12 Chapter3good
12 Chapter3good
12 Chapter3good
Chapter - 3
In the previous chapter, the researcher has discussed the review of available
and published literature on the subject of employee engagement. The review has been
presented in different sections such as meaning and concept of employee engagement,
importance and factors influencing employee engagement, employee engagement in
hospitality industry and impact of employee engagement on organizational
performance.
The present chapter deals with the concept of employee engagement, nature
and importance of employee engagement for an organization. Researcher also
presented theories and models of employee engagement along with its various drivers
and barriers. The chapter ends with antecedent and consequences of employee
engagement and measures to improve the level of engagement among the employees
in the organizations.
3.1 Introduction
56
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Today the business scenario is changing both in terms of the global nature of
work and diversity of the workforce. Each and every organization across the globe
wants to make the best utilization of its human resources in order to achieve
competitive advantage in the market (Heaney, 2010). When employees are engaged in
their work, they have good relationships with their co-workers and working
environment becomes better. An engaged workplace encourages commitment and
energy among the employees of the organization to improve production and business
performance (Kumar and Swetha, 2011). High levels of engagement in domestic and
global firms promote retention of talent, foster customer loyalty and improve
organizational performance and stakeholder value ((Wilson, 2009; Markos & Sridevi,
2010). Engaged employees are not only happy in their job, but also translate that
satisfaction into higher productivity and profitability of the organization (Larkin,
2009; Lee, 2012). It is a technique which can be used by the organization to handle
uncertainty of business environment. The organization that understand the conditions
which enhance employee engagement will have accomplished something that their
competitors will find very difficult to imitate (Kumar & Swetha, 2011).
Engaged employee is almost three times more sincere toward his job in
comparison to those employees who are actively disengaged (Kular, Gatenby, Rees,
Soane, & Truss, 2008). Therefore the organization should focus on the aspect of
employee engagement in order to improve organizational performance (Basbous,
2011; Sundaray, 2011). Employee engagement can be a deciding factor for
organizational effectiveness. It does not only have the potential to significantly affect
employee retention, productivity and loyalty, but also has a key link to customer
satisfaction, company reputation and overall stakeholder value (Sundaray, 2011).
Engaged employees provide a lot of benefits to the organization such as productivity,
improved quality, customer care, cooperation among the employees, reduced
employee turnover, reduced absenteeism and disputes (Wilson, 2009; Mortimer,
2010). In the present business environment, organizations across the globe are
enhancing the level of engagement of their employees in order to gain competitive
57
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
advantage in the form of higher productivity, profitability, lower turnover and safety
of the organization (Mani, 2011).
The term employee engagement was firstly used by the human resource
practitioners and business firm, but in academic community the concept was rarely
discussed. Kahn (1990) was the first academic researcher to define the concept of
employee engagement. According to Kahn (1990) employee engagement is the level
of commitment and involvement of the employees towards their organization and its
values. While Perrin (2003) defined engagement “as willingness or enthusiasm that
the employee holds to spend optional effort towards the job.” In a study about
antecedent and consequences of employee engagement, Saks (2006) defines employee
engagement as the extent to which an individual is attentive and absorbed in the
performance of his/her roles. It is the positive feeling that employees have towards
their jobs and also the motivation and effort they put into it.
Bakkar and Scheufeli, (2008) have defined the term employee engagement
that “it is a psychological state where employees feel a vested interest in the
organization’s success and perform to a high standard that may exceed the stated
requirements of the job.” An engaged employee is aware of business context and
works with colleagues to improve performance within the job for the benefits of the
organization (Sharma & Anupama, 2010). It is a positive attitude held by the
employees towards the organization and its values. The organization must work to
develop and nurture engagement, which requires a two-way relationship between
employer and employee (Robinson, Perryman, & Hayday, 2004). Apart from this,
Baig (2010) argued that employee engagement is concerned with the individual
contribution under healthy working conditions, promote individual development,
encourage mutual confidence and understanding between the employer and the
employee and between the employees themselves. According to Mortimer (as cited in
CIPD, 2009), employee engagement is a combination of commitment to the
organization, its values and a willingness to help their colleagues. Zinger (2010)
defines that “employee engagement is the art and science of engaging people in
authentic and recognized connections to strategy, roles, performance, organization,
community, relationship, customers, development, energy and transform the work
58
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
connections into final results.” Rashid, Asad, and Ashraf (2011) have highlighted
that engagement is the capacity of the employees to work honestly, obligation and
aspiration enduring in a business. While Wilson (2009) elucidates that an engaged
employee is that who is fully energetic, emotionally connected with the organization
in achieving the goals. Thus employee engagement is a barometer that determines the
association of a person with the organization (Vazirani, 2007).
