Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Avatar
Because All Good Heroes Deserve Kidneys

@becausegoodheroesdeservekidneys / becausegoodheroesdeservekidneys.tumblr.com

Hello. I'm Elanor. There is nothing but nonsense here; mostly trees, with occasional shitposts about politics, walruses, video games, or my friend Phil. Eventually I will actually publish that book about queer Welsh werewolves I keep teasing you with (sorry) (I also delete anon hate without reading so tbh you might as well send it to your therapist instead xoxo)

I was a woman with stubble and a receding hairline, alternating back and forth between different terrible haircuts before I got laser and bangs and became the woman you see before you today. And when I talk to some of these girls now who get hrt and laser IMMEDIATELY after coming out, it's got me having mixed feelings. On the one hand, I'm happy for them, it's really a testament to how much we've fought to get access to medical transition. on the other hand, they all ask me where I get my confidence from and literally it's because I used to look like a crossdressing faggot before I looked like a woman, and people still gendered me correctly about 50% of the time back then and it made me realize that nobody fucking notices little bumps in your clothes or the spot you missed shaving. An actress who forgets a line can still deliver a memorable performance.

ALSO! WHILE I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION

I'm a 5'10" Brick Shithouse of a woman. I have forearms bigger than some dude's biceps. I got a soft tummy and am often covered in grease and you know what! I get treated like a woman everywhere I go now. anyone telling you that you need to lose weight, or stop working out, or starve yourself to be a woman is fucking lying to you. There are as many ways to be a woman as there are women. As long as its authentic to yourself, the world will respond in kind.

You're gonna be fine kid.

People look at this and go 'yeah that's a woman', all your fear is in your head.

Also, go eat a sandwich.

Oh my god I'm sooooo mad right now

So. I have no business telling people not to collect wild plants/materials.

I do it all the time.

However.

The words "wildcrafted," and "foraged," even "sustainably harvested," are terrifying to see in an ad on Etsy or Instagram

There is a such thing as the honorable harvest where you ASK the plant if it is okay to take, with the intention of listening if the answer is NO. Robin Wall Kimmerer talked about this, She did not make it up, it is an ancient and basic guideline of treating the plants with respect.

Basically it is not wrong to use plants and other living things, even if this means taking their life. But you are not the main character. You have to reflect on your knowledge of the organism's life cycle and its role in the ecosystem, so you can know you are not damaging the ecosystem. You have to only take what you need and avoid depleting the population.

Mary Siisip Geniusz also talked about it in an enlightening way in her book Plants Have So Much to Give Us, All We Have To Do is Ask. She gave an example of a woman who was on an island and needed to use a medicinal herb to heal her injured leg or she would not survive the winter. In that situation she had to use up all of the plant that was on the island. This was permissible, even though it eliminated the local population, because she had to do it to save her life. But in return the woman had the responsibility to later return to the island and plant seeds of that plant.

And what makes me absolutely furious, is that there are a bunch of people online who have vaguely copied this philosophy of sustainability in a false and insulting way, saying "wildcrafted" or "foraged" materials to be all trendy and cool and in touch with nature, when it is actually just poaching.

If you are from a capitalistic culture the honorable harvest is very hard and unintuitive to learn to practice. I am not very good at it still. This is why it is suspicious if someone is confident that they can ethically and respectfully harvest wild materials with money involved.

So there's this lichen that is often called "reindeer moss." It looks like this:

It grows only a few millimeters a year.

This is "preserved" reindeer moss.

It is from Etsy, similar is also sold in many other online shops, many of which have the audacity to describe it as a "plant" for decorations and terrariums that needs no maintenance.

It is not maintenance-free, it is dead. It has been spray-painted a horrible shade of green. The people buying it clearly don't even know what it is. It is a popular crafting material for "fairy houses," whatever the hell those are. So is moss, also dead, spray-painted, and wild-harvested. Supposedly reindeer moss is harvested sustainably in Finland, where it is abundant, for the craft industry. However poaching of lichens and mosses is absolutely rampant.

It's even more upsetting because there's hardly any articles drawing attention to the problem. This one is from 1999. And the poaching is still going on.

There is a "moss" section on Etsy, and it is so upsetting

These mosses and lichens were collected from the wild. Most of the shops are in the Pacific Northwest or Appalachia, which are the major locations of moss and lichen poaching. There are some shops based in Appalachia selling "foraged" reindeer moss.

Reindeer moss may be abundant in Finland, but in Appalachia it should NOT be harvested to be sold on Etsy as craft supplies! Moss doesn't grow quickly. Big, healthy colonies like this took years to grow. Some of these shops have thousands of sales, all of bags and bags of moss and lichen, and thinking of how much moss and lichen that must be, I am filled with horror.

Clubmosses do not transplant well, and these ones have no roots. The buyers do not realize they have bought a dead plant because clubmoss stays green and pliable after it is dead.

