Group 3 Report Personality Assessment FINAL
Group 3 Report Personality Assessment FINAL
Group 3 Report Personality Assessment FINAL
THE PERSONALITY
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT:
AN OVERVIEW
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT:
AN OVERVIEW
What is
PERSONALITY?
- Queene Diane Armonia
Jay Wong
Game ?!
Personality
Scope
Theory
Developing Instruments to
Assess Personality
-Kienna Mae Perez &
Marie Eugenie Amaro
Instruments:
Logic
Theory
Data Reduction Methods
Criterion Groups
Logic and Reason
May dictate what content is covered by
the items.
The use, if this in development test items
is sometimes referred to as the content or
content-oriented approach to test
development.
Logic and Reason [Cont]
Test performance
may be used for this purpose if deemed
appropriate
become the standard against which future test
takers will be evaluated
Criterion Groups [Cont...]
1930's
Team of Researchers
Paper-and-Pencil test
Reliability (psychiatric diagnosis)
Criterion Groups [Cont...]
Process of acculturation
- begins at birth, at time at which the
new born infants family or caretakers serve
as agents of the culture.
Acculturation and Related
consideration [Cont...]
Agents of Acculturation
other family members
Teachers
Peers
books, films, theatre, newspaper, television,
and radio programs, and other media
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT
METHODS
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT
METHODS
Objective Methods
-Laurianne Desingano
& Jay Wong
Test of Personality
Objective
Projective
Objective Personality Test
Test Feature:
Standardized
Unambiguous Test Items
Typically written
Types of responses:
Multiple choices
True/ False options
Likert- Scale ratings
Objective Personality Test
Test Questionnaire:
Written
The Items include the clients own behavior,
feelings, tendencies, or preferences
The methods of data collection is Self- Report
Scoring:
Uniform
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT
METHODS
Projective Methods
-Queene Diane Armonia
Jay Wong
Projective Methods
Look at the
BLACKBOARD!!!
Projective Method
A technique of personality assessment in
which some judgment of the assessees
personality is made on the basis of
performance on task that involves
supplying some sort of structure to
relatively unstructured or incomplete
stimuli.
Projective hypothesis:
3 multicolour
Inkblots: Initial Administration
Location
Part of inkblot utilized
Entire blot, large or small section, minute detail,
white space
Determinants
Qualities of the inkblot
Form, color, shading, movement
Inkblots: Scoring Categories
(Cont)
Content
Content category of response
Human figures, animal figures, blood, sexual responses, etc.
Popularity
Frequency of response
Form
How accurately the individuals perception matches or
fits the corresponding part of the inkblot
Form level: adequate or inadequate good or poor
Inkblots: Interpretation of Scores
Murray concepts:
Need determinants of behavior arising from
within the individual.
Basic Assumptions:
Examinee is identifying with protagonist in the
story.
Examinees concerns, hopes and desires are
reflected in the protagonists needs, demands,
and conflicts.
That is, examinees personality is projected
onto the protagonist.
TAT Psychometric Properties
Reliability:
Split- half, test- retest, and alternate form
reliability measures are not appropriate
Validity:
Conflicting opinions concerning the validity of
assumptions and the various application
(interpretation)
Other tests using pictures as
projective stimuli
The Hand Test (Wagner, 1983)
The Hand Test (Wagner, 1983)
Consists of 10 cards
9 Pictures of the hands
1 blank card
Imagine a pair of hands on the card and then describe
what they might be doing
Picture Frustration Study
(Rosenzweig, 1945, 1978)
Picture Frustration Study
(Rosenzweig, 1945, 1978)
Employs cartoons depicting frustrating
situation
Testtakers task is to fill in the response of the
cartoon figure being frustrated
Who?
Children (respond orally to the pictures)
Adult(respond either orally or writing)
Inquiry period to clarify responses
Picture Frustration Study
(Rosenzweig, 1945, 1978)
Scoring:
Types of reaction elicited (categories)
Obstacle Dominance- which the response
concentrates on the frustrating barrier
Direction of aggression
Intropunitive aggression turned inward
Familiarity
Consistency
Simple and Complicated
Universal Interest
Factors Considered to evaluate
the DAP:
Example:
assessing a fighters actions and reactions
while in fighting is direct measure of fighting
ability and asking a fighter for her/his action
and reaction in fighting would give indirect
measure.
Self- monitoring
Example:
The road test you took to obtain your drivers
license was a situational performance
measures that entailed an evaluation of you
driving skills in real car, on real road and in
real traffic.
Situational Performing Measure