OD Final Report - ONGC - Group 2
OD Final Report - ONGC - Group 2
OD Final Report - ONGC - Group 2
As said by management guru Peter F. Drucker “good organization structure does not, by itself, produce
good performance, but a poor organization structure makes good performance impossible, no matter how
good the individual may be.”, success of any organization depends on effectiveness of decentralization of
authority, control over power sources, flexibility and adaptability with changing technology & business
environment, adaptability with changing customer demand and development and engagement of its
employees in core operation. With rapidly changing global business environment, it is very critical to study
how & why some of the business giants are falling or how rest are coping with. How a typical organization
deals with various issues of globalization, communication, cultural diversity, internal conflict, environmental
uncertainty and satisfies multiple stakeholders and grows further, is the focus of this study.
Why ONGC?
ONGC is the 2nd largest company worldwide among global Exploration & Production (E&P) companies, just
after China National Offshore Oil Corporation. With increasing conflict in South China Sea and Arctic
region over natural resources, mostly oil and gas, it is very critical for Indian business and international
relations, that the flagship Indian company deal with global uncertainties and change its structure to be at par
with the competitors. ONGC has a significant role to play in both domestic and international energy strategy
of India. Thus, while ONGC produces only a small amount of the world’s energy and controls a small
portion of global reserves, it figures as a central entity in the search for energy by one of the fastest growing
consumers of oil and gas in the world, i.e India. ONGC’s performance will affect India’s energy-related
plans for the future. Thus, besides the importance of ONGC for its own sake, the importance of ONGC in the
eyes of the Indian government is very critical.
ONGC, a Maharatna company, the most valued public sector company and the most dominant oil and gas
producer in India, is one of the best available organizations to study organizational restructuring. In a
negative environment of decreasing resource base, stricter regulations on Carbon footprint & tumbling oil
prices across the world, ONGC has restructured and showed its capability to plan and adapt quickly and
appropriately in a challenging environment to remain competitive with operational efficiency & financial
figures.
ONGC is one of the state owned Maharatna integrated oil & gas corporate. It is mainly focused on E&P,
refining, LNG, power, petrochemicals. ONGC produces 1.24 million barrels of oil & oil equivalent natural
gas per day, it’s refining 12.6MMTPA and extracting 3.2 MMTPA of LPG, Naptha etc from gas on an
average. It supplies 70% of domestic crude production.
It is a fully integrated oil and gas company catering to exploration and production activities. The various
functional units are drilling, well completions, workover operations on well, objects testing & well
stimulation, reservoir flow studies, health, safety and environment, etc.
Not only in India, ONGC is engaged in exploration & production in 20 countries and 41 projects.
The company has been ranked 183rd in Forbes Global 2000 list and has been featured as “Most Admired
Energy Companies List” in Forbes.
Commission Structure:
The first organizational structure outline of ONGC was drawn on the Russian report prepared under
leadership of Mr. N. A. Kalinin in 1954. The structure adopted by Govt. of India was functional or
departmental structure in 1956. This structure helped govt. to ensure maximum utilization of financial
resources and increased operational efficiency and developed functional skills.
But it failed to inculcate a work culture and sense of ownership among the employees. Also, the organization
suffer from “Red tapism”. Lack of decentralization and decision-making capability was affecting its business
flexibility. Changing of structure became evident due to increased scale of business and complexity of labor-
management problems.
Statutory body:
To make the authority more accountable & bring more involvement and efficiency, it moved to statutory
corporation structure by special act of parliament in 1959. This structure reduce day to day decision making
dependency on govt. and more freedom in terms of planning, promoting, organizing and implementing of
projects. As a public corporation, ONGC enjoyed financial freedom but for any capital expenditure beyond
limit as mentioned in the act, it was bound to take approval from govt.
