Carbon Markets and Trading
Carbon Markets and Trading
Carbon Markets and Trading
Residents inspect the damage at a village affected by flooding on Adonara Residents use a raft to move along a waterlogged street in a residential area Himachal Pradesh and other neighbouring states in North India
Island, East Flores, Indonesia. April 5, 2021. Photographed by Rofinus after a heavy monsoon rainfall in Hyderabad City, Pakistan on Aug. 19, 2022. witnessed 20 major landslides and 17 flash floods, India on Jul 11, 2023
Monteiro Credit: Akram Shahid/AFP via Getty Images Credit: See here
Carbon Markets can bring in Carbon Finance
• A recent analysis by IETA suggests that 80% of countries that have submitted their NDCs have signaled an intention to use Carbon Markets to meet their NDC targets.
• 24% of the countries are already engaging in pilots and/or bilateral agreements.
Significance of Carbon Market
The World Bank estimates that trading in carbon credits could reduce the cost of implementing
NDCs by more than half — by as much as $250 billion by 2030.
The value of the global carbon market soared 13.5% in 2022 to a record high of 865 billion euros.
The EU ETS is the largest carbon market based on value and accounted for roughly 87% of global
market size in 2022.
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Carbon Market
Compliance Voluntary
Carbon Market Carbon Market
Finance
Additional: The project should not be legally required, common practice, or financially attractive in the absence
of credit revenues
No overestimation: CO2 emissions reduction should match the number of offset credits issued for the project
and should take account of any unintended GHG emissions caused by the project.
No Double counting: Each metric ton of CO2 can only be claimed once and must include proof of the credit
retirement upon project maturation. A credit becomes an offset at retirement.
Permanence: The impact of the GHG emission reduction should not be at risk of reversal and should result in a
permanent drop in emissions.
Provide additional social and environmental benefits: Projects must comply with all legal requirements of its
jurisdiction and should provide additional co-benefits in line with the UN's SDGs.
From Kyoto to Paris
COP3 Carbon Rush COP21
The Kyoto Protocol introduced Amid the global financial crisis, the The Paris Agreement agreed upon,
three flexible mechanisms for global carbon market soars 84% to contains Article 6, which covers
nations to engage in carbon $118bn, with EU allowance ‘voluntary cooperation’ to help
trading: JI, CDM, and Emission accounting for 80% and CDM countries meet their climate goals.
Trading. credits 13% of the value. This includes two market-based
approaches.
6.2
Cooperative
Implementation Bilateral
Article 6 of the Paris Agreement recognizes 6.4 Cooperation
that some countries choose to pursue
voluntary cooperation in the implementation
of their NDCs to allow for higher ambition in
Market-based
their mitigation and adaptation actions and
6.8 Approach
to promote sustainable development and
environmental integrity.
Non-market
Approach
Article 6.2
Financial Support
• Article 6.2 enables a host country, that is on track to exceed its NDC target, to trade units to obtain investments,
support for capacity building, and access to technologies not available through domestic resources.
• The buyer country purchases these units, known as ITMOs (Article 6.2 units), to address any gaps in meeting its
own climate goals.
• Cooperation b/w countries can take different shapes, e.g., project-based units, linking of ETS, etc.
• Countries can design policy mechanisms to operationalize trades of ITMOs.
UNFCCC
Financial Support
Host Country/
Buyer Country/
Project Developer
Entity
• Article 6.4 credits trades are supervised by a United Nations (UN) body, called Article 6.4 Supervisory Body,
which is similar to how the UN’s CDM mechanism worked under KP.
• At COP27, a new type of unit was defined called ‘Mitigation Contribution’.
• MCs are unauthorized credits that can be used for other purposes, e.g., result-based finance, domestic carbon
markets and/or international voluntary carbon markets.
UNFCCC
Host Country/ Support (Technological,
Capacity, Financial) Buyer Country/
Project Developer
Entity
• Countries can decide to support other countries without any expectation of trading carbon units.
• A6.8 established a framework for the creation of a UNFCCC centralized website where countries and other
stakeholders could submit mitigation projects that are being planned and outline where support is needed.
• This online platform could be voluntarily used to facilitate matching projects with the support needed and
available.
Transferred
ITMOs
NDC Target NDC Target
Host Country can Buyer Country counts
transfer credits to the purchased carbon
Buyer Country credits towards its
NDC
Support
Japan Mongolia, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Kenya, Maldives, Viet Nam, Lao PDR, Indonesia, Costa Rica, Palau,
Cambodia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Chile, Myanmar, Thailand, Philippines, Senegal, Tunisia, Azerbaijan,
Moldova, Georgia, Sri Lanka, Uzbekistan, Papua New Guinea
Singapore Colombia, Ghana, Morocco, Peru, Papua New Guinea, Thailand, Viet Nam