The Origin of Life-5
The Origin of Life-5
The Origin of Life-5
What is the real origin of life? We will answer this question. But, first – how far has
science gotten?
According to Robert Shapiro in his article published by Scientific American (June 2007)
the title of which is “A Simpler ORIGIN for LIFE”; Summarized: “The sudden
appearance of a large self-copying molecule such as RNA was exceedingly improbable.
Energy-driven networks of small molecules afford better odds as the initiators of life.”
In other words, there must be some chemical compound that is smaller than RNA that can
replicate itself and thus be classified as a living thing – but, science does not yet know
what that smaller chemical compound is. So, the net result is a surmise – a theory.
That’s it.
There are two schools of main stream thought as to the origin of life – one holds that
some large molecule developed the ability to replicate itself and the other maintains that a
collection of molecules could have developed the ability to create energy or absorb
energy and thus maintain their organization i.e. a metabolism.
The cowboy, this writer, would suggest that the original form of life must be able to
replicate and have thoughts, feelings & emotions, as well as short and long term memory
i.e. be sentient. We shall see what the smallest thing that lives is.
Also, Antoine Bechamp, he discovered tiny living units that he called, microzymas. Dr.
Bechamp’s biggest problem was that his research and discoveries ran counter to those of
Louis Pasteur, whose germ theory still is the accepted science of disease.
In all three cases, Bechamp, Naessens, and Merkl their discovered tiny living units are
pleomorphic, meaning that they change their shape and morph into different organisms.
This ability to shape shift is hotly contested by main stream science, but there have been
an enormous number of researchers confirm the fact. It takes very little reading in both
Naessens web site as well as that of Bechamp ( http://www.bechamp.org ) to arrive at
extremely simple proof that any one can replicate i.e. via the growing of yeast.
This also extends to the concept of alchemy i.e. changing base elements from one atomic
structure to another without a chemical reaction – the famous conversion of lead into gold
is one example. My personal favorite is the fact that a crop of corn will have 10 times
more magnesium that what has been leached from the soil – the magnesium just seems to
manifest. Ditto, the calcium around a chicken’s eggs – they don’t eat calcium – most of
what free range chickens east is mica / silicon, which they are seemingly able to convert
to elemental calcium in their bodies. This is called biological transmutations ala Louis
Kervran, a Nobel Prize nominee his paper written circa 1960 ( http://educate-
yourself.org/zsl/zslclouiskervran23jul02.shtml ). He was only confirming work started in
1799 i.e. the observations of plants creating the minerals they need to live.
The point here is that living things do, in fact, manufacture the things that they need to
live. Therefore, the one basic precept of main stream science that a living thing must
metabolize i.e. eat other things, is very obviously wrong. Which is what Naessens said
about his somatids – they do not need to eat or even absorb energy from other sources,
they make all their own – totally self sufficient.
Further, the fact of pleomorphism supports the observations of Naessens, Merkl and
Bechamp that their tiny living units would band together and become larger living things
– in all cases quite beneficial and useful living things. Now, we are talking easily
repeatable observations that main stream science refused to even observe – despite the
fact that all of these esteemed researchers offered all comers to see for themselves –
many of which did and reported same only to be discredited. So, I say again
pleomorphism is a fact – a real important fact – we did arrive at human development due
to this ability of tiny living things to get together and become larger living things.
On the same subject – and, important to know – viruses are very tiny living things – they
have the ability to morph / transmute – the way one virus differs from another is
primarily via shape – thence their internal sequence, which is determined by the energy
coming through their crystalline shell casings – their skins. Therefore, if you have any
virus in your body – you then have all viruses in your body because they will morph to
look like any example that is introduced to their environment. This is a combination of
Bechamps microzymas and Pasteur’s germ theory i.e. Bechamp held that disease
occurred spontaneously via morphism in the body whereas Pasteur postulated that germs
from outside the body were the culprits – now we see that the combination of the two is
correct.
This is important to our discovery of the origin of life for this reason: the introduction of
a new idea into a living shape changing medium causes the new organism to manifest.
So, we have to add another requirement to our smallest living thing i.e. the ability to
shape change along with the last tenable precept of science – the ability to reproduce.
But, far short of my requirements which include: short & long term memory, thoughts
feelings and emotions. So, I’ve set much higher standards than has science and we are
going to arrive at that holy grail before the end of this essay!!!
