Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Attitude and Judgment Formation and Change

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 23

Chapter 8

Attitude and Judgment


Formation and Change

CHAPTER OBJECTIVES
1. Define search, experience, and credence attributes.
2. Define descriptive, informational, and inferential beliefs.
3. Calculate numerical values for attitudes using expectancy-value
models.
4. Use dual-process models of persuasion to design more effective
marketing communications.
5. Use multiple strategies to develop more effective marketing
communications.

NONEVALUATIVE JUDGMENTS
Beliefs nonevaluative ratings of product attributes,
benefits, and likelihoods.
Beliefs capture consumers assessments about a specific
relationship between a brand and an attribute.
Starbucks coffee is strong.
Beliefs also entail assessments about probability or likelihood.
Tylenol will not harm my stomach.
Consumers often maintain beliefs about the importance of an
attribute or benefit.
Fuel efficiency is important in an automobile.
3

NONEVALUATIVE JUDGMENTS
Search Attributes Can be judged or rated
without buying the product.
Experience Attributes Can only be judged by
use.
Credence Attributes Deals with attributes
related to extended use, such a durability and safety.
Do product review sites blur these lines?
4

NONEVALUATIVE JUDGMENTS
Descriptive beliefs based on direct experience.
Informational beliefs based on indirect experience.
Inferential beliefs goes beyond the information
provided..
Sometimes described in terms of the halo effect.

EVALUATIVE JUDGMENTS
Attitudes evaluative ratings about how good or
bad consumers find a person, place, object, or
issue.
Directionpositive, negative, neutral.
Extremityweak, moderate, strong.

EVALUATIVE JUDGMENTS
Strong Attitudes
Highly accessible from memory
Maintained with confidence (difficult to change)
Held with little uncertainty
Highly correlated with beliefs

EVALUATIVE JUDGMENTS
Zanna and Rempels Model
A reciprocal relationship exists
between attitudes and their bases.

The Bases of Attitudes


Beliefs (cognition)
Affect (feelings)
Purchase (behavior)

Attitudes
(Evaluative Judgments)

8
Buying a car

INVOLVEMENT
Involvement the personal relevance or
importance of an issue or situation.
Enduring Involvementinvolvement with a
particular issue or topic (an important issue/task).

Situational Involvementbased solely on special


circumstances or conditions.

MULTIATTRIBUTE MODELS
Theory of Reasoned Action

Attitudes
Intentions

Beliefs

Purchase

Subjectiv
e Norms

10

ELM
Elaboration Likelihood Model
Central Route
Attitude change results from diligent consideration of
information that is central to the true merits of a message.
Peripheral Route
Attitude change results from cues that are peripheral to, but
nevertheless associated with, a persuasive message.

11

INVOLVEMENT
Elaboration Likelihood Model
Exposure to advertising

Low
Motivation to elaborate
High
Low
Ability to elaborate

Peripheral Route
(minimal processing and
simple inferencing)

High
Central route
(effortful processing of information central
to the true merits of an attitudinal position)

(Petty, Cacioppo, and Schumann 1983)

12

ELM
Elaboration Likelihood Model

Motivation
High

Ability

Central Route

High (strong attitudes)


Low Peripheral Route
(weak attitudes)

Low
Peripheral

Route

(weak attitudes)

Peripheral Route
(weak attitudes)

13

HEURISTICS
Heuristic a shortcut for evaluating products that
allows consumers to quickly reach an given attitude.
Usually employed when consumers are unable or
unwilling to think carefully about a situation.
Brand names
Expert opinion

14

ATTITUDE MODELS

Theory of
Reasoned Action

Information
Integration Theory

Ao = biei

Ao = w isi

Ao = Attitude toward object

Ao = Attitude toward object

bi = Belief about attribute i


(likely/unlikely)

wi = Importance of attribute i
(weights)

ei = Evaluation of i
(good/bad)

si = Scale value for attribute i


(good/bad)
wi = 1

15

MULTIATTRIBUTE MODELS
Theory of Reasoned Action

Attitudes
Intentions

Beliefs

Purchase

Subjectiv
e Norms

16

MULTIATTRIBUTE MODELS
Theory of Reasoned Action
(Expectancy and Attractiveness)

Attitude Formation for Clark Shoes


Attribute

Belief (b)

Evaluation (e)

Comfort

20

Support

12

Style

25

Overall Attitude

Attitude (A)

57

17
A more is better additive theory

MULTIATTRIBUTE MODELS
Theory of Reasoned Action
Attitudes are based on more than direct attribute evaluations

Subjective Norms for Clark Shoes


Source of
Compliance

Normative
Beliefs (NB)

Motivation to
Comply (MC)

Subjective
Norm (SN)

Friends

35

Parents

Co-workers

36

Overall Subjective Norms

78

18

MULTIATTRIBUTE MODELS
Information Integration Theory
Attitude Formation for Clark Shoes
Attribute

Weights (w)

Evaluation (s)

Attitude (A)

Comfort

0.50

1.0

Support

0.30

-1

-0.3

Style

0.20

0.6

Overall Attitude

Sum of the importance


weights = 1.00

1.3

Overall values > 0 indicate


favorable attitude.

A less is more averaged theory. As Marketers, do we trust


consumers to provide such weights?

19

PARAMETERS OF JUDGMENT
Perceived relevance of the information
Task demands
Cognitive resources
Nondirectional motivation
Directional motivation
20

CHANGING ATTITUDES
Who says What to Whom
Find sources that are likeable, credible,
attractive, trustworthy, and knowledgeable
Use experts for complex messages, use
attractive sources for simple messages
Factual messages when consumers are likely
to think, otherwise use emotional messages
Use two-sided arguments for knowledgeable
consumers, otherwise use one-sided
Tailor your message to your audience
21

KEY TERMS

Judgment
Belief
Attitude
Search attribute
Experience attribute
Credence attribute
Descriptive beliefs
Informational beliefs
Inferential beliefs
Evaluative-cognitiveconsistency

Involvement
Expectancy-value models
Theory of reasoned action
Information integration theory
Dual-process models
Elaboration likelihood model
Heuristic/systematic model
Zanna and Rempels model
Semantic differential scale
Likert scale

22

CHANGING ATTITUDES GROUP ACTIVITY


Think of a brand that is not living-up-to its
full potential.
How would change consumer attitudes
around the brand?

23

You might also like