Papers by Dejan Pilipović
Pravna riječ, 2023
ANNULMENT OF ARBITRATION AWARD
In domestic and international business practice, the arbitration m... more ANNULMENT OF ARBITRATION AWARD
In domestic and international business practice, the arbitration method of dispute resolution has already been established. In addition, a rich practice has been built up. However, in any settlement of disputes, including arbitration, certain omissions are possible, which lead to the possibility of refuting the arbitration decision. It means the transition from the sphere of private to the domain of state justice. This is often possible through a claim for annulment of an arbitration award, which is a specific and limited extraordinary legal remedy. In the following lines of this work, the relationship between this lawsuit and similar legal institutes will be presented, then the annulment of the arbitration awards according to domestic and international legal documents and its relationship with the appeal (constitutional lawsuit). Through a uniform and precise system of judicial control of arbitration awards in the post-arbitration phase through the institute of annulment of arbitration awards, legal certainty and trust of all is achieved, which is also possible in our country through the adoption of a special Law on Arbitration based on international legal documents and good comparative law practices. The paper presents proposals for improving the institution of annulment of arbitration awards in our country.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Politeia 2022, vol. 12, br. 23, str. 75-95, 2022
Pitanje obeštećenja odnosno naknade štete usljed terorističkih akata je danas aktuelno i značajno... more Pitanje obeštećenja odnosno naknade štete usljed terorističkih akata je danas aktuelno i značajno, posebno u kontekstu izbora mehanizama ili modela obeštećenja. Zbog toga se analiziraju domaća i komparativna pozitivnopravna rješenja, sudska praksa i pravna literatura. Ovaj rad treba da pokaže da postoji više mehanizama obeštećenja koje zakonodavac može da izabere i da se oni nužno ne isključuju, kao i da postojeće pravno stanje u Republici Srpskoj povodom razmatranog pitanja nije zadovoljavajuće i da se može razmišljati o poboljšanju modela koji je predviđao jugoslovenski Zakon o obligacionim odnosima (ZOO), a koji je recipiran u bivšim jugoslovenskim republikama. Za kvalitetan odabir mehanizama, nužno je i sučeljavanje stavova o potrebi postojanja posebnog slučaja odgovornosti za štetu usljed terorističkih akata sa stavovima o mogućim drugim mehanizmima obeštećenja van pravila odštetnog prava (npr. postojanje određenih fondova za reparaciju štete, osiguranje itd.). S tim ciljem, u radu se koriste dogmatički i normativni metod, uporednopravni i sociološki metod, istorijski metod i metod konceptualne analize.
***
COMPENSATION MECHANISMS FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY TERRORIST ACTS
Consideration of the issue of compensation for damage caused by terrorist acts is relevant and important today, especially in the context of choosing mechanisms or models of compensation. Therefore, domestic and comparative positive legal solutions, case law and legal literature are analyzed. This paper should show that there are several mechanisms of compensation that the legislator can choose and that they are not necessarily excluded, as well as that the current legal situation in Republika Srpska on this issue is not satisfactory and that it can consider improving the model provided by Yugoslav Law on Obligations ("ZOO"), which was received in the former Yugoslav republics. For quality selection of mechanisms, it is necessary to confront attitudes about the need for a special case of liability for damage due to terrorist acts with attitudes about possible other compensation mechanisms outside the rules of tort law (e.g. existence of certain funds for reparation, insurance, etc.). The paper uses the dogmatic and normative method, comparative law and sociological method, historical method and the method of conceptual analysis.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Banja Luka, 2014
https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/bib/516724156
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, br. 3/2021, str. 734-793.
