Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Inter FA_CH01

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 102

INTERMEDIATE FINANCIAL

ACCOUNTING I (ACFN3131)
1
I SEMESTER 2024/25 AY
AAU
Compiled by Andualem
2 Financial Accounting at the Intermediate Level

 COURSE DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVE


3 CHAPTER 1
DEVELOPMENT OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

1. The Environment of Accounting

2. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting


 Basic Objectives of Financial Reporting

 Fundamental Concepts

 Recognition, Measurement, and Disclosure Concepts

3. Cash Flows and Income Measurement


I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING
4

 Definition, Objective, Importance of

Accounting

 The Accounting profession

 Development of Accounting Standards

 Financial Reporting Challenges


I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
5

1.1 DEFINITION, OBJECTIVE, IMPORTANCE OF ACCOUNTING


 Accounting

 the production and transmission of information about an enterprise.

 identifies, measures, and communicates financial information about economic

entities to interested persons.


 is a service activity

 is a descriptive/analytical discipline, and

 is an information system.

 Objective – To provide financial information about the reporting entity that is

useful to current and potential decision makers (decision-usefulness approach)


I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
6

1.1 DEFINITION, OBJECTIVE, IMPORTANCE OF ACCOUNTING


 Accounting …

 As a service activity – its function is to provide interested parties with

quantitative information, primarily financial in nature, about


economic entities that is intended to be useful in making economic
decisions (reasoned choices among alternative courses of action).
 As an information system – it collects and communicates

economic/financial information about an entity to a wide variety of


persons whose decision and actions are related to the activity.
I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
7

1.1 DEFINITION, OBJECTIVE, IMPORTANCE OF ACCOUNTING


 Accounting …

 As a descriptive/analytical discipline, it defines the great mass of

events and transactions that characterize economic activity and


through measurement, classification, and summarization, reduces
those data to relatively small, highly significant, and interrelated
items that, when properly assembled and reported, describe the
financial condition, and results of operation of a specific economic
activity.
I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
8

 Accounting

 Accounting

information
system (AIS)
I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
9

 Accounting

 Accounting

information
system
(AIS)
I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
10

 Accounting …
 Role of Accounting in Capital Allocation
• Resources are limited – An effective process of capital allocation is critical to
a healthy economy; efficient, effective, and economical use of scarce
resources often determines whether a business thrives
• Accounting assists (key) in the efficient and effective use/allocation of scare
resources.
I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
11

Note the
interplay
I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
12

 Stakeholders in Financial Reporting

 Key stakeholders include traditional users of financial information and parties

with something at risk (at stake)

 Users that rely directly on the financial information for resource allocation

(investors and creditors)

 Users who help in the efficient allocation of resources (financial analysts and

regulators)

 Anyone who prepares, relies on, reviews, audits, or monitors financial

information
I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
13

 Stakeholders in Financial Reporting…

 What is at Stake for Each Stakeholder?


Stakeholder (User) What is at Stake (Use)?
Investors/creditors Investment/loan
Management/Employees Job, bonus, reputation, salary increase, access to capital
markets by company
Securities commissions and stock Reputation, effective and efficient capital marketplace
exchanges
Analysts and credit rating Reputation, profits
agencies
Auditors Reputation, profits (companies are their clients)
Standard setters Reputation
Government Taxation, Regulation
Customers Production and delivery
Others Various
I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
14

 Fundamentals of Financial Accounting Theory

 Information: Evidence that can potentially affect an individual’s decisions.

 External parties’ decision-making needs create demand for financial

reporting.

 Supply and demand for financial reporting is due to the presence of

information asymmetry.

 Information Asymmetry

 A condition in which some people have more information than others.


I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
15

 Information Asymmetry…
 Some reasons for information asymmetry

• Efficient markets hypothesis suggests markets reflect publicly available

information
• Human behaviour sometimes motivated by maximizing self-interest
 Two types: Adverse selection and Moral hazard

 Adverse Selection
 A type of information asymmetry whereby one party to a contract has an

information advantage over another party – “hidden information from the past

and present”
 knowing that there is information asymmetry, capital markets may attract wrong
I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
16

 Adverse Selection…
 Example – buying a used car

• Seller has more information than you

• Rational buyers will always pay the lowest price of their own price range.

• Rational sellers will only accept a price that matched their expectation, thus

sellers who feel their cars are worth more than buyers’ price will never enter the

market. So, only bad cars are available on the market, or “ lemons”.
• Seller uses costly signalling (or signalling) – Information that is otherwise

unverifiable
• Seller uses cheap talk – Unverifiable disclosures.

• A costless signal is not credible.