Bhatla (2011) has explained that the engagement is all about having a
psychological commitment toward the assigned task, which is clearly reflected in
his/her dedication towards the work. Mani (2011) has noted that an engaged employee
is fully aware with the business environment and works with the help of other
employees to improve the performance within the job for the benefits of the
organization. Engaged employees put their all efforts and enthusiasm towards their
work and also care about the future of the organization (Mani, 2011; Sundaray, 2011).
By making the employees involved in organization’s business, the HR manager will
have to motivate them to contribute in the business and productivity success and at the
same time, it increases their sense of well-being (Swarnalatha & Sureshkrishna,
2013). Employee engagement and job satisfaction play an important role in increasing
the morale of the employees. The managers have to play active role in building
satisfaction among the employees and make them engaged in their work. While
Cattermole and Johnson, (2014) opine that employee engagement is a workplace
approach designed to ensure that employees are committed to business, its values and
goals. Chandhok and Bhavet, (2014) perceived engagement as a passion and
commitment of the willingness to devote oneself and expand one’s discretionary
effort to contribute towards achieving the goals and objectives of the organization as a
whole. Thus employee engagement is the extent to which employees think, feel and
act in ways that represent high levels of commitment to their organization.
Kahn (1990) says that in engagement, people employ and express themselves
physically, cognitively and emotionally during their role performances. The ideas of
each and every employee differs from each other and every employee should be given
freedom to express their views and thought. This kind of activity increases the morale
of the employees, hence the employees are motivated and engaged towards their work
and increases the productivity of the organization. He further describes that lack of
connection with the organization, emotional absence, passive and incomplete role
59
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
causes disengagement among the workers. In the views of Robinson, Perryman, and
Hayday (2004) employee engagement is closely related with feeling and perception of
the employees and the key driver of the employee engagement are effective leadership
by the top management, two way communication among the workers of the
organization, well designed human resource policies and organizational development
of employees. Anand (2011) opines that employee engagement plays a crucial role in
the hotel because it affects everything from retention and productivity to profitability
and safety. There is an intrinsic link between employee engagement, customer loyalty
and profitability. Kahn (1992) has highlighted that fully engaged employees lead to
the success of the organization. There are many dimensions which makes the
employees engaged towards their job. These are continuity in the organization,
connected with other staff members, integrated and focussed in their job. Saradha and
Patrick, (2011) have discussed that employee engagement activities significantly
improve the overall performance of an organization. It is a technique for the
successful functioning of the organization and improvement in performance of the
employees.
According to the Gallup, the Consulting Organization, there are mainly three
types of engagement that occur in the organization. All are different in terms of
involvement and their role in the organization. Types of employee engagement are
shown in figure 3.1:
Types of Employee
Engagement
60
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Engaged Employees
Not Engaged
These kind of employees care only about their work not any other things like
goals, objectives and development of the organization. They do not have energy and
enthusiasm in their work (Reilly, 2014). These categories of employees do not have
cooperative relationship with their colleagues as well as the employers also. Their
contribution is little in the success and development of the organization.
Actively Disengaged
According to Robinson, Perryman, and Hayday (as cited in IES, 2003) an engaged
employee has the following characteristics:
· Engaged employees have emotional attachment with their job as well as the
organization.