EXPANDING THE SCOPE OF CLAIMS FALLING UNDER THE ONE-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
This paper analy... more EXPANDING THE SCOPE OF CLAIMS FALLING UNDER THE ONE-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
This paper analyses the possibility of an analogous application of Art. 378 of the Law of Contract and Torts (LCT) to other similar (identical) claims. The aim of the research is to try to answer the central question of whether it is necessary to update the provisions of the LCT regarding the one-year statute of limitations in accordance with modern trends in terms of the scope of claims that should become statute-barred within this period. In order to answer this question, scientific research methods, that is, techniques are used, such as the dogmatic-normative, historical-legal, and comparative-legal one, content analysis and a questionnaire. This apparatus is used within the study of legislation, case law and legal literature, as well as in empirical research. Knowing the scope of claims that become statute-barred in a year is not only important for theoretical analysis, but is also of practical importance for court actions , as well as for consumers.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, br. 95/2022, str. 161-183
This paper analyzes some issues related to the one-year statute of limitations for claims, from ... more This paper analyzes some issues related to the one-year statute of limitations for claims, from the beginning of this period and throughout its course, in the context of obligation (contract) law and consumer law relations. The focus is on reconsidering whether the length of the special one-year statute of limitations should be changed. The author examines whether there is room for refining, specifying and amending the provisions of the Obligation Relations Act, especially pertaining to the beginning of this period, given that the legal provisions on the one-year statute of limitations in this Act do not contain special rules on this issue. The discussion is further complicated by the fact that in the Republika Srpska, the Consumer Protection Act contains a provision on a one-year statute of limitations for claims on services of general economic interest. Is the circle of claims or the rule concerning the beginning of this statute of limitations different from the one prescribed in the Obligations Relations Act? The paper aims to find answers to these questions by using scientific research methods in the analysis of legislation, legal theory and case law, as well as the questionnaire techniques in the empirical research which is of both theoretical and practical importance.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Book of Proceedings, Economic and Social Development, 67th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development and 7th ITEM Conference – „Innovation, Technology, Education and Management“ - Cakovec / Sv. Martin na Muri, 2021, p. 68-79.
Liability for damage is based under certain conditions or in accordance with certain rules. The
... more Liability for damage is based under certain conditions or in accordance with certain rules. The
legal order sometimes sets greater or lesser limits on the institution of liability for damage,
although all the conditions of liability are satisfied. In some cases, they are particularly
accentuated, such as the situation in a special case of liability for damage caused by acts of
public violence. In these situations, the state often has the position of a liable entity for
compensation for damage caused to citizens as a result of terrorist acts, public demonstrations
or manifestations and other forms of public violence. These phenomena represent the
challenges of the modern world. Taking into account the different classification of limits of
liability for damage in the legal literature, limitations of liability for damage caused by acts of
public violence include limits regarding the heads of damages ("subject limits"), limits
regarding the injured parties entitled to compensation ("personal limits") and other limits
(voluntary, limits in time and other). Starting from the analysis of this case, in this paper the
author will examine, through scientific methods, the hypothesis whether the set limits on
liability caused by acts of public violence in domestic law, in principle, correspond to
comparative law and observed international and regional legal documents (regardless of the
different models of indemnification of victims). The author's findings are affirmative. In
addition, he concludes that the limits of liability are possible on the basis of the legislative
policy of the state as long as they are not in conflict with the constitutional norms and as long
as there is a balance between the interests of the victim and liable entity. The analysis showed
that there is a mutual connection between the so-called subject and personal limits. Also,
certain de lege ferenda proposals have matured with regard to the degree of development of
tort law. In addition to the theoretical analysis, the scope of compensation and the circle of
persons entitled to compensation in this particular case are also of practical importance for
obtaining compensation before the courts.
Keywords: acts of public violence, limitations regarding the injured parties, limitations of
liability for damage, limitations regarding the heads of damages
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Conference of Proceedings, International Scientific Conference: "Transformative Technologies: Legal and Ethical Challenges of the 21st Century", Banja Luka 2020., str. 111-132.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Pravni život, br. 10/2019, str. 565-586.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Pravna riječ, br. 59/2019, str. 487-508.
Као посљедица НАТО разарања на подручју Републике
Српске (РС) настала је енормна штета. Посматра... more Као посљедица НАТО разарања на подручју Републике
Српске (РС) настала је енормна штета. Посматра се грађанскоправна
одговорност у међународном праву поводом НАТО бомбардовања РС. На
међународном плану може се разматрати подношење тужбе пред Међународним судом правде од стране „оштећених“ држава против држава чланица НАТО-а које су извршиле бомбардовање или против НАТО-а
као међународне организације. С тим је повезано питање одговорности
држава чланица за противправне радње НАТО-а. Може се поставити
питање подношења ове тужбе против наведених тужених пред Међународним судом правде од стране оштећених појединаца, или пак од стране
држава, а ради заштите оштећених појединаца као њених грађана.