I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
17

 Moral hazard
 A type of information asymmetry whereby one party to a contract cannot observe

some actions relating to the fulfillment of the contractual terms by the other party.
• “hidden actions and involves information about what happens in the future”

• concept that people will shirk responsibility if there is no accountability

• one party to a contract cannot observe some actions relating to the fulfillment of

the contractual terms by the other


• Example – a person buys insurance for a car – We call this moral hazard because

the insurance encourages less care and effort, and higher risk (it creates a hazard

to our morals). The higher risk is expected by both.


I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
18

 Application of Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard to Accounting

 To overcome the adverse selection:

• Hiring independent auditors to attest to the financial statements and paying


dividends (costly signalling)

 To overcome moral hazard:

• Measuring performance and incentive pay such as bonuses (principal-agent


problem: shareholders and CEO )

• Specifying covenants during the term of the loan (Banks and Firms)
I. THE ENVIRONMENT OF ACCOUNTING…
19

 Application of Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard to Accounting

 Moral Hazard in Action: The Financial Crisis of 2008

• Critical role in the financial crisis

• Banks packaged mortgages together and sold them to other investors: mortgage-
backed securities (MBS)

• Buying insurance through a financial instrument called a credit default swap (CDS)

• Passing on risk: result – bankers and lenders became careless


II. THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION
20
II. THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION
21

 Accountants may specialize in different accounting fields some of which


include the following (Branches in Accounting).

• Financial accounting – Provide information to external parties

• Managerial accounting – Reporting within the enterprise

• Tax accounting – Taxable amounts to government revenue authorities

• Cost accounting – a managerial accounting activity designed to help


managers in identifying, measuring and controlling operating costs.

• Governmental (Public) Accounting – refers to the type of accounting


information system used in the public sector.
II. THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION
22

 Accountants specializations…

• Forensic Accounting – the use of accounting, auditing and investigative


techniques in cases of litigation or disputes.

• Social Accounting (Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and


Sustainability Accounting) – the process of reporting implications of an
organization's activities on its ecological and social environment.

• Auditing – assure the credibility of accounting information


III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
23

 Need for Standards

• help reduce information asymmetry problems in financial reporting

• Transactions and events must be recognized, measured, presented and


disclosed in a specific way

• Standards are not rules, regulations or laws; they are recommendations

• Standards are intended to be generally accepted and universally practiced


- are written in general terms so that they can be applied to a variety of
businesses.

• In addition to set standards, some principles are generally accepted


because they are universally practiced
III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
24

 Standards Development Basics

 Two underlying premises for standards development

• Be responsive to the needs and viewpoints of the entire economic community

• Operate in full public view through due process

 Historical Perspective and Standards


• Standards set by private-sector
• Standards set by governmental body

 Parties involved in standard setting in Ethiopia

• The Accounting and Auditing Board of Ethiopia(AABE)

• The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)


III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
25

 Ethiopia passed a financial reporting law in 2014 which requires the use of IFRS by
commercial businesses operating in Ethiopia.
 Proclamation No. 847/2014
 Regulation No. 332/2014
 The proclamation 847/2014 requires:
 Commercial organizations to follow
• International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), or
• International Financial Reporting Standards for Small and Medium Enterprises
(IFRS for SME)
 Charities and societies to follow International Public Sector Accounting Standards
(IPSAS)
 Public auditors to follow International Standards for Auditing.
III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
26

 International Accounting Standards


Board (IASB)
 Dominant global standard-setting body

 Tries to lessen differences among countries’


standards
 Aim to improve and harmonize regulations,
accounting standards and procedures
 Affiliates: IFRS Foundation, IFRS Advisory
Council, Accounting Standards Advisory
Forum, IFRS Interpretations Committee
(IFRIC)
III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
27

 International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)…


 IASB members include accounting profession, analysts, academics, regulators,
and government.
 IFRS Foundation selects members, oversees, and ensures adequate funding.

 IFRS Advisory Council advises on agenda and work priorities.

 IFRS Interpretations Committee seeks to resolve accounting issues and


interpret existing IFRS.
 International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) provides
regulatory oversight of IASB.
 IASB is a private and non-governmental body with no authority to enforce the
use of IFRS.
III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
28

 International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)…


 Role of International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)

 Develop, promote and coordinate the use of a single set of high-quality,


understandable, and enforceable global and harmonized accounting standards
known as IFRSs.
 Prior to 2003 standards were issued as International Accounting Standards
(IASs). In 2003 IFRS 1 was issued and all new standards are now designated as
IFRSs.
 IFRS used in over 115 countries.

 Standards used on most foreign exchanges.