Now, Naessens observed that his somatids were virtually indestructible, immortal, would
replicate and morph. Since his somatids do amazing healings and since there are a great
number of people who have observed his somatids themselves – then the somatid would
seem to be a candidate for the origin of life. And, Naessens observed that the somatids
had an innate intelligence, which fits nicely with my requirements. But, I disagree – the
somatid is not the origin of life.
Next, Dr. Merkl’s chondriana. In keeping with the first video presentation of Merkl’s
discoveries as confirmed by himself to me via the telephone – but, contrary to some of
the things reported on his web sites ( http://www.rexresearch.com/merkl/merkl.htm )
– let me summarize his findings: George Merkl discovered cold fusion a very long time
ago – at a time when nobody was interested in cheap energy. He noticed that the
presence of light on the fusion reaction changed the reaction. And, that different kinds of
light, inside or outside, made different changes to the reaction. So, he decided to study
light. Eventually he found that light would condense into a living thing he called
chondriana, which was also indestructible, intelligent and immortal. The chondriana
would morph into larger organisms with ability to attack disease in the human body and
to intelligently do what the body needed most – including rebuilding organs – a fact that
he proved on his own body. And, a fact that I observed in the lady doctor who
regenerated her lungs. So, we could say that Merkl’s light (thence condriana) is the
origin of life – I mean, how much more fundamental can you get than light? But, I
disagree – and so will you shortly.
ANU is the first name of GOD in the ancient scriptures – it is also a verifiable energy
form. The human aura from kirlian photos is shaped like the Anu.
From http://www.aetherpress.com/book.htm by Frank Meno the electron, which is
obviously an Anu.
Please refer to my “Nested Aethers” and “Messages in Water” essays attached for further
info on the Anu and how it was formed. Photons have this same shape and they are non-
polar i.e. 2-D. In fact, photons are points of light – please read the attached essay
“NEAR DEATH EXPERIENCES – FURTHER SUPPORT FOR THE ORIGIN OF
LIFE”
The origin of life is the Anu, which resides in the aether of space / darkness. All things
are conceived in darkness – this is a fact – the first form of God is Space and Space is
female.
Now the creationists will disagree saying that consciousness is the origin of life, which is
kind of true because consciousness came into being because of the rule, which also
caused the aether – its just that the idea of life came along after the Anu was already there
by default – it had been automatically / logically / unconsciously created within the
aether via the rule “like attracts like” as established in several previous essays. There was
never the conscious idea of the Anu – it just happened – God is – that’s it.
And, even before the conscious idea of life, the Anu was replicating itself within the
aether creating the uniform field = living. The Anu is indestructible and immortal after
all it is God. And, as established in the essay “MEMORIES AND KARMA ARE MADE
OF THIS” the Anu is the repository of memory – thus, it has intelligence, thoughts,
feelings, emotions, short and long term memory – in fact, its memory is perfect.
I think that the fact that the Anu is the origin of life is irrefutable.
For those of you that read my essays this conclusion is not surprising – sorry to drag you
through the scientific slog. I was trying to write an essay that might get published, which
is why lower case letters have been used. But, unfortunately it is necessary to lean on my
previous writings in order to nail this one down.
16 March 2006
DNA Shaped Nebula Observed At
Center Of Milky Way
I’D SUGGEST THAT THE SHAPE OF THE ENERGY IN THE NEARBY MASSIVE
BLACK HOLE IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS THAT MIRRORED ONTO THIS
NEBULA. LIKE ATTRACTS LIKE.
THESE THEORISTS SAY THE SAME I.E. THE UNIFORM FIELD IS THE BACK
GROUND SCREEN EVERY WHERE. AND – LIKE ATTRACTS LIKE
http://montalk.net/notes/the-etheric-origins-of-gravity-electricity-and-magnetism
SO, WHAT CAN WE SAY FURTHER? WELL THE UNIFORM FIELD / THE
AETHER IS THERE – OUT THERE AND EVERY WHERE. IN EVERY OTHER
CELL OF THE AETHER THERE IS AN ANU – THE CENTER OF WHICH IS
SHAPED LIKE DNA – AUTOMATICALLY CONSTRUCTED THAT WAY VIA A
LOGICAL SEQUENCE OF ENERGETIC EVENTS. NOW THIS AETHER IS
PRETTY MUCH STATIONARY – AS “THINGS” MOVE THROUGH IT THE ANUs
DO THEIR JOB OF MANIFESTING THE THINGS WE SEE – WHAT EVER IT IS.