61
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Crim and Seijts, (2006) have discussed how leaders can engage employees’
heads, hearts and hands. They summarize these as Ten C’s of employee engagement.
These are shown in Figure 3.2:
62
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Career: The manager should provide the opportunity for growth and development of
the employees. Proper training and induction programme are very important for the
career advancement of the employees.
Clarity: The managers must communicate the goals and objectives of the
organization. The success of the organization is largely depends upon clarity of goals
and objectives among the employees (Crim & Seijts, 2006).
Convey: The managers should discuss the expectation which they want from the
employees and provide feedback on the performance of the employees. Effective
leaders work daily to improve the performance of the employees.
Congratulate: The employees are getting feedback in the area where they are lacking
behind and at the same they should also be rewarded and recognized on their excellent
performance.
Contribute: The employees feel happy and motivated if their works contributes in
achieving the organizational goals in a meaningful way. Therefore the managers must
discuss the role of the employees in achieving goals and objectives of the
organization. Effective leaders help employees to see and feel that how they are
contributing to the organization success and future (Crim & Seijts, 2006).
Collaborate: When employees work in group and have trust and cooperation of their
group members, they perform best. Good leaders are team builders, they create an
environment that fosters trust and collaboration.
Credibility: Leaders should struggle to maintain organizational image and show high
ethical standards. People want to be proud of their jobs, performance and organization
(Crim & Seijts, 2006).
63
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Employee engagement is very important for hotel industry because hotel industry
has a diversity of workforce and greater number of employees work in a single
organization. Ncube and Jerie, (2012) have highlighted the contribution of employee
engagement to competitive advantage in hotel industry. Hotels which have high level
of employee engagement enjoy a competitive advantage over the hotel having lower
level of employee engagement because the engaged employees are highly committed
towards the job. Therefore it is a challenging task for human resource managers to
create and maintain a healthy work environment that motivate the employees in their
work and select the right employees at right place. Some of the advantages of
employee engagement are given below:
· Engaged employees work with passion and enthusiasm to get the job done
(Ference, 2009).
64
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
· Engaged employees put their all efforts and enthusiasm towards their work
and also care about the future of the organization (Mani, 2011).
· Engaged employees act in a way that reflect the greater level of commitment
to the organization and contribute his/her skills and abilities for the betterment
of the organization. It increases the level of trust and reduces the problem of
turnover of the employees (Hamid & Farooqi, 2014).
· Engaged employees are not only happy with their job, but also translate that
satisfaction into higher productivity and profitability of the organization
(Larkin, 2009).
· Engaged employees are less likely to feel exhausted and make the organization
a success in this competitive era.
· Employees with higher work engagement have higher level of confidence and
a high quality relationship with their employers (Saks, 2006).
· Engaged employees will normally perform better and are more motivated than
other employees working in the organization.
· It creates a sense of loyalty in a competitive environment and provides a
highly energetic working environment.
· It boosts business growth and makes the employees effective brand
ambassadors for the organization.
65
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
In the present business scenario, employee engagement has become one of the
most leading priorities for human resource practitioners and senior managers in any
organization. Garber (2007) succinctly says that engagement is just like a muscle that
continuously requires exercise to grow and develop. Engaging the employees will
keep them motivated and skilled in their works. If the organization does not use those
skills regularly, they will be diminished. Therefore, to develop engagement among the
employees, human resource managers should create positive relationship among the
employees and clear, honest and reliable communication within the organization.
Chanania (2012) emphasized that employee engagement is the top priority for every
organization’s human resource manager’s agenda. HR managers are constantly
developing innovative and effective ways to engage the employees in a better way.
There are various factors which influence employee engagement. These factors are
common to all organizations and create a feeling of value and involvement among the
employees. But the components of feeling valued and involved and the relative
strength of each factor are likely to vary from organization to organization. The
factors which influence employee engagement are shown in figure 3.3:
66
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Job Designing
Job design is concerned with the type of job for which a particular employee
is recruited. If the job design is according to the choice of the employee, definitely it
will engage the employee (Sundaray, 2011). Swathi (2013) perceived that “Job
characteristics encompassing challenge, variety and autonomy are more likely to
provide psychological meaningfulness and conditions for employee engagement. Job
becomes meaningful and attractive to employee as it provides him/her variety and
challenge, thereby affecting his/her level of engagement.”
