Task 1 1.sales Budget: First Quarter Sales Unit Quarterly Unit Increment Selling Price
Task 1 1.sales Budget: First Quarter Sales Unit Quarterly Unit Increment Selling Price
Task 1 1.sales Budget: First Quarter Sales Unit Quarterly Unit Increment Selling Price
1.Sales Budget
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year
Expected Sales
(in units) 460 500 540 580 2,080
Selling price
(RM) 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
Total sales
(RM) 920,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,080,000.00 1,160,000.00 4,160,000.00
2.Production Budget
Percent of Closing Stock 15.00%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year
Expected Sales (in units) 460 500 540 580 2,080
Add: Desired ending
Finished goods (units) 75 81 87 93
Total required units 535 581 627 673
Less: Beginning Finished
goods (units 0 75 81 87
Required Production Units 535 506 546 586 2,173
3.Direct Material Budget
Percent of Closing Stock 10.00%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year
Units to be
produced (from
production
budget) 535 506 546 586 2,173
Direct material
per unit 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000
Total DM
required for
production
(units) 26,750 25,300 27,300 29,300 108,650
Add: Ending
DM (units) 2,530 2,730 2,930 3,130
Total DM
required (units) 29,280 28,030 30,230 32,430
Less: Beginning
DM (units) 0 2,530 2,730 2,930
Direct Material
to be purchased
(units) 29,280 25,500 27,500 29,500 111,780
Cost per unit 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Total Cost of
DM purchased
(RM) 292,800.00 255,000.00 275,000.00 295,000.00 1,117,800.00
DM2 (Motor)
Direct Material Per Unit 1.000
Cost Per Unit 100.00
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year
Units to be produced
(from production
budget) 535 506 546 586 2,173
Direct material per unit 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Total DM required for
production (units) 535 506 546 586 2,173
Add: Ending DM (units) 51 55 59 63
Total DM required
(units) 586 561 605 649
Less: Beginning DM
(units) 0 51 55 59
Direct Material to be
purchased (units) 586 510 550 590 2,236
Cost per unit 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Total Cost of DM
purchased (RM)
58,560.00 51,000.00 55,000.00 59,000.00 223,560.00
4.Direct Labour Budget
DL1 (Machine Technician)
Direct Labour Time Per Unit 0.500
Direct Labour Cost Per Hour 10.00
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year
Units to be produced (from
production budget)
535 506 546 586 2,173
Direct labour time per unit 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Total required direct
labour hours 267.500 253.000 273.000 293.000 1,086.500
Direct labour cost per
hour 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Total direct labour cost
(RM) 2,675.00 2,530.00 2,730.00 2,930.00 10,865.00
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year
Sales
4,160,000.00
Less: Cost of Goods Sold
2,261,474.59
Budgeted Gross Profit
1,898,525.41
Less: Selling & Admin. Expenses
63,372.13
Budgeted Net Profit
1,835,153.28
Provision for tax (….%)
550,545.98
Retained Profit
1,284,607.30
10. Cash Budget for each four quarter of 2017
Expected Cash Collection
% of Cash Collected in Quarter Sold 50.00%
% of Cash Collected in following Quarter 50.00%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Q1 Sales 920,000.00 460,000.00 460,000.00
Q2 Sales 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00
Q3 Sales 1,080,000.00 540,000.00 540,000.00
Q4 Sales 1,160,000.00 580,000.00
Total
Cash
Collection 460,000.00 960,000.00 1,040,000.00 1,120,000.00
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Q1 DM1 Purchase 292,800.00 204,960.00 87,840.00
Q1 DM2 Purchase 58,560.00 40,992.00 17,568.00
Q2 DM1 Purchase 255,000.00 178,500.00 76,500.00
Q2 DM2 Purchase 51,000.00 35,700.00 15,300.00
Q3 DM1 Purchase 275,000.00 192,500.00 82,500.00
Q3 DM2 Purchase 55,000.00 38,500.00 16,500.00
Q4 DM1 Purchase 295,000.00 206,500.00
Q4 DM2 Purchase 59,000.00 41,300.00
Total Cash
Payments 245,952.00 319,608.00 322,800.00 346,800.00
Cash Budget
Number of Group Member 5
Common Share from Each Group Member 2,000.00
Opening Cash Balance 100,000.00
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year
Receipts:
Collection from
customer 460,000.00 960,000.00 1,040,000.00 1,120,000.00 3,580,000.00
Common Share 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00
Total Receipts 470,000.00 960,000.00 1,040,000.00 1,120,000.00 3,590,000.00
Payments:
Direct Material 245,952.00 319,608.00 322,800.00 346,800.00 1,235,160.00
Direct Labour 4,815.00 4,554.00 4,914.00 5,274.00 19,557.00
Factory Overhead 214,386.86 210,270.47 215,948.25 221,626.02 862,231.60
Selling &
Administrative 15,073.90 15,006.66 15,099.41 15,192.16 60,372.13
Income Tax 137,636.50 137,636.50 137,636.50 137,636.50 550,545.98
Payment Fixed Asset 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total payments 617,864.26 687,075.62 696,398.15 726,528.68 2,727,866.71