This is especially awful because in Mary Siisip Geniusz's book she talked about clubmosses being poached so much for Christmas wreaths that they had almost disappeared from a lot of forests.

I don't even know if this is illegal if it's not a formally endangered species so I don't know if I can report them I'm just. really sad and angry

The abundance of lichen in Finland is... debatable. According to economic standards, there's enough for commercial harvesting (which is done by harvesting 20-30% in a given location, then harvesting is banned from that specific location for the next 5 years. At least this is how things go in theory...). However, there's a constant issue of reindeer not having enough lichen to feed on, since reindeer are always herded in the wild. This leads to reindeer herders having to give them species-incompatible supplementary feed.

Personally, if the native species don't have enough food to feed on in the wild, to me that would be a better standard to measure the economic viability of harvesting lichen for other purposes with.

Also there's a constant issue of poaching lichen from the wild for which culprits are almost never found. Part of it can be simple issue of ignorance or thoughtlessness. But undoubtedly there are people doing it for commercial purposes, knowing it's not part of the "jokamiehenoikeus" ("everyman's rights", which gives Finns moving in nature the right to pick berries and mushrooms or whatever pinecones they find on the ground in the woods for their own use).

Thats terrible, but I'm not surprised, I suspected it might not truly be sustainable.

Yeah. Harvesting this stuff on industrial scale to be sold for arts and crafts is not acceptable.

Do not buy reindeer moss.

Hang on

One of these shops (with thousands of sales!) is selling BIRD FEATHERS

That is a FEDERAL CRIME

...

If you see people selling poached items you should see if you can contact their government. Many places allow you to make a report. This is only time I'd advocate Narcing

Yeah like...

I'm not a snitch, but this shop I'm talking about is selling ORCHIDS. Uprooted, clearly pulled up from the wild, for people's terrariums. And slow-growing lichens. And mosses.

And they have thousands of sales.

One of their items includes bird feathers in the photos. In the USA even possessing the feathers of any wild bird, let alone selling them, is illegal.

So.

Update.

I'm looking through etsy shops for anything that appears obviously poached/illegal.

There are so, so, so many listings of Usnea (old man's beard lichen) as a medicinal herb. And other lichens. I found someone selling PULMONARIA LOBATA of all things.

I'm thinking about how I can recognize when a plant is probably poached from Appalachia, but I can't recognize a plant that is probably poached from a faraway place.

This is going to sound crazy, but I sort of hate the houseplant business.

I don't hate houseplants as a concept. But a lot of house plants are tropical plants, desert plants, epiphytic plants, and other plants with narrow habitat requirements, and it creates a HUGE market for these plants in areas the plants don't live.

Not all of them are poached, but outside of a few very widely cultivated species, how do I know, especially if I don't know anything about the plant's native ecosystem?

Cacti, succulents, carnivorous plants, and orchids are all threatened by poaching. Even species that are cultivated in nurseries are heavily poached. And someone buying from California doesn't necessarily know that those "wild-collected" Goodyera pubescens from Kentucky are scarce enough that seeing dozens of them being sold on Etsy is a major red flag.

Most people don't even know that Venus flytraps are native to North and South Carolina and nowhere else.

Poaching doesn't look how you think it does.

People think "oh, if it was illegal it would have been shut down/it wouldn't be for sale still". WRONG. There's tons of illegal plant, animal, and fungi remains for sale, often on cutesy websites like Etsy. It's especially rampant in the "gothic" aesthetic, which places great value on bones and real animal remains:

It shouldn't be up to you, the consumer, to do all the research and track down every bit of information to make sure what they're buying is actually respectfully and sustainably sourced, but often, it is, because it's really hard to regulate and track Internet-based businesses.

"It's just a few plants, it doesn't matter" - yes, it does. If it were only one person, I might understand, but the whole thing about businesses and capitalism is that they have a never-ending need, an infinite demand.

As a conservation ecology student I am begging people to think twice when you see this kind of thing. Don't take sellers at their word, and if they act cagey or give you non-answers or vague assurances, STOP and LEAVE. Better yet, report them. Take screenshots in case listings and pages get taken down, and report them to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, or the appropriate equivalent in your country - just google "(your area) report poaching". The US Fish and Wildlife Service has an online form, below:

Thank you for reading. Your actions really do make a difference for every single plant or animal that gets exploited like this, and I appreciate you.

If someone doesn't understand 24 hour time and is chill you can convert it for them because that's helpful and polite.

If someone primarily uses 12 hour time but understands 24 hour time and is chill you can leave it unconverted as a sign of respect for their abilities.

If someone throws a hissy fit whenever someone gives a time in 24 hour time you are obligated by sacred duty to exclusively give them the time in 24 hour time, even if you actually use 12 hour time.

