechnology. (2008). de Moor, Bart ; Rodriguez, Victor ; Debackere, Koenraad ; Janssens, Frizo .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:1:p:89-100.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Soil science and the h index. (2007). Hartemink, Alfred E ; Minasny, Budiman ; McBratney, Alex.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:73:y:2007:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1811-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. (2007). Pecharroman, Carlos ; Iglesias, Juan E.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:73:y:2007:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1805-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. (2007). Bordons, Maria ; Costas, Rodrigo.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:1:y:2007:i:3:p:193-203.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Gatekeepers of science—Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications. (2007). Bornmann, Lutz ; Daniel, Hans-Dieter.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:1:y:2007:i:1:p:83-91.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Hirschs h-index: A stochastic model. (2007). Burrell, Quentin L..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:1:y:2007:i:1:p:16-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. (2006). , Anthony.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:67:y:2006:i:3:d:10.1556_scient.67.2006.3.10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance. (2006). Elgar, Mark A ; Gorringe, Kylie L ; Braisher, Tamsin L ; Gemmell, Neil J ; Re, Matthew.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0000127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-01 20:39:20 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.