Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Individual Behaviour-11

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 64

Individual Behaviour

•Personality and Learning


•Perception, Attribution, and Judgment of
Others
•Values, Attitudes, and Work Behaviour
•Theories of Work Motivation
•Motivation in Practice
What Is Personality?

• The relatively stable set of psychological


characteristics that influences the way an
individual interacts with his or her environment.
• Dimensions and traits that are determined by
genetic predisposition and one’s long-term
learning history.
• People have a variety of personality
characteristics.

Copyright ©2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Chapter 2 / Slide 5


Personality and Organizational
Behaviour
• Personality has a long history in
organizational behaviour.
• The role of personality in organizational
behaviour has often been debated in what is
known as the “person-situation debate”
• This has led to three approaches:
– The dispositional approach
– The situational approach
– The interactionist approach
The Dispositional Approach

• Focuses on individual dispositions and personality.


• Individuals possess stable traits or characteristics
that influence their attitudes and behaviours.
• Individuals are predisposed to behave in certain
ways.
The Situational Approach

• Characteristics of the organizational setting such


as rewards influence people’s attitudes and
behaviour.
• Many studies have shown that situational factors
such as the characteristics of work tasks predict
job satisfaction.
The Interactionist Approach

• Organizational behaviour is a function of both


dispositions and the situation.
• To predict organizational behaviour, we need to
know something about an individual’s personality
and the work setting.
• This the most widely accepted approach to
organizational behaviour.
Personality and the Situation

• Personality has the strongest effect in weak


situations.
• In weak situations, roles are loosely defined,
there are few rules and weak reinforcement and
punishment contingencies.
Personality and the Situation
(continued)
• Personality has less of an impact in strong
situations.
• In strong situations, the roles, rules, and
contingencies are more defined.
Implications of the Interactionist
Approach
• Some personality characteristics are useful in
certain organizational situations.
• There is no one best personality.
• The advantages of employee diversity.
• The importance of fit - putting the right person in
the right job, group, or organization.
The Five-Factor Model of
Personality
• Five basic but general dimensions that describe
personality:
– Extraversion
– Emotional stability/neuroticism
– Agreeableness
– Conscientiousness
– Openness to experience
The Five-Factor Model of
Personality (continued)
The Five-Factor Model of
Personality (continued)
• Each of the “Big Five” dimensions is related to job
performance.
• Conscientiousness is the strongest predictor of
overall job performance.
• The “Big Five” are related to work motivation and
job satisfaction.
• The “Big Five” predict job search, employment,
vocational interests, and career success.
Locus of Control

• A set of beliefs about whether one’s behaviour is


controlled mainly by internal or external factors.
• Internals believe that the opportunity to control
their own behaviour rests within themselves.
• Externals believe that external forces determine
their behaviour.
The Internal/External Locus of
Control Continuum
Locus of Control (continued)

• Internals are more satisfied with their jobs, earn


more money, and achieve higher organizational
positions.
• Internals perceive less stress, cope with stress
better, and engage in more careful career
planning.
Self-Monitoring

• The extent to which people observe and regulate


how they appear and behave in social settings and
relationships.
• High self-monitors take great care to observe and
control the images that they project.
Self-Monitoring (continued)

• High self-monitors show concern for socially


appropriate behaviour and social cues, and they
regulate their behaviour according to these cues.
• High self-monitors gravitate to jobs that require
role-playing.
Self-Monitoring (continued)

• High self-monitors are more likely to change


employers and locations and to receive more
promotions.
• They do not feel comfortable in ambiguous social
settings in which it is hard to determine what
behaviours are appropriate.
Self-Esteem

• The degree to which a person has a positive self-


evaluation.
• People with high self-esteem have favourable
self-images.
• People with low self-esteem have unfavourable
self-images.
Self-Esteem and Behavioural
Plasticity Theory

• People with low self-esteem tend to be more


susceptible to external and social influences than
those who have high self-esteem.
• Events and people in organizations have more
impact on the beliefs and actions of employees
with low self-esteem.
Self-Esteem (continued)

• Employees with low self-esteem react badly to


negative feedback.
• People with high self-esteem make more fulfilling
career decisions and have higher job satisfaction
and job performance.
• People with high self-esteem are more resilient to
the strains of everyday worklife.
Recent Developments in
Personality and Organizational
Behaviour
• Five new personality variables that have been
found to be important for organizational
behaviour:
– Positive and negative affectivity
– Proactive personality
– General self-efficacy
– Core self-evaluations
Positive and Negative Affectivity