 At present there are 41 IASs issued by IASC, predecessor body of IASB and 19
III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
29

 International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)…

 Under IFRS, GAAP includes

• International financial reporting standards (I F R S)

• International accounting standards (I A S)

• Interpretations (I F R I C or the former Standards Interpretation


Committee)
III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
30
III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
31
III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
32

 Due Process [Operating Procedures]

 The IASB due process has the following elements:

1. Independent standard-setting board;

2. Thorough and systematic process for developing standards;

3. Engagement with investors, regulators, business leaders, and the global


accountancy profession at every stage of the process; and

4. Collaborative efforts with the worldwide standard-setting community.


III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
33

 Due Process [Operating Procedures]

 The IASB due process has the following elements:

1. Independent standard-setting board;

2. Thorough and systematic process for developing standards;

3. Engagement with investors, regulators, business leaders, and the global


accountancy profession at every stage of the process; and

4. Collaborative efforts with the worldwide standard-setting community.


III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
34

 Due Process [Operating Procedures]…


Identify topic Conduct research Issue preliminary views
of pros and cons

Hold public hearings on Evaluates research and public


proposed standard response and issue exposure draft

Hold public Evaluate responses Final Standard


hearings and change exposure Issued
draft, if necessary
III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
35

 Hierarchy of IFRS

 Companies first look to:

1. International Financial Reporting Standards; International Financial


Reporting Standards, International Accounting Standards (issued by the
predecessor to the IASB), and IFRS interpretations originated by the IFRS
Interpretations Committee (and its predecessor, the IAS Interpretations
Committee)-IFRICs & SICs;

2. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting; and

3. Pronouncements of other standard-setting bodies that use a similar


conceptual framework (e.g., U.S. GAAP).
III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
36
III. DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
37

 User groups that influence the formulation of accounting standards


IV. FINANCIAL REPORTING CHALLENGES
38

 Challenges and Opportunities for the Accounting Profession


 Short-term Standard setting in a political environment
 Stakeholder influence and special interest groups can have a significant
impact on accounting standards—some supporting, some opposing
 Principles versus rules
 Standards should be
• based on a cohesive set of principles and a conceptual framework that
are consistently applied;
• flexible to cover many industries;
• detailed enough to provide good guidance
IV. FINANCIAL REPORTING CHALLENGES
39

 Impact of technology
 Easy access to a significant amount of very timely company information
• Disclose more detail
• Access to a larger group of users
• Information can be targeted to specific users
 Drawbacks
• Equal access to all levels of users
• Quality and reliability
 New ways of communicating financial information (XBRL)
IV. FINANCIAL REPORTING CHALLENGES
40

 Integrated reporting
 A company’s ability to articulate its strategic vision and carry out that
vision affects financial performance
 Reporting extends beyond financial information and includes broader
business reporting (e.g. governance and compensation, as well as
sustainability reporting)
 The Expectations Gap
 The gap between what the public thinks accountants should do vs. what
accountants think they can do, is difficult to close.
 The development of highly transparent, clear, and reliable systems to
meet public expectations requires considerable resources.
IV. FINANCIAL REPORTING CHALLENGES
41

 Significant Financial Reporting Issues: lack of focus/failure to provide:


 Non-financial measurements
• customer satisfaction, backlog information, quality, etc
 Forward-looking information
• Opportunities and risks including those resulting from key trends
• Managements plans, including Critical Success Factors (CSFs)
 Soft assets
• know how, market dominance, brand image, well trained employees
 Timeliness
• Companies only prepared financial statements quarterly and provided
audited financials annually. Little or no real-time financial statement information
was available.
IV. FINANCIAL REPORTING CHALLENGES
42

 Centrality of Ethics
 Ethical dilemmas are common in accounting and other areas of business - Poor
ethical values on the part of management are at the heart of accounting abuses
and scandals.
 Companies that concentrate on “maximizing the bottom line,” “facing the
challenges of competition,” and “stressing short-term results” place accountants in
an environment of conflict and pressure.
 IFRS do not always provide an answer. Technical competence is not enough when
encountering ethical decisions. Ethical decisions often go beyond applying GAAP or
rules of the profession
 Globalization: is a move to global markets and global investors demanding a single
set of high-quality international accounting standards.
 New economy: A move from the traditional ‘resource’ based to a ‘knowledge based’
 Accountability: Driven by more sophisticated and varied investors
1 DEVELOPMENT OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE…

43 1.2 THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL


REPORTING
The Conceptual Framework (CF) for Financial Reporting
44

 Definition and Importance

 The Components of the CF

 Objectives of Financial Reporting

 Fundamental Concepts

 Foundational accounting principles (e.g. Recognition, Measurement, and


Disclosure Concepts)
45
I. The Conceptual Framework - Meaning
and Importance
 Meaning of the CF (What)
 A coherent system of interrelated objectives and fundamentals that are the
foundation for consistent standards
 A coherent system of concepts that flow from an objective.
• The objective identifies the purpose of financial reporting.
• The other concepts provide guidance on:
(1) identifying the boundaries of financial reporting;
(2) selecting the transactions, other events, and circumstances to be
represented;
(3) how they should be recognized and measured; and
(4) how they should be summarized and reported.
46
I. The Conceptual Framework - Meaning
and Importance
 Meaning of the CF (What)…

 “... business plan to anticipate the demand for information and to

structure a reporting system to supply information that meets that

demand.”

