Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Environmental Law Seminar

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

ROLE OF JUDICIARY UNDER THE WATER ACT, 1974

INTRODUCTION

- Reason behind the enactment of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

- Importance of Water Resources : Scarcity of freshwater, need for conservation.

- Objective of the Water Act, 1974 : prevention and control of water pollution, restoration of

wholesomeness of water.
FRAMEWORK OF THE WATER ACT

- Main feature of the Act : Consent Administration, control of pollution through a permit.

- Aspects of regulating water resources covered by the Water Act :


 To prevent and control of water pollution.
 Maintain wholesomeness of water
 Establish State Boards and empower them
 Provide Penalty for flouting provisions
 Establish State Water Testing Laboratories

- The Act has 64 Sections compiled under 8 Chapters.


SCOPE OF JUDICIAL RELIEF UNDER THE WATER ACT, 1974

- SECTION 33 OF THE WATER ACT, 1974


SCOPE OF JUDICIAL RELIEF UNDER THE WATER ACT, 1974

SCOPE OF SECTION 33 OF THE WATER ACT, 1974


- Judicial opinion is divided.

CASE : Pondicherry Papers Ltd. v. Central Board For Prevention And Control Of Water Pollution
[Cri. M. P. No. 4662 and 4663 of 1978]

CASE : Delhi Bottling Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Central Board For The Prevention And Control Of Water
Pollution [AIR 1986 DEL 152]
SCOPE OF JUDICIAL RELIEF UNDER THE WATER ACT, 1974

CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO SECTION 33 RESTRAINING ORDERS


- Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India : Freedom of Trade and Occupation.

CASE : Aggrawal Textile Industries v. State of Rajasthan [S.B.C Writ Petition No. 1375/80]

SECTION 33 OF THE WATER ACT AND SECTION 133 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE

CASE : Harihar Poly-fibres v. The Sub- Divisional Magistrate [1997 (1) ALT (Cr.) 946]]
PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF DIRECTIONS ISSUED UNDER SECTION 33

- Section 41 Clause 2 of the Water Act, 1974


CONCLUSION

- Water Act regulates water pollution through a system of ‘Command and Control’
- Section 33(1) : Empowers Board to make an application to a Court for restraining a person who is
likely to cause apprehended pollution.
- Section 33(2) : Court may make an order that it deems fit.
- Section 33 (3) : Court may direct the person to remove the effluents. May order the Board to remove
and dispose such effluents.
- Act should enable a magistrate at least of first class to initiate Suo Moto action.
- Act should also empower Water Pollution Control Board to take appropriate action in certain cases
without having to seek judicial intervention.
REFERENCES

BOOKS :
1. Environmental Law and Policy of India ; Shyam Diwan, Armin Rosencranz ; 2 nd Ed ; (176-189)
2. Environmental Law ; Dr. S.C. Tripathi ; 3rd Ed ; (106-108)
3. Handbook on Environmental Law: Water Laws, Air Laws and the Environment ; Sanjay Upadhyay,
Videh Upadhyay ; Volume 2 ; (23-24 , 75-91)
4. Environment Protection and the Law ; Dr. Padma ; 2nd Ed ; (76 -82)

ONLINE RESOURCES :
5. Role of Judiciary in Environmental Protection by Priyal Bohra
Link : www.nluassam.ac.in/docs/lex%20terra/Lex%20Terra%20Issue%2032_5.pdf
THANK YOU!

You might also like