Кључне ријечи: НАТО бомбардовање РС, штета, међународно право, одговорност
As a consequence of NATO destruction in the area of the Republic of
Srpska (RS), enormous damage has been caused. On the international plane,
a question of filling a lawsuit before the International Court of Justice by
“injured” countries against NATO member states that have carried out the
bombing or against NATO as an international organization, could be taken
into consideration. This is related to the question of the liability of the member
states for the unlawful actions of NATO. It could also be argued about the
question of filling this lawsuit against the defendants mentioned before the
International Court of Justice by the injured individuals, or by the states, in
order to protect the injured individuals as its citizens.
Key words: NATO bombing of RS, damage, International Law, liability
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Zbornik radova sa XXIV Budvanskih pravničkih dana "Aktuelna pitanja savremenog zakonodavstva", 2019, str. 407-425.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Pravni život br. 10/2018, str. 635-654.
Savremeno doba donosi čitav niz promjena i nedoumica, pa tako i u obligacionom pravu. Jedno od p... more Savremeno doba donosi čitav niz promjena i nedoumica, pa tako i u obligacionom pravu. Jedno od pitanja koje predstavlja razlog za poseban osvrt, odnosno
preispitivanje određenih obligacionopravnih instituta, jeste pitanje otkaza i raskida ugovora na primjeru ugovora o prodaji ili snabdijevanju toplotnom energijom
u smislu odredaba Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, Zakona o zaštiti potrošača i
drugih propisa. Naročito zbog različitih termina za označavanje pojmova identičnih ili sličnih pojmovnom određenju raskida, odnosno otkaza, predviđenih propisima o zaštiti potrošača, prethodno se nastoje spoznati koncepti ova dva tradicionalna pravna instituta ugovornog prava kroz njihove sličnosti i razlike. Potom,
otkaz se posmatra kroz prizmu Zakona o obligacionom odnosima na primjeru
ugovora o prodaji toplotne energije i posebnih propisa.
Posebna pažnja je posvećena raspravi o pojmovnom određenju raskida
(ugovora o prodaji toplotne energije) kroz prizmu Zakona o zaštiti potrošača i
posebnih propisa.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Pravna riječ, br. 55/2018, str. 187-214
Poplave, kao prirodni događaj sa velikim potencijalom za prouzrokovanje materijalne štete većeg o... more Poplave, kao prirodni događaj sa velikim potencijalom za prouzrokovanje materijalne štete većeg obima, predstavljaju kompleksan pravni problem u smislu raspravljanja pitanja naknade štete oštećenim licima. Osim što postavljeni problem, odnosno njegova moguća rješenja imaju veliku praktičnu važnost, riječ je o interesantnom pravnom pitanju, a naročito sa stanovišta kreacije i primjene mogućih modela reparacije materijalne štete. Autori u ovom radu raspravljaju o modelima reparacije materijalne štete, u namjeri da se analiziraju pozitivnopravni propisi i domaća i uporedna sudska praksa, kako bi se utvrdile prednosti i nedostaci pojedinih rješenja sa ciljem utvrđivanja eventualnih prijedloga de lege ferenda. Razmotreni su modeli reparacije koji se zasnivaju na opštim pravilima o naknadi materijalne štete, gdje posebno mjesto ima pravna kvalifikacija poplave kao više sile, odnosno predstavljena sa pojedina rješenja koja se zasnivaju na primjeni posebnih propisa (van terena obligacionog prava). Sa druge strane, analizirani su i vanodštetni modeli reparacije materijalne štete, različiti prema svojoj pravnoj prirodi i načinima realizacije. U ovom radu, autori su koristili pravni metod, uporednopravni metod, metod studije slučaja i metod analize sudske prakse.
MODELS OF REPARATION OF DAMAGES CAUSED BY FLOODS
Abstract: Floods as a natural event with great potential for causing damages are coplex legal issue in regarding damage compensation. This issue has a significant practical importance and, at the same time, this is a legal phenomen particularly regarding potential models reparation of damage.Therefore, authors in this paper have been considering different models of reparation of damage, positive legislation and court practice in order to determine advantages and disadvantages both of certain solutions and de lege ferenda suggestions. There have been analyzed models of reparation of damage based on general damage compensation rules and models of reparation of damage which had been prescribed by special laws. On the other hand, there have been presented other models of reparation of damage which do not have origin in field of law on obligation. Authors have used legal method, comparative method and case stady method.