 New framework issued by IASB; effective Jan 1, 2020

 Does not override specific I F R S

 Theoretical in nature but has highly practical final aims


47
I. The Conceptual Framework - Meaning
and Importance
 Importance of the CF (Why – The Rationale)…
 Aims/helps to address information asymmetry
 Create standards based on established concepts
 Increase users’ understanding of and confidence in financial reporting
 Enhance comparability of different companies’ financial statements
 Solve new and emerging practical problems more quickly
 Serve the public interest by providing structure and direction to financial
statements;
 Prescribes the nature, function and limits of financial accounting and reporting;
 Determine the bounds for judgment in preparing financial statements by providing
definitions of basic objectives, key terms, and fundamental concepts;
 Forms the theoretical basis for determining which events should be accounted and
how they should be measured and communicated to the users.
48
I. The Conceptual Framework -
Outline/Development
a. Demand side (Assessing demand - The Question)
 Choose users of financial reporting and their needs

 Understand the information needs and objectives

 Identify the information characteristics

b. Supply side (Supply planning - The Answer)


 Identify elements of financial statements

 Consider whether these elements are reported (recognition)

 Consider how these elements should be measured


49
I. The Conceptual Framework -
Outline/Development
50
II. The Conceptual Framework -
Components
 the “Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting” under IFRS (“IFRS
Conceptual Framework” )
51
II. The Conceptual Framework -
Components
 The IFRS Framework

First level: the building blocks,


identifies goals and purposes

Second level: characteristics that


make accounting information useful

Third level: principles used in


establishing and applying accounting
standards
52
II. The Conceptual Framework – FR
Objectives
 Objectives of Financial Reporting

 Provide/communicate financial information about the reporting entity that is useful

to existing and potential investors, lenders, and other creditors in making decisions

about providing resources to the entity.

• Information includes amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows – Useful in

assessing prospects for future cash flows (amount, timing, & uncertainty)

o Cash flows to present and potential investors (derived external user objective)

o Cash flows to the enterprise (derived enterprise objective)

Investors/
Cash flows Entity Cash flows
Creditors
53
II. The Conceptual Framework – FR
Objectives
 Objectives of Financial Reporting…

• Information on the entity’s resources, claims, and performance

• Information should be about financial position, changes in financial position,

performance and management stewardship

• Stewardship — how efficiently and effectively the entity’s management and

governing board have discharged their responsibilities to use the entity’s

resources – e.g. protecting the entity’s resources from unfavourable effects of

economic factors such as price and technological changes.


54
II. The Conceptual Framework – FR
Objectives
 Objectives of Financial Reporting…
• Decisions include investment and lending decisions - buy, hold, sell equity

instruments; grant or deny a credit/loan


• Refers to General Purpose Financial Reporting, which are the financial reports

publicly available to outsiders


• Refers to investors and creditors as primary users
o Generally all parties who have provided financial resources to the firm

o Users who cannot require the reporting entity to provide information directly to

them
• The needs of other potential users (employees, suppliers, customers, auditors, and

governments) are less well served


55
II. The Conceptual Framework – FR
Objectives
 Objectives of Financial Reporting…
• General purpose financial reporting…
o Adopts the entity perspective (rather than the proprietary perspective) - The
viewpoint that companies are viewed as separate and distinct from their owners
and therefore financial reporting should focus on the needs of the main users and
not just the owners.
• Special purpose financial reporting
o Responds to the requirements of users that have the authority to require the
reporting entity to provide the information that they need for their purposes
directly to them. Examples include: prudential regulation reporting requirements,
tax reporting requirements
56
II. The Conceptual Framework – FR
Objectives
 Test your understanding

For each user below choose one of: 1) the user is a primary user; or 2) the user is not a
primary user.

a) A retail investor deciding whether to buy shares in Company A.

b) A retail investor deciding whether to sell their insignificant holding of Company A


shares.

c) The controlling shareholder deciding whether to hold or sell her shares in Company
A.

d) The tax authority that requires Company A’s IFRS financial statements be submitted
in support of its tax filing.

e) The prudential regulator that requires Company A to reconcile the numbers in its
57
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
1) Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information
 Determining the amount and types of information to present requires choosing
alternatives that provide the most useful information (decision usefulness)

 The second level of the conceptual framework has identified characteristics that
distinguish more useful (“better”) information from the less useful (“inferior”)

 Desirable characteristics of financial reports that help meet the users’ information
needs

a. Fundamental qualitative characteristics (the characteristics must be present for


information to be useful for decision making)

b. Enhancing qualitative characteristics (the characteristics that affect the


information’s degree of usefulness)
58
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
1.Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information…

 For financial information to be useful it must be relevant and faithfully represent

what it purports to represent.

