EKO ATLANTIC CITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (EAC) PP
EKO ATLANTIC CITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (EAC) PP
EKO ATLANTIC CITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (EAC) PP
E-mail: fagbohun@elri-ng.org
Regulated by Environmental Impact Assessment Act, 1992 (Decree No. 86 of
1992)
- The EIA Procedural Guideline and Sectoral Guidelines
3
Covers both … “public or private sector projects”.
4
a) A description of the proposed activities;
b) A description of the potential affected environment, including specific information necessary to
identify and assess the environmental effect of the proposed activities;
c) A description of the practical activities as appropriate;
d) An assessment of the likely or potential environmental impacts of the proposed activity and the
alternatives including the direct or indirect cumulative , short term and long-term effects;
e) An identification and description of measures available to mitigate adverse environmental impacts
of proposed activity and assessment of those measures;
f) An indication of gaps in knowledge and uncertainty which may be encountered in computing the
required information;
g) An indication of whether the environment of any State or local government area or areas outside
Nigeria is likely to be affected by the proposed activity or its alternatives;
h) A brief and non-technical summary of the information provided under paragraphs (a) to (g) of this
section.
5
EIA is not required in the case of
6
List covers:
Airport Drainage &
Irrigation
Industry
Forestry
Agriculture Housing
Fisheries Mining
Ports
Quarries Railways
Petroleum
Power
Generation & Resort &
Transmission Transportation Recreational
Development
Waste Treatment & 7
Disposal Water Supply
EIA Procedural Guideline
– Steps to follow in the EIA process (Annex I of the Procedural Guideline)
Sectoral Guidelines
– Oil & Gas, including petroleum refining, petrochemical industry pipelines, on-
shore, offshore exploration and drilling etc;
– Industries – including all other manufacturing industries, besides those in the oil
and gas sector;
8
Category 1 – full and mandatory EIA;
Category 2 – full EIA is not necessary unless
the activity is within the Environmentally
Sensitive Area;
Category 3 – activities having beneficial
impacts on the environment;
Extent of EIA are thus determined either
through listing or an initial environmental
evaluation (IEE). 9
EACP plans to develop the shoreline of Victoria Island in Lagos State
by dredging approximately 90 million cubic metres of sand from
marine shelf waters to reclaim 900 hectares of land for the development
of a modern city;
In the EIA, SENL indicates that it was only in respect of the dredging
and land reclamation activities and promises to submit a further
study/report on construction over the reclaimed land.
10
A package of integrated coastal zone management to check
the impacts of sea level rise resulting from global warming;
Absorb an escalating population of megacity;
Create employment opportunities;
Protect valued land on Victoria Island from further erosion;
Raising of profile of Lagos; and
Reduce traffic and better public amenities.
11
Environmental alterations will occasion changes
(either positive or negative in the quality of the
natural system)
12
EACP is classified under Category 1
as per the EIA Act, being an
“infrastructure” project, and therefore
considered to be environmentally
sensitive.
13
Dredging commenced in EACP site in 2009;
The EACP’s EIA Report was completed in April 2011, and displayed
for public comments from 13th July to 12th August, 2011;
The main reclaimed area is projected to be about 6km long, with a
width of 1.5km on the western end, tapering to 0.5km on the eastern
end;
Public hearing was held on the 21st of January 2011 at Eko Hotel &
Suites in Lagos;
The study team consist of 25 individuals ranging from ecologist to
survey specialist, social experts, engineers, air quality and noise
experts, groundwater specialist, hydro-biologist and other
environmental experts
14
Since dredging started long before the EIA, the project clearly failed to connect with
key stakeholders (public participation) to consider the pre-project concerns between
environment, resources and development. This is a major flaw;
− A submission after the project and not before is not in line with EIA Act.
In a project of this nature, the phases will be interwoven, yet, the period of subsequent
phases (aside of phase 1) are not indicated. Consequently, their uncertainties and risks
are not considered;
Conclusions on likely impacts of the project on adjacent coastal areas and likely
snowball effect along the shoreline of the eastern Gulf of Guinea are at best conjectural
and not based on solid scientific evidence from the study or existing literature;
The EIA neither discussed nor reacted to the latest scientific findings and predictions
from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This would have further
helped in developing adaptation and mitigation responses;
15
SAN FRANCISCO MEXICO
Built substantially on sand filled • Mexico City grew from an Island in the
land; middle of Lake Texcoco;
Earthquake, April 18, 1906 ignited • Marshes were filed in the 16th century
fire (waterpipe broke, so no water to and that formed basis of modern
fight the fire); Mexico;
16
It is never too late to engage;
There is a need for a thorough and sincere review of
the EACP’s EIA with key stakeholders, experts and
NGOs who have been working in this area;
Opinions may differ, but it is always beneficial;
After all of us here present today might have gone,
what will be the lot of Eko Atlantic City Project?
17
Thank you all for listening
Acknowledgement:
Special thanks to my colleague, Ako Amadi, CEO of CCDI for allowing me the use of
some of his materials
18