Key words: reparation of damage, floods, force major, model of damage compensation, other models of reparation of damage.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Zbornik referata sa međunarodnog naučnog skupa XIV Majsko savetovanje "Savremeni pravni promet i usluge", Kragujevac 2018, str. 439-460
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Pravni život, br. 10/2017, str. 657-673
Osim situacije kada pravno lice odgovara za štetu koju prouzrokuju njegov organ i lica u njegovoj... more Osim situacije kada pravno lice odgovara za štetu koju prouzrokuju njegov organ i lica u njegovoj službi, aktuelizovano je pitanje naknade nematerijalne štete pravnom licu kao oštećenom. Predmet ovog rada je ispitivanje da li pravno lice ima pravo na pravičnu (novčanu) naknadu nematerijalne (neimovinske, moralne) štete u domaćem i stranom pravu, što uključuje komparativnu analizu zakonskih rješenja, proučavanje doktrinarnih stavova i posebno pravne prakse, te davanje određenih prijedloga na osnovu rezultata tog ispitivanja. Pod pravnim licem se misli i na komercijalna (privredna društva, preduzeća u svim oblicima) i nekomercijalna (udruženja, fondacije i sl.) pravna lica, pravna lica privatnog i javnog prava. Predmet razmatranja neće biti pružanje nenovčane satisfakcije pravnom licu (npr. objava sudske odluke ili ispravke i sl.), nego mogućnost novčane satisfakcije (pravične novčane naknade nematerijalne štete). Cilj (kroz potvrđivanje hipoteze), koristeći uobičajene metode naučno-istaživačkog rada, jeste da se pokaže da domaći opšti zakonodavni okvir za obligacionopravne odnose nije dovoljan da omogući naknadu nematerijalne štete pravnom licu kao oštećenom. Na osnovu komparativnih saznanja, daju se de lege ferenda prijedlozi za uređenje ovog pitanja kroz zakonodavnu intervenciju u kontekstu koncepcijske promjene shvatanja nematerijalne štete i izričitog regulisanja prava pravnog lica na naknadu nematerijalne štete. U Republici Srbiji prilika se vidi u projektu izrade građanskog kodeksa. Pravno lice može biti titular nematerijalnih vrijednosti (dobara) koja mogu biti povređena. Međutim, subjektivna koncepcija nematerijalne štete u domaćem Zakonu o obligacionim odnosima - ZOO je prepreka za priznavanje prava pravnom licu na naknadu nematerijalne štete. Proučavanjem zakonskih rješenja zemalja nastalih disolucijom SFRJ i nekih evropskih država, uočavaju se određene zakonitosti, odnosno tendencije, što otvara mogućnost za diskusiju i uviđanje dominantnog modela rješavanja ovog pitanja. Omogućavanjem pravnom licu da kao oštećeni sa uspjehom ostvari naknadu nematerijalne štete u parnici, proširuje se i personalno polje odštetnopravne zaštite i onemogućava se diskriminacija pravnih lica.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Srpska pravna misao br. 50/2017, str. 179-202
Аутор у раду указује на правне проблеме који су настали у примијени права у вези са случајем „шва... more Аутор у раду указује на правне проблеме који су настали у примијени права у вези са случајем „швајцарац “и објашњава основне правне категорије битне за разумијевање разматране проблематике у судској пракси. Ради се о проблему у погледу уговора о кредиту са валутном клаузулом у швајцарском франку насталом усљед „скока “швајцарског франка. Стављен је акценат на проучавање судске праксе у Републици Србији, Црној Гори, Босни и Херцеговини (РС и ФБиХ) и Републици Хрватској (и ЕУ). С тим у вези, аутор синтетичким погледом на доступну судску праксу у одабраним земљама издваја, из бројних судских одлука, правна питања којима су се бавили судови, наводећи и аргументе судова које сматра значајним за разумијевање изнесених ставова. Судови датих земаља су, некада, различито одговорили на спорна (облигационоправна) питања, па аутор увиђа те различитости, али и заједничке особине и покушава дати коментар о стању судске праксе.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Godišnjak Pravnog fakulteta u Banjoj Luci, br. 39/2017, str. 199-220
У овом раду аутори анализирају правне аспекте уговора о кредиту са валутном клаузулом у швајцарск... more У овом раду аутори анализирају правне аспекте уговора о кредиту са валутном клаузулом у швајцарском франку. Аутори полазе од дефинисања уговора о кредиту, појашњавања валутне клаузуле и промјенљиве каматне стопе и на основу проучене судске праксе у Србији, Црној Гори, Босни и Херцеговини и Хрватској, компаративним освртом, саопштавају ставове судова и питања којима су се они бавили. Они често наилазе на опречна мишљења и ставове судова и увиђају њихова почетна несналажења, те се питају постоји ли јединствено рјешење (судско, законодавно и сл.) и које би било најоптималније. Аутори постављају оквир за разрјешење проблема у вези са овим кредитима у виду подобних правних института за примјену на овај случај. Још нема коначног рјешења и тешко је дати сигурну прогнозу даљег кретања судске праксе, посебно у државама у којима нема ставова највиших судских инстанци. На основу литературе и судске праксе, аутори дају и предлажу закључна мишљења у погледу предметних питања која су се појавила као спорна у вези са овом проблематиком.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Pravna riječ br. 43/2015, str. 271-296.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Srpska pravna misao, br. 48/2017, str. 155-186.
