Case Study:

U.S.
Presidential
Elections

Herman Butale
“Sani”
1. Introduction

 The case study discusses the impact of social media, specifically Twitter, on the U.S.
presidential election.
 It cites Eric Schmidt's statement that the candidate who can maximize the potential of
the internet will stand out in the next presidential election.
 The case study highlights how President Trump used Twitter to communicate directly
with voters and revolutionized the traditional method of releasing news through press
conferences.
2. Statement of the problem

 The problem is how to effectively communicate with voters in the era of mobile
internet and social media.
 The traditional method of releasing news through press conferences may not be the
most effective way to reach voters, especially the younger generation who are more
active on social media.
3. SWOT Analysis
3.1 Strengths

 Social media platforms like Twitter provide a direct channel of communication

between politicians and voters.
 Social media can be used to bypass traditional media outlets and reach a wider
audience.
 President Trump's use of Twitter was innovative and allowed him to connect with his
base in a more personal way.
3.2 Weaknesses

 Social media can be prone to misinformation and fake news.

 Not everyone uses social media, and relying solely on social media may alienate
some voters.
 President Trump's use of Twitter was often controversial and could be seen as
unprofessional.
3.3 Opportunities

 Social media can be used to reach younger voters who are more active on these
platforms.
 Social media can be used to quickly and easily disseminate information to a large
audience.
 Politicians can use social media to engage with voters and gain valuable feedback on
their policies.
3.4 Threats

 Social media can be easily manipulated by foreign governments and other bad
actors.
 Social media can be a breeding ground for extremist views and hate speech.
 The overreliance on social media could lead to a lack of trust in traditional media
outlets.
4. Discussion of possible options

 Continue to use social media to communicate with voters but be more cautious
about the content being posted.
 Use a combination of traditional press conferences and social media to reach a wider
audience.
 Develop a new social media platform specifically for politicians to communicate with
voters in a more controlled environment.
5. Recommendation:

 The recommended option is to use a combination of traditional press conferences and

social media to communicate with voters.
 This approach will allow politicians to reach a wider audience while still maintaining a
level of professionalism.
 It also ensures that all information is verified and accurate, reducing the risk of
spreading misinformation.
5. Details of the chosen option

 Politicians can continue to use social media to communicate with voters, but they
should be more cautious about the content being posted.
 This means fact-checking all information before posting and avoiding controversial or
offensive language.
 They should also use traditional press conferences to reach a wider audience and
provide more in-depth information about their policies.
US Presidential elections – An Overview
• US Presidential elections involve complex and extensive marketing efforts to reach and persuade voters.
• Political campaigns use a range of marketing strategies to engage with voters, promote their candidate, and win support.
• One primary goal of marketing in US Presidential elections is to build a strong brand and promote a candidate's image.
• Political campaigns use a range of tactics to develop their candidate's brand, including advertising, social media, and public appearances.
• Another critical aspect of marketing in US Presidential elections is targeting specific voter segments with tailored messages.
• Political campaigns use data analysis and voter profiling to identify key groups of voters and develop messaging that resonates with their interests and concerns.
• Marketing also plays a crucial role in fundraising efforts for US Presidential campaigns.
• Political candidates rely heavily on donations from individuals and interest groups to fund their campaigns.
• Effective marketing campaigns can help to attract donors and generate revenue through online fundraising, events, and direct mail campaigns.
• Finally, marketing in US Presidential elections also involves extensive efforts to mobilize voters and get them to the polls.
• Political campaigns use a range of tactics to increase voter turnout, such as voter registration drives, early voting campaigns, and get-out-the-vote (GOTV) efforts.
• The US Presidential elections thinking model is a complex and multifaceted process that involves building a candidate's brand, targeting specific voter segments,
raising funds, and mobilizing voters.
• Effective marketing strategies can help to differentiate a candidate from their opponents and win support from key voter groups.
6. Conclusion:
 Social media has had a significant impact on the way politicians communicate with
voters.
 While it provides a direct channel of communication, it also poses risks such as the
spread of misinformation and the alienation of certain voter demographics.
 Using a combination of traditional press conferences and social media is the best
approach to effectively communicate with voters while maintaining professionalism and
accuracy.
7. References:

• Bode, L. (2016). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. New Media & Society, 18(2), 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814544894

• Chen, H., & Ratkiewicz, J. (2019). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190498071.013.38

• Cook, T. E., & Figueira, D. F. (2019). The influence of Twitter use during the 2016 presidential election. Social Science Computer Review, 37(6), 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318776348

• Fahy, D., & Fahy, D. (2019). The role of social media in political communication. In Routledge Handbook of Political Advertising (pp. 303-318).

• Fahy, D., & Fahy, D. (2019). The role of social media in political communication. In Routledge Handbook of Political Advertising (pp. 303-317). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315121677-18

• Gibson, R., Cantijoch, M., & Ward, S. (2017). Social media and political participation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.496

• Gottfried, J., & Shearer, E. (2021). News use across social media platforms 2021. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2021/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2021/

• Hua, H. (2019). Mobile Marketing Management, Case Studies from Successful Practices. Routledge.

• Kim, S., & Kim, S. H. (2018). The effect of politicians’ Twitter use on their public image and political support. Journal of Political Marketing, 17(2), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2017.1421817

• Kreiss, D. (2018). Inaccurate, costly, and harmful: The effects of the partisan press on democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190699512.001.0001

• Kruikemeier, S., & Desmet, P. (2018). Social media and political communication: A survey of Twitter users during the 2014 European Parliament elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,
23(1), 26-44.
• Kruikemeier, S., & Desmet, P. (2018). Social media and political communication: A survey of Twitter users during the 2014 European Parliament elections in the
Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(1), 26-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12183
• Nimmo, B., & Chen, C. (2020). Disinformation, misinformation, and influence operations in the COVID-19 pandemic. Joint Special Operations University
Press. https://jsou.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=56106543
• Perrin, A. (2021). Social media fact sheet. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/
• Perrin, A. (2021). Social media fact sheet. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/
• Routledge. Hermanns, F., Kornprobst, M., & Musiol, G. (2018). Social media and political communication: A survey among political communicators in
Germany. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 126-149.
• Silverman, C. (2016). This analysis shows how fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. BuzzFeed News.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook
• Smith, A. (2011). Why Americans use social media. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2011/11/14/why-americans-use-social-media/
• Stieglitz, S., Dang-Xuan, L., & Bruns, A. (2017). Social media analytics. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(6), 433-453.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0490-6
• Stroud, N. J., Scacco, J. M., Curry, A. L., & Muddiman, A. (2019). Political campaigns and social media. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.891
• Tufekci, Z. (2018). YouTube, the great radicalizer. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/10/opinion/sunday/youtube-politics-radical.html
• U.S. Department of State (2020). Social media and democracy: Promoting transparency and accountability.
https://www.state.gov/social-media-and-democracy-promoting-transparency-and-accountability/