Special Topics in HRM
Special Topics in HRM
Special Topics in HRM
Interviews References
Selection
Self Subordinates
PAY AND BENEFITS
Pay level: how the firm’s pay incentives compare to
other firms in the industry.
• Managers can decide to offer low or high
relative wages.
• Pay Structure: clusters jobs into categories
based on importance, skills, and other
issues.
Benefits: Some are required (social security, workers
comp).
• Others (health insurance, day care, and
others) are provided at the employers
option.
• Cafeteria-style plan: employee can choose
the best mix of benefits for them. Can be
hard to manage.
PAY
• Base Wage
• Job Based Pay-paid for the job that is
done
• Competency Based Pay-pay is linked
to job-relevant skills, knowledge, and
experience
• Incentive Pay-linked to job performance
• can increase motivation
• links employees to firm performance
• works well when employees trust firm
Individual Incentives
• Piece-Rate - Pay for each unit of output
• Commissions - Pay from percentage of
sales or profits
• Bonuses - Lump sum payments
• Merit Pay - Permanent increases in base
pay linked to individual’s previous
performance
• Seniority - Increases over time
Team or Organizational Incentive
• Gain Sharing - teams of employees share
in gains from improvements in
productivity or cost saving measures
• Profit Sharing - A percentage of profits
earned by a department or company
• Stock Ownership
• Options
• Employee Stock Ownership Plans
Labor Legislation Laws
Fair Labor Law
• Minimum Wage
• Pay for overtime
• Does not cover commission, salary, or tips
Pro-Union/Labor Legislation
Pro-Individual
• Equal Pay Act
• Men and women must be paid equally when doing
equal work
• requiring similar skill, effort, responsibility, and
conditions
• Equal Pay Vs Comparable Worth
Civil Rights Act
• Prohibits discrimination in all phases of
employment based on race, color, religion, sex,
or national origin.
• Such information can’t be considered in
hiring, firing, promotions, training, or
granting raises
• religious discrimination
• EEOC monitors, justice department
enforces
Individual Rights
• Age Discrimination
• Occupational and Safety Health Act
• Requires employers to provide a safe and healthful
workplace with adequate protection against
hazards
• Dangerous Equipment
• Chemicals
• Established Occupational Safety and Health
Centers
Individual Rights
• Equal Employment Opportunity Principle thru
R.A. 10524
Love, Affection, and Belongingness Needs. The third layer is called love, affection, and
belongingness needs. Maslow believed that if an individual met the basic physiological and
safety needs, then that individual would start attempting to achieve love, affection, and
belongingness needs next, “He [or she] will hunger for affectionate relations with people in
general, namely, for a place in his [or her] group, and he [or she] will strive with great
intensity to achieve this goal. Maslow believed that organizations would have better worker
retention and satisfaction if they kept their employees in a cohesive environment.
Furthermore, if a worker feels isolated or ostracized from their environment, then he or she
would feel less motivated to work, which will lead to a decrease in overall productivity.
Maslow believed that organizations would have better worker retention and satisfaction if
they kept their employees in a cohesive environment. Furthermore, if a worker feels isolated
or ostracized from their environment, then he or she would feel less motivated to work, which
will lead to a decrease in overall productivity.
Esteem Needs. The fourth layer is called esteem, and is represented by two different sets
of needs according to Maslow. First, individuals are motivated by the “desire for strength,
for achievement, for adequacy, for confidence in the face of the world, and for
independence and freedom.” Maslow goes on to discuss a second subset of esteem needs,
“we have what we may call the desire for reputation or prestige (defining it as respect or
esteem from other people), recognition, attention, importance or appreciation.” While
Maslow originally separated these two lists from each other, they clearly have more in
common than not. If employees do not feel that their input is valued at the organization,
they will seek out other places of employment that will value their input, because humans
have an intrinsic need to be appreciated for their efforts.
