Chap-1-Modern Project Management
Chap-1-Modern Project Management
Chap-1-Modern Project Management
Chapter 1
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–2
Programs versus Projects
• Program Defined
– A series of coordinated, related, multiple projects that
continue over an extended time and are intended to
achieve a goal.
– A higher level group of projects targeted at a common
goal.
– Example:
• Project: completion of a required course in project
management.
• Program: completion of all courses required for a business
major.
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–3
Comparison of Routine Work with Projects
Routine, Repetitive Work Projects
Taking class notes Writing a term paper
Daily entering sales receipts into Setting up a sales kiosk for a
the accounting ledger professional accounting meeting
Responding to a supply-chain Developing a supply-chain
request information system
Practicing scales on the piano Writing a new piano piece
Routine manufacture of an Apple Designing an iPod that is
iPod approximately 2 X 4 inches,
interfaces with PC, and stores
10,000 songs
Attaching tags on a manufactured Wire-tag projects for GE and
product Wal-Mart
TABLE 1.1
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–4
Project Life Cycle
FIGURE 1.1
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–5
The Challenge of Project Management
• The Project Manager
– Manages temporary, non-repetitive activities and
frequently acts independently of the formal
organization.
• Marshals resources for the project.
• Is linked directly to the customer interface.
• Provides direction, coordination, and integration to the
project team.
• Is responsible for performance and success of the project.
– Must induce the right people at the right time to
address the right issues and make the right decisions.
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–6
The Importance of Project Management
• Factors leading to the increased
use of project management:
– Compression of the product life cycle
– Global competition
– Knowledge explosion
– Corporate downsizing
– Increased customer focus
– Rapid development of Third World and
closed economies
– Small projects that represent big
problems
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–7
Integrated Project Management Systems
• Problems resulting from the use of piecemeal
project management systems:
– Do not tie together the overall strategies of the firm.
– Fail to prioritize selection of projects by their
importance of their contribution to the firm.
– Are not integrated throughout the project life cycle.
– Do not match project planning and controls with
organizational culture to make appropriate
adjustments in support of project endeavors.
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–8
Integrated
Management of
Projects
FIGURE 1.2
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–9
The Technical and
Sociocultural
Dimensions
of the Project
Management
Process
FIGURE 1.3
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–10
An Overview of Project Management 3e.
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–11
Pr o je c t Ma n a g eme n t
THE MANAGERIAL PROCESS Clifford F. Gray
Eric W. Larson
Chapter 2
Organization Strategy
and Project Selection
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–13
Why Project Managers Need to Understand
the Strategic Management Process
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–14
Strategic
Management
Process
FIGURE 2.1
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–15
Characteristics of Objectives
T Time related
EXHIBIT 2.1
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–16
Project Portfolio Management Problems
• The Implementation Gap
– The lack of understanding and consensus on strategy
among top management and middle-level (functional)
managers who independently implement the strategy.
• Organization Politics
– Project selection is based on the persuasiveness and
power of people advocating the projects.
• Resource Conflicts and Multitasking
– The multiproject environment creates interdependency
relationships of shared resources which results in the
starting, stopping, and restarting projects.
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–17
Benefits of Project Portfolio Management
EXHIBIT 2.2
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–18
Portfolio of Projects by Type
FIGURE 2.2
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–19
A Portfolio Management System
• Selection Criteria
– Financial: payback, net present value (NPV), internal
rate of return (IRR)
– Non-financial: projects of strategic importance to the
firm.
• Multi-Weighted Scoring Models
– Use several weighted selection criteria to evaluate
project proposals.
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–20
Project Screening Matrix
FIGURE 2.3
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–21
Applying a Selection Model
• Project Classification
– Deciding how well a strategic or operations project fits
the organization’s strategy.
• Selecting a Model
– Applying a weighted scoring model to bring projects to
closer with the organization’s strategic goals.
• Reduces the number of wasteful projects
• Helps identify proper goals for projects
• Helps everyone involved understand how and why a project is
selected
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–22
Project Proposals
• Sources and Solicitation of Project Proposals
– Within the organization
– Request for proposal (RFP) from external sources
(contractors and vendors)
• Ranking Proposals and Selection of Projects
– Prioritizing requires discipline, accountability,
responsibility, constraints, reduced flexibility, and loss
of power.
• Managing the Portfolio
– Senior management input
– The priority team (project office) responsibilities
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–23
Major Project
Proposal
FIGURE 2.4A
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–24
Risk
Analysis
FIGURE 2.4B
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–25
Managing the Portfolio
• Senior Management Input
– Provide guidance in selecting criteria that are aligned
with the organization’s goals
– Decide how to balance available resources among
current projects
• The Priority Team Responsibilities
– Publish the priority of every project
– Ensure that the project selection process is open and
free of power politics.
– Reassess the organization’s goals and priorities
– Evaluate the progress of current projects
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–26
Project Screening
Process
FIGURE 2.5
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–27
Project Portfolio Matrix
FIGURE 2.7
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–28
Project Portfolio Matrix Dimensions
• Bread-and-butter projects
– Involve evolutionary improvements to current products and
services.
• Pearls
– Represent revolutionary commercial advances using proven
technical advances.
• Oysters
– Involve technological breakthroughs with high commercial
payoffs.
• White elephants
– Projects that at one time showed promise but are no longer
viable.
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 1–29