But ONGC as a statutory corporation failed to exploit its full freedom due to impending political and
administrative interference from ruling parties. As correctly said by Prof. Marshall Edward Dimock
“administrative formulae and management principles are rarely if ever capable of immunization against
group pressures and public policy controls, which bend administration to their own design, sometimes in
conformity with what the impartial experts consider sound principles and practice but just as often in
knowing disregard of such considerations.” Its also failed to efficiently apply its main principle of combining
business to public service rather than profitability of stakeholders. The structure also created transparency
problem, as a statutory corporation it was only answerable to parliament which created the gap.
Functional Matrix based Structure:
Prior to 1971, organization structure of ONGC was director based. But as ONGC was evolving as one of the
biggest oil and gas exploration company of south-east Asia and was moving upward in its, it was very critical
to improve organizational structure. As per recommendation of Malviya Committee in 1971, the company
moved towards a project-based structure. Functions were regrouped into Exploration, drilling, operation and
production. Re-grouping was done on a common basin approach.
With increasing uncertainty in oil & gas business, new private entrants in market, technological
development, changing business environment, need for further organization structure development became
eminent. It needed to be more customer focused and market adaptable. The ’91 economic stress also made a
huge effect. Low efficiency, productivity and profitability and critical oil crisis due to gulf war aggravated
the situation. Main focus for this restructuring was to enhance public accountability and maximize possible
utilization of resources and reduce political and administrative influence.
In February 1994, the oil and natural gas commission was changed to oil and natural gas corporation and was
incorporated as a public limited company, led to much better flexibility both in term of policies and structure.
ONGC became more adaptable in collaboration with foreign parties.
The ever increasing import dependence needed newer sedimentary basins to be opened for production. In
order to bring in international experience and enhance competitiveness, the blocks were put to auction. The
objective was to bring in newer blocks under production.
a. Bidding for new blocks, open business to other players apart from ONGC & OIL
b. Standardization of fiscal and contract terms for all companies
c. Independence in marketing of crude oil and gas produced in India
S W O T
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
Unrivaled supply pool Skills for key activities Easier licensing policies Dynamic global price
of skilled Indian like exploration and leading to introduction of changes
scientists and reservoir management is independents
technicians fragmented abruptly
Privileged access to Weak commercial focus With the converge of Indian crude oil demand
quality acreage within on reserve accretion service company and outpaces supply quantity
India and lagging operating roles,Majors
internationally and NOCs are reorganised
around assets.
● MDTs consist of one representative from each of the above mentioned functional groups.
● These specially introduced teams are optimally sized and represent all disciplines needed to perform
the desired task.
● These are self directed with leaders and managers serving as enablers.
● They are focused by clearly self generated goals and objectives which have management inputs and
agreement.
● They promote cross functional solutions and inputs.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
FROM TO
Overall objective Maximise production volume Maximise economic value and reserve accretion
Organisational Ministry of petroleum and To MOP & NG, financial institutions, other
accountability natural gas (MOP & NG) shareholders, alliance partners
Culture of ONGC
The various facets of cultural elements of an organization are as shown in the figure below.
Rites and
Ceremonies
Stories
Symbols and
Myths
Organization
al Culture
Organizational Power
Structures Relationships
Control
System
Rites to Passage
Motivational Stories
There are motivational stories about NB Prasad. Mr. Nuthakki Bhanu Prasad, was appointed as the chairman
of the ONGC in 1974, a position he held till 1978. He was a phenomenal geo-scientist who played an
important role in finding Basin Satellite and marginal fields like D1 field, a field in Bombay High. In honour
of him, the field is named as NBP field.
The daily production of D1 field is 32k barrels of oil per day. This has helped sustain the overall production
as the Bombay High fields are brown fields whose productions are declining continuously. This is the 1 st
time when a field has been named after a person to glorify the contributions of person towards the
organisation.
