Social Thinking
Social Thinking
Social Thinking
Zura Ramli
10 APR 2023
• Introduction
• Assessment
• Intervention
• Introduction
• Assessment
• Intervention
What is Social Thinking?
• Developing social competencies by teaching implicit (abstract) social
concepts in an explicit (concrete) manner
• Teaching about the Social World to empower Social Learners to meet
their own social goals based on their own starting place
• 3 Aspects of Social Thinking
1. How does social learner function in the social world?
2. What can I teach this social learner about how the social world works?
3. How can social learner apply information to better navigate to regulate in
the social world?
A fit for some, not for all…
• 4 years to adulthood
• Solid/strong language & academic learning
• For those who ‘think about thinking’ & talks about ‘thoughts and
thinking’
• Neurodivergent and neurotypical
• If it’s not helpful, it’s not a good fit!
Keywords
• Social world
• Social competencies
• Social learner
Keywords
• Social world
• Social competencies
• Social learner
What is the social world?
• It is where each of us interpret and respond to social information
• Social information can be:
• Felt or thought or sensed
• Spoken or unspoken
• Heard or not heard
• Seen or not seen
• Intentional or unintentional
• Hidden or clear
• Involving us or someone else
This includes (not limited to):
• Sports
• Literature
The social world is active • Movies, TV, YouTube, Social Media
anytime we and/or others
have awareness of people • Driving a car, biking, walking
in context. • Face-to-face interactions online or
* Filled with constantly in person
shifting social landscapes • People watching, co-existing,
sharing space
Social World
• We ‘enter’ the social world through our social attention
• Social attention is not a behavior but it is a brain process
• Different people have different social attention
• Each person’s social world is uniquely impacted by dynamic internal
drivers and external forces
Internal
drivers
Social World
Keywords
• Social world
• Social competencies
• Social learner
Social Competencies Model
• Socially attend to
Attend
information
NOTES:
• Not intended to be diagnostic or a prognostic tool.
• Means of observing and categorizing play
• Help with planning intervention and celebrating progress
with realistic expectations!
Group Playing Problem Solving (GPS) Play Levels
ME Play Level 1
• Play is very singular and is object or action focused. Tends to play alone. They
will attend to an adult who actively seeking their attention
WE Play Level 4
• With minimal adult facilitation (providing props, materials, and initial
ideas), peers can begin to create structured play together. Adults may
step in to resolve conflicts and keep play moving along
Struggles to
notice, attend,
and interprets
social
information
Social Thinking-Social Communication/Characteristics Summary (ST-SCS)
Well-developed
social competencies
Solid interpreters of
language. Solid social
Literal interpreters, attention, social self-
challenges with social awareness, difficulty
attention, social self- understanding
Very literal
awareness. May have others’ perspectives.
interpreters. Critical
solid language and
thinking, problem
critical thinking in
solving, social
sciences
attention, and theory NSC
of mind are
significantly impacted
Very, very literal and NCC
often shows cognitive
and language-based ESC
challenges
PESC
SCSC
• Introduction
• Assessment
• Intervention
Dynamic Assessment
• Exploring ideas to assess social competencies
• Assessing social pragmatic abilities which require rapid synergistic
and dynamic processing and responses to social information
• Determining one’s social competencies in the here and now
• Definition:
• Refers to an assessment, by an active teaching process, of a child’s
perception, learning, thinking, and problem solving
Goals of Dynamic Assessment
A. Assess the capacity of the child to assess the principle underlying an
initial problem (ability to problem solve)
B. Assess the nature and amount of investment (teaching) that is
required to teach a child a given rule or principle
C. Identify the specific cognitive functions (i.e., systematic exploratory
behavior) and non-intellective factors (i.e., need for mastery) that
are responsible for weakness in performance and how modifiable
they are as a result of teaching
Dynamic Assessment vs
Standardized Assessments
Assessment Process
• Assessing abstract elements of social communication and language
without depending on formalized test
• To describe and figure out individual’s social communicative
competencies within the real time contexts in which they co-exist,
learn, work and communicate
• No discrete starting and stopping point – getting a sense of the
individual prior to meeting them, reviewing past reports, if available
• Also actively aware of that person in context during all the time you
are observing, co-existing, or interacting with them
Components of Dynamic Assessments
• No wrong answers
• What type of scaffolding needed?
• What type of verbal and non-verbal cues needed?
• How long does the tasks take?
• What might this information tell us about this individual’s abilities
across context?
• What are the individuals’ executive functions observed throughout
the assessment process?
Executive Functions
• 10 basic executive functions
1. Recognizing one’s goal
• The social mind 2. Impulse control
requires the same 3. Emotional Awareness
executive functions as 4. Flexible Thinking
those needed to do 5. Working Memory
assignments, and
these functions 6. Planning & prioritizing
evolving across our 7. Task Initiation
lives 8. Mental Time Travel
9. Perspective taking
10. Self-regulation of feelings/behaviors
Example of DA tasks:
• Wordless pictures book
• ‘Not a box’ – flexible thinking, shared imagination
• Think with your eyes
• Social Sequencing Pictures
• Fill out a form
• Double interview
• Social scenario pictures
• Generate a story based on video clip
• Examining peer-based collaboration and play
Examining peer-based collaboration and
play
• 6 guiding questions
1. Do they seek peers or adults as a play partner in interactive play?
2. How do they use language during play?
3. How do they engage with objects or play materials during
interactive play?