Surplus/Deficit -
147,864.26 272,924.38 343,601.85 393,471.32 862,133.29
Opening Balance 100,000.00 -47,864.26 225,060.12 568,661.97 100,000.00
Closing Balance -47,864.26 225,060.12 568,661.97 962,133.29 962,133.29
Task 2
1. Most of the cash balance in the year 2017 is above RM200,000 except for Quarter 1.
The cash flow in Quarter 1 is in negative which is RM - 47,864.26. There are a few
potential problems related to this negative cash flow, but most significant problem
occurred in the cash payment for Direct Material. In Quarter 1, the Direct Material’s
cash payment consume majority of the cash receipts with an amount of RM 245,952
but this is a typical cash flow for a business that manufactures and sells products.
Precaution and extra attention need to be given for Quarter 1 because it is the first
quarter of the year and normally the cash receipts from customer’s collection is low,
thus with a high amount of direct material’s cash payment then resulting the cash flow
to be in negative. This condition does not comprehend with the aim of the cash
management, “Cash Received into the business is must exceeds cash disbursed out of
the business”.
2. The possible simplest and commonly known solution for the company to improve its’
agreement between a supplier and trade customer whereby the supplier agrees to
provide materials up front with payment to come later. In an agreement, usually the
supplier and the buyer agreed to pay within 10 days with a 2 percent discount or
within 30 days without any discount, hence the buyer must optimize the cash use
within those 30 days. This method offers many advantages to the buyer such as not
having to pay up front, by which enables the company to use its’ cash for other capital
needs. By delaying the cash payment for Direct Material, the value of cash balance will
production team have to learn the working ethics from other modern country to such
a degree that they will adopt their thinking and working. The production process will
internationally.
Task 3: Variance Analysis
Question 1
Galvanised Steel Price Variance = (Actual Price – Standard Price) x Actual Quantity
= RM 82,270.08
Hence,
Motor Usage Variance = (2,346.84 – 2,173) x 10.00
= RM 1,738.40
Labour Rate Variance for DL1 (Machine Technician)
Machine Technician Labour Rate Variance = (Actual Rate–Standard Rate) x Actual Hour
Hence,
Machine Technician Labour Rate Variance = (10.80 – 10.00) x 999.58
= RM 799.66
Welding Technician Labour Efficiency Variance = (Actual Hour – Standard Hour)xStandard Rate
Hence,
Welding Technician Labour Efficiency Variance = (999.58 – 1,086.50) x 8
= RM 695.36
2.
1. Value of Galvanised Steel (DM1) price variance is caused due to the decline price of
Galvanised Steel and also the decline usage and purchased of Galvanised steel than
what have been budgeted. Both are reduced by a percentage of 8%. As a result, this
will impact the company to pay less for Galvanised Steel, hence making it a favourable
variance.
Value of Welding Technician (DL2) efficiency variance is caused due to the reduction
of working hour by 8%, it can be understood that if the working hour is reduced but
the output product remains the same, thus it can be said that the worker is more
energetic, motivated or the quality of equipment used is better. In other words, the
actual output is in excess of standard output set for same number of hours. Hence,
budgeting the price for Galvanised Steel. This will allow the company to save money
and able to invest capital in other places. The price variance can also be reformed by
re-estimate the material used and purchased. This will act as a medium for the
company to avoid poor management of the company and can focus on other more
important thing.
re-allocating the work hour needed to complete the product. Management has to play
an important role to ensure the allocation of work hour is directly proportional to the