 Financial information without both relevance and faithful representation is not

useful, and it cannot be made useful by being more comparable, verifiable, timely

or understandable.
59
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
i. Fundamental qualities

a) Relevance: The ability to influence users’ economic decisions/capability of making a


difference in a decision .

 Information is relevant if it has (ingredients/attributes):

1) Predictive value—helps users make predictions about past, present and future
events

2) Feedback/confirmatory value—helps users confirm or correct previous expectations

3) Materiality: Whether omitting, misstating, or obscuring a particular piece of


information about the reporting entity would influence primary users’ economic
decisions
60
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
 Materiality
• All material items should be disclosed in the financial statements.
• A decision to disclose or not certain information may be made because users have
need or no need for that information (it is relevant or irrelevant) and because the
amount is large enough or too small to make a difference in a decision (i.e. it is
material or immaterial)
• Permit treatment of immaterial items in an expedient (convenient and cost effective)
manner.
• There is no absolute measure of materiality - Involves exercise of subjective judgment
to assess whether or not an item is material:

a) Nature of the item, i.e. arises from abnormal instead of normal circumstances, &

b) Value of the item, i.e. relative instead of absolute.


61
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
 Materiality – Example
• If a statement of financial position shows non-current assets of Br.2 million and
inventories of Br.30,000, an error of Br.20,000 in the depreciation calculations
might not be regarded as material. However, an error of Br.20,000 in the inventory
valuation would be material. In other words, the total of which the error forms part
must be considered.
• If a business has a bank loan of Br.50,000 and a Br.55,000 balance on bank deposit
account, it will be a material misstatement if these two amounts are displayed on
the statement of financial position as 'cash at bank Br.5,000'. In other words,
incorrect presentation may amount to material misstatement even if there is no
monetary error.
• How would you treat the following items as assets in the accounts of a company?
(a) A box file; (b) A computer; (c) A plastic display stand
62
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
i. Fundamental qualities…

b)Representational faithfulness

 The extent to which financial information reflects the underlying transaction,

resources, and claims of an enterprise (i.e. Validity)

 Correspondence or agreement between a measure or description and the underlying

economic event or resource.

 Substance over Form: the principle that transactions and other events are accounted

for and presented in accordance with their substance and economic reality and not

merely their legal form.


63
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
i. Fundamental qualities
b)Representational faithfulness…
 Faithful representation of a transaction is only possible if it is accounted for
according to its substance and economic reality, not with its legal form. Substance
over form usually applies to transactions which are fairly complicated. It is very
important because it acts as a 'catch-all' to stop entities distorting their results by
following the letter of the law, instead of showing what the entity has really been
doing.
 Example: One party may sell an asset to another party and the sales documentation
may record that legal ownership has been transferred. However, if agreements exist
whereby the party selling the asset continues to enjoy the future economic benefits
arising from the asset, then in substance no sale has taken place.
64
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
b)Representational faithfulness…
 Ingredients/Attributes
1. Completeness – include all information needed to portray underlying events and
transactions (e.g., level of detailed included)
2. Free from error – reliability – extent to which information is absent of errors or
omissions.
3. Neutrality – extent to which information is free from bias
 information does not favour one set of interested parties over another
 supported by the concept of conservatism/prudence
• exercising caution when making estimates under uncertainty.
• economic consequences argument
 Neutrality is lost if the financial statements are prepared so as to influence the user
to make a judgment or decision in order to achieve a predetermined outcome, i.e.
influence behavior in particular direction. It does not mean that information has no
65
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
ii. Enhancing qualities

a)Comparability

 information is measured and reported in a similar way—company to company and


year to year (e.g., same accounting policies)

 IFRS requires comparative information to be disclosed for the previous period for
all numerical information.

 Intercompany (i.e. across companies or cross sectional analysis) or Intracompany


(i.e. across period within company or time series analysis).

 Ability to identify (discern) and explain similarities and differences between two or
more sets of economic facts or data.
66
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
ii. Enhancing qualities…
b)Verifiability
 knowledgeable, independent users achieve similar results
 Means objectivity and consensus among measurers.
 Pertains to the correct application, (i.e. without errors or bias) of a measurement
basis.
 Ability to replicate or duplicate measurement results.
 Useful in eliminating or reducing both intentional and unintentional measurer bias
or errors.
c) Timeliness
 information is available in sufficient time to influence decisions - means having
information available to decision-makers before it loses its capacity to influence
decisions.
67
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
ii.Enhancing qualities…
d) Understandability
 information must be of sufficient quality and clarity (onus on the preparer) so
reasonably informed users (onus on the user) can see its significance
 Provides a link/connection between user characteristics and decision specific
characteristics inherent in the information itself.
 It is the quality of information that enables users to perceive its significance - The
ease with which users are able to comprehend financial reports.
 Assume that users’ have prior reasonable knowledge of business or economic
activities and willingness to comprehend/study the information with reasonable
diligence.
 Understandability is enhanced when information is classified, characterized, and
68
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
1) Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information…