67
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Leadership
Mutunga (2009) argued that effective leadership is very important for smooth
functioning of the organization. Organizational environment is directly influenced by
the quality of leadership in human resource managers. A leader should have the
quality to increase the level of engagement among the employees and without
effective leadership, an organization cannot survive for a longer period of time.
Leaders need to actively demonstrate the organization’s values and goals. They need
to align themselves with the corporate values and create an open and fair work
environment for employees within the organization (Mortimer, 2010).
Empowerment
68
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
69
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Performance Management
Compensation
According to Mutunga (2009) organizations should care the health and safety
of their employees in order to motivate and engage them in their work. It is the
70
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
responsibility of HR managers to look after the health and safety of each and every
employee of the organization. The engagement levels of the employees will be low if
the organizations do not pay proper attention on the health and safety of the
employees. The employees should feel that they are secure while working in the
organization. Therefore every organization should develop and implement appropriate
methods and systems for the health and safety of their employees (Swathi, 2013).
Job Satisfaction
Communication
71
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
relationship between an employee and employer can only grow and remain strong if
there is continuous flow of communication from both side. Internal communications
play an effective role in the engagement of employees. Understanding the modes of
capturing employee feedback and analysing them to act on engagement drivers are
important steps in enhancing employee engagement. He further describes that an
organization cannot afford to neglect internal communication as a critical area, if it
wants to grow and keep its customers and employees engaged and happy. Therefore
the manager should encourage meaningful relationship with the employees and
internal communication within the organization. Effective internal communication
engages the employees towards the works and finally increases productivity, retention
and profit for the organization (Zajkowska, 2012).
Family Friendliness
72
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
exchange theory is that the relationship grows over time into trusting, loyal and
mutual understanding as long as the parties stand by certain rules of exchange.
Therefore one effective technique for an employee to pay their organization is through
their level of engagement towards their work.
Saks (2006) argued that the level of engagement of the employees is largely
dependent upon the facilities and resources which they receive from their
organization. By making full involvement towards their works and dedicating higher
amount of cognitive and emotional and physical resources is an important way for
every employee to respond to the organizational action (AbuKhalifeh & Som, 2013).
When the employees receives resources from their employer, they feel they "owe" the
organization by becoming more engaged and bring themselves more into their works
effectively to repay their organization. When an organization fails to provide these
kinds of resources, employees are more likely to withdraw and disengage themselves
from their work. Therefore all of the resources; cognitive, emotional and physical
which an employee brings to their works are provisional on the resources which they
receive from their organization (Kahn, 1990). Thus employee engagement consists of
psychological and emotional connection between employees and organization that
leads to positive or negative performance at work (AbuKhalifeh & Som, 2013).
Kahn (1990) was the first academic researcher who used the term employee
engagement and define the term employee engagement as “the simultaneous
employment and expression of a person’s “preferred self” in task behaviours that
promote connection to work and to others, personal presence and active full role
performance.”
Kahn (1990) has developed the first grounded model of personal engagement
and personal disengagement. Kahn's work conceptualised employee engagement and
is therefore considered a seminal work on the topic and contributed significantly to
73
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Kahn (1990) has also found that workers were more engaged at work in
situations that offer them more psychological meaningfulness and psychological
safety and when they were more psychologically available. He also looked at why the
three psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability are
important to fully understand why a person becomes engaged in their work. He
defined meaningfulness as the positive "sense of return on investments of self in role
performance", safety as the ability to show one's self "without fear or negative
consequences to self image, status or career" and availability as the "sense of
possessing the physical, emotional and psychological resources necessary" for the
completion of the work. All these psychological conditions show positive connection
with the engagement of the employees (May, Gilson, & Harter, 2004).
