Chapter 7
Chapter 7
Chapter 7
LEADING/DIRECTING
Leading is the process of integrating the people with the organization so as
to obtain their willing and enthusiastic cooperation for the achievement of
its goals.
According to Stoner, Freeman and Gilbert, leadership is the process of
directing and influencing the task related activities of group members.
Leading is the process by which managers seek to influence subordinates
to accomplish goals by communicating with them.
At the top of any organizations leading is most concerned with:
Establishing values, cultures and climate
Defining vision
Identifying core competencies
Scanning environments
Sensing the need for change
The importance of the directing function
Directing initiates by giving directives and guidance to employees
Directing integrates employees’ effort by coordinating actions of
the members and leading toward the objectives
Directing attempts to get the maximum out of individuals by
providing ways to fully utilize the potentials and capabilities of
employees.
Directing facilitates changes by incorporating environmental and
internal changes into the organization
Directing provides stability by balancing the different parts of the
organization.
Elements of Leading
Leading has three major components/elements: leadership, motivation and communication.
A. Leadership
Leadership is the art of influencing individual or group activities towards the
achievement of organizational objectives.
Leaders are extremely important in a variety of organizations.
Leadership style implies the way in which the leader exercises leadership
it is the way in which the functions of leadership are carried out
It is the way how the leaders behave towards their subordinates in the
accomplishment of the work.
1. Autocratic style/ “I” approach:
A manager who uses autocratic style does not share decision making
authority with subordinates.
The manager makes the decision and then announces it.
Autocratic managers may ask for subordinates’ ideas and feedback
about the decision, but input does not usually change the decision
unless it indicates that something vital has been overlooked.
The hallmark of this style is that the manager, who retains all the
authority, executes the entire process.
Consequently, the autocratic style is sometimes called
the “I” approach.
2. Participative/ Democratic/“We”
approach
Managers who use the participative style share decision making
authority with subordinates.
The degree of sharing can range from the manager’s presenting
a tentative decision that is subject to change to letting the group
or subordinate participate in making the decision.
Sometimes called the “we” approach, participative management
style involves others and lets them bring their unique viewpoints,
talents, and experiences to bear on an issue.
This style is strongly emphasized today because of the trends
toward downsizing, employee empowerment and worker teams.
3. Laissez faire style/Free rein style/
“They” approach
often called “they” approach or the spectator style, the free rein
style empowers individuals or groups to function on their own,
without the involvement from the managers to whom they report.
The style relies heavily on delegation of authority and works best
when the parties have expert power, when participants have know
how to use the tools and techniques needed for their tasks.
Under this style, managers set limits and remain available for
consultation.
Free rein leadership works particularly well with managers and
experienced professionals in engineering, design, research, and
sales. Such people generally resist other kind of supervision.
4. Employee oriented vs. Task oriented
leadership style
i. Employee oriented leadership style: The leader focuses on the
people, considering their feelings and the quality of their mutual
relationship.
The essence of this leader’s style is sensitivity to subordinates as
persons. They seek friendly, trusting and respectful relationships
with employees.
i. The task oriented leadership style: The leader focuses on the
task to be performed, the progress being made, and the means of
accomplishing the work. The leader closely supervises
employees to make sure the task is performed satisfactorily. The
emphasis is given on getting the job done, rather than
employee’s growth or personal satisfaction.
Theories of Leadership
The findings of the two factor theory indicate that the work characteristics
associated with satisfaction are quite different from those pertaining to
dissatisfaction which prompted the notion that two factors influence work
motivation, namely hygiene factors and motivation factors.
Hygiene factors include salary, job security, status, company policies,
quality of technical supervision and quality of interpersonal relationships
among peers, supervisors and subordinates. These are the primary elements
involved in job dissatisfaction.
When present in sufficient amount, they have no effect; when absent, they lead
to job dissatisfaction.
Con’t…
Motivation factors include achievement, recognition, responsibility,
advancement, the job itself and possibility of growth. These are the primary
elements involved in job satisfaction. When present, they can stimulate
personal and psychological growth.
b) Process Theories of Motivation:
1. Vroom’s Expectancy Theory
this theory is based on the belief that people will act to maximize their
rewards. Vroom defines motivation as a process governing choices among
alternative forms of voluntary activities. Motivation-the spur to act- is a
function of how badly we want something and how likely we think we are to
get it. Its intensity functions in direct proportion to perceived or expected
rewards.
Expectancy theory includes three variables:
Effort-Performance link: will the effort achieve performance? How much effort will
performance require? How probable is success
Performance-reward link: what is the possibility that a certain performance will
produce the desired reward or outcome?
Attractiveness/valence: how attractive is the reward? This factor relates to the strength
or importance of the reward to the individual and deals with his or her unsatisfied
needs.
2.Adam’s Equity Theory:
This theory states that people’s behavior relates to their
perception of the fairness of treatment they receive.
It also includes the fairness that an individual perceives in the
relationship between effort expended and reward.
People calculate equity by calculating a simple ratio: the efforts
they are expected to invest on the job (their input) in relation to
what they expect to receive after investing that effort (their
outcome).
Equity exists when the ratios are equivalent.
Inequity exists when, in the employee’s mind, inputs exceed the
relative or perceived values of the outcomes.
3. Skinner’s Reinforcement
states that behaviors result in desirable consequences are likely to recur; and
those that result in undesirable consequences will be less likely to recur.
There are various types of reinforcement as mentioned below.
Positive reinforcement: is a type of reinforcement that strengthens behavior
by providing a desirable consequence when a desirable behavior occurs.
Thus, it increases the likelihood that a desired behavior will be repeated.
Positive reinforcement can be praise, pay, or promotion.
Avoidance: this reinforcement attempts to increase the probability that a
positive behavior will be repeated by showing the consequences behavior
the manager does not desire. The employee is allowed to avoid those
consequences by displaying the desired behavior. For example, a manager
has a policy of penalizing all employees who do not turn in reports in time.
Extinction: managers can ignore the behavior of subordinates in order to
weaken the behavior. This approach is most effective when behavior is
temporary and not serious. The supervisor’s hope is that behavior will go
away or disappear soon if it is ignored.
Punishment: managers might attempt to decrease the recurrence of a
behavior by applying negative consequences.
Theory X and Theory Y