У овом раду аутор се бави преиспитивањем основа уговорне одговорности за штету, односно правне пр... more У овом раду аутор се бави преиспитивањем основа уговорне одговорности за штету, односно правне природе одговорности за повреду уговорне обавезе, узимајући у обзир досадашњу доктринарну баштину и релевантну судску праксу. Зашто неко одговара за проузроковану штету? Иако се у правној литератури истиче да дужник одговара на основу претпостав-љене кривице због повреде уговора, конструкција уговорне одговорности према одредбама Закона о облигационим односима (ЗОО), нарочито имајући у виду чл. 263. ЗОО, учинила је диску-табилним питање основа уговорне одговорности, без обзира на степене кривице који се наводе у чл. 266, ст. 2. ЗОО. Заснован на расправном начелу, у раду се обрађује субјективно и објективно схватање у погледу основа уговорне одговорности, износе се аргументи за једно и друго схватање, те се критички освијетљују поједини ставови. Свако разматрање се настоји поткријепити примјерима из судске праксе. Иако у домаћој правној литератури и судској пракси превладава субјективно схватање основа уговор-не одговорности, све више се апострофира схватање о објектив-ном основу одговорности због повреде уговора, па се настоје при-казати новија схватања и с тим у вези реафирмисање и редефи-нисање неких појмова и института облигационог права, као што је кривица. Настоји се цјeловито обрадити постављени истра-живачки проблeм тако што ће се исти на нов и специфичан начин
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
STUDENTSKA REVIJA ZA PRIVREDNO PRAVO • STUDENT ECONOMIC LAW REVIEW, 2/2012-2013, p. 66-73
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Book Reviews by Dejan Pilipović
Godišnjak Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci, br. 44/2022, str. 185-187
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Dejan Pilipović
In domestic and international business practice, the arbitration method of dispute resolution has already been established. In addition, a rich practice has been built up. However, in any settlement of disputes, including arbitration, certain omissions are possible, which lead to the possibility of refuting the arbitration decision. It means the transition from the sphere of private to the domain of state justice. This is often possible through a claim for annulment of an arbitration award, which is a specific and limited extraordinary legal remedy. In the following lines of this work, the relationship between this lawsuit and similar legal institutes will be presented, then the annulment of the arbitration awards according to domestic and international legal documents and its relationship with the appeal (constitutional lawsuit). Through a uniform and precise system of judicial control of arbitration awards in the post-arbitration phase through the institute of annulment of arbitration awards, legal certainty and trust of all is achieved, which is also possible in our country through the adoption of a special Law on Arbitration based on international legal documents and good comparative law practices. The paper presents proposals for improving the institution of annulment of arbitration awards in our country.
***
COMPENSATION MECHANISMS FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY TERRORIST ACTS
Consideration of the issue of compensation for damage caused by terrorist acts is relevant and important today, especially in the context of choosing mechanisms or models of compensation. Therefore, domestic and comparative positive legal solutions, case law and legal literature are analyzed. This paper should show that there are several mechanisms of compensation that the legislator can choose and that they are not necessarily excluded, as well as that the current legal situation in Republika Srpska on this issue is not satisfactory and that it can consider improving the model provided by Yugoslav Law on Obligations ("ZOO"), which was received in the former Yugoslav republics. For quality selection of mechanisms, it is necessary to confront attitudes about the need for a special case of liability for damage due to terrorist acts with attitudes about possible other compensation mechanisms outside the rules of tort law (e.g. existence of certain funds for reparation, insurance, etc.). The paper uses the dogmatic and normative method, comparative law and sociological method, historical method and the method of conceptual analysis.