THEY ARE ALWAYS SUBJECT TO THE RULE – MEANING THAT AS THE
BEINGNESS OF THE NEBULA REACHES THEM – THEY IMMEDIATELY, IN NO
TIME, REFLECT THAT IDEA.
“… At full power of 30,000 volts, the lifter is roaring and a noticeable downward breeze
is observed. Many physicists call it ‘ion wind’ and say that this is what causes the lifters
to fly. …
To analyse the air currents, Tim blew baby powder at the top of the lifter. The
majority of the particulate cloud was drawn into the middle area of the lifter and then
sucked downward. A kind of vortex was created at times … I could see a cloud forming
into an organized column beneath the lifter and then spreading out 360 degrees once it hit
the work table surface.” QUOTES FROM NEXUS MAGAZINE
http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/dna-phantom.htm
Basically the DNA caused photons to organize in columns or rows – again!!! DNA is
known to be super conducting. Since super conductors levitate – one can only conclude
that the super conductors harmonize with the aether. Therefore, the super conductors
have the same honeycomb structure as the aether – ditto the DNA.
M,
a little pointer for your research on life and its origin. Links an interesting article...
Sepp
Until now, physicists assumed that there could be little organization in such a cloud of
particles. However, The Russian Academy’s V.N. Tsytovich and colleagues found,
using a computer model of molecular dynamics, that plasma particles can undergo
self-organization as charges become separated. This results in microscopic strands
of solid particles that twist into corkscrew shapes, or helical structures. These helical
strands are themselves charged and are attracted to each other.
Quite bizarrely, not only do these helical strands interact in a surprising way in which
like can attract like, they also undergo changes normally associated with biological
molecules, such as DNA and proteins, say the researchers. They can, for instance,
divide, or bifurcate, to form two copies of the original structure. These new structures
can also interact to induce changes in their neighbours and they can even evolve into
yet more structures as less stable ones break down, leaving behind only the fittest
structures in the plasma.
Compare this with what I said just after reading the Xmas 2003 edition of New Scientist:
"I had read in New Scientist that it had been discovered that blobs of plasma
gas appear to be able to “communicate, replicate and grow”. Of course they can! It
is clearly possible by the interchange of encoded helixes.
Best regards
Robert F. Beck
Physicians and Scientists for Responsible Application of Science and Technology (PSRAST)
Already the eminent quantum physicists Fritz London and Niels Bohr suggested that quantum phenomena might
be essential for life processes. During the last decade especially, increasing evidence is accumulating that indicate
that this is indeed the case. Especially the experimental work of Garajev et al (see point 1 below) indicates that a
radical reinterpretation of the regulatory mechanisms of DNA is required.
Below you find brief summaries of some interesting texts along with links to their sources.
1. Genetic code only half the story - DNA is a quantum mechanical biowave computer
Recent research has demonstrated that electromagentic signals are of key importance in the regulatory functioning
of DNA . Part of it is based on ultraviolet luminence creating biophotons that have been experimentally
demonstrated to be able to enhance metabolic reactions thousandfold (1). Another aspect is an electromagnetically
mediated "language" for communication between DNA and the cells. Actually laser light generated in DNA,
experimentally demonstrated by P.P. Garajev (2),(3) is a key element in this information transmission system.
Excerpt from:
"...These assumptions produce a chromosome apparatus and fast wave genetic information
channels connecting the chromosomes of the separate cells of an organism into a holistic
continuum, working as the biocomputer, where one of the field types produced by the
chromosomes, are their radiations. This postulated capability of such "laser radiations" from
chromosomes and DNA, as will be shown, has already been demonstrated experimentally in
Moscow, by the Gariaev Group. Thus it seems the accepted notions about the genetic code must
Gariaev P et al, "The DNA-wave Biocomputer" (3)
"...These assumptions produce a chromosome apparatus and fast wave genetic information
channels connecting the chromosomes of the separate cells of an organism into a holistic
continuum, working as the biocomputer, where one of the field types produced by the
chromosomes, are their radiations. This postulated capability of such "laser radiations" from
chromosomes and DNA, as will be shown, has already been demonstrated experimentally in
Moscow, by the Gariaev Group. Thus it seems the accepted notions about the genetic code must
change fundamentally, and in doing so it will be not only be possible to create and understand
DNA as a wave biocomputer, but to gain from nature a more fundamental understanding of what
information [Marcer in press] really is! For the Gariaev Group's experiments in Moscow and
Toronto say that the current understanding of genomic information i.e. the genetic code, is only
half the story [Marcer this volume]. "
AND, WE ARE QUITE SURE THAT A DNA ENERGETIC STRUCTURE FORMS IN THE
VOIDS OF BLACK HOLES. THIS DNA STRUCTURE IS THE CENTER OF AN ANU –
SUFFICE TO SAY THIS – IF YOU HAVE A DNA STRUCTURE THEN YOU HAVE TO
HAVE THE REST OF THE ANU I.E. THE OUTER ENERGY SPIN AND THE AETHERIC
CELL. LIVING CELLS ARE A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF DNA IN ITS OWN AETHERIC
PACKET / CELL – DITTO THE HUMAN AURA THE ENERGY IN THE CENTER OF
WHICH IS A DOUBLE HELIX, DITTO THIS UNIVERSE AND DITTO ALL QUANTUM
PACKETS.
