Wikidata:Property proposal/Mummy of a person
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mummy of a person
[edit]Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Under discussion
| Description | mummy of a person |
|---|---|
| Represents | mummy (Q43616) |
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | item, mummy (Q43616) |
| Example 1 | Ahmose I (Q7222)→Mummy of Ahmose I (Q130250337) |
| Example 2 | Tutankhamun (Q12154)→Tutankhamen's mummy (Q7856908) |
| Example 3 | subject→value |
Motivation
[edit]Could also be generalised as ‘mortal remains’.--Sinuhe20 (talk) 08:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Rename to "remains of this person" for precision, otherwise
Support: there is a clear domain, range, and relationship, and no appropriate existing property for that relationship. (Closest I can think of: has effect (P1542)? Neither replaced by (P1366) or followed by (P156) is appropriate.) Raises the question of how to model the inverse, given of (P642) is (eventually) going away: has cause (P828)? Swpb (talk) 17:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with a generalization to include any body parts used as relics like Uncorrupted hand of Saint Teresa of Jesus (Q5991616) --Melderick (talk) 23:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment If we are talking about any body parts wouldn't it be better in the inverse direction? Currently part of (P361) is being used but I wouldn't mind having a more specific property for this... ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think part of (P361) would be intuitive for a (more or less) complete mummy. One advantage (for what it's worth) of having the property in this direction is being able to see on a person item that there is an item for their remains, without needing to expand "Derived statements". Swpb (talk) 18:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Sinuhe20:, could you please clarify all comments in this proposal? Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 19:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think part of (P361) would be intuitive for a (more or less) complete mummy. One advantage (for what it's worth) of having the property in this direction is being able to see on a person item that there is an item for their remains, without needing to expand "Derived statements". Swpb (talk) 18:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