Recognition Micromanagement
Salary
Decision Making
Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and
Theory Y
The classical perspective felt that leadership should control and
order subordinates. Then, in the human relations approach, we
learned that superiors need to cultivate and support their employees.
Douglas McGregor. McGregor, D. (1960), a management professor at
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the 1950s and 1960s, felt
that there are two different perspectives, which he termed as Theory
X and Theory Y. These theories were based on assumptions that
managers have about their workers.
a management professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
in the 1950s and 1960s, felt that there are two different perspectives,
which he termed as Theory X and Theory Y. These theories were
based on assumptions that managers have about their workers.
McGregor defined a Theory X manager who believes
that most people do not like work. Workers are not
smart or creative. People do not care about the
organization, and will adequately work when there are
promises for rewards and potential punishments.
Moreover, Theory X manager believes that people want
to have direction in order to evade responsibility.
People dislike work and find ways to People perceive work as natural and find it
avoid it enjoyable
Workers want to avoid
People want responsibility
responsibility
The last major theorist we are going to explore related to the human
resources side of management theory is Rensis Likert’s Participative
Decision Making (PDM) Theory. Likert originally explored the idea of
how organizational leaders make decisions in his book The Human
Organization.Likert, R. (1967). Likert’s ideas were based in the notion
that supervisors with strong worker productivity tended to focus on the
human aspects of subordinate problems while creating teams that
emphasized high achievement. In other words, these supervisors were
employee centered and believed that effective management required
treating employees as humans and not just worker bees. Likert further
noted that these highly productive leaders also tended to involve
subordinates in the decision making process. Out of this basic
understanding of productive versus unproductive management, Likert
created a series of four distinct management styles.
System 1: Exploitive Authoritative. System 1,
exploitative authoritative management, starts with the basic
issue of trust. Under this system of management, the
manager simply does not trust subordinates and has no
confidence in subordinate decision making capabilities.
Because of this lack of trust, all decisions are simply decided
upon by people at the upper echelons of the hierarchy and
then imposed on the workers. Communication under these
leaders is typically unidirectional (from management to
workers), and employees are motivated to comply with
management dictates out of fear.
System 2: Benevolent Authoritative. System 2,
benevolent authoritative management, starts with the
basic notion that decision making should be situated with
those in managerial positions. Because managers believe
that decision making should be theirs and theirs alone,
managers believe that workers will simply comply with
managerial dictates because of the manager’s legitimate
right to make decisions. This type of management almost
takes on a master-servant style relationship. As for
communication, subordinates are not free to discuss
decisions or any job-related matters with their superiors.
Ultimately, employ motivation to comply with managerial
dictates is done through a system of rewards.
System 3: Consultative. System 3, consultative management, starts
with a lot more trust in employee decision making capabilities.
However, the manager may either not have complete confidence in
employee decision making or may have the ultimate responsibility for
decisions made, so he or she does not allow workers to just make and
implement decisions autonomously. Typically, the manager seeks input
from workers and then uses this input to make the ultimate decision.
Under consultative management, communication, decision making
participation, and teamwork is fair, and employees tend to be more
motivated and satisfied than the previous two styles of management.
However, consultative management can be very effective if, and only if,
the input process is conducted legitimately. One of the biggest mistakes
some managers make is to use pseudo-consultative practices where they
pretend to seek out input from subordinates even though the actual
decision has already been made. Pseudo-consultative decision making is
just a different flavor of benevolent authoritative management.
System 4: Participative. System 4, participative management, is
built on the goal of ensuring that decision making and organizational
goal attainment is widespread throughout the organizational
hierarchy. In these organizations, organizational leaders have
complete confidence in worker ability to make and implement
decisions, so workers are constantly encouraged to be very active in
the decision making process. Under participative management,
communication, decision making participation, and teamwork is good,
and employees tend to be motivated and satisfied.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Human Resources encourages an environment where employees have the
ability to be creative and take risks in order to maximize outcomes.