An empirical test of Kahn model (May, Gilson, & Harter, 2004) found that
meaningfulness, safety and availability have significant influence on employee
engagement.
74
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Kahn (1990) has reported that job enrichment, work role fit and co-workers
relation were positive indicators for meaningfulness. Rewarding co-workers and
supportive supervisor relation enhance safety and self consciousness, resource
availability and outside activities were positive signs for psychological availability.
75
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
· There are number of variables which predict job engagement and organization
engagement such as job characteristics, perceived organizational and
supervisor support, rewards and recognition, procedural and distributive
justice.
76
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Saks (2006) has also asserted that employee engagement is an emerging field
of research and should be studied more. There are other variables which are important
for both job and organization engagement such as human resource practices like
flexible work arrangements, training and development programmes.
Source: http://www.davidzinger.com/zinger-model/
77
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
work in a planned way to achieve the organizational goals and objectives (Zinger,
2010).
Craft Strategies: Crafting appropriate strategies is the first step to achieve higher
levels of employee engagement. It requires planning and considerations of employee
as well as organization also. Managers should consult professionals to craft strategies
(Sourabh et al., n.d.).
Authentic: Managers should be effective leaders and should concern towards the
problems of employees and to help in reducing their problems.
Engage: The desired results can be achieved in the fastest possible way only if
employees are fully engaged. Therefore the manager should implement the strategies
to engage the employees.
Enliven Work Roles: The managers should assign the task to the employees
according to their area of interest. If it is so then definitely the employees will be
engaged (Sourabh et al., n.d.).
Esteem Organization: Employees will stay in the organization for longer period of
time if employees feel that they are a part of the organization. They should feel proud
to work for their organization. Management should understand that the employees are
their most important assets without whom organizational goals cannot be achieved
(Zinger, 2010).
78
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Serve Customers: Engaged employees can serve the customers in the best possible
way. Making employees aware of tradition and culture of the organization from time
to time may help the employees to provide best services to the customers (Sourabh et
al., n.d.).
Develop Career: The organization should not only focus on achieving its goal but
also on the development of employees by providing training and orientation
programmes. The organization which cares about the development of its employees,
employees of that organization are emotionally attached to their works and make their
best in order to achieve the organizational goals.
Experience Well - Being: The employer should develop a kind of environment which
makes the employees happy and satisfied because happy and satisfied employees are
the most important assets of an organization. The success of the organization largely
depends upon happy and satisfied employees.
On the basis of social exchange theory, Kang (2014) has developed his own
conceptual model of employee engagement. According to the Kang model of
employee engagement, psychological capital and perceived service climate influence
the level of employee engagement in the organization. He further explained that level
of employee engagement within the organization influences their level of satisfaction,
organizational citizenship behaviour and the turnover intention. Employees’ levels of
satisfaction also influences the organizational citizenship behaviour and turnover
intention of the employees.
79
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Equity: The employees should be treated honestly in relation to the basic conditions
of employment with respect to others in the organization as well as minimum personal
and social standards (www.sirota.com).
80
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Source: http://www.sirota.com/employee-engagement-model
According to Sirota’s Model, when these three factors are achieved by the
organization, employees are highly engaged. Engaged employees tend to:
· Perform their works most effectively and efficiently than the expectation of
the employers.
· Encourage and help for assignment to the employees as well as employers
also.
· Motivate and help the other employees of the organization to improve their
performance.
· Welcome the changes which are required for the development of the
organization rather than opposing the change.
· Develop greater level of customer satisfaction to increase the organization’s
reputation.
81
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
· Robinson, Perryman, and Hayday (2004) have identified different drivers like
leadership, relationships at work, total reward, recognition, work life balance
and work itself that leads to the engagement of the employees.
· According to Bhatla (2011) organizational culture and effective
communication in the organization are important drivers of employee
engagement.
· Crim and Seijit, (2006) have identified the 10 C’s of employee engagement.
These are: connect, career, clarity, convey, congratulate, contribute, control,
collaborate, credibility and confidence.
