Constitution I
Constitution I
Constitution I
Dr. Sathish K S
Syllabus
UNIT-I:
Meaning & Definition of Constitution: kinds of Constitution, Constitutionalism, Salient features of Indian Constitution.
Preamble: Meaning, Scope, Importance, Objectives and Values enshrined in the Preamble.
Citizenship- modes of acquisition & termination.
UNIT-II:
State: Definition under Article 12, New Judicial trends on concept of State Action- need for widening the definition.
Definition and Meaning of Law: Pre- Constitutional and Post- Constitutional Laws, Doctrine of Severability and Doctrine of
eclipse, Judicial Review and Article 13.
Equality and Social Justice: General Equality Clause under Article 14, New Concept of Equality, Judicial Interpretation on
Equality.
UNIT-III:
Protective Discrimination and Social Justice under Articles 15 and 16, New Judicial trends on Social Justice, Constitutional
Provisions on Untouchability under Article 17.
Right to Freedom: Freedom of Speech and Expression, Different dimensions - Freedom of Assembly, Association, Movement
and Residence, Profession, Occupation, Trade or business, Reasonable restrictions.
UNIT-IV:
Rights of the Accused: Ex-post facto Law; Double jeopardy — Right against self incrimination (Article 20). Rights of the
arrested person, Preventive Detention Laws (Article 22), Right to Life and Personal Liberty, Various facets of Life and Liberty
(Article.21), Right against Exploitation, Secularism - Freedom of Religion, Judicial interpretation, Restrictions on freedom of
religion.
UNIT-V:
Cultural and Educational Rights of minorities - Recent trends - Right to Constitutional Remedies: Article 32 and 226 — kinds
of writs - Right to property (prior to 1978 and the present position), Directive Principles of State Policy and Fundamental
Duties- inter relation between fundamental rights and directive principles.
History
• Congress demanded for constituent assembly in 1935 and the same was accepted. Later the Crips Mission
in the year 1942 announced that after the end of the war steps shall be taken to constitute a body.
• Labour party came to power in England and it was sympathetic towards India and sent a cabinet mission
in 1946 it suggested to put an end to the paramountcy of crown to frame constitution.
• the constitution assembly cane into being in November 1946. It was consisted of 389 members. Of whom
292 were elected from provinces (among them 73 from Muslim league, 208 from congress, and remainders
were independent). 93 were to be nominated from princely states. 4 were to be nominated from chief
commission areas.
• Mount batten plan 1947 announced partition of India and separate constituent assembly for both Pakistan
and India. Persons who are elected from the territories of Pakistan belongs to Pakistan constituent
assembly. There for membership of constituent assembly was reduced to 299. i.e.389-90 =299. Only 284
members signed the constitution on 26th November 1949 others were died.
• In the 14 August 1947 meeting of the Assembly, a proposal for forming various committees was presented.
There are 22 committees were appointed among the members of constituent assembly.10 were on
procedural affairs and 12 on substantive affairs. Such committees included a Committee on Fundamental
Rights, the Union Powers Committee and Union Constitution Committee.
• Dr. Sachidananda Sinha was elected as temporary chairman and later Dr. Rajendra Prasad elected as
permanent president of constitution assembly.
• On 29 August 1947, the Drafting Committee was appointed, with Dr Ambedkar as the Chairman along
with six other members. A Draft Constitution was prepared by the committee and submitted to the
Assembly on 4 November 1947.
History
• The Assembly met, in sessions open to the public, for 166 days, spread over a period of
2 years, 11 months and 18 days and spent Rs. 64 lakhs to draft the constitution.
• The draft constitution was published in January 1948. The people of india were given 8
months time to discuss the draft and propose amendments. As many as 7635
amendments were proposed and 2473 were actually discussed in total 11 sessions, this
draft constitution was considered for 114 days.
• some provisions of the constitution i.e. articles 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 60, 324, 366, 367, 379, 380,
388, 391, 392, 393 came into force on 26th November 1949, remaining provisions came
into force on 26th January 1950. That is why we celebrate republic day.
• Constitution assembly came to end 24th January 1950 it emerged as provisional
parliament on 26th January till the election to lokasabha Rajendra Prasad appointed as
first president till the election.
• When the constitution came into force it was consisted of 395 articles, 8 schedules, and
22 parts. The Constitution of India has undergone 105 amendments in the less than 60
years since its enactment.
• Know it is consisted of containing 395 articles in 22 parts, 12 schedules and 105
amendments, for a total of 117,369 words in the English language version. Besides the
English version, there is an official Hindi translation.
