Stress Based Topology Optimization of 30 Ton C Hook Using FEM.
Stress Based Topology Optimization of 30 Ton C Hook Using FEM.
Stress Based Topology Optimization of 30 Ton C Hook Using FEM.
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Jnana Sangama, Belagavi- 590018, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Karnataka
Project Title:
Stress Based Topology Optimization Of 30 Ton C-Hook
Using Finite Element Analysis
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF
Prof. NAGABHUSHANA M
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
PROJECT GROUP
1KS13ME041 JEEVAN REDDY.N.S
1KS14ME015 ARAVIND J
1KS14ME113 GOVARDHANA V BHARGAV
1KS14ME114 BASAVANAGOWDA
CONTENTS
• INTRODUCTION
• LITERATURE REVIEW
• PROBLEM DEFINITION
• METHODOLOGY
• EXPERIMENTAL WORK
• RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
• REFERENCES
Introduction
• Topology optimization is the process of
optimizing the design parameters with in the
design space with the main aim of
redistributing the stresses along with weight
reduction .
What is Hook?
A lifting hook is a device for grabbing and lifting load by means
of a device such as a hoist or crane .a lifting hook is usually
equipped with a safety latch to prevent the disengagement of
the lifting via ropes sling, chain or rope to which the load is
attached.
Types of C-Hook
• Turner c-hook.
• Rotating c-hook.
• J-hook.
• Double c-hook.
• Fork c-hook.
• Simple c-hook and Coil-clamps.
C-Hook Applications:
The figures shows structural safety for the design dimensions of 120mm width and
428mm height for the beam. The segment 2 has maximum stress compared to the
other regions. Since it is a heavy structure, self weight also plays very important role in
the structural safety. So analysis is carried out further with self weight consideration. So
further input of acceleration due to gravity and mass density are required as input to
find the self weight solution.
Self Weight Results – Deformation
Plot
Stress Due To Self Weight
Total Self Weight
Final Dimensions Considered
• Due to the hole requirement for hinge at the
center of plate , along with bush insertion the
final dimensions are as follows.
• Height of the beam : 800mm ( Due to removal of
the material for hinging and bush placement)
• Width of the beam: 120mm
• Cross sectional area A=1e5mm2
• Moment of Inertia of the problem: 0.54e10mm4.
• Weight of the structure W=11973kg
Final C-Frame Dimensions
Three Dimensional View Of The
Problem
Mesh View Of The Problem
By Element Birth and Death feature, the low stress elements can be killed
and only live elements can be displayed using Ansys post processor. Final
weight : 9773kgs. Overall weight reduction in the problem equal to 18%.
Results And Discussions
• Initially theoretical calculations are carried out for the given design
requirements. Using free body diagram, initially bending moments and
shear force diagrams are represented for the problem. Both theoretical
and finite element calculations are compared and results found matching
and so finite element calculations are carried out further.
• Once the moments and shear forces are calculated , the sectional
dimensions are calculated for structural safety. Due to the dimensional
calculation, the design dimensions are altered and further iterations are
carried out for structural safety under external loading and self weight.
The final dimensions are concluded with width requirement of 120mm
and height of the bema requirement of 800mm.
• Further a three dimensional model is considered based on conventional
rectangular representation with the calculated values. The geometry is
built using Solid Edge software and meshed with Hypermesh. The results
shows safety of the structure for the given structural loads(external load
300000N, counter weight of 5 tons and self weight). But the results shows
stress concentration on outer surfaces compared to the inner geometry.
• topology optimisation is carried out to reduce the weight. The results
shows weight reduction from 11973kgs to 9773kgs. So a weight reduction
of 18% is observed in the problem.
Further Scope
• Composite material usage can be checked
• Shape optimisation can be carried out
• Transient response analysis can be carried out
• Dynamic response can be calculated
• Full assembly with coil in the position can be
carried out
• Possible thermal effects can be carried out
References
1. Vijendra Kumar, Badri Prasad,”Experimental Verification and Analysis of A U-
Shaped Curved Beam Plate by using FEA Tool’, IJCSE, Vol 6, E-ISSN: 2347-2693,
June 2018.
2. Amaresh U, Rajashekhar Kuntanahal, “ Analysis and Design Optimisation of Multi
Arm Lift”, IJRASET, ISSN: 2321-9653, Vol 5, Sep 2017.
3. Shiv Pratap Singh Yadav, Kishan Reddy,” Numerical and Analytical Study on
Curved Beams”, IJERT, ISSN: 2278-0181, Vol 6, April 2017.
4. Eduardo Vazquez-Santacruz, “ Optimal Synthesis and 3D Modelling of a Lifting
Mechanism for a Platform with Variable Slope”, Research in Computing Science
107 pp 19-29,2015.
5. Dr. P. Ravinder Reddy, K. B. Jagadeesh Gouda,”Analysis of Stress distribution in a
Curved structure using Photoelastic and Finite element Method”, IOSR –JMCE”,
ISSN: 2329-334x, pp 112-116,Issue 1, Ver III, 2015.
6. Li Rong-hao, Yang Jue,” Optimisation Design of the Lifting Mechanism of the
Electric Wheel Mining Truck”, JCPRCS, ISSN: 0975-7384, University of Science
and Technology, Beijing. 2014.
7. Sam Hutcheson,” Design and Construction of a portable Gantry Hoist”,
California Polytechnic State University, 2013.
8. A Sloboda, P. Honamandi,” Generalized Elasticity Method for Curved Beam
Stress Analysis: Analytical and Numerical Comparisions for a Lifting Hook”,
Mechanics based Design of Structures and Machines, Vol 35, issue 3, 2007.
Thank You.