 Trade-offs of Useful Information

• Both relevance and representational faithfulness must be present to ensure


decision-relevant information

• Not always possible to have all enhancing qualities,

• Trade-offs are necessary (e.g., adopting a new accounting policy to provide better
information but lose year to year comparability [consistency])
69
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
2. Elements of Financial Statements
 Items or categories that appear in the financial statements

a. Elements relating to measuring financial position

b. Elements relating to measuring performance


70
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
2. Elements of Financial Statements…
 Financial position
a) Asset: A resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events and from which
future economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity.
 Assets have three essential characteristics:
1) They represent a present economic resource—a right to use an asset that
produces economic benefit or that has the potential to produce economic
benefits
2) Entity has control over that resource – entity’s ability to decide how to use the
asset and receive economic benefits (through legal ownership or a contractual or
other right)
3) Resource results from a past transaction or event
71
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
2) Elements of Financial Statements…
b) Liability: A present obligation of the entity arising from past events, the settlement
of which is expected to result in an outflow from the entity of resources embodying
economic benefits.
 Liabilities have three essential characteristics:
1) They represent a present duty or responsibility—and there is no practical ability
to avoid them
2) Entity is obligated to transfer an economic resource
3) Obligation results from a past transaction or event
 Types of liability obligations:
• Contractual or statutory requirements
• Constructive—acknowledging a potential burden
• Equitable—from moral or ethical considerations
72
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
2) Elements of Financial Statements…
c) Equity: A residual interest in an entity that remains after deducting liabilities from
assets

 Also known as net worth

 In business, equity is the ownership interest and is normally

• Common and preferred shares

• Retained earnings

• Accumulated other comprehensive income (IFRS)


73
II. The Conceptual Framework –
Fundamental concepts
2) Elements of Financial Statements…
 Performance

a) Income (Increases in assets or decreases in liabilities that result in increases in


equity, other than those relating to contributions from equity participants.)

b) Expenses (Decreases in assets or increases in liabilities that result in decreases in


equity, other than those relating to distributions to equity participants.)

 Revenues and gains are grouped together under Income (they are not separately
defined), and expenses and losses are grouped together under Expenses.

 No distinction between ordinary revenue-generating activities and losses.


74
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
 Implement the basic objectives of the first level of the conceptual
framework

 Concepts and constraints that help explain

 which, when, and how financial elements and events should be


recognized/derecognized, measured, and presented/disclosed

 Includes assumptions and conventions

 Guidelines for developing rational responses to controversial financial


reporting issues

 Must decide at which level it’s applied—define the unit of account


75
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
1) Recognition/Derecognition
 Recognition is the act of including something on the statement of financial position
or income statement. Under I F R S, the element must
1. Meet the definition of an element
2. Provide relevant information that faithfully represents the underlying transaction
or event
 Control is an important concept when determining asset recognition
 Derecognition is the act of taking something off the statement of financial position
or income statement
 For assets: when control is given up
 For liabilities: when the obligation is extinguished
76
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
a) Economic Entity Assumption
 Also called entity concept

 Means an economic activity can be identified with a particular unit of


accountability, e.g., a company, a division, an individual
 An economic entity is not always a legal entity

 Legal entities can be merged into an economic entity for financial


reporting purposes (consolidated financial statements)
 Defining factor for an economic entity is “Who has control?”
77
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
b) Revenue Recognition Principle (I F R S)
 Balance sheet approach—transaction occurs when entity enters the
contract
 Follows a five-step approach