SOURCES OF THE CONSTITUTION
• Debates of the constituent assembly
• Provisions of 1909, 1919, 1935, 1947 Acts
• Opinions of the constitutional jurists
• Judicial decisions
• Foreign decisions
• Conventions and usages
• Enactments of the Indian parliaments
• Constitutions of foreign countries
•
PROVISIONS OF CONSTITUTION AND THEIR SOURCE
Significance of preamble;
According to K.M. Mushi—Political Horoscope
According to Barkar--- Key to open the Constitution
According to Thakurdas Bhargav—soul of the Constitution
Article 2: Parliament may by law admit into the Union or establish, new States on such terms and conditions,
as it thinks fit.
Article 2 grants two powers to the parliament:
• Admission of states which are already in existence.
• Establishing new states which were not in existence previously.
Parliament has admitted by using this power, for example, the French settlements of Pondicherry,
Karaikal, etc.
• Article 4:
(1) Any law referred to in article 2 or article 3 shall contain such provisions for the amendment of the First
Schedule and the Fourth Schedule as may be necessary to give effect to the provisions of the law and may
also contain such supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions (including provisions as to
representation in Parliament and in the Legislature or Legislatures of the State or States affected by such
law) as Parliament may deem necessary.
(2) No such law as aforesaid shall be deemed to be an amendment of this Constitution for the purposes of
article 368.
THE UNION AND ITS TERRITORY
Article 1: Name and territory of the Union; India that is Bharat shall be a union of states --- not purely federal and not purely unitary but it is
combination of both
1st schedule – before 1956 it shall consist of part A, part B, part C,& part D states but 7th constitutional amendment act abolished these
states and now only states and union territories. There are 28 states and 7 union territories.
Article 2: Admission or establishment of new states—provides that the parliament may by law admit into the union or establish new states on
such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.
Article 3: Formation of new States and alteration of areas, boundaries or names of existing States; this article empowers the parliament to
form a new state to increase or decrease the area of any state to alter the boundaries of any state or to alter the name of any state.
Article 4: Laws made under articles 2 and 3 to provide for the amendment of the First and the Fourth Schedules and supplemental, incidental
and consequential matters
CASE LAWS
In re Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves, AIR 1960 SC 845 47
Ram Kishore Sen v. Union of India, AIR 1966 SC 644
Union of India v. Sukumar Sengupa, AIR 1990 SC 1692
N. Masthan Sahib v. Chief Commissioner Pondicherry, AIR 1962 SC 797
R. C. Poudyal v. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 1804
Babulal Parate v. State of Bombay, AIR 1960 SC 51
CITIZENSHIP
India has two sets of people as (i) Citizens (ii) Aliens. Citizens are full members of Indian state. They enjoy all
civil and political rights. Constitution confirms certain advantages such as fundamental rights like articles
15, 16, 19, 29, 30 are available only to the citizens. Certain posts only reserved for Indian citizens. The right
to vote confirmed only to Indian citizens. Aliens do not enjoy all the civil and political rights.
Article 5: Citizenship by domicile; every person who has his domicile in the territory of India and
Who was born in the India
Whose parents were born in India
Who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of Indian for not less then 5 years immediately preceding such
commencement shall be citizen of India.
Article 6: citizenship of emigrants from Pakistan Citizenship by Birth
Article 7: Rights of citizenship of certain migrants to Pakistan
Article 8: Rights of citizenship of certain persons of Indian origin residing outside India
Article 9: Persons voluntarily acquiring citizenship of a foreign State not to be citizens
Article 10: Continuance of the rights of citizenship
Article 11: Parliament to regulate the right of citizenship by law; as per the powers confirmed to parliament by
this provision parliament enacted the Indian citizenship act 1955. It was amended in 2003. 2019
Conti……
Article 6: Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons who have Migrated to India Territory
from Territory of Pakistan
Any person who has migrated to the territory of India from the territory currently enclosed in Pakistan shall be
deemed to be an Indian citizen at the commencement of this Constitution if –
• If a person migrated from Pakistan to India before 19 July 1948 shall be considered as an Indian citizen if
either of the person’s parents or any of his grandparents were born in India as expressed in the Government
of India act, 1935 and has been living or residing since the date of migration.
• For people who migrated after 19 July 1948, they should be registered as a citizen of India by an officer
from the Government of India but for registration, the subjected person has to be a resident in the territory
of India for a minimum of six months, preceding the date of his application.
Conti….
The Parliament enacted the Indian Citizenship Act, 1955. it consist of 19 section and mainly deals
with the acquisition and termination of the citizenship.
