Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Whale Optimization Algorithm

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

ANGADI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY &

MANAGEMENT
Department of Computer Science Engineering
Seminar on
“CREDIT CARD FRAUD DETECTION BASED ON WOA BP
NEURAL NETWORK ”

Project Guide:
Prof. Bharati Kale.

Presented by:
Priyanka Kiran Patil 2AG15CS055
CONTENTS
1. Introduction

2. Problem Statement & Motivation

3. Literature Survey

4. Implementation

5. Applications

6. Advantages & Disadvantages

7. Result

8. Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
 The use of credit card is becoming more and more widespread.

 Currently decision tree algorithm, neural network algorithm are being used.

 BP neural network have drawback such as slow convergence speeds and network are
vulnerable to local minima.

 Whale algorithm is used to optimize the initial network weights and threshold to
improve the accuracy.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
A credit card fraud detection technology based on whale algorithm optimized BP
neural network aiming at solving the problems of slow convergence rate, easy to
fall into local optimum, network defects and poor system stability derived from BP
neural network. Using whale swarm optimization algorithm to optimize the weight
of BP network.

MOTIVATION
Detecting credit card fraud has become a task in the technically growing world.
With the growth in technology cashless payments are also increasing. Hence to
handle all this online as well as offline credit card transactions we use several
methods like decision tree, neural network etc. to increase the speed and efficiency
of detecting fraud here we can use whale optimization algorithm to assign weights
to the neural network.
LITERATURE SURVEY

Sr No. TITLE AUTHOR SUMMERY


YEAR
Fraud detection using neural Raghvendra Patidar et.al Supervised learning feed
1 network Year: 2011 forward back propogation
algorithm.

Fraud detection based on artificial Neda Soltani et.al  User behaviour is


2 immune system Year: 2012 considered
 Two methodology,
tracking account
behaviour & general
thresholding.
LITERATURE SURVEY
Sr No. Title Author Summery
Year
Fraud detection: A realistic Andrea Dal Pozzolo Lack of realism concerns two
3 modeling & a novel learning et.al main problems:
strategy. Year: 2018 1. Way & timing in which
supervised information is
provided.
2. Measures used to assess
fraud detection.
Applications of whale Mohit verma et.al It copies the pattern of spiral
4 optimization algorithm Year: 2018 bubblenet hunting pattern of
humpback.
It is used to solve numerous
multidimensional complex
problems.
IMPLEMENTATION
BP NEURAL NETWORK
 The BP algorithm is composed of two parts:
1. The forward transmission of information.
Input layer hidden layer output layer
2. The back propagation of error.
 Hidden layer output is as in formula (1); X1 h1 y1

output layer output is as in formula (2);


h2
y2
X2
error function is as in formula (3):

hn

y3
XNA
THE WHALE OPTIMIZATION
ALGORITHM
• The Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) is a new heuristic
optimization algorithm inspired by humpback whale hunting.
1. Surrounding prey:

2. Hunting behaviour:

3. Searching for prey:


ALGORITHM FLOWCHART
APPLICATIONS

 Neural Network training


 Economic Dispatch problem
 Workflow Planning of construction site
ADVANTAGES
 Self-Adaptation

 Self-Organized

 Better fault tolerance

 Robustness

DISADVANTAGES
 Hard to interpret model.

 Don’t perform well on small data.


RESULTS
TRAINING RESULT TEST RESULT
WOA+BP NOMAL FRAUD DETECTION NOMAL FRAUD DETECTION
RATE RATE

A NOMAL 92.75% 96.40%


34 405 10
P 1516 93.18% 98.25%

R FRAUD 33 97.81% 97.83%


F 111 9 95.44% 8 32 98.04%
CONCLUSION
The detection rate of the optimized model woa-bp on the training set is relatively
close to that of the unoptimized BP model, and the detection rate of the optimized
model woa-bp on the test set is higher than that of the optimized model. The
detection rate of the optimized BP model is high, which shows that the woa-bp
network model has a stronger generalization capability and improves the detection
accuracy.
REFERENCE
1. Phua C, Alahakoon D, Lee V. Minority report in fraud detection:classification of skewed data[J]. Acm Sigkdd
Explorations Newsletter, 2004, 6(1):50-59.

2. Soltani N, Akbari M K, Javan M S. A new user-based model for credit card fraud detection based on artificial immune
system[C]// Csi International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing. IEEE, 2012:029-033

3. Renu HCE Sonepat, Suman HCE Sonepat displaystyle. Analysis on Credit Card Fraud Detection Methods //
International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) – volume 8 number 1– Feb 2014. ISSN: 2231-2803

4. Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Hybrid Approach Using Fuzzy Clustering & Neural Network[C]// Second International
Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering. IEEE, 2015:494-499.

5. Mirjalili S, Lewis A. The Whale Optimization Algorithm[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 95:51-67.

6. Sadasivam G S, Subrahmanyam M, Himachalam D, et al. Corporate governance fraud detection from annual reports
using big data analytics[J]. 2016, 3(1):51

7. Dal P A, Boracchi G, Caelen O, et al. Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Realistic Modeling and a Novel Learning
Strategy[J]. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2017, PP(99):1-14

8. M.Rizki A A, Surjandari I, Wayasti R A. Data mining application to detect financial fraud in Indonesia's public
companies[C]// International Conference on Science in Information Technology. IEEE, 2018:206-211.

You might also like