 Identify the contract with the customer

 Identify the performance obligations

 Determine the transaction price

 Allocate the price to each performance obligation

 Recognize revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied


78
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
c) Matching Principle
 Cause and effect relationship between money spent to earn revenues
and the revenues themselves
 The effort (expenditure) is matched to the accomplishments (revenues)
 Product costs are held in inventory until the costs (cost of goods sold) are
recorded at the same time as the revenue (sale)
 PPE costs, which benefit future periods, are matched to future revenues
through depreciation
 However, period costs are recognized immediately even if some of the
benefits are realized in the future—expenditures that do not meet the
definition of an asset are expensed
79
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
2) Measurement Basis
 Because of accrual accounting, measuring many elements of financial
statements requires the use of estimates
 Estimates give rise to uncertainty—uncertainty affects faithful
representation
 Measurement basis must provide relevant information that faithfully
represents the transaction or event
 Common choices: historical cost (including amortized cost); and current
cost (fair value, value in use or fulfilment value)
 Underlying assumptions: periodicity, unit of measure and going concern
80
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
a) Periodicity Assumption
 Economic activity of an entity can be divided into artificial time periods
for reporting purposes
 Most common: one month, one quarter, and one year
 For shorter time periods, more difficult to determine proper net income
(i.e. more likely errors occur due to more estimates)
 With technology and AI, investors use more online, real-time financial
information to ensure relevant information—continuous reporting
81
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
b) Monetary Unit Assumption
 Money is the common unit of measure of economic transactions
 Use of a monetary unit is relevant, simple and understandable,
universally available, and useful
 In Canada and the United States, the dollar is assumed to remain
relatively stable in value (effects of inflation/ deflation are ignored i.e.
price-level change is ignored)
 Monetary unit is relevant as long as it is assumed that quantitative data
are useful in communicating economic information
82
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
c) Going Concern Assumption
 Assumption that a business enterprise will continue to operate in the
foreseeable future
 There is an expectation of continuing long enough to meet objectives and
commitments
 Management must look out at least 12 months from balance sheet date
 If liquidation of the company is assumed to be likely, use liquidation
accounting (at net realizable value)
 Measuring financial statement elements at historical cost would have
limited usefulness if liquidation were assumed to be likely
83
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
c) Going Concern Assumption…
 Going concern concept assumes that, when preparing a normal set of
accounts, the business will continue to operate in approximately the
same manner for the foreseeable future (at least the next 12 months). In
particular, the entity will not go into liquidation or scale down its
operations in a material way.
 The main significance of a going concern is that the assets should not be
valued at their 'break-up' value; the amount they would sell for if they
were sold off piecemeal and the business were broken up.
84
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
c) Going Concern Assumption…
Example: A retailer commences business on 1 January and buys inventory of 20
washing machines, each costing Br.100. During the year he sells 17 machines at Br.150
each. How should the remaining machines be valued at 31 December in the following
circumstances?
 Case 1: He is forced to close down his business at the end of the year and the
remaining machines will realise only Br.60 each in a forced sale. If the business is to
be closed down, the remaining three machines must be valued at the amount they
will realise in a forced sale, i.e. 3 × Br.60 = Br.180.
 Case 2: He intends to continue his business into the next year. If the business is
regarded as a going concern, the inventory unsold at 31 December will be carried
forward into the following year, when the cost of the three machines will be matched
against the eventual sale proceeds in computing that year's profits. The three
85
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
d) Historical Cost Principle
 Transactions are measured at the amount of cash (or equivalents) paid or
received, or the fair value of the initial transaction
 Three basic assumptions of historical cost
1. Represents a value at a point in time
2. Results from a reciprocal exchange (i.e. a two-way exchange)
3. Exchange includes an outside arm’s-length party
 Sometimes the historical cost principle cannot be applied in determining
a value
86
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
d) Historical Cost Principle …
 Times when historical cost cannot be used …
• Nonmonetary or barter transactions (no cash or monetary consideration)
• Nonmonetary, non-reciprocal transaction (no exchange)
• Related party transactions
 In these types of situations, an attempt may be made to estimate the fair
value
 Principle also applies to financial instruments when issued in exchange
for assets or services; the price becomes the “cost” of the instrument
87
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
d) Historical Cost Principle …
 Initially, historical cost usually equals fair value
 Over time, this value may lose its predictive value
 Calls for subsequent remeasurement
• Can be based on different measurement values, but that means measurement
uncertainty
• With no external exchange, value may be subjective
 Trend is toward using a mixed valuation model: primarily historical cost
moving to a market valuation model
 Market valuation uses fair value measures
88
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
e) Fair Value Principle
 At acquisition, historical cost = fair value
 Subsequently, with market and economical conditions changing, the values
diverge
 Fair value (current value, market-based) measures provide more relevant
information than historical cost for some assets and liabilities
 Fair value reflects the current cash equivalent
 Fair-value option—to encourage using fair value
• There is an option to use fair value for most financial instruments (non-
strategic investments)
• Financial instruments are measured at fair value with gains and losses booked
to income
89
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
e) Fair Value Principle…
 I F R S defines fair value as “The price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date”
 An exit price and a market-based measure
 Explicitly allowed for some non-financial assets (investment properties, PPE)
 Required for some assets (biological)
90
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
e) Fair Value Principle…
 To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measures, the IASB
established a fair value hierarchy that provides insight into the priority of valuation
techniques to use to determine fair value. As shown in the following illustration, the
fair value hierarchy is divided into three broad levels.