This paper analyses the possibility of an analogous application of Art. 378 of the Law of Contract and Torts (LCT) to other similar (identical) claims. The aim of the research is to try to answer the central question of whether it is necessary to update the provisions of the LCT regarding the one-year statute of limitations in accordance with modern trends in terms of the scope of claims that should become statute-barred within this period. In order to answer this question, scientific research methods, that is, techniques are used, such as the dogmatic-normative, historical-legal, and comparative-legal one, content analysis and a questionnaire. This apparatus is used within the study of legislation, case law and legal literature, as well as in empirical research. Knowing the scope of claims that become statute-barred in a year is not only important for theoretical analysis, but is also of practical importance for court actions , as well as for consumers.
legal order sometimes sets greater or lesser limits on the institution of liability for damage,
although all the conditions of liability are satisfied. In some cases, they are particularly
accentuated, such as the situation in a special case of liability for damage caused by acts of
public violence. In these situations, the state often has the position of a liable entity for
compensation for damage caused to citizens as a result of terrorist acts, public demonstrations
or manifestations and other forms of public violence. These phenomena represent the
challenges of the modern world. Taking into account the different classification of limits of
liability for damage in the legal literature, limitations of liability for damage caused by acts of
public violence include limits regarding the heads of damages ("subject limits"), limits
regarding the injured parties entitled to compensation ("personal limits") and other limits
(voluntary, limits in time and other). Starting from the analysis of this case, in this paper the
author will examine, through scientific methods, the hypothesis whether the set limits on
liability caused by acts of public violence in domestic law, in principle, correspond to
comparative law and observed international and regional legal documents (regardless of the
different models of indemnification of victims). The author's findings are affirmative. In
addition, he concludes that the limits of liability are possible on the basis of the legislative
policy of the state as long as they are not in conflict with the constitutional norms and as long
as there is a balance between the interests of the victim and liable entity. The analysis showed
that there is a mutual connection between the so-called subject and personal limits. Also,
certain de lege ferenda proposals have matured with regard to the degree of development of
tort law. In addition to the theoretical analysis, the scope of compensation and the circle of
persons entitled to compensation in this particular case are also of practical importance for
obtaining compensation before the courts.
Keywords: acts of public violence, limitations regarding the injured parties, limitations of
liability for damage, limitations regarding the heads of damages
Српске (РС) настала је енормна штета. Посматра се грађанскоправна
одговорност у међународном праву поводом НАТО бомбардовања РС. На
међународном плану може се разматрати подношење тужбе пред Међународним судом правде од стране „оштећених“ држава против држава чланица НАТО-а које су извршиле бомбардовање или против НАТО-а
као међународне организације. С тим је повезано питање одговорности
држава чланица за противправне радње НАТО-а. Може се поставити
питање подношења ове тужбе против наведених тужених пред Међународним судом правде од стране оштећених појединаца, или пак од стране
држава, а ради заштите оштећених појединаца као њених грађана.
Кључне ријечи: НАТО бомбардовање РС, штета, међународно право, одговорност
As a consequence of NATO destruction in the area of the Republic of
Srpska (RS), enormous damage has been caused. On the international plane,
a question of filling a lawsuit before the International Court of Justice by
“injured” countries against NATO member states that have carried out the
bombing or against NATO as an international organization, could be taken
into consideration. This is related to the question of the liability of the member
states for the unlawful actions of NATO. It could also be argued about the
question of filling this lawsuit against the defendants mentioned before the
International Court of Justice by the injured individuals, or by the states, in
order to protect the injured individuals as its citizens.
Key words: NATO bombing of RS, damage, International Law, liability
preispitivanje određenih obligacionopravnih instituta, jeste pitanje otkaza i raskida ugovora na primjeru ugovora o prodaji ili snabdijevanju toplotnom energijom
u smislu odredaba Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, Zakona o zaštiti potrošača i
drugih propisa. Naročito zbog različitih termina za označavanje pojmova identičnih ili sličnih pojmovnom određenju raskida, odnosno otkaza, predviđenih propisima o zaštiti potrošača, prethodno se nastoje spoznati koncepti ova dva tradicionalna pravna instituta ugovornog prava kroz njihove sličnosti i razlike. Potom,
otkaz se posmatra kroz prizmu Zakona o obligacionom odnosima na primjeru
ugovora o prodaji toplotne energije i posebnih propisa.