Symbols
It has been mandatory for the key executives and the top level managers to wear upon their person the
ONGC logo at all times during video conferences, board meetings, public appearances and internal meetings
as well. This is to instill a sense of pride among the employees as energy soldiers of the nation and the
sacrifices and the valuable contribution they make for the country. ONGC has come up with green buildings
at Delhi, Dehradun and Mumbai, towards its aim of designing sustainable office spaces. These spaces have
30% lesser energy requirement with design incorporating natural light penetration.
Power relationship
Since the core operation of ONGC revolves around drilling and production, these two verticals are quite
powerful and very formalised based primarily on their contribution to the organisation. The supporting
department such as reservoir, geophysics, cementing and mud-services aid and advice the core departments.
The fringe functions such as HR, Finance, Corporate communication augment the organisational functioning.
Earlier in the pre-NELP era, the competition in the market was very low. But the NELP policy of the
government made the market competitive. To cope up with the competition, there was a need for the
company to restructure as per the changing environment and the change was also required in the culture and
the recruitment policy. Being a government organization, ONGC had a bureaucratic culture in the past. But,
then it moved towards the mission culture since it became a maharatna company.
2018-2022
18128 people retire
4000
18000
To fill this gap, many junior executives were promoted. They got an opportunity to share bigger
responsibilities at an early stage. ONGC’s policy of promoting Graduate Trainees to senior level managers
was revised due to a dearth of senior level managers. The company introduced a policy of lateral hiring. But
every solution comes for a cost. The problem with this was, the laterally hired managers didn’t know the
problems that the employees face at the lower level. Earlier, the senior managers who were promoted to that
stage went through the stages and they knew the problems that their subordinates will be facing.
Before Implementation
One of the most valuable resources for any organization is information, it is more so for an oil company.
ONGC spanned across 10 countries outside India and it wanted to implement IT control system for
streamlining the Supply chain management and inventory control business processes so that all the pertinent
information regarding the business core operations is available in one place.
Earlier ONGC used a legacy system for planning and implementation. They used hardware of HP, Compaq,
IBM, and Sun. The operating system used were Microsoft Win NT, Sun Solaris and open source operating
system UNIX. The database employed was Oracle.
Challenges Faced
The migration to a different control system of IT control was not going to be easy due to a variety of factors.
The biggest hurdle was collation and consolidation of operational data which was huge. Also, the entire
process was time-consuming. The amount of data that had to be migrated from earlier legacy systems to the
new system was immense. Hundreds if business processes for thousands of users had to be standardized for
both onshore and offshore locations. While this migration to the new system was taking place, it could not
upset the existing operations. All this had to be done in a very stringent timeline of 30 months, which also
included the stabilization process.
Implementation of ICE
With the above-mentioned challenges kept in mind, a project named ICE (Information Consolidation for
Efficiency) was started. The organization as a whole is a single entity and hence the data available to it must
be uniform, the information provided must also be the same across various entities. Hence the motto of this
project was “One organization, One Data, One Information”. ERP package was introduced whose main aim
was to provide real-time information thereby eliminating duplicate activities and hence improving the overall
profitability of the organization by providing better control to the management team. State of the art
technology SCADA was used to leverage productivity by providing real-time information. A separate budget
of about one thousand crores was set aside to invest in IT, along with an additional ninety-five crores to be
spent in towards SAP implementation.
SHRAMIK KUBER
(SAP) (SAP)
EPINET Oracle
Integration
of
Information
ICE Project
By SAP
Implementation
As a result of all the above mentioned considerations, a deal worth nineteen million US dollars was signed
between SAP India and ONGC for implementation of the project ICE, which was the largest consulting deal
for SAP Asia Pacific and it would be the largest ERP project in Asia as it would cater to eight thousand and
five hundred users. The deal was to provide a comprehensive IT-enabled system to ONGC.
Plan
The plan was to implement a lot of SAP solutions including mySAP Business Suite, SAP Strategic
Enterprise Management application, SAP portal and SAP Business Information Warehouse component. This
entire project would also integrate the existing human resource and financial packages of Shramik and
Kuber, respectively already provided earlier by SAP. This solution was intended to