4. What type of pretend play do they use when interacting with peers?
5. How flexible do they shift play based on others’ ideas during
interactive play?
6. How well do they problem solve during interactive play?
From Assessment to teaching….
• During the dynamic assessments, FOLLOW THEIR LEAD
• Attend to what they’re interested in to build rapport and trust, prior
to give them specific tasks to focus on
• If they want to talk about friendship, can explore more what they
understand about friendship
• If they reluctant to participate or say they don’t care – The I don’t
Care scale
• Use stress scale to understand their struggles
• Let them name their feelings using the emotions scale
• Introduction
• Assessment
• Intervention
Before we continue….
• Thinking about our own thoughts and feelings Metacognition
• Thinking about others’ thoughts and feelings and how they think
about our own thoughts and feelings Social Metacognition
Social Thinking Teaching Journey
What do I bring to
this journey?
Who is this
What frameworks person and how
& strategies fit? do I relate to
them?
What Goal or
problem(s) are we
solving for?
Social Thinking Teaching Journey
What do I bring to
this journey?
Who is this
What frameworks person and how
& strategies fit? do I relate to
them?
What Goal or
problem(s) are we
solving for?
What do I bring to the Who is the person and how
journey? to relate with them?
• What are my • How do I learn about this
assumptions based on person?
my experiences, my • Am I taking perspectives or
training, my trauma, or getting perspectives?
my personal beliefs? • Do I understand their learning
• Diagnosis? strengths and struggles?
• Biases? • Getting information prior the
• Expertise? session (i.e., reports, class
observations) can help or
hinder teaching process
Who is the person and how to
relate with them?
Understanding
U
perspectives
Who is this
What frameworks person and how
& strategies fit? do I relate to
them?
What Goal or
problem(s) are we
solving for?
What is their social learning
ME Play Level 1
style?
Group Playing Problem Solving (GPS) Play Level
• Play is very singular and is object or action focused. Tends to play alone. They will attend to an adult who actively
seeking their attention
ME to WE Play Level 3
• Adult directs the play, providing the structure, ideas, and context. Peers take a role and enact the play within that
structure
WE Play Level 4
• With minimal adult facilitation (providing props, materials, and initial ideas), peers can begin to create structured
play together. Adults may step in to resolve conflicts and keep play moving along
Well-developed
Solid interpreters of social competencies
language. Solid social
Literal interpreters, attention, social self-
challenges with social awareness, difficulty
attention, social self- understanding
Very literal
awareness. May have others’ perspectives.
interpreters. Critical
solid language and
thinking, problem
critical thinking in
solving, social
sciences
attention, and theory NSC
of mind are
significantly impacted
Very, very literal and NCC
often shows cognitive
and language-based ESC
challenges
PESC
SCSC
Social Thinking Teaching Journey
What do I bring to
this journey?
Who is this
What frameworks person and how
& strategies fit? do I relate to
them?
What Goal or
problem(s) are we
solving for?
What goal or problem(s) are we solving?
• Sometimes social goals are clearly stated, “I want to make friends in
my new school”
• Sometimes it is not clear, “Why won’t Ayra play with me?”
• Sometimes social goals are personal and sometimes they are formed
by group expectations
• Asking them and clarifying with them
• Making progress towards one’s social goal requires self-awareness,
self-reflection, and self-evaluation
It is not about producing social skills based on standard,
they are based on a person’s desire or need:
• Avoiding threats
• Co-existing for companionship
• Conflict resolution
• Organizing for school
• Participating
• Belonging
Social Thinking Teaching Journey
What do I bring to
this journey?
Who is this
What frameworks person and how
& strategies fit? do I relate to
them?
What Goal or
problem(s) are we
solving for?
What are other considerations?
• Consider patterns across environments like:
• Awareness of others (when an adult is not
interacting with them)
• How they share an imagination
• Inferring social cues
• How they use language to relate (e.g., narrative, etc.) • Even more
• Anxiety, sensory, screen time overwhelm considerations:
• More considerations • Are they isolated?
• Developmental stage • Any negative inner
• Personality thoughts?
• Contexts (school, home, etc.) • Struggle to read
• Role (parents, child, etc.) intention?
• Executive function – self-regulation • Think everyone is
• Other environmental pressure their friend?
• Always start teaching at the place where the social learner can easily
learn
• Use available DOORWAYS to enter teaching (for example, but not
limited to):
• Do they have a unique talent or interests that might be motivating?
• Do they desire a friend?
• Do they want to avoid people?
• Do they seem inattentive and clueless?
• Do they reject adults and challenges authorities?
• Do they have academic struggles?
Social Thinking Teaching Journey
What do I bring to
this journey?
Who is this
What frameworks person and how
& strategies fit? do I relate to
them?
What Goal or
problem(s) are we
solving for?
Frameworks, Concepts, and Strategies
• Teaching is organized by:
SELF-REGULATION
Play/
Set Up Clean Up
Activity
Neutral OK
Ne
ga
tiv
e
I Don’t Care Scale