Posebna pažnja je posvećena raspravi o pojmovnom određenju raskida
(ugovora o prodaji toplotne energije) kroz prizmu Zakona o zaštiti potrošača i
posebnih propisa.
MODELS OF REPARATION OF DAMAGES CAUSED BY FLOODS
Abstract: Floods as a natural event with great potential for causing damages are coplex legal issue in regarding damage compensation. This issue has a significant practical importance and, at the same time, this is a legal phenomen particularly regarding potential models reparation of damage.Therefore, authors in this paper have been considering different models of reparation of damage, positive legislation and court practice in order to determine advantages and disadvantages both of certain solutions and de lege ferenda suggestions. There have been analyzed models of reparation of damage based on general damage compensation rules and models of reparation of damage which had been prescribed by special laws. On the other hand, there have been presented other models of reparation of damage which do not have origin in field of law on obligation. Authors have used legal method, comparative method and case stady method.
Key words: reparation of damage, floods, force major, model of damage compensation, other models of reparation of damage.
Book Reviews by Dejan Pilipović
In domestic and international business practice, the arbitration method of dispute resolution has already been established. In addition, a rich practice has been built up. However, in any settlement of disputes, including arbitration, certain omissions are possible, which lead to the possibility of refuting the arbitration decision. It means the transition from the sphere of private to the domain of state justice. This is often possible through a claim for annulment of an arbitration award, which is a specific and limited extraordinary legal remedy. In the following lines of this work, the relationship between this lawsuit and similar legal institutes will be presented, then the annulment of the arbitration awards according to domestic and international legal documents and its relationship with the appeal (constitutional lawsuit). Through a uniform and precise system of judicial control of arbitration awards in the post-arbitration phase through the institute of annulment of arbitration awards, legal certainty and trust of all is achieved, which is also possible in our country through the adoption of a special Law on Arbitration based on international legal documents and good comparative law practices. The paper presents proposals for improving the institution of annulment of arbitration awards in our country.
***
COMPENSATION MECHANISMS FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY TERRORIST ACTS
Consideration of the issue of compensation for damage caused by terrorist acts is relevant and important today, especially in the context of choosing mechanisms or models of compensation. Therefore, domestic and comparative positive legal solutions, case law and legal literature are analyzed. This paper should show that there are several mechanisms of compensation that the legislator can choose and that they are not necessarily excluded, as well as that the current legal situation in Republika Srpska on this issue is not satisfactory and that it can consider improving the model provided by Yugoslav Law on Obligations ("ZOO"), which was received in the former Yugoslav republics. For quality selection of mechanisms, it is necessary to confront attitudes about the need for a special case of liability for damage due to terrorist acts with attitudes about possible other compensation mechanisms outside the rules of tort law (e.g. existence of certain funds for reparation, insurance, etc.). The paper uses the dogmatic and normative method, comparative law and sociological method, historical method and the method of conceptual analysis.
This paper analyses the possibility of an analogous application of Art. 378 of the Law of Contract and Torts (LCT) to other similar (identical) claims. The aim of the research is to try to answer the central question of whether it is necessary to update the provisions of the LCT regarding the one-year statute of limitations in accordance with modern trends in terms of the scope of claims that should become statute-barred within this period. In order to answer this question, scientific research methods, that is, techniques are used, such as the dogmatic-normative, historical-legal, and comparative-legal one, content analysis and a questionnaire. This apparatus is used within the study of legislation, case law and legal literature, as well as in empirical research. Knowing the scope of claims that become statute-barred in a year is not only important for theoretical analysis, but is also of practical importance for court actions , as well as for consumers.
