<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="macklovitch-1999-regional">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Regional survey: M(A)T in North America</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Elliott</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Macklovitch</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>1999-sep 13-17</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit VII</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Singapore, Singapore</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>We examine two North American case studies, each of which illustrates a different strategy for coming to terms with high-volume, high-quality translation. The first eschews MT in favour of translation memory technology; the second employs a controlled language to simplify the input to an MT system. Both strategies betray a certain dissatisfaction with the current state of machine translation, although neither alternative, it turns out, fully lives up to its expectations.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">macklovitch-1999-regional</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/1999.mtsummit-1.11</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>1999-sep 13-17</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>73</start>
            <end>79</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Regional survey: M(A)T in North America
%A Macklovitch, Elliott
%S Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit VII
%D 1999
%8 sep 13 17
%C Singapore, Singapore
%F macklovitch-1999-regional
%X We examine two North American case studies, each of which illustrates a different strategy for coming to terms with high-volume, high-quality translation. The first eschews MT in favour of translation memory technology; the second employs a controlled language to simplify the input to an MT system. Both strategies betray a certain dissatisfaction with the current state of machine translation, although neither alternative, it turns out, fully lives up to its expectations.
%U https://aclanthology.org/1999.mtsummit-1.11
%P 73-79

Markdown (Informal)

[Regional survey: M(A)T in North America](https://aclanthology.org/1999.mtsummit-1.11) (Macklovitch, MTSummit 1999)

• Regional survey: M(A)T in North America (Macklovitch, MTSummit 1999)

ACL

• Elliott Macklovitch. 1999. Regional survey: M(A)T in North America. In Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit VII, pages 73–79, Singapore, Singapore.