A L S L: Grarian AWS AND Ocial Egislation
A L S L: Grarian AWS AND Ocial Egislation
A L S L: Grarian AWS AND Ocial Egislation
B. Constitutional Provisions
1) Agricultural Land
2) Agrarian Dispute
3) Farmer
4) Farmworker
Types of farmworker
1) Police Power
2) Eminent Domain
Related Jurisprudence:
Association of Small Landowners in the
Philippines vs. Secretary of Agrarian Reform,
G.R. No. 78742
Luz Farms vs. Secretary of Agrarian Reform,
G.R. No. 86889
A. Agricultural Tenancy
1) Elements
1 | Pag e
Related Jurisprudence:
Cayetano and Tiongson, et al. vs. Court of
Appeals, et al., G.R. No. L – 62626
Stanfilco Employees Agrarian Reform
Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative vs.
DOLE Philippines, G.R. No. 154048
Mendoza vs. Germino, G.R. No. 165676
Related Jurisprudence:
Talavera vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 77830
Milestone Realty and Co., Inc. vs. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 135999
Villaviza, et al. vs. Panganiban, et al., G.R. No.
L – 19760
4) Share Tenancy
A. Legal Provisions
B. Modes of Acquisition
Related Jurisprudence:
Roxas and Co., Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 127876
2 | Pag e
Hacienda Luisita Case (Corporate Landowners:
Stock Distribution Option – read with Section
31, R.A. No. 6657, as amended)
C. Retention Rights
Related Jurisprudence:
Natalia Realty vs. Department of Agrarian
Reform, G.R. No. 103302
A. Definition
Related Jurisprudence:
Hacienda Luisita vs. Presidential Agrarian
Reform Council, G.R. No. 171101
B. Land Valuation
Related Jurisprudence:
Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Natividad,
G.R. No. 127198
Lubrica vs. Land Bank of the Philippines, G.R.
No. 170220
Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Court of
Appeals and Pedro Yap, G.R. No. 118712
V. LAND REDISTRIBUTION
1) Qualified Beneficiaries
3 | Pag e
2) Distribution Limit
3) Award Ceiling
Related Jurisprudence:
Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Palmares, G.R.
No. 192890
C. Indefeasibility of Titles
Related Jurisprudence:
Estribillo, et al., vs. Department of Agrarian
Reform and Hacienda Maria, Inc., G.R. No.
159674
Related Jurisprudence:
Tangub vs. Court of Appeals, UDK No. 9864
4 | Pag e
PART II – SOCIAL LEGISLATION
5 | Pag e