VFD Presentation
VFD Presentation
VFD Presentation
Are VFDs worth it for pump applications? Have they been oversold to the market? Presented by Geoffrey D Stone C.Eng FIMechE; CP Eng FIEAust RPEQ Design Detail & Development
http://waterhammer.hopout.com.au/ Skype address geoffrey.d.stone
are not fully developed Variable process conditions Poor pump selection Future process upgrades Energy efficiencyReduced operating cost Prior art-Industry
restraint-Soft starting Braking- Dynamic or hold Unlimited number of starts and stops Waterhammer mitigation-Fatigue Ignorance -Engineer having no understanding of other process control
Process Solutions-Alternatives
Pressure, Change pump
temperature or flow control valves Bypass valves Larger suction tanks or sumps Holding tank Pump for longer periods Stop/start controls
impeller diameter Alternate pump type Multiple pumps Different sized pumps
Pump Considerations
rating Efficiency Specific speed Moment of inertia Curve shape Stability over range Best efficiency point 1st Critical speed
System Design-Issues
Software allows the Motor/VFD
analysis of systems Excessive design factors used Pump suppliers design factors New vs. Old pipe friction losses Pipe wall /lining tolerances
Efficiency Wire to Water kW The original Affinity Laws are based on systems with no static head Affinity Laws overstate energy savings Revise the 2nd Affinity Law for
reduced to between 60% to 85% of the BEP. Where duty is reduced to only 85% of BEP, a control valve or reduced impeller energy demand is less than that for the combined VFD installation inefficiencies Wire to water energy kW-hr per m3 delivered should be the criteria used in assessing a VFD application VFDs offer little benefit for systems with more than 50% static head VFDs are ideal for closed systems with varying process duties-no static head
Today >20kHz
IGBT (Insulated Gate
Transistor) SCRs (Silicon Controlled Rectifier) GTO (Gate Turn Off Thyristor)
Bipolar Transistor)these offer the benefits of higher frequencies and increased efficiencies
HV) Braking requirements Power Power loss Line & load side Ride through time harmonics Audible noise Load torque Length/type of cable Speed range Power factor Speed regulation correction Failure mode Altitude Acceleration/decelerat Motor, insulation and ion times VFD life Mechanical engineers are required to Efficiency
Cable
Voltage peaks at motor terminals can be
increased to 2 times the peaks of the VFD output for a long cable 25m is the recommended cable length Cables longer than 25m have an inductive load that affects a motors life Cables need to be screened to avoid EMI
Motor Considerations
Motor Cooling
Below 25hz motor fan speed will not cool
motor Supplementary fan required Added cost of drive, cable, SCA, controls, access and maintenance Reduced reliability
Efficiency
Published motor efficiency
data is based on a pure sinusoidal voltage The high frequency harmonics created by VFDs increase copper and core losses decreasing the efficiency of the motor Materials behave differently under these operating conditions resulting in a higher efficiency drop when fed by VFDs.
Current
A higher r.m.s. current to supply the same
output (about 10% higher) Increase in motor operating temperature On average, VFD fed motors will have a temperature increase of about 15C, at rated speed and load
Noise Level
Due to the harmonics, the motor noise level
will increase when it is operated using a VFD Experience shows that the sound pressure level at A scale at motor rated speed is increased by anything between 2 and 15dBA with a VFD This extra noise level depends mainly on the inverter switching frequency and harmonic content. Noise mitigation costs increase
Commercial Considerations
Opex
VFD inefficiency
a design life < 10years Larger switchroom Increased air conditioning Screened cable Harmonic protection Special motors Supplementary fans Increase in noise
95% Inefficiency of motor Supplementary fans Special motor spares Air conditioning energy Reduced life of motor Spares for VFD Spares costs oversize pump
Commercial-Other
Engineers who use suppliers to select pumps or
process solutions lose engineering control of the procurement process Pump suppliers do not necessarily know, or care, about the process vs. electrical requirements of the VFD/motor interface-divided responsibility String testing motor/pump/VFD is difficult during the contract period for larger motors because of :-time -manufacture location of components -responsibility of the other parties equipment -packing/unpacking/re-packing
Conclusions
Engineers need to specify all operating & electrical
conditions to pump, motor & VFD supplier Invest in the mechanical engineering and specify correctly Future operating conditions may not occur. If they do they can be met with alternate solutions VFDs do not always save energy, Capex or Opex VFDs do not avoid transients from power loss VFDs provide a suitable solution to some pump operating conditions but should not be considered a panacea You just can't ever beat the energy efficiency of running a properly sized pump at 100% BEP rated flow. Mechanical engineers have a poor understanding of electric motors & VFDs and fail to communicate with process or electrical engineers
Questions
Useful links
This presentation was by Geoff Stone
geoffrey.stone@yahoo.c o.uk
sulzerpumps.com mcnallyinstitute.com
eng-tips.com
nidi.org pumpsystemsmatter.org
aft.com
toshont.com/vfdapp.htm virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com
canterburyengineeringassociat
es.com