SSM College of Engineering and Technology: Moletronics
SSM College of Engineering and Technology: Moletronics
SSM College of Engineering and Technology: Moletronics
A SEMINAR REPORT
Submitted to
By
ENROLLMENT: 5555
BACHELOR OF ENFINEERING
In
ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
NOV 2018
CERTIFICATE
2 BACKGROUND 6
3 ADVANTAGES OF MOLETRONICS 7
7 REFERENCES 23
1. Introduction
2. Background
Study of the charge transfer in molecules was promoted in the late 1940s by Albert
Szent-Gyorgiand and Robert S. Mulliken.6 They discussed the so-called “donor-
acceptor” systems and then developed the study of charge transfer and energy
transfer in molecules. In 1959, Richard P. Feynman presented his lecture “There’s
Plenty of Room at the Bottom”. This famous call was for chemists, engineers and
physicists to work together and to build structures from bottom up at the molecular
level. Feynman’s suggestion spurred serious notion to the possibility of engineering
single molecules to function as elements in the
information-processing systems. This idea was tested by a 1974 paper entitled
“Molecular Rectifiers” by Mark Ratner and Ari Aviram.7 This paper illustrated a
theoretical molecular rectifier and generalized molecular conduction in molecular
electronics. They discussed theoretically the possibility of constructing a “very
simple electronic device, a rectifier, based on the use of a single organic molecule”.
It has turned out in later years that observing true molecular rectification is very
difficult. Their proposal formed a brave attempt that would strengthen the
foundations of the field with hopes of electronic applications truly at the molecular
scale. Later, in 1988, Aviram described in detail a theoretical single-molecule field-
effect transistor.8 Further concepts were proposed by Forrest Carter5 of the Naval
Research Laboratory, including single-molecule logic gates. These were all
theoretical constructs and not concrete devices. The direct measurement of the
electronic characteristics of individual molecules has to wait for the development of
new techniques which are capable of making reliable electrical contacts at the
molecular scale. This was not an easy task. The first experiment measuring the
conductance of a single molecule was only reported in 1997 by Mark Reed and co-
workers. Since then, the development of nano-scale measuring techniques has
progressed rapidly and the theoretical predictions of the early workers have mostly
been confirmed. Rapid progress in molecular electronics has been made in the last
three decades owing to advent of new characterization techniques.
Size – Molecules are in the nanometer scale between 1 and 100 nm. This scale
permits small devices with more efficient heat dissipation and less overall production
cost to be made.
Power: One of the reasons that transistors are not stacked into 3D volumes today is
that the silicon would melt. The inefficiency of the modern transistor is staggering. It
is much less efficient at its task than the internal combustion engine. The brain
provides an existence proof of what is possible; it is 100 million times more efficient
in power/calculation than our best processors. Sure it is slow (under a kHz) but it is
massively interconnected (with 100 trillion synapses between 60 billion neurons),
and it is folded into a 3D volume. Power per calculation will dominate clock speed as
the metric of merit for the future of computation.
Manufacturing Cost - Many of the molecular electronics designs use simple spin
coating or molecular self-assembly of organic compounds. The process complexity is
embodied in the synthesized molecular structures, and so they can literally be
splashed on to a prepared silicon wafer. The complexity is not in the deposition or
the manufacturing process or the systems engineering. Much of the conceptual
difference of nanotech products derives from a biological metaphor: complexity
builds from the bottom up and pivots about conformational changes, weak bonds,
and surfaces. It is not engineered from the top with precise manipulation and static
placement.
inorganic substrates, is the caudal functional group of the organic electronic material.
It is important to note that each part of an organic molecule used as the active
component in nano scale electronic device has their own contribution. In general, by
measuring the conductivity of a series of systematically modified molecules, the
contribution of each component can be determined. For example, by varying the
molecular alligator clip and examining the molecules’ conductivity, the contribution
of the alligator clip to the conductivity can be determined.
cloud. This cloud spreads over several units along the backbone. When this happens,
delocalized π valence (bonding) and π* conduction (anti-bonding) bands with
defined bandgap are formed — which meets the requirements for (semi)conducting
behavior. Normally the electrons reside in the lower energy valence band. If given
sufficient energy, they can be excited into the normally empty upper conduction
band, giving rise to a π–π* transition. Intermediate states are forbidden by quantum
mechanics. The delocalized π-electron system confers the (semi)conducting
properties on the molecule and gives it the ability to support charge transport.
Modifications can be done based on the backbone to improve electron transfer
properties. Scheme shows several popular backbones for a 1D molecular electronic
material. Backbones for 2D and 3D molecular electronics are similar to 1D’s.
Representative structures
for 1D molecular
electronic materials;
(a) Alkyldithiol;
(b) Oligo(p-phenylene)-
dithiol
(c) (p-phenylene
ethynylene)-dithiol.