· A study conducted by Bedarkar and Pandita, (2014) has observed that
leadership, communication and work life balance are important drivers of
employee engagement.
· According to Clapon (n.d.) engagement is driven by several factors like
management/leadership, meaningful work and professional growth.
· Soni (2013) says that culture of respect where good work is appreciated,
feedback, counselling and mentoring, fair reward, recognition and incentive
scheme are important driver of employee engagement.
Heaney (2010) has explained that there are various drivers that make the
employees engaged. These are:
82
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Source: http://www.bizzuka.com/company-blog/6-keys-to-drive-employee-
engagement
Ezell (2013) has described that the managers should clearly communicate the core
values and belief of the employees. There should be transparency about the goals and
objectives of the organization. The line managers should also care about personal life
of the employees and support their health and well-being. The organization should
assign the job according to the area of interest of the employees. Growth opportunity
and trust on employees are important for the engagement of the employees.
Weaver (2013) has reported that role conflict, effective training, personal
autonomy and manager abilities are effective drivers of employee engagement.
Researchers have observed that there are certain barriers which inhibit employee
engagement. Hauck (2011) reported that improper performance appraisal and lack of
skills in the managers are barriers of employee engagement. Sales Benchmark Index
83
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
(2014) has candidly discussed that income inequality, job insecurity and work life
imbalance are major barriers of employee engagement. The typical pay for
performance policy is also a barrier of employee engagement (Hauck, 2011). Other
key barriers of employee engagement may be as follows:
· Recruitment of right person and giving them a realistic job according to the
area of interest of that employee (Swarnalatha & Prasanna, 2012).
84
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Job Characteristics
Saks (2006) openly showed that job characteristics provide the opportunity for
individuals to work effectively and to become more engaged. Job characteristics are
those tasks that provide challenging work, variety, use of different skills and
opportunity to make important contributions (Kahn, 1992). It provides individuals
with the room and incentive to bring more of themselves into their work or to be more
engaged.
Saks (2006) found that employees who receive higher level of organizational
support are more engaged towards their job. Perceived organizational support is now
getting an important attention in industrial/organizational literature. According to
85
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Rasheed, Khan, and Ramzan (as cited in Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002) perceived
organizational support is also seen as a promise that the organization will help the
employees when they need any aid to run their jobs and tasks effectively.
Organization should also support the employees from every aspect such as safety and
security. Health and moral value of the employees should also be maintained by the
organization.
According to Rasheed, Khan, and Ramzan (as cited in Kottke & Sharafinski,
1988) perceived supervisor support is defined as the view of employees that how
much the supervisor gives importance to employee’s performance, well-being,
interest and benefits of employees. Supervisor’s perform just like an agent for the
organization, with the duty of guiding the employees and evaluating their
performance. The employees also examine whether supervisor is providing them with
effective leadership and guidance.
Saks (2006) argued that employees will be more likely to be engaged towards
the job to the extent that they receive the amount of rewards and recognition on their
job performances. The organization should have good reward and recognition system
and provide certain compensation and benefits to improve the level of engagement
among employees (Vazirani, 2007).
The literal meaning of the word “reward” is that it is something that is offered
by the organization to the workers in response of their performance and contributions
which are expected by the workers. A reward may be intrinsic or extrinsic and it can
86
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Saks (2006) has discussed that distributive and procedural justices are “the
degree to which an organization was predictable and consistent in the distribution of
rewards and the procedures used to allocate them.” He found that positive procedural
justice is a good sign for the engagement of employees and employees who perceived
higher levels of procedural justice are more engaged towards their works. Saks (as
cited in Rhoades, Eisenberger & Armeli, 2001) has reported that if employees did not
feel that justice and rewards are being fairly distributed in the organization, they
become disengaged from work.
According to Rasheed, Khan, and Ramzan (as cited in Landy & Conte, 2007)
distributive justice is “the fairness in the allocation of resources, benefits and rewards
of the organization among the employees.” Distributive justice is related to outcomes
when employees are treated with unfairness regarding any particular outcome, it
affects the employees emotions and intentions such as guilt, happiness, pride or anger.