Loss of Citizenship
• By Renunciation Declaration by the person himself.
• By Termination On acquiring other citizenship, his/her Indian citizenship terminates automatically.
• By Deprivation In the case of fraud acquisition of nationality or any disloyalty to Constitution or
country or any person citizen by registration or naturalization who imprisoned in any country for
two years or citizen residing outside country for seven years, citizenship will be terminated.
Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 (CAA)
– The Act gives permission to non-Muslim immigrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh and
Afghanistan to become citizens of India.
– It indirectly entitles Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians emigrated from the
three nations, to seek Indian citizenship who had arrived in India before 31 December 2014.
– The amendment relaxes this requirement from 11 years to 6 years, for Hindus, Sikhs,
Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians from the three nations.
Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 (CAA)
– Amendment of Third Schedule:
– 'Provided that for the person belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or Christian
community in Afghanistan, Bangladesh or Pakistan, the aggregate period of residence or
service of Government in India as required under this clause shall be read as "not less than five
years" in place of "not less than eleven years"
Conti…
Single Citizenship: Indian Constitution is federal and envisages of dual polity (centre & state). It provides for only single
citizenship, that is the Indian citizenship. The citizens in India owe allegiance only to the union. There is no separate
state citizenship. But USA & Switzerland having dual citizenship.
Kinds of Rights
• Natural or Human Rights
• Moral Rights
• Legal Rights – Civil and Political Rights
• Fundamental Rights in India
Natural Rights
• Natural Rights are those rights that are available to each and every being, including human
beings. Rights that are specific to Human beings are also called as Human Rights. Natural
rights deals with right to life, right to movement, etc.
• Article 21 deals with right to protection of life and personal liberty.
• At the same time, when a person lives alone in an island, he does not have right but freedom.
Only when a man lives as a group or in a community, rights evolve. Because, when a man
lives in a group, there is always conflict and absolute freedom cannot be assured. Hence, the
concept of right is correlated with duties.
• Every right has an obligation to duty. Recognition of freedom of others forms the basis of
rights. Our rights is based on other’s duties and other’s rights based on our duties. State does
not create rights, but only recognizes, maintains and co-ordinates the rights of its people.
Origin of Fundamental Rights
• The rights that are basic to the advancement of the human race are called Fundamental Rights.
All other rights are derived from these rights as direct implications or application of their
principles. It is an accepted belief among the philosophers that these rights are nothing but
“natural human rights”, which distinguish between humans and animals and which have been
so instrumental in bringing humans from the stone age to the present age. Among all, the right
to life and liberty is considered to be the most basic.
• The history of legally enforceable fundamental rights probably starts from Magna Carta, which
was a list of rights extracted from King John by the people of England in 1214 AD. This was
followed by the “Bill of Rights” in 1689 in which Englishmen were given certain civil and
political rights that could not be taken away. Later on the French compiled the “Declaration of
the rights of Man and of the Citizen” after the French Revolution in 1789.
• The most important advancement in history of fundamental rights occurred when the USA
incorporated certain fundamental rights in the form on “Bill of Rights” in their constitution by
the way of first 10 amendments. These rights were deemed to be beyond the vagaries of
politics. The protection by the constitution meant that these rights could not be put to vote and
were not dependent on the whims of politicians or of the majority.
• After this, nearly all democracies of the world have given a constitutional sanctity to certain
inalienable rights available to their citizens.
The need for Fundamental Rights
Rule of Law
These rights are a protection to the citizens against the govt and are necessary for having the rule of law and not of a
a govt or a person. Since explicitly given by the constitution to the people, these rights dare not be transgressed
by the authority. The govt. is fully answerable to the courts and is fully required to uphold these rights.
2. First fruits of the freedom struggle
After living in subjugation for such a long time, people had forgotten what is meant by freedom. These rights give
people hope and belief that there is no stopping to their growth. They are free from the whims of the rulers. In
that sense, they are first fruits of the lengthy freedom struggle and bring a sense of satisfaction and fulfillment.
3. Quantification of Freedom
Every Indian citizen in free to practice a religion of his choice, but that is not so in the gulf countries. Our right to
speech and expression allows us to freely criticize the govt. but this is not so in China. (Source: Hanumant.com)
Fundamental Rights in India
As regard India Simon Commission and Joint Parliamentary Committee had reject the idea of enacting declaration
of Fundamental right on the ground that the abstract declaration is useless. Although the demand of the people
was not met by the British Parliament under the government of India Act 1935 yet the enthusiasm of the people
to have such right in the constitution was not impaired. The recommendation of the Nehru Committee was
included in the constitution in 16 May’1946 by the cabinet mission.
