Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

The Solar Dynamo

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 29

The Solar Dynamo

NSO Solar Physics Summer School Tamara Rogers, HAO June 15, 2007

Sunspots on Solar Disk

PSPT (CaK)

PSPT (blue)

Regions of strong magnetic field (3000 Gauss) About 20000km diameter Lifetime of a few weeks

X-ray Activity over sunspot cycle

Yohkoh X-ray images

Joys law

QuickTime an d a Cinepak decompressor are need ed to see this p icture .

Summary of Observations
Butterfly diagram
Equatorward propagation of activity starting from 35 degrees latitude over 11 years (individual lifetimes of sunspots ~ a few weeks)

Hales polarity law


Opposite polarity of bipolar groups in north and south hemisphere Polarity in individual hemisphere changes every 11 years

Joys law
Bipolar groups are tilted to east-west direction Leading polarity closer to equator

Tilt angle increases with latitude

What is a dynamo?
A dynamo is a process by which kinetic energy of fluid motion is converted into magnetic energy. By this process a magnetic field can maintain itself against ohmic dissipation

Why study the dynamo?


Its the source of all magnetic activity on the Sun and likely most other stars (although the process of the dynamo is different in massive or very low mass stars)

Why a dynamo?
It is possible that a diffusing primordial field is responsible for the magnetism observed: the diffusion time for a poloidal field of is approximately 109 years, so this is not strictly ruled out. However, an oscillating primordial field would likely be observed by helioseismology (unless of course the oscillations took place in the tachocline or deep interior, regions not sampled well by helioseismology).

The (Magneto-) Hydrodynamic Equations

Terms:
Poloidal - field in the Toroidal - field in the direction direction

Meridional - flow in the Azimuthal - flow in the

direction direction

Cowlings Theorem
Assume an axisymmetric poloidal field, any such field must have a neutral point where: Because of the assumption of axisymmetry the neutral point must circle the rotation axis on this line the poloidal field must equal zero, however the toroidal current does not

But we also know

These are in contradiction==>assumptions are not consistent A steady state axisymmetric fluid flow can not maintain an axisymmetric magnetic field. The flow and field must be 3D or time dependent or both

Axisymmetric Field, Axisymmetric Flow


Poloidal field Toroidal field

Induction Equation becomes in spherical coordinates

No source Term!!
This is just another way to illustrate Cowlings theorem: an axisymmetric flow CANNOT maintain an axisymmetric field--NO 2D DYNAMOS!!!

How to make an axisymmetric dynamo

Can make toroidal field (B) from poloidal field (A, also Br ,B ) with differential rotation effect

Need a way to make poloidal field (A) from toroidal field (B) Parker (1955) pointed out that a rising field could be twisted by the Coriolis force producing poloidal field from toroidal field effect
This alpha effect is fundamentally 3D so how do we put it into 2D equations?

The alpha effect


Alpha is meant to represent the twisting an induction effect due to turbulent motions but we dont want to solve for turbulence (hard!) so we will parametrize it

In CZ

In the simplest approximation

In bulk of convection zone (in N.H.), rising fluid elements produce + alpha effect (negative vorticity, positive radial velocity) in tachocline - alpha effect

Note: in subadiabatic regions the above effect has opposite sign. Signs are all reversed in southern hemisphere

This alpha effect is fundamentally 3D so how do we put it into 2D equations?

Mean Field Electrodynamics

*assume flow and field are nearly axisymmetric with small scale turbulence

Flow field and field are 2D

axisymmetric

Substituting these decompositions into Ohms law and doing the proper averaging

Expand Electromotive Force in Taylor Series, keep only first two terms

Induction equation then becomes

In general alpha and beta should be tensors, in practice they are not

Axisymmetric flow+field with Mean Field approximation

Dynamos

These models are also called kinematic which means that the flow is specified and not allowed to evolve in response to the field

The Dynamo Wave


Solutions of the dynamo equations allow wave solutions (Parker 1955) who suggested that a latitudinally propagating wave was the source of the sunspot cycle Dynamo waves travel in the direction (Parker-Yoshimura sign rule):

If alpha effect is in tachocline: At low latitudes:


(from helioseismology) Need a negative (-) alpha effect for equatorward propagation (good)

If alpha effect is in bulk of CZ: At low latitudes:


Need a negative (-) alpha effect for equatoward propagation (bad)

The Role of the Tachocline


The tachocline provides the proper sign for the alpha effect to produce a dynamo wave that propagates toward the equator at low latitudes - good place for the alpha effect

The radial shear in the tachocline provides ideal place for Omega effect.
The remarkable coherence of sunspots (Hales Law and Joys Law) require a field strong enough to resist shredding by turbulent motions in the convection zone. Such a field strength can only be generated in the tachocline where the Parker instability is less efficient Cartoon schematic of dynamo process
QuickTime and a YUV420 codec decompressor are neede d to see this picture.

Typical Solutions - Kinematic dynamos


There are numerous models called by different names: Babcock-Leighton, Interface, Flux Transport, etc. They vary mainly in where the effect occurs:

Get VASTLY different results depending on what you specify for alpha (both in radius and latitude) (-) alpha in tachocline gives equatorward propagation (observed) Poleward propagating component amplitude is too high (compared with observations) Can get remarkably periodic Solutions (even 11 years) - due to solutions of the alpha-Omega dynamo equations

alpha-Omega dynamos + Meridional Circulation


Take previous alpha-Omega mean field equations (which only had differential rotation) and add a meridional circulation - same profile of alpha as previously

Again, get VASTLY different results depending on assumptions

Typical Solutions - Kinematic dynamos The Flux Transport Dynamo


Unlike typical dynamos, the flux transport dynamo relies on meridional circulation to bodily advect the toroidal field, instead of a dynamo wave

The Flux Transport Dynamo

Again, can get nice periodic solutions with equatorward propagation at low latitude, but poleward branch is bad (typical).

Whats Wrong with these Models?


Mean field theory requires that there be clear scale separation (i.e. that the mean quantities (B, u) are much larger than the fluctuating quantities (B,u) -- observations and simulations show that there is a range of spatial scales with no clear distinction between large and small
There is no feedback. The MHD equations are COUPLED, the flow affects the field which affects the flow which affects the energy They are solving 2 equations out of 7!! *Only keep first two terms in series expansion of induction term *The models are HIGHLY PARAMETRIZED, alpha is not known empirically it can be tuned to reproduce the results you want (like the butterfly diagram). What we really need (and want) to do is to solve the full MHD equations in a sphere (remember: expensive). This has been done for the Earths dynamo and is being done for the Sun

Earths Dynamo

QuickTime and a YUV420 codec decompressor are neede d to see this picture.

QuickTime and a Video d ecompressor are neede d to see this picture.

Solar Dynamo

QuickTime and a Cinepak decompressor are neede d to se e this picture.

No reversal and certainly no butterfly diagram or equatorward propagation of toroidal fieldbut this model does not have a tachocline LOTS OF WORK TO BE DONE

The Induction Equation

You might also like