Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Retrenchment: Cartajenas-Cabanilla Law Office 3 FLR, Infinity Business Center Don Anselmo Bernad Avenue Ozamiz City

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

RETRENCHMENT Atty. Cleo Marjo C.

Cabanilla

Cartajenas-Cabanilla Law Office


3rd Flr, Infinity Business Center
Don Anselmo Bernad Avenue
Ozamiz City
Definition

 Retrenchment is an act of the employer in dismissing employees because of


losses in the operation of a business, lack of work, and considerable reduction
on the volume of his business, a right consistently recognized and affirmed by
this Court. (Arabit, et. Al. vs. Jardine Pacific Finance, Inc. G.R. No. 181719,
April 2014)
Elements:
1. The losses incurred are substantial and not de minimis
2. The losses are actual and reasonably imminent
3. The retrenchment is reasonable necessary and is likely to
be effective in preventing the expected losses
4. The alleged losses, if already incurred, or the expected imminent
losses sought to be forestalled, are proven by sufficient and
convincing evidence.
Employer must exercise its prerogative
to retrench in good faith
 Illustration:
 Mitsubishi was bleeding to the tune of 1.2Billion pesos in years 1997 and 1998
 To stop the losses, it implemented many cost-cutting measures
 It reduced office supplies use, deferred project implementation, froze hiring, and
implemented a 5% cut in managerial salaries among others
 It decided it would need to permanently retrench.
 When this was challenged, the Supreme Court upheld the decision in favor of
Mitsubishi.
 It pointed to all the proof Mitsubishi submitted to show that there was a real
reason for retrenchment.
Alfredo Mendros, Jr. vs. Mitsubishi Motors Phils.
Corporation (MMPC), G.R. NO. 169780, February 16,
2009
 The right of management to retrench or to lay-off workers to meet clear and
continuing economic threats or during periods of economic recession to
prevent losses is recognized by Article 283 of the Labor Code, as amended,
partly providing:
Art. 283. Closure of establishment and reduction of personnel.––The employer
may also terminate the employment of any employee due to x x x retrenchment
to prevent losses or the closing or cessation of operations of the establishment x
x x by serving a written notice on the worker and the [DOLE] at least one month
before the intended date thereof. x x x In case of retrenchment to prevent
losses, the separation pay shall be equivalent to one (1) month pay or at least
one-half month pay for every year of service whichever is higher. x x x (Emphasis
ours.)
Alfredo Mendros, Jr. vs. Mitsubishi Motors Phils.
Corporation (MMPC), G.R. NO. 169780, February 16,
2009
 it bears to state that the aforequoted Art. 283 of the Code uses the phrase
"retrenchment to prevent losses." The phrase necessarily implies that
retrenchment may be effected even in the event only of imminent,
impending, or expected losses. The employer need not wait for substantial
losses to materialize before exercising ultimate and drastic option to prevent
such losses. In the case at bench, MMPC was already financially hemorrhaging
before finally resorting to retrenchment.
The employer uses fair and reasonable criteria in
ascertaining who would be retrenched or retained

 When termination of employment is occasioned by retrenchment to prevent


losses, an employer must declare a reasonable cause or criterion for
retrenching an employee. Retrenchment that disregards an employee's record
and length of service is an illegal termination of employment. (La Consolacion
College of Manila Sr. Imelda A. Mora, et. Al. vs. Virginia Pascua. G.R. No.
214744, March 14, 2018)
La Consolacion College of Manila Sr. Imelda A. Mora,
et. Al. vs. Virginia Pascua. G.R. No. 214744, March 14,
2018
 Retrenchment is normally resorted to by management during periods of
business reverses and economic difficulties occasioned by such events as
recession, industrial depression, or seasonal fluctuations. It is an act of the
employer of reducing the work force because of losses in the operation of the
enterprise, lack of work, or considerable reduction on the volume of business.
Retrenchment is, in many ways, a measure of last resort when other less
drastic means have been tried and found to be inadequate.
 While a legitimate business option, retrenchment may only be exercised in
compliance with substantive and procedural requisites.
La Consolacion College of Manila Sr. Imelda A. Mora,
et. Al. vs. Virginia Pascua. G.R. No. 214744, March 14,
2018
 Asia World Publishing House, Inc. v. Ople[37] considered seniority, along with
efficiency rating and less-preferred status, as a crucial facet of a fair and
reasonable criterion for effecting retrenchment.
 Emcor, Inc. v. Sienes[39] was categorical, a "[r]etrenchment scheme without
taking seniority into account rendered the retrenchment invalid“
 In Philippine Tuberculosis Society, Inc. v. National Labor Union,[42] this Court
quoted with approval the following discussion by the National Labor Relations
Commission:
La Consolacion College of Manila Sr. Imelda A. Mora,
et. Al. vs. Virginia Pascua. G.R. No. 214744, March 14,
2018
 We noted with concern that the criteria used by the Society failed to consider the
seniority factor in choosing those to be retrenched, a failure which, to our mind,
should invalidate the retrenchment, as the omission immediately makes the selection
process unfair and unreasonable. Things being equal, retaining a newly hired
employee and dismissing one who had occupied the position for years, even if the
scheme should result in savings for the employer, since he would be paying the
newcomer a relatively smaller wage, is simply unconscionable and violative of the
senior employee's tenurial rights. In Villena vs. NLRC, 193 SCRA 686. February 7, 1991,
the Supreme Court considered the seniority factor an important ingredient for the
validity of a retrenchment program. According to the Court, the following legal
procedure should be observed for a retrenchment to be valid: (a) one-month prior
notice to the employee as prescribed by Article 282 of the Labor Code; and b) use of a
fair and reasonable criteria in carrying out the retrenchment program, such as 1) less
preferred status (as in the case of temporary employees) 2) efficiency rating, 3)
seniority, and 4) proof of claimed financial losses.
  status (i.e., whether they are temporary, casual, regular or managerial
employees), efficiency, seniority, physical fitness, age, and financial hardship
for certain workers.
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS

 Procedurally, employers must serve a "written notice both to the employees


and to the Department of Labor and Employment at least one month prior to
the intended date of retrenchment.“ Likewise, they must pay "the retrenched
employees separation pay equivalent to one month pay or at least 1/2 month
pay for every year of service, whichever is higher."
THANK YOU!

You might also like