• People who are high on positive affectivity (PA)


have a propensity to the view world in a positive
light.
• People who are high on negative affectivity (NA)
have a propensity to view the world in a negative
light.
• PA and NA are emotional dispositions that predict
people’s general emotional tendencies.
Positive and Negative Affectivity
(continued)
• People with high PA report higher job satisfaction.
• People with high NA report lower job satisfaction.
• People with high NA experience more stressful
conditions at work and report higher levels of
workplace stress and strain.
Proactive Personality

• A relatively stable personal disposition that


reflects a tendency to behave proactively and to
effect positive change in one’s environment.
• Proactive individuals search for and identify
opportunities, show initiative, take action, and
persevere until they bring about meaningful
change.
Proactive Personality (continued)

• Proactive personality is related to:


– Job performance
– Tolerance for stress
– Leadership effectiveness
– Participation in organizational initiatives
– Work team performance
– Entrepreneurship
– Career success
General Self-Efficacy

• A general trait that refers to an individual’s belief


in his or her ability to perform successfully in a
variety of challenging situations.
• General self-efficacy (GSE) is a motivational trait.
• High GSE individuals are better able to adapt to
novel, uncertain, and adverse situations.
• Employees with higher GSE have higher job
satisfaction and job performance.
Core Self-Evaluations

• A broad personality concept that consists of more


specific traits that reflect the evaluations people
hold about themselves and their self-worth.
• Four traits of core self-evaluations:
– Self-esteem
– General self-efficacy
– Locus of control
– Neuroticism (emotional stability)
Core Self-Evaluations (continued)

• People with more positive core self-evaluations


have higher job satisfaction and job performance.
• Core self-evaluations are also positively related to
life satisfaction.
What is Learning?

• A relatively permanent change in behaviour


potential that occurs due to practice or
experience.
• The environment provides feedback concerning
the consequences of behaviour.
What Do Employees Learn?

• Practical skills:
– job-specific skills, knowledge, technical
competence.
• Intrapersonal skills:
– Problem solving, critical thinking, alternative work
processes, risk taking.
What Do Employees Learn?
(continued)
• Interpersonal skills:
– Interactive skills such as communicating,
teamwork, conflict resolution.
• Cultural awareness:
– The social norms of organizations, company goals,
business operations, expectations, and priorities.
Operant Learning Theory

• The subject learns to operate on the environment


to achieve certain consequences.
• Operantly learned behaviour is controlled by the
consequences that follow it.
• It is the connection between the behaviour and
the consequence that is learned.
Increasing the Probability of
Behaviour
• One of the most important consequences that
influences behaviour is reinforcement.
• Reinforcement is the process by which stimuli
strengthen behaviours.
• A reinforcer is a stimulus that follows some
behaviour and increases or maintains the
probability of that behaviour.
Positive Reinforcement

• The application or addition of a stimulus that


increases or maintains the probability of some
behaviour.
• The stimulus is the positive reinforcer.
• The reinforcer is dependent or contingent on the
occurrence of some desired behaviour.
Negative Reinforcement

• The removal of a stimulus from a situation that, in


turn, increases or maintains the probability of
some behaviour.
• Negative reinforcement occurs when a response
prevents some event or stimulus from occurring.
• The removed or prevented stimulus is a negative
reinforcer.
Organizational Errors Involving
Reinforcement
• Rewards fail to serve as reinforcers when they are
not made contingent on some specific desired
behaviour.
• Organizations often fail to appreciate individual
differences in preferences for reinforcers.
Organizational Errors Involving
Reinforcement (continued)
• Managers often neglect important sources of
reinforcement such as those administered by
coworkers or intrinsic to the job.
• An important source of reinforcement that
managers often ignore is positive feedback that
accompanies desired behaviour or good
performance.
Reinforcement Strategies

• For fast acquisition of some response, continuous


and immediate reinforcement should be used.
• Behaviour tends to be persistent when it is
learned under conditions of partial and delayed
reinforcement.
• Managers have to tailor reinforcement strategies
to the needs of the situation.
Summary of Reinforcement
Strategies and their Effects
Reducing the Probability of
Behaviour
• Some behaviours are detrimental to the operation
of an organization and we want to stop them from
occurring.
• There are two strategies that can reduce the
probability of learned behaviour:
– Extinction
– Punishment
Extinction