Human resources places an emphasis on more communication than
human relations.
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs help us to understand what motivates people
in organizations.
Herzberg’s theory focuses on what motivates individuals to work and he
also focused on what factors lead individuals to demotivation at work.
McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y are assumptions that managers have
about their employees. They differ in the type of communication involved
as well as the expectations of workers.
Rensis Likert’s ideas were based on the idea that supervisors are
employee centered and to treat all employees as unique humans rather
than just another worker.
Organization Behavior Theory
The study of organizational behavior (OB) is applied to HRM
functions and its related subjects helps us understand what people in
organizational environments think, feel and do. This knowledge helps to
anticipate, recognize and monitor organizational events for HR and,
realistically all employees. Organizational behavior study includes research
areas dedicated to improving performance at work, increasing job
stability, fostering creativity, and fostering leadership. A focus on
organizational behavior helps to explain why certain different behaviors
impact workers ' efficiency and discretionary effort, as well as how to
consider and forecast the effects of different policies on managing human
resources.
There are several important aspects from the viewpoint of organizational
behavior that Pfeffer in (2007) illustrated three:
First, people are social beings and as such are concerned with their
interactions with one another and affected by what others say and do.
Secondly, people are worried with equality and justice, both the
distributive results and the mechanisms by which those results are
decided. Because of this equal role in both systems and results, people will
be gradually known as economists, in reality, spend money to "punish"
people who violate fairness standards.
However, there are some researchers who stand against the human capital theory,
such as Fix, Blair (2018) they suggest that the correlation between income and
education is weak. “Simple correlations between earnings and years of schooling
are quite weak. Moreover, in multiple regressions when variables correlated with
schooling are added
Human capital theorists claim that productivity and efficiency of
employees increases by education through raising the level of cognitive
stock of economically productive human ability that is an outcome of innate
capability and investment in human beings. According to Babalola (2003)
stated in Olanyan and Okemakinde (2008) the logic behind investing in
human capital is built on three points of view which are first, the new
generation must be provided with the knowledge that previous generations
also had. Second, the new generation should be trained in the ways in which
the existing knowledge can be used to develop and invent different products
or social services.
Resource-based Theory
The resource-based view is applied as a theoretical foundation in HRM that
is based on the assumptions that firm resource variedly distributed and
remained stable over time. A firm’s resources include materials, skills,
organizational processes and systems, plus information and data of the
organization. This theory ties HRM with competitive advantage
generation through focusing on fostering the internal resources that the
organization owns which most probably are unique and special to the firm,
in different words no two organizations have the same exact resources,
either tangible or intangible. “If resources and capabilities of a firm are
mixed and deployed in a proper way, they can create competitive
advantage for the firm. Eventually, only companies themselves can
achieve and sustain competitive advantage by innovation and
strategically positioning in the market”. However, theorists argue that
effective human resource practices can easily be copied by other competitors
while the type human capital an organization has cannot be copied which
ultimately turns into competitive advantage for the firm.
Theorists distinguish between resources and capabilities arguing that sources
are the inputs in the production process that are the fundamentals of analysis.
According to Grant (1999) researchers face some problems in identifying
the resource basis for specific organizations due to the fact that the two main
sources of data and information which are IT and financial statements and
both of those factors fail to provide adequate information about intangible
resources and people-based skills and only provide a fragmented picture of
resource bases.
However, As Suska (2016) mentioned that the transaction cost divided into
three types; Marking transaction costs are the costs of collecting
information, conducting decision making about an agreement, and the cost of
implementation of the contract. The inter-company transaction costs are the
fixed and the variable costs of the company’s practices.
The last one is public transaction costs, which are the costs of organizing
and maintaining public order. Therefore, firms through marking
transaction cost can reduce the cost of searching for the qualified applicant
by providing enough information about the vacancies, checking the
application documents, references, and negotiation about contracts
(Suska, 2016).