Library of molecules under investigation
4.2 Different Alligator Clips in SAMs
Scheme 2 shows some common alligator clips used in molecular electronics for
forming SAMs. The acetyl-protected thiols and dithiols can be deprotected in situ
under acid or base conditions to form SAMs on gold substrate. The diazonium salt
generates an aryl radical by loss of N2 and ultimately produces an irreversible gold-
aryl bond. Isocyanide and diisocyanide also perform gold-carbon bond. Among all
the alligator clips, sulfur compounds have a strong affinity to transition metal
surfaces. This is probably because of the possibility to form multiple bonds with
surface metal clusters. The number of reported surface active organosulfur
compounds and their derivatives that form monolayers on gold include, di-n-alkyl
sulfide, di-n-alkyl disulfides, thiophenols, thiophenes, mercaptopyridines,
mercaptoanilines, xanthates, cysteines,thiocarbamates, thiocarbaminates, thioureas,
mercaptoimidazoles, ditellurides and alkaneselenols. SAMs of alkanethiolates on Au
surfaces are the most studied and well understood.
the electrode. Small changes in energy levels can dramatically affect the junction
conductance.
Novel molecular electronics would approach the density of ~10 13 logic gates/cm2. It
offers a 105 decrease in the size dimensions compared to the present feature of a
silicon-based microchip. In addition, the present fastest devices can only operate in
nanosecond while the response times of molecular-sized systems can reach the range
of femtoseconds. Thus, the speed may be attained to a 10 6 increase. On the basis of
these estimates, a 1011 fold increase in the performance can be expected with
molecular electronics, which offers an exciting impetus for intense research and
development though numerous obstacles remain.
Many of the technological applications of molecular electronics, including the
computational applications, should be considered and viewed as the drivers for the
field. Tour’s group has demonstrated the synthetic/computational approach to digital
computing of molecular scale electronics. In his paper, the alligator clip –SH acted as
the contact to input or output in digital computing of molecular electronics. The alkyl
groups which broke the conjugation of the wire served as the transport barrier in the
integrated circuits. The successful development of molecular-electronic integrated
circuitry would also benefit nanomechanical devices, ultradense single-molecule
sensor arrays, the interfaces to biosystems and the pathways toward molecular
mechanical systems.
5.1 Switch using Moletronics
Benzene ring of six carbon atoms (with a few hydrogen atoms thrown in as well) is
held together in part by a pi bond—a sort of smeared bond in which some of the
electrons are loosely shared by all the atoms in a kind of cloud that circles above and
below the carbon ring. It’s not a broken bond. Instead, it’s a sort of bond within
which electrons are somewhat more able to move.
By changing the structure of the molecule, the researchers found that they were able
to alter its behaviour. They hung molecular fragments—an NH2 group and an NO2
group—from the middle benzene ring. This distorted the electron cloud, making the
molecule more susceptible to twisting. By applying a voltage to the molecule, for
example, they could cause a “change, a bend or a twist in the molecule.” This
disrupted the flow of electrons
And, this twist was reversible. When the voltage was removed, the molecule
returned to its original shape, allowing current to pass through once again. In other
words, this molecule can act as a switch. It turns electricity on and off—a basic
characteristic that a computer needs to process information in bits of 1 and 0.
Moletronic device retains its electrons for about nearly fifteen minutes. It has the
ability to get the information in and out of the systems and using significantly less
power. Compared to, say, current equipment, which only runs for a few hours before
the batteries wear out, Reed says, machines using molecular memory could run for a
week.
Working molecular electronic devices exist today. Research progress is steady and
strong, giving us cause to believe that molecular electronic systems may be practical
in five to ten years. If lithography reaches fundamental physical or economic limits,
molecular electronics may allow us to continue observing Moore’s Law. Regardless,
molecular bottom-up fabrication could give us a
much better alternative, whose price would depend mainly on design and test cost,
instead of billion-dollar factories.
Challenges to making this reality are plentiful at every level, some naturally in
physics and chemistry, but many in ICCAD. These include fabricating and
integrating devices, managing their power and timing, finding fault-tolerant and
defect-tolerant circuits and architectures and the test algorithms needed to use them,
developing latency-tolerant circuits and systems, doing defect-aware placement and
routing, and designing, verifying and compiling billion-gate designs and the tools to
handle them. Any one of these could block practical molecular electronics if
unsolved.
Many of these are challenges that will be faced regardless of the underlying
technology. Molecular electronics provides a pure and extreme example, and
strengthens the case for solving them sooner rather than later.
Robust modeling methods are also necessary in order to bridge the gap between the
synthesis and understanding of molecules in solution and the performance of solid-
state molecular devices. In addition, the searching of fabrication approaches which
can couple the densities achievable through lithography with those achievable
through molecular assembly is also a great challenge. Controlling the properties of
molecule-electrode interfaces and constructing molecular-electronic devices that can
exhibit signal gain are also crucial to the development in the field.
7. REFERENCES
[1] Wikipedia