When employees are treated fair, the employees feel satisfied in all respect and their
loyalty is increased and they are engaged toward the work of the organization. They
further discussed that the procedural justice relates to the methods and procedures
through which these rewards and outcomes are divided. Procedural justice level is
high when members feels that they have a right to give opinion in the procedures or
the processes. These include the characteristics just like flexibility, correctness,
ethicality, consistency and lack of biasness (as cited in Leventhal, 1980). The
organization must give significant value to determine whether procedural justice is
encounter to employees or not.
87
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Job Satisfaction
According to Wang (as cited in Davis, 1981) job satisfaction is the feeling of
happiness or unhappiness experienced by employees working in an organization.
According to Clifford (as cited in Wright & Davis, 2003) job satisfaction is “the
representation of employees and their work environment by comparing what they
expect to receive versus what actually employees received.” Employee engagement is
directly related with the job satisfaction. If an employee is engaged towards the work,
definitely he/she will be fully satisfied with the job. Basbous (2011) said an engaged
employee is a satisfied employee. Therefore it is very important for the organization
to make their employees engaged by providing various financial and non financial
incentives and assign the task according to their area of interest. This will make the
employee more appreciative of his job and satisfied with his career.
Organizational Commitment
Intention to Quit
According to Clifford (as cited in Kacmar, Carlson, & Brymer, 1999) intention
to quit is the degree to which employees are considering leaving the organization.
Intention to quit includes basically the reasons why employees are going to quit the
job and what factors made the employee leave the organization. The engaged
employees do not frequently quit the job, but stay in the organization for longer
period of time (Swetha & Kumar, 2011).
88
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Use the Right Employee Engagement Survey: When organization asks its
employees for their opinions, those employees expect to implement their opinion and
suggestion, but organization often makes the mistake of implementing that survey.
Employee survey data must be specific, relevant and actionable for any team at any
organizational level.
Select the Right Managers: An effective leader understands the organizational goals
and objectives and cares about the employees working in the organization. They seek
to understand each employee’s strength and provide every opportunity to use their
strengths in their job. Effective managers empower their employees, recognize and
value their contributions and actively seek their ideas and suggestions.
89
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Trained Managers: Gallup research has found that managers are accountable for the
engagement of the employees. Therefore the organization should provide training and
orientation to the managers to take active role in building employee engagement.
Markos and Sridevi, (2010) have discussed that in order to engage employees in
any organization, managers need to look at the following ten points. They named
these points as “tablets” because it is believed that they will cure employee
disengagement diseases. These are as follows:
90
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
affiliation and autonomy, employee will present physically at work but not mentally.
Giving workers participation opportunities creates a feeling of belonging towards
their work and opportunities of participation gives them pride, ownership and a deep
sense of fulfilment that motivates them towards their work.
3.15 Summary
The present chapter has been drafted to elaborate the present scenario of
employee engagement. Employee engagement has become an important subject in
recent years among consulting firms and in the popular business organizations.
However, in academic literature it has rarely been studied and relatively little is
known about it. Employee engagement has become one of the most leading priorities
for HR practitioners and senior managers in the organizations. The foregoing
discussion concludes that the employee engagement is a good indicator for success of
any organization. The organizations should focus on employee engagement to boost
their growth and to get a competitive advantage. An engaged workplace encourages
commitment and energy among the employees of the organization to improve
production and business performance. High levels of engagement in domestic and
global firms promote retention of talent, foster customer loyalty and improve
organizational performance and overall stakeholder’s value. It is concerned about
maximum utilization of organization’s assets in order to gain competitive advantage
in the market. There are various factors which influence the level of engagement such
as recruitment and selection, training and development, communication, leadership
style and performance management. While relationships at work, total reward and
recognition, work life balance and work itself are important drivers of employee
engagement. The management should understand the importance of employee
engagement because highly engaged workforce will definitely make an organization
more successful in terms of financial and nonfinancial parameters. However, it can be
said that engagement which has a positive impact on the organizational performance
can be derived from a strong mutual relationship between the co-employees, their
employer and the organization as a whole. Therefore the organization should focus on
every aspect of employee engagement in order to gain competitive advantage by
increasing their productivity, profitability and lower absenteeism.