legal order sometimes sets greater or lesser limits on the institution of liability for damage,
although all the conditions of liability are satisfied. In some cases, they are particularly
accentuated, such as the situation in a special case of liability for damage caused by acts of
public violence. In these situations, the state often has the position of a liable entity for
compensation for damage caused to citizens as a result of terrorist acts, public demonstrations
or manifestations and other forms of public violence. These phenomena represent the
challenges of the modern world. Taking into account the different classification of limits of
liability for damage in the legal literature, limitations of liability for damage caused by acts of
public violence include limits regarding the heads of damages ("subject limits"), limits
regarding the injured parties entitled to compensation ("personal limits") and other limits
(voluntary, limits in time and other). Starting from the analysis of this case, in this paper the
author will examine, through scientific methods, the hypothesis whether the set limits on
liability caused by acts of public violence in domestic law, in principle, correspond to
comparative law and observed international and regional legal documents (regardless of the
different models of indemnification of victims). The author's findings are affirmative. In
addition, he concludes that the limits of liability are possible on the basis of the legislative
policy of the state as long as they are not in conflict with the constitutional norms and as long
as there is a balance between the interests of the victim and liable entity. The analysis showed
that there is a mutual connection between the so-called subject and personal limits. Also,
certain de lege ferenda proposals have matured with regard to the degree of development of
tort law. In addition to the theoretical analysis, the scope of compensation and the circle of
persons entitled to compensation in this particular case are also of practical importance for
obtaining compensation before the courts.
Keywords: acts of public violence, limitations regarding the injured parties, limitations of
liability for damage, limitations regarding the heads of damages
Српске (РС) настала је енормна штета. Посматра се грађанскоправна
одговорност у међународном праву поводом НАТО бомбардовања РС. На
међународном плану може се разматрати подношење тужбе пред Међународним судом правде од стране „оштећених“ држава против држава чланица НАТО-а које су извршиле бомбардовање или против НАТО-а
као међународне организације. С тим је повезано питање одговорности
држава чланица за противправне радње НАТО-а. Може се поставити
питање подношења ове тужбе против наведених тужених пред Међународним судом правде од стране оштећених појединаца, или пак од стране
држава, а ради заштите оштећених појединаца као њених грађана.
Кључне ријечи: НАТО бомбардовање РС, штета, међународно право, одговорност
As a consequence of NATO destruction in the area of the Republic of
Srpska (RS), enormous damage has been caused. On the international plane,
a question of filling a lawsuit before the International Court of Justice by
“injured” countries against NATO member states that have carried out the
bombing or against NATO as an international organization, could be taken
into consideration. This is related to the question of the liability of the member
states for the unlawful actions of NATO. It could also be argued about the
question of filling this lawsuit against the defendants mentioned before the
International Court of Justice by the injured individuals, or by the states, in
order to protect the injured individuals as its citizens.
Key words: NATO bombing of RS, damage, International Law, liability
preispitivanje određenih obligacionopravnih instituta, jeste pitanje otkaza i raskida ugovora na primjeru ugovora o prodaji ili snabdijevanju toplotnom energijom
u smislu odredaba Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, Zakona o zaštiti potrošača i
drugih propisa. Naročito zbog različitih termina za označavanje pojmova identičnih ili sličnih pojmovnom određenju raskida, odnosno otkaza, predviđenih propisima o zaštiti potrošača, prethodno se nastoje spoznati koncepti ova dva tradicionalna pravna instituta ugovornog prava kroz njihove sličnosti i razlike. Potom,
otkaz se posmatra kroz prizmu Zakona o obligacionom odnosima na primjeru
ugovora o prodaji toplotne energije i posebnih propisa.
Posebna pažnja je posvećena raspravi o pojmovnom određenju raskida
(ugovora o prodaji toplotne energije) kroz prizmu Zakona o zaštiti potrošača i
posebnih propisa.
MODELS OF REPARATION OF DAMAGES CAUSED BY FLOODS
Abstract: Floods as a natural event with great potential for causing damages are coplex legal issue in regarding damage compensation. This issue has a significant practical importance and, at the same time, this is a legal phenomen particularly regarding potential models reparation of damage.Therefore, authors in this paper have been considering different models of reparation of damage, positive legislation and court practice in order to determine advantages and disadvantages both of certain solutions and de lege ferenda suggestions. There have been analyzed models of reparation of damage based on general damage compensation rules and models of reparation of damage which had been prescribed by special laws. On the other hand, there have been presented other models of reparation of damage which do not have origin in field of law on obligation. Authors have used legal method, comparative method and case stady method.
Key words: reparation of damage, floods, force major, model of damage compensation, other models of reparation of damage.