8THE DIGITAL SELF by GROUP 5
8THE DIGITAL SELF by GROUP 5
8THE DIGITAL SELF by GROUP 5
DIGITAL
SELF
TOPIC
•
S:CYBER SPACE
ONLINE IDENTITY AND
SELF IN
• SELECTIVE SELF PRESENTATION
AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT
• IMPACT OF ONLINE
INTERACTION ON THE SELF
• GENDER SEXUALITY
ONLINE
• PERFORMING GENDER
• ONLINE
BOUNDARIES OF THE
ONLINE SELF
ONLINE IDENTITY AND SELF IN
CYBER SPACE
• The term "online-identity" implies that there is a distinction between how people
present themselves and how they do offline.
• SPLIT BETWEEN “ONLINE” AND “OFFLINE” IDENTITY IS
NARROWING FOR 2 REASONS:
• Since there are fewer identity cues available online than face-to-
face, every piece of digital information a person provides, from
typing speed to nickname and email address, can and is used to
make inferences about them. (Marwick A. 2013)
ONLINE IDENTITY AND SELF IN
CYBER SPACE
• You build your Online Identity when you interact with websites, it will collect its own version of
who you are based on the information that you have shared. It depends on you if you want your
online identity near to your real identity or far from reality.
SELECTIVE-SELF PRESENATION AND
IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT
• According to Goffman (1959) and Leary (1995), self-presentation is
the process of controlling how one is perceived by other people.
• Anything posted online is considered “public” despite what our “privacy” settings are.
• Personal identity is the interpersonal level of self which differentiates the individual as unique
from others.
• Social Identity is the level of self whereby the individual is identified by his or her group
memberships.
SELECTIVE-SELF PRESENATION AND
IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT
• Belk stated that sharing ourselves is no longer new and has been
practiced as soon as human beings were formed.
• Online friends are even more updated than the immediate family
Schwarz mentioned that we have entered an extra-ordinary era of self-
portraiture.
• As a result, researchers and participants become concerned with actively managing identity and
reputation and to warn against the phenomenon of “oversharing” (Labrecque, Markos, and Milne)
• People become unware of the extent of information they share online.
• FEAR OF MISSING OUT - The lack of privacy in many aspects of social media make users
more vulnerable, leading to compulsively checking newsfeeds and continually adding tweets and
postings in order to appear active and interesting.
SELECTIVE-SELF PRESENATION AND
IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT
• DISINHIBITION EFFECT - The lack of face-to-face gaze-meeting
with the feeling of anonymity and invisibility, gives people the freedom
for self-disclosure but can “flame” others and may cause conflict.
• Online interactions does not require cognitive or emotional involvement, making our
interactions with it much easier (Riling, Sanfey, Aronson, Nystrom, and Cohen, 2004)
• Sex is the biological state that corresponds to what we might call a “man” or a “woman.”
• While “sex” is often explained as biological, fixed, and immutable, it is actually socially constructed (West and
Zimmerman 1987)
• Gender, then, is the social understanding of how sex should be experienced and how sex manifests in behavior,
personality, preferences, capabilities, and so forth.
• Gender is historical
• It is taught by families, schools, peer groups, and nation states (Goffman 1977).
GENDER AND SEXUALITY ONLINE
• It is reinforced through songs, sayings, admonition, slang, language, fashion, and discourse (Cameron 1998;
Cameron and Kulick 2003), and it is deeply ingrained.
• Gender is a system of classification that values male-gendered things more than female related things.
• This system plays out on the bodies of men and women, and in constructing hierarchies of everything from colors
(e.g., pink vs. blue) to academic departments (e.g., English vs. Math) to electronic gadgets and websites.
• Given this inequality, the universalized “male” body and experience is often constructed as average or normal, while
female-gendered experiences are conceptualized
as variations from the norm (Goffman 1977)
she argued that gender was performative, in that it is produced through millions of individual actions, rather
than something that comes naturally to men and women
• In 1990's many internet scholars drew from Butler and other queer theorists to understand online identity.
• According to the disembodiment hypothesis, internet users are free to actively
chose which gender or sexuality they are going to portray with the possibility of
creating alternate identities (Wynn and Katz 1997)
• The ability of the users to self consciously adapt and play with different gender
identities would reveal the choices in the production of gender, breaking down
binaries and encouraging fluidity in sexuality and gender expression.
PERFORMING GENDER ONLINE
• The Pew internet and American life project found no discernible differences in user generated content by
gender except remixing, which was most likely among teen girls. (Leonhart et al. 2010)
• Researchers has constantly shown that similar members of men and women maintain a blog about 14% of
internet users. (Lenhart et.al 2010). While the number of male and female bloggers is roughly different, they
tend to blog out different thing.
• Although the technologies are the same, the norms and mores of the people using them differ.
BOUNDARIES OF THE ONLINE SELF:
With the proliferations of multiple online personas, the core self idea crumbles in the digital world, the
self is now extended into avatars, which can affect our offline behavior and our sense of self, from a
more private to public presentation of self which is now co-constructed that can help affirm or modify
our sense of self. It is highly recommended that we set boundaries to our online self.
THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES WILL HELP YOU SHARE INFORMATION ONLINE IN A SMART
WAY THAT WILL PROTECT YOYRSELF AND NOT HARM OTHERS.