91
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
References
Bedarkar, M., & Pandita, D. (2014). A study on the drivers of employee engagement
impacting employee performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
133, 106-115.
Bhatla, N. (2011). To study the employee engagement practices and its effects on
employee performance with special reference to ICICI and HDFC bank in
Lucknow. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 2(8), 1-
7.
Cattermole, G., & Johnson, J. (2014, March 11). Employee engagement is key in the
hotel industry. Retrieved from http://www.hoteldesigns.net/ industry-
news/news_12787.html
Chandhok, A., & Bhavet. (2014). Engagement and commitment: A study conducted
in Delhi and NCR with special reference to telecom industry. International
Journal of Research in Commerce, IT & Management. 4(07), 5-10.
92
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Clapon, P. (2014, April 21). The top 3 employee engagement drivers. Retrieved from
http://www.gethppy.com/workplace-happiness/the-top-3-employee-
engagement-drivers/
Crim, D., & Seijts, G. (2006). What engages employees the most or, the ten C’s of
employee engagement. Ivey Business Journal, March/April 2006.
Hamid, S., & Farooqi, A. R. (2014). Taj group of hotels as brand employer: A
selective study of students as job aspirants at Aligarh, India. International
Journal of Tourism and Travel, 7(1 & 2), 23-30.
93
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Jose, G., & Mampilly, S. R. (2012). Satisfaction with hr practices and employee
engagement: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Economics and
Behavioral Studies, 4(9), 423-430.
94
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Kular, S., Gatenby, M., Rees, C., Soane, E., & Truss, K. (2008). Employee
engagement: A literature review. Working paper series (19). Kingston
University. Retrieved from http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/4192/1/19wempen.pdf
Lochhead, C., & Stephens, A. (2004). Employee retention, labour turnover and
knowledge transfer: Case studies from Canadian plastics sectors. Canadian
Labour and Business Centre. Retrieved from http://www.nald.ca/ library/
research/cpsc/employee_retention/employee_retention.pdf
Markos, S., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving
performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 89-
94.
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of
meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human
spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77,
11-37.
95
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Ncube, F., & Jerie, S. (2012). Leveraging employee engagement for competitive
advantage in the hospitality industry. A comparative study of hotels A and B
in Zimbabwe. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics & Management
Sciences, 3(4), 380-388.
Neeti, R., & Leekha, C. N. (2011). Employee engagement: A primer for strategic
human resource management. Asian Journal of Research in Business
Economics & Management, 1(2), 16-27.
Ranjan, P. (2014, December 24). Do you communicate enough. Ascent, The Times of
India. 1-4.
Rasheed, A., Khan, S., & Ramzan, M. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of
employee engagement: The case of Pakistan. Journal of Business Studies
Quarterly, 4(4), 183-200.
Rashid, H. A., Asad, A., & Ashraf, M. M. (2011). Factors persuading employee
engagement and linkage of EE to personal & organizational performance.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(5), 98-
108.
Reilly, R. (2014, January 7). Five ways to improve employee engagement now.
Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/businessjournal/166667/five-ways-
improve-employee-engagement.aspx
96
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Saks, A. M. (2008). The meaning and bleeding of employee engagement: How muddy
is the water?. Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 40-43.
doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00005.x
97
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Singh, A., & Shukla, T. (2012). Employee engagement in an Indian tin manufacturing
organization: An investigation. Asian Journal of Management Sciences &
Education, 1(3), 80-93.
98
Employee Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Weaver, L. (2013, May 2). The 8 drivers of employee satisfaction and engagement.
Retrieved from http://incentiveprogram.hubpages.com/hub/The-8-Drivers-of-
Employee-Satisfaction-and-Engagement
99