Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Chap-1-Modern Project Management

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 29
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that a project is a complex, non-routine effort with defined objectives, timelines and deliverables to meet customer needs, while routine work is repetitive in nature. Projects require cross-functional teams and have unique objectives, while routine work is part of regular operations.

Routine work is repetitive in nature, has predictable outcomes and timelines, and is part of regular operations. A project is a complex, non-routine effort with unique objectives and deliverables to meet customer needs within defined time and budget constraints.

The major characteristics of a project are that it has an established objective, a defined lifespan with a beginning and end, requires cross-functional participation, involves doing something never done before, and has specific time, cost and performance requirements.

Pr o je c t Ma n a g eme n t

THE MANAGERIAL PROCESS Clifford F. Gray


Eric W. Larson

Chapter 1

Modern Project Management


What is a Project?
• Project Defined
– A complex, non-routine, one-time effort limited by
time, budget, resources, and performance
specifications designed to meet customer needs.
• Major Characteristics of a Project
– Has an established objective.
– Has a defined life span with a beginning and an end.
– Requires across-the-organizational participation.
– Involves doing something never been done before.
– Has specific time, cost, and performance
requirements.

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–2
Programs versus Projects
• Program Defined
– A series of coordinated, related, multiple projects that
continue over an extended time and are intended to
achieve a goal.
– A higher level group of projects targeted at a common
goal.
– Example:
• Project: completion of a required course in project
management.
• Program: completion of all courses required for a business
major.

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–3
Comparison of Routine Work with Projects
Routine, Repetitive Work Projects
Taking class notes Writing a term paper
Daily entering sales receipts into Setting up a sales kiosk for a
the accounting ledger professional accounting meeting
Responding to a supply-chain Developing a supply-chain
request information system
Practicing scales on the piano Writing a new piano piece
Routine manufacture of an Apple Designing an iPod that is
iPod approximately 2 X 4 inches,
interfaces with PC, and stores
10,000 songs
Attaching tags on a manufactured Wire-tag projects for GE and
product Wal-Mart

TABLE 1.1

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–4
Project Life Cycle

FIGURE 1.1

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–5
The Challenge of Project Management
• The Project Manager
– Manages temporary, non-repetitive activities and
frequently acts independently of the formal
organization.
• Marshals resources for the project.
• Is linked directly to the customer interface.
• Provides direction, coordination, and integration to the
project team.
• Is responsible for performance and success of the project.
– Must induce the right people at the right time to
address the right issues and make the right decisions.

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–6
The Importance of Project Management
• Factors leading to the increased
use of project management:
– Compression of the product life cycle
– Global competition
– Knowledge explosion
– Corporate downsizing
– Increased customer focus
– Rapid development of Third World and
closed economies
– Small projects that represent big
problems

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–7
Integrated Project Management Systems
• Problems resulting from the use of piecemeal
project management systems:
– Do not tie together the overall strategies of the firm.
– Fail to prioritize selection of projects by their
importance of their contribution to the firm.
– Are not integrated throughout the project life cycle.
– Do not match project planning and controls with
organizational culture to make appropriate
adjustments in support of project endeavors.

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–8
Integrated
Management of
Projects

FIGURE 1.2

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–9
The Technical and
Sociocultural
Dimensions
of the Project
Management
Process

FIGURE 1.3

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–10
An Overview of Project Management 3e.

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–11
Pr o je c t Ma n a g eme n t
THE MANAGERIAL PROCESS Clifford F. Gray
Eric W. Larson

Chapter 2
Organization Strategy
and Project Selection
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–13
Why Project Managers Need to Understand
the Strategic Management Process

• Changes in the organization’s mission and


strategy
– Project managers must respond to changes with
appropriate decisions about future projects and
adjustments to current projects.
– Project managers who understand their organization’s
strategy can become effective advocates of projects
aligned with the firm’s mission.

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–14
Strategic
Management
Process

FIGURE 2.1

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–15
Characteristics of Objectives

S Specific Be specific in targeting an objective

M Measurable Establish a measurable indicator(s) of progress

A Assignable Make the objective assignable to one person for


completion

R Realistic State what can realistically be done with available


resources

T Time related

EXHIBIT 2.1

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–16
Project Portfolio Management Problems
• The Implementation Gap
– The lack of understanding and consensus on strategy
among top management and middle-level (functional)
managers who independently implement the strategy.
• Organization Politics
– Project selection is based on the persuasiveness and
power of people advocating the projects.
• Resource Conflicts and Multitasking
– The multiproject environment creates interdependency
relationships of shared resources which results in the
starting, stopping, and restarting projects.

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–17
Benefits of Project Portfolio Management

• Builds discipline into project selection process.


• Links project selection to strategic metrics.
• Prioritizes project proposals across a common set of
criteria, rather than on politics or emotion.
• Allocates resources to projects that align with strategic
direction.
• Balances risk across all projects.
• Justifies killing projects that do not support organization
strategy.
• Improves communication and supports agreement on
project goals.

EXHIBIT 2.2

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–18
Portfolio of Projects by Type

FIGURE 2.2

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–19
A Portfolio Management System
• Selection Criteria
– Financial: payback, net present value (NPV), internal
rate of return (IRR)
– Non-financial: projects of strategic importance to the
firm.
• Multi-Weighted Scoring Models
– Use several weighted selection criteria to evaluate
project proposals.

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–20
Project Screening Matrix

FIGURE 2.3

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–21
Applying a Selection Model
• Project Classification
– Deciding how well a strategic or operations project fits
the organization’s strategy.
• Selecting a Model
– Applying a weighted scoring model to bring projects to
closer with the organization’s strategic goals.
• Reduces the number of wasteful projects
• Helps identify proper goals for projects
• Helps everyone involved understand how and why a project is
selected

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–22
Project Proposals
• Sources and Solicitation of Project Proposals
– Within the organization
– Request for proposal (RFP) from external sources
(contractors and vendors)
• Ranking Proposals and Selection of Projects
– Prioritizing requires discipline, accountability,
responsibility, constraints, reduced flexibility, and loss
of power.
• Managing the Portfolio
– Senior management input
– The priority team (project office) responsibilities

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–23
Major Project
Proposal

FIGURE 2.4A

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–24
Risk
Analysis

FIGURE 2.4B

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–25
Managing the Portfolio
• Senior Management Input
– Provide guidance in selecting criteria that are aligned
with the organization’s goals
– Decide how to balance available resources among
current projects
• The Priority Team Responsibilities
– Publish the priority of every project
– Ensure that the project selection process is open and
free of power politics.
– Reassess the organization’s goals and priorities
– Evaluate the progress of current projects

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–26
Project Screening
Process

FIGURE 2.5

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–27
Project Portfolio Matrix

FIGURE 2.7

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–28
Project Portfolio Matrix Dimensions
• Bread-and-butter projects
– Involve evolutionary improvements to current products and
services.
• Pearls
– Represent revolutionary commercial advances using proven
technical advances.
• Oysters
– Involve technological breakthroughs with high commercial
payoffs.
• White elephants
– Projects that at one time showed promise but are no longer
viable.

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–29

You might also like