PART III Fundamental Rights
• Right to Equality (Article 14 – 18)
• Right to Freedom (Article 19 – 22)
• Right against Exploitation (Article 23 – 24)
• Right to freedom of Religion (Article 25 – 28)
• Cultural and Educational Right (Article 29 – 30)
• Right to Constitution Right (Article 32)
Fundamental Rights
Fundamental Rights Article Provisions
15 Prohibition of Discrimination
17 Abolition of untouchability
18 Abolition of Titles
19 Protection of 6 Rights
32 writs
Ramana Dayaram Sheety v. International Airport Authority of India:-Held that if a body is an agency or
instrumentality of the government it may be an authority in Article 12.
In Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohanlal, the supreme court ruled that a state electricity board,
set up by a statue, having some commercial function to discharge , would be an authority under article 12.
In Sukhdev Singh v. Bhagatram:- held that oil and natural gas commission life insurance corporation and
industrial finance corporation are authorities within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution.
In Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib it has been held that a society registered under the societies registration
act 1898 is an agency or instrumentality of the state and hence a state within the ambit of article 12.
Its composition is determined by the representatives of the government. The expenses of society are entirely
provided by the central government the rules made by the society requires prior approval of the state and is
completely controlled by the government. The government has the power to appointment and remove the
member of the society.
In Manmohan Singh Jaitla v. Commissioner, Union Territory of Chandigarh, the Court following Ajai
Hasia's case held that an aided school which received a Government grant of 90 per cent was an
"authority" within the meaning of Article 12.
Similarly, it has been held that the Food Corporation of India, the Steel Authority of India, Bihar State
Electricity Board, Indian Oil Corporation, are the 'State' within the meaning of 'other authorities' under Article
12 as they are instrumentalities of the State.
Zee Telefilms v. Union of India case judgment held that BCCI cannot be called a State under Article 12 of
The Constitution as it is not created by a statute, not dominated by government either financially,
functionally or administratively.
Conti….
Examples of State-
(a) Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) is a State: Held in Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of
Chemical Biology (2002) 5 SCC 111.
(b) Sainik School Society is State: Held in All India Sainik Schools Employees’ Association v. Sainik School Society AIR 1989
SC 88.
(c) U.P. Rajya Karmachari Kalyan Nigam is a State: Held in Virendra Kumar Srivastava v. U.P. Rajya Karmachari Kalyan
Nigam (2005) 1 SCC 722.
(d) Rajasthan Electricity Board is State: Held in Rajasthan Electricity Board, Jaipur v. Mohan Lal, AIR 1967 SC 1857
(e) Indian Council of Agricultural Research is State: Held in P.K. Ramachandra Iyer v. Union of India, (1984) 2 SCC 141
(f) Indian Statistical Institute is State: Held in B.S. Minhas v. Indian Statistical Institute, (1983) 4 SCC 582
(g) Children’s Aid Society is State: Held in Sheela Barse v. Secretary, Children’s Aid Society, (1987) 3 SCC 50
(h) Buddhist School is State: Held in Chairman, School of Buddhist Philosophy v. Makhanlal Mattoo, (1990) 4 SCC
In Ajay Hasia v/s Khalid Mujib &Sheela Barse v/s Secretary Childrens Aid Society it was held that the companies
registered under companies act 1956 and societies registered under societies registration act 1860 are state within the
meaning of article 12.
Somprakash v/s U.O.I Bharat Petroleum Corporation is state
Mohan Khanna v/s NCERT National Council of Educational Research Training is state.
In Ramana Dayaram Shetty v/s The International Airport Authority of India( Airport Authority case) Supreme
Court held that International Authority was set up by Parliament and it is under the control of Central Government
hence it is state. It also states that any authority not created by constitution or by a statute could not be a state within
the meaning of state.
Universities, Electricity Board, oil and Natural Gas Commission, LIC, KSRTC, state Finance Corporation etc are
state.
Art 13 provides that any law which made before the commencement of constitution must be consistent with
the part III of the constitution .if any statue is inconsistence with the provisions of part III of the
constitution such statue shall become void. At the same time such statue shall not be treat as Dead
unless it is abolish by Parliament. It will be treated as dormant or remains eclipsed to the extent it
comes under the shadow of the fundamental rights. Regarding the doctrine of eclips few points need to
be consider. It is held to be applied only the Pre Constitutional Laws, and not to be post constitutional
laws.
