Use of Images As Historical Evidences
Use of Images As Historical Evidences
Use of Images As Historical Evidences
Introduction
Research question; Overview of Historical studies on the images; Varieties of Images; The idea of Iconography The Warburg School and Panofsky s Three Levels
Iconography and Iconolgy The method exemplified: Sacred and Profane Love
Burkes 3 points Criticism of the Method Landscape
-Neverthless, a significant minority of Historians were already using the evidence of images in their studies about: European prehistory the cave paintings of Altamira and Lascaux Middle Ages history Bayeux Tapestry Renaissance and the autumn of the Middles Ages- Johan Huizinga Interwar period Aby Warburg, Gilberto Freyre History from below in the 60s Raphael Samuel -Criticism : images are mute witnesses and is difficult to translate their testimony in words.
Varieties of Images
Two revolutions in image production: -1930s-1960s the rise of printed image (woodcut, engraving, etching); -19th- 20th century- the rise of photographic image ( including film and television);
Definition: Before attempting to read images between the lines, and to use them as historical evidence, it is only prudent to begin with their meanings. Their makers had their own concerns, their own messages. The interpretations of this messages is known as iconography or iconology, terms sometimes used as synonyms, but sometimes distinguished. The idea of Iconography -the terms iconography and iconology were launched in the art-historical worlds in the 1920s and 1930s; -to be more exact they were re-launched-a famous Renaissance handbook of images, published by Cesare Ripa in 1953- Iconologia; Who they were used at the beginning? -associated with a reaction against a predominantly formal analysis of painting in
The most famous group of iconographers was to be founded in Hamburg in the years before Hitler came to power. It included: Aby Warburg, Fritz Saxl, Erwin Panofsky and Edgar Wind, all scholars with a good classical education and wide interest in literature and philosophy. The Hamburg groups approach to images was summed up in a famous essay by Panofsky, first published in 1939, distinguishing three levels of corresponding to three levels of meaning in the work itself. 1. Pre-iconographical description, concerned with natural meaning and consisting of identifying objects ( such as trees, buildings, animals and people) and events (meals, battles, processions and so on). 2. Iconographical analysis, concerned with conventional meaning ( recognizing a battle as the Battle of waterloo); 3. Iconological interpretation, concerned with intrinsic meaning, underlying principles which reveal the basic attitude of a nation, a period, a class, a religious or philosophical persuasion; To interpret the message it is necessary to be familiar with cultural codes.
Often used to interpret works of the Italian Renaissance; In Burkes text, he uses Titians Sacred and Profane Love as an example;
Titian, Sacred and Profane Love, 1514 Medium: oil on canvas Location: Galleria Borghese, Rome Source: http://www.galleriaborghese.it/borghese/en/eamor.htm
Burkes 3 Points
1. The Method joins series of images 2. Attention to detail is paramount 3. Iconographers juxtapose images and text
Speculative Lacks social context Not a sufficient method for all images Emphasizes content over form Assumes cultural homogeneity
Meaning of Images
What is the meaning of an Image? Meaning for whom?
1- Social Context
Chastity or Suppression Symbol of Liberty or Nudity
2- Political Context
3- Material Context
4- Feminist Theory
5- Reception Theory
- Artists view of image - Viewers view of image - Actual Response - Predicted Response - Positive Response - Negative Response
Thanks