SO, THEY ARE SAYING THAT IF YOU HAVE A QUANTUM (AETHERIC CELL)
ANYWHERE, THEREIN WILL FORM DNA AND THAT DNA IS A BIOCOMPUTER. IF
YOU HAVE A VOID DNA WILL FORM BECAUSE THE VOID IS LIKE THE NULL
CAPACITANCE FIELD AND THAT DNA WILL BECOME A BIOCOMPUTER – NOW
YOU KNOW WHY.
References
1. Kaznacejev V. P., Michailova L. P. Ultraschwache Luminiszenz in interzellularen Interaktionen. Novosibirsk,
Nauka, 1981 (in Russian.)
2. Garjajev P. P. Der wellengenetische Code. 1997, ISBN 5-7816-0022-1 (in Russian.)
3. Peter P. Gariaev, Boris I. Birshtein, Alexander M. Iarochenko, Peter J. Marcer, George G. Tertishny, Katherine
A. Leonova, Uwe Kaempf, "The DNA-wave Biocomputer" at http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/dna-wave.doc
Comment
These experimental findings about DNA control of cellular processes mediated by
electromagnetic/quantum mechanical mechanisms have not been considered by biotechnology
researchers. They introduce important new elements that radically change our understanding of the
workings of DNA.
Most importantly, they seriously undermine the present biotechnological dogma where DNA is
treated as a micro-object that is "clipped" and "glued". In stead, so far completely unknown
Quantum Wave aspects have been found to be involved that may radically change our
understanding of what happens in genetic engineering.
This reveals another aspect of the great incompleteness of the knowledge of present biotechnology.
2. Quantum mechanics of the Acto-mysoin molecule
Research indicates that quantum phenomena play a role in the contractile element of muscles, see Quantum
Biology. [AL]
Excerpt: "Quantum physics and molecular biology are two disciplines that have evolved relatively independently.
However, recently a wealth of evidence has demonstrated the importance of quantum mechanics for biological
systems and thus a new field of quantum biology is emerging... Matsuno argues that actomyosin functions as a heat
engine (a device that converts heat energy into mechanical energy) that is able to maintain a constant velocity due
to quantum mechanical coherence and entanglement."
3. "What is life? Are quantum states and processes at the core of living systems?"
Articles by Stuart Hameroff and Paul Davis. Both discuss the possibility that quantum processes may be a
common denominator for living systems. The noted experimental physicist Anton Zeilinger has also suggested that
quantum effects underlie the living state. In a 1997 paper entitled "Quantum vitalism" for the Fetzer Institute
journal "Advances: The Journal of Mind-body Health" I had suggested that, indeed, quantum processes were at the
core of living systems, and relevant to health.
SO, SINCE ALL THINGS EXIST IN AND AS A RESULT OF QUANTUM PROCESSES – THEN ALL
THINGS ARE ALIVE.
ALL OF THIS FITS WITH THE HINDU PRECEPT OF THE SHIVA LINGHAM (AN
OVOID / ANU), THE MOST SACRED FORM IN HINDUISM, WHICH IS
WORSHIPED AS BEING THE FORM THROUGH WHICH ENERGY PASSES AS IT
GOES FROM FORMLESSNESS TO FORM AND VICE VERSA.
LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVE BEEN RIGHT ON FOR THE LAST 5000 YEARS!!!