If someone calls it military time you get to laugh at them for being a yankee. even if they're not.

Every time you have GenAI make you an anime waifu with three titties and a dumptruck ass a family doesn't get to have a drink or bathe.

Every time you ask Copilot to write you a PowerShell script to stroke your boss' ego, a city experiences a brownout.

Every time you chat with your AI "girlfriend" a farmer doesn't get to water their animals.

Using these tools actively hurts you and your community, while at the same time enriching some shitheel who would happily step on your neck to make an additional dollar. Don't use them. Actively remove them from devices you own. Disable them whenever possible. Go out of your way to avoid them. It's honestly not hard. You've been using the internet just fine without GenAI hallucinating at you.

Doctor Who, but Chronologically: 57

IT WAS A FOUR-PARTER!!! Sort of. No Slitheen this time, but we return to 2006 for Christmas, to discover that:

  • The Doctor is mid-regeneration, with a shiny new David Tennant-shaped face and a coma
  • Mickey and Jackie don't know when Rose will come back, but they're clearly listening out for the TARDIS at all times, and
  • Harriet Jones is now Prime Minister!

This last point is what makes it a very neat quadrilogy when watched this way, because the Themes mean you could bundle this as a single story and call it the Rise and Fall of Harriet Jones. It's interesting, too, because by the end of this story, Harriet has disgraced herself by shooting an alien ship out of the sky and the Doctor brings down her government in retaliation, a plot point that I hated 20 years ago when this episode first aired; funnily enough, though, I find that I now think it's the right choice from a story perspective. I still wish it didn't happen, like, because I like the character. But, in terms of plot and story and Themes... yes, correct ending. BUT I DON'T HAVE TO LIKE IT. I contain multitudes.

I'm getting ahead of myself. Okay, so, the TARDIS crashes into Rose's housing estate, nearly flattening Mickey and Jackie, and the Doctor staggers out, beams "Merry Christmas!" at them both, and then promptly falls into a coma. He is still wearing Christopher Eccleston's leather jacket, which is really wearing him. Rose follows, looking shell-shocked and traumatised, and tells her family that this is the Doctor now.

And so, a major Theme of the episode is the central question: if he can change like this so radically, Doctor Who? Who is he now? Has he changed too much? Is this the same man?

This would be shocking and compelling! Except we've seen about six different Doctors. Old news. Fuck, we've even seen Clara reacting to Peter Capaldi. It was harder for her; neither she nor Rose know what the fuck is going on, because no one has deigned to tell either, but at least Rose is surrounded by people who validate her feelings and try to support her through it rather than emotionally abusing her and trying to tell her she's a shallow cunt who just wants to fuck him because she reacts with any emotion other than blinding happiness while he calls her a freak and chooses to abandon her in a different century three times.

Anyway: new Tennant! I wonder how we lost Eccleston? Let's see how soon we get that answer :)

Meanwhile, a nice Welshman with a beautiful accent called Mr Llywelyn (not that anyone else pronounces it right) has sent a probe to Mars, containing samples of Earth things in case of aliens. This includes rocks and seeds and a sample of human blood, for baffling reasons. Unfortunately, it is intercepted by a bunch of skull-faced aliens doing a Queen Bohemian Rhapsody impression. They arrive and use the blood to do a sort of mass hypnosis on anyone who is A+ blood type (not me lol. Uh, my husband though) and make them stand on roofs, ready to jump. They then beam Harriet Jones and the beautiful Welshman and also an assistant and an army man aboard, and tell Harriet that if she surrenders the planet, half of humanity will be enslaved; if not, a third will jump to their deaths.

They also immediately kill the nice Welshman, because Welsh people are not allowed to survive. Never forgive, never forget. Oh, and the army man, but shrug.

Anyway, after being menaced by four Santas and a Christmas tree for a bit, Rose and Mickey wrestle the unconscious Doctor back into the TARDIS, and then the Sycorax beam them aboard. Rose takes a brave stand, and tries to imitate the Doctor by telling the Sycorax to get fucked. She does this by citing a bunch of aliens and monsters she's heard of/encountered! This includes:

  • The Shadow Proclamation (we've seen this! The Doctor says this to the Nestene Consciousness)
  • The Gelth Confederacy (we've seen this! the ghosts in Dickensian London!)
  • The Slitheen (we've seen this! FOUR PARTER)
  • The Mighty Jagrafess (the what?)
  • The Daleks (we've seen this! Churchill had some, with Matt Smith and Amy. And there were some in Manhattan with Martha and some pig men. But when has Rose seen them?)

It doesn't work and she is laughed at. Mean.