• The gradual dissipation of behaviour following the


termination of reinforcement.
• If the behaviour is not reinforced, it will gradually
dissipate or be extinguished.
• Extinction works best when coupled with the
reinforcement of some desired substitute
behaviour.
Punishment

• The application of an aversive stimulus following


some behaviour designed to decrease the
probability of that behaviour.
• A nasty stimulus is applied after some undesirable
behaviour in order to decrease the probability of
that behaviour.
Summary of Learning Effects
Problems Using Punishment

• Punishment has some unique characteristics that


often limit its effectiveness in stopping unwanted
activity.
• It does not demonstrate which activities should
replace the punished response.
• Punishment indicates only what is not
appropriate.
Problems Using Punishment
(continued)
• Punishment only temporarily suppresses the
unwanted response.
• Punishment can provoke a strong emotional
reaction.
Using Punishment Effectively

• Provide an acceptable alternative for the


punished response.
• Limit the emotions involved in punishment.
• Make sure the chosen punishment is truly
aversive.
Using Punishment Effectively
(continued)
• Punish immediately or reinstate the circumstances
surrounding the problem behaviour at a more
appropriate time.
• Do not reward unwanted behaviours before or
after punishment.
• Do not inadvertently punish desirable behaviour.
Social Learning Theory

• Social learning involves:


– observing the behaviour of others
– seeing what consequences they experience
– thinking about what might happen if we act the
same way
• Modelling, self-efficacy, and self-management are
part of social learning theory.
Modelling

• The process of imitating the behaviour of others.


• Self-reinforcement occurs in the modelling
process.
• Attractive, credible, competent, high-status
people are most likely to be imitated.
• It is important that the model’s behaviour result
in positive consequences and that it is vivid and
memorable.
Self-Efficacy

• Beliefs people have about their ability to


successfully perform a specific task.
• It influences the activities people choose to
perform, the amount of effort and persistence
devoted to a task, affective and stress reactions,
and job performance.
Self-Efficacy (continued)

• Sources of information that can influence self-


efficacy beliefs:
– Task success
– Observation
– Verbal persuasion and social influence
– Physiological or emotional state
Self-Management

• The use of learning principles to manage one’s


own behaviour.
• Self-management processes:
– Self-observation
– Observe others
– Set goals
– Rehearse
– Reinforce oneself
Self-Management (continued)

• Self-management can improve learning and result


in a change in behaviour.
• Self-management training has been shown to
improve work attendance and sales performance.
Organizational Learning Practices

• Organizational learning practices include:


– Organizational behaviour modification
– Employee recognition programs
– Training and formal learning
– Informal learning
– Career development
Organizational Behaviour
Modification
• The systematic use of learning principles to
influence organizational behaviour.
• O.B. Mod. has been shown to improve safe
working behaviour, work attendance, and task
performance.
Organizational Behaviour
Modification (continued)
• The effects on task performance are stronger in
manufacturing than in service organizations.
• Money, feedback, and social recognition have
been used as effective forms of positive
reinforcement.
• All three together has the strongest effect on task
performance.
Employee Recognition Programs

• Formal organizational programs that publicly


recognize and reward employees for specific
behaviours.
• To be effective they must specify:
– How a person will be recognized
– The type of behaviour being encouraged
– The manner of the public acknowledgement
– A token or icon of the event for the recipient
Employee Recognition Programs
(continued)

• Employee recognition programs have been found


to be related to higher job satisfaction and
performance, and lower turnover.
• Many of the best companies to work for in Canada
have employee recognition programs.
Training and Formal Learning

• Planned organizational activities that are


designed to facilitate knowledge and skill
acquisition in order to change behaviour and
improve performance.
Training and Formal Learning
(continued)

• Effective training programs include positive


reinforcement, feedback, observation, and self-
management.
• Self-efficacy is an important factor in a training
program’s effectiveness.
Informal Learning

• Learning experiences that are not planned and


designed by the organization.
• It is more spontaneous, immediate, and task
specific than formal learning.
• Up to 70 percent of learning in organizations takes
place informally.
Career Development

• An ongoing process in which individuals progress


through a series of stages that consist of a unique
set of issues, themes, and tasks.
• It involves career planning and career
management.
• Career planning involves the assessment of one’s
interests, skills, and abilities, and the
development of career goals and plans.
Career Development (continued)

• Career management involves taking the necessary


steps that are required to achieve one’s goals and
plans.
• Many organizations have career development
programs.

You might also like