RE: THE ANU BEING THE ORIGIN OF LIFE AND HAVING THOUGHTS,
FEELINGS AND EMOTIONS, SHORT & LONG TERM MEMORY. IN COMING TO
THAT CONCLUSION, I HAD THESE ADVANTAGES: 1) THE ANU FORMED UP
WITHIN THE AETHER LOGICALLY; 2) IF WE ACCEPT THE ANCIENT
SCRIPTURES STATING THAT THE ANU IS GOD – THEN IT IS VERY DIFFICULT
NOT TO ACCEPT GOD AS THE ORIGIN OF LIFE – PARTICULARLY SINCE THE
ANU SEEMS TO BE ALSO THE ORIGIN OF DNA – OBVIOUSLY THE ANU WAS
HERE FIRST AND THUS LAYS CLAIM TO THAT SHAPE AT THE PATENT
OFFICE; 3) MEMORIES ARE IMPRINTED ON ANUs – THAT IS FAIRLY WELL
ESTABLISHED IN THE “MEMORIES & KARMA ARE MADE OF THIS” ESSAY;
4) THE BACKSTER / BAXTER EFFECT. THE FOREMOST LIE DETECTOR
(POLYGRAPH) EXPERT IN THE U.S., CLEVE BACKSTER, TESTED HIS HOUSE
PLANTS FOR OVER 35 YEARS AND DISCOVERED THAT THEY HAD
AWARENESS THE EXTENDED WELL BEYOND THE ROOM, AS WELL AS
THOUGHTS, FEELINGS AND EMOTIONS, SHORT & LONG TERM MEMORY.
HE WENT ON TO TEST SUPPOSED INANIMATE OBJECTS LIKE THE TWO
SLIVER COINS SHOW BELOW WITH THEIR AURA PHOTOGRAPHED.
At first, it seemed no more than a curious coincidence. Professor Klaus Heinemann, a researcher for
NASA, the U.S. space agency, was studying a collection of photographs his wife had taken at a
gathering of spiritual healers when he noticed that many of them featured the same pale but clearly
defined circle of light, like a miniature moon, hovering above some of the subjects.
Like most rational people, he assumed that the pictures were faulty. 'I presumed the circles were due
to dust particles, flash anomalies, water particles and so on,' says Prof Heinemann.
'But I was sufficiently intrigued that I returned to the room in which the pictures were taken, in the hope
of finding an explanation - like a mirror in the background. None was forthcoming.'
Nor could he find any faults with his wife's camera. And as a scientist with considerable experience in
sophisticated microscope techniques - examining matter down to atomic levels of optical resolution -
his methods were nothing if not rigorous.
Still puzzled, Heinemann set out to discover what else might have caused the mysterious
circles. He and his wife began taking hundreds of digital photographs at random events to see
whether they could recreate the mysterious effect.
The answer was that they could make these shimmering 'orbs' appear again, but only - absurd
as it may sound - if they 'asked' the apparitions to make themselves visible to the camera. And
they found this method worked particularly well when the couple photographed spiritual
gatherings.
What on earth was going on? Again, a maverick technical glitch seemed the obvious answer. Such
anomalies happen frequently in digital photography. If you accidentally jog a camera while a picture is
being taken, especially in dim light, you can easily get a double image.
But again, Prof Heinemann ruled out a technical fault. 'We were quickly able to eliminate the common
problems associated with photography - such as dust particles, water droplets, reflections and a host
of other likely causes.'
Yet the orbs still kept appearing. And the more images he took, the more he was able to study the
bizarre properties of these shimmering lights.
Heinemann set up dozens of experiments using two cameras on static tripods under controlled
conditions. His early experiments found that orbs can move very fast, up to 500mph or more.
Heinemann also found that during his numerous dual camera experiments, when he used twin
cameras to capture an object from two different angles, a single orb shape would often appear - but
only in one of the two images taken simultaneously.
It was as if the orbs somehow chose which camera to appear on, or whether to appear at all.
Eventually, Heinemann was left with only one conclusion: that he was witnessing some form of
paranormal intelligence.
I THINK WE’VE BEAT THIS HORSE TO DEATH. NOW THE “LIGHT OF LIFE”
– THE ENERGY THAT ANIMATES DNA IS SUPER CONDUCTING ENERGY –
PHOTONS / ANUs – 2-D ENERGY. THE EVIDENCE OF THAT IS
MOUNTAINOUS – WITH LUCK I’LL GET TIME TO WRITE IT UP.