Bhikaji v/s State of MP AIR 1955
The MP Government passed an Act in the year 1950 for nationalizing the motor transport before
commencement of the constitution. The statue was challenge by the petitioner under Art 19(1)(g). The
Center Govt. Amended Act 1955 on27-4-1955 enabling the state to nationalize the motor transport.
That SC held that the statue of MP sate State nationalizing the motor transport 1950 was cured by the
4th Amendment Act 1955 and therefore the Doctrine of Eclipse has-been applied and the such Act is
valid.
In Deep Chand v/s State of U.Psupreme court held that post constitutional law void ab initio. There for
doctrine of eclipse does not apply. But State of Gujarat v/s Ambica Millsand Dulare Lodh v/s III
Additional District Judge Kanpurmodified its view in deepa chand case.
Bhikhaji v. State of M.P., AIR 1955 S.c. 781 M.P government passed an act in 1950 nationalizing the
motor transport before commencement of the constitution but it fall under list I but 4 th constitutional
amendment act 1955 empowers the states to nationalize even though the act of 1950 was against to the
provisions. It was in dominant nature later act become valid.
DOCTRINE OF SEVERABILITY – (POST CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS ) ART 13 (2)
Art 13 provides that Act is void which is inconsistent with the Part III of the constitution. Art 13 is having
a flexible nature; it does not make the whole Act inoperative. It makes inoperative only such
provisions of it as are inconsistent with or violative of fundamental right. Sometimes valid and invalid
portion of the Act are so intertwined that they cannot be separated from one another. In such cases,
the invalidity of the portion must result in the invalidity of the Act in its entirety, the reason is that the
valid part cannot survive independently. In determining whether the valid parts of a statue are
severable from the invalid parts. In intention of the Legislature is the determining factor. In other
words it should be asked whether the legislature would have enacted at all that which survive without
the part found ultra virus
The rule of severability applies as much clause (2) as to Clause (1) of Art 13Jia Lal v/s Delhi
Administration AIR 1962
The appellant was prosecuted for an office u/s 19 (f) of the Arm Act 1878. In fact, section 29 of this Act
provides that in certain area in which the petitioner did not obtain any license in which the petitioner
was residing, it was not necessary to obtain the said license for possession fire arm. Section 29 was
challenged as ultra virus and unconstitutional as offending Art 14 and also section 19(f) of the Arms
Act 1878 on the ground that two sections were not severable, on the question of severability the SC
held that the section 29 of the Arms Act 1878 was ultra virus.
R.M.D.C. v. Union of India, AIR 1957 S.c. 628 section 2(d) of prize competition act which was broad
enough to include competitions of a gambling nature as well as competitions involving skill. it is
severable
DOCTRINE OF WAIVER
The FR under Part III Art 12 to 35 of the constitution are conferred to every citizen of India by the
constitution. These constitutional rights are not absolute. There are reasonable restriction impose by the
constitution. The primary objective of these FR are based on public policy. Therefore no individual can
waive off such RF rights
Basheshr Nath v/s Income Tax commissioner AIR 1959 SC 149
In this case the petitioner whose matter had been referred to the Investigation commissioner u/s 5(1) of the
Taxation of Income Act 1947 was found to have concealed a settlement u/s 8 A to pay Rs 3 Lakhs in
monthly installments, byway of arrears of tax and penalty. In the meanwhile the SC in another case
held that section 5(1) is ultra vires the constitution, as it was inconsistence with Art 14. So the
appellant cannot his waive off his FR
WHAT IS LAW?
Article 13 (3);in this article unless the context otherwise requires
(a). Law includes any ordinance, order, bye law, rule, regulation, notification, custom, usage, having in the
territory of india the force of law.
(b). Laws inforce includes laws passed or made by a legislature or other competent authority in the territory
of India before the commencement of this constitution and not previously repealed notwithstanding
that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas.
IS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT A LAW UNDER ARTICLE 13(2)?
In Shankari Prasad V/s Union of India supreme court held that it is not law. Same thing
upheld in the Sajjan Singh V/s State of Rajashthan case also. But in Golaknath V/s State
of Punjab it was held that it is a law. Inorder to overcome form the decission passed by
the supreme court in Golaknath case parliament enacted 24th constitutional Amendment
act in 1971 there by introduced article 13(4).
Article 13(4)It states that nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this
constitution made under article 368.
Again this act (24th constitutional Amendment act) is challenged in the Keshvanad Bharti V/s
State of kerala case.but court overruled the the golaknath case and upheld the validity of
24th constitutional constitutional amendment act.