But Mickey accidentally pours tea into the TARDIS and that finally wakes the Doctor up, who manages to save the day by means of an extraordinarily camp sword fight for possession of the planet, during which two different things are dropped off the spaceship and onto London below: (a) the Doctor's severed hand (it grows back using regeneration energy); (b) AN ENTIRE SYCORAX WARRIOR, COMPLETE WITH SWORD

(He's still quite killy)

No one seems bothered by the idea that those might have landed on someone. ALSO, it was only a few episodes back that River told us the Doctor's corpse needs to be burned, because a single cell could bring down entire intergalactic empires in the wrong hands - are we okay?? With an entire hand??? Just falling on South Wimbledon?? Unclear. No one seems to give a shit. Hope that doesn't crop up again :)

The Sycorax promise to leave, on pain of satsuma. The gang go back to London. And then, in a truly bewildering move, the Doctor tells Harriet about all the hundreds if not thousands of alien species wanting to conquer Earth and then wanders off for crisps. This is not Reassuring, and makes her decide that Earth needs to be able to defend itself for when it doesn't have the Doctor around to win improbable swordfights. And so, she orders "Torchwood" to fire on the spaceship.

WHICH IS FUN BECAUSE we have, in fact, already heard of Torchwood! We saw it founded by Queen Victoria, to kill alien threats and that. This is not mysterious to us. More confirmation that they're still about. But the upshot is, the big Torchwood gun obliterates the fleeing spaceship, and so the Doctor is furious at, you know, all the deaths, and so he says to the assistant man, "Don't you think she looks tired?"

The following day Harriet is embroiled in a health scandal and a vote of no confidence is called.

Speaking as someone who lived and blogged through the fall of the Tory party in the last five years, LOL would that happen the next day. This is less believable to me than the Sycorax. But okay.

(I still mourn the fall of Harriet Jones. But, I do now think that's a good narrative choice. People in positions of power may have wonderful personalities - Harriet knows everyone's names, and makes people coffee, and is a general delight in spite of being PM - but when they are responsible for that many lives and then live through the trauma of seeing people murdered in front of them, they may choose to wield their power negatively, for very human and understandable reasons. Her empathy becomes her weakness. She doesn't want anyone else to die; she feels scared; she feels guilty and responsible. And so she chooses to kill a fleeing enemy to send a message. That's good character work, and good for establishing to the audience that the Doctor is a character who nonetheless will never make that choice, and nor should you. I think this is right and good, but I reserve the right to be grumpy about it because I like Harriet Jones T_T)

Anyway, ultimately, Rose decides he's still the Doctor, and chooses to keep travelling with him. Jesus, though, but this is a softer Doctor. Episode 2 of this four-parter ended with Eccleston insisting that he will not ever do dinner with family, and bullying Rose into leaving with him; this one ends with Tennant sitting at Christmas dinner in a paper crown, and shyly asking Rose if she still wants to come with him, while they both gaze with naked adoration at one another. Fuck Mickey - the entire audience feels like a third wheel. I felt like I needed to pull a curtain across the TV.

Oddly, we are nonetheless told that this Doctor is a "no second chances sort of man". I wonder how consistent that will prove to be :)

ANYWAY. Let's update the board!

Didn’t you also try to convince us that microwave was some ludicrous thing in Welsh?

Avatar

EXCUSE ME. AFTER ALL THESE YEARS, ARE YOU INSINTUATING THAT I WAS PRO-POPTY PING?

-

-

-

I WAS DOING THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF THAT THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

Avatar

everyone stop interacting with this post, @i-wear-the-cheese is the only person I'm listening to from now on

I sometimes call the microwave the "nuke box", as in "nuke it for a few seconds". I see nothing wrong with calling it "popty ping".

And that's fine! Out of context I can see how this is might just seem like I'm being extremely pedantic and slamming down on people's personal lexicons for no reason, but it's less about the individual usage of popty ping and more about the widespread 'teehee Welsh is so silly' attitude that non-Welsh speakers so often display — maliciously or not — when talking about the language.

I genuinely don't care if a mam teaches her child to say popty ping instead of meicrodon or if someone genuinely enjoys using it in everyday speech, but I do care if it's being used by English speakers as a way of treating a minority language as a linguistic punching bag for the millionth time.

It's less about the microwave and more about the microcosm.

it always seems weird to me when certain political historians define fascism very narrowly. it kinda seems lile they're always using nazi germany as the only true example of fascism, and anything that isn't exactly the same as nazi germany is not truly fascist

japan in wwii? not true fascism because they didn't have a single dictator with absolute power. spain under franco? not fascist because they weren't constantly at war with their neighbors. chile under pinochet? not fascist because they had some capitalist economic policy. mussolini, who literally coined the term fascism? not a true fascist because he was pro-catholic

i have heard all these arguments from serious people. but if you accept them, you have to conclude that there has only been one fascist nation and one fascist movement literally ever, and there will never be another one. you have to deny the reality that fascism can take root in any culture. and it always takes on different characteristics because every culture lionizes a different glorious (imagined) past

Sponsored

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.