Level 1: Prices for identical assets or liabilities in Least subjective


observable inputs that reflect quoted active markets.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level
1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly
or through corroboration with observable data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs (for example,
a company’s own data or assumptions). Most subjective
91
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
e) Fair Value Principle…
 Fair value can be measured using:
1. Market approaches.
2. Income approaches.
3. Cost approaches.
 Market approaches base valuation on market information. For example, the value of
a share of a company’s stock that’s not traded actively could be estimated by
multiplying the earnings of that company by the P/E (price of shares/ earnings)
multiples of similar companies.
 Income approaches estimate fair value by first estimating future amounts (for
example, earnings or cash flows) and then mathematically converting those amounts
to a single present value.
 Cost approaches determine value by estimating the amount that would be required
to buy or construct an asset of similar quality and condition.
92
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
e) Fair Value Principle…

 Market-Based versus Entity-Specific Value

• Fair value is a market-based measure as opposed to an entity-specific value

• Market-based value

o How market participants would value the item in question

o More objective and must be applied under IFRS for fair value situations

• Entity-specific value (value in use)

o Present value of the future cash flows expected from the asset

o More relevant for operating assets but is subjective


93
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
e) Fair Value Principle…
 Fair Value versus Value in Use
• Value in use is an entity-specific value (perspective of the entity)- defined as the
present value of the future cash flows expected from use of the asset
94
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
3) Full Disclosure Principle

 Only principle associated with presentation and disclosure

 General practice of providing information that is important enough to influence

an informed user’s judgement and decisions

 Recognizes a series of judgemental trade-offs

• Detailed enough to disclose matters that make a difference to users?

• Condensed enough to make the information understandable?

 Avoid information overload


95
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
3) Full Disclosure Principle…

 Information about an entity is presented in three places

1. Main body of financial statements—formalized structured way of communicating

financial information

2. Notes to the financial statements—amplify or explain items presented in the

main body of the statements

3. Supplementary documents including the Management Discussion and Analysis

(MD&A) Report—includes details or amounts that present a different perspective


96
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
3) Full Disclosure Principle…
 Notes to the Financial Statements
 Additional information needed to complete the picture of performance and
position
 Information does not have to be quantifiable; could include
• Descriptions of policies and methods
• Explanations of uncertainties and contingencies
• Details too voluminous to include in the statements
 According to guidance from I F R S conceptual framework for effective
communication
• Entity-specific over general information
• Duplication inhibits usefulness of information
97
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
3) Full Disclosure Principle…
 Management Discussion and Analysis
• Six disclosure principles for the MD&A
1. Provide a view through management’s eyes
2. Supplement and complement information in the financial statements
3. Provide fair, complete, and balanced information that is material to decision-
makers
4. Outline key trends, risks, and uncertainties that may affect the company in the
future
5. Explain management’s plan for long- and short-term goals
6. Be understandable, relevant, comparable, verifiable, timely
98
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
3) Full Disclosure Principle
 Management Discussion and Analysis…
• Provides management’s explanation of financial information and a
discussion of its significance
• Includes forward-looking information
• Five key elements included to give users greater insight into the business
o Core businesses
o Objectives and strategies
o Capability to deliver results
o Results and outlook
o Key performance measures and indicators
99
III. The Conceptual Framework –
Foundational principles
Summary - Expanded Conceptual Framework
Practice problem
100

Meadow Limited has hired you to review its accounting records prior to the closing of the revenue and expense accounts as
at December 31, the end of the current fiscal year. The company follows IFRS. The following information comes to your
attention.
1) During the current year, Meadow Limited changed its policy in regard to expensing purchases of small tools. In the past,
it had expensed these purchases because they amounted to less than 2% of net income. Now, the president has
decided that the company should follow a policy of capitalization and subsequent depreciation. It is expected that
purchases of small tools will not fluctuate greatly from year to year.
2) The company built a warehouse at a cost of $1 million. It had been depreciating the asset on a straight‐line basis over
10 years. In the current year, the controller doubled depreciation expense because the replacement cost of the
warehouse had increased significantly.
3) When the statement of financial position was prepared, the preparer omitted detailed information as to the amount of
cash on deposit in each of several banks. Only the total amount of cash under a caption “Cash in banks” was presented.
4) On July 15 of the current year, Meadow purchased an undeveloped tract of land at a cost of $320,000. The company
spent $80,000 in subdividing the land and getting it ready for sale. An appraisal of the property at the end of the year
indicated that the land was now worth $500,000. Although none of the lots were sold, the company recognized revenue
of $180,000, less related expenses of $80,000, for a net income on the project of $100,000.
5) For a number of years, the company used the FIFO method for inventory valuation purposes. During the current year,
the president noted that all the other companies in the industry had switched to the average‐cost method. The company
decided not to switch to average‐cost because net income would decrease by $830,000.
Instructions: State whether you agree or disagree with the decisions made by Meadow in each of the five items above.
Support your answers with reference, whenever possible, to the conceptual framework.
1 DEVELOPMENT OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE…

101 1.2 CASH FLOWS & INCOME MEASUREMENT


…End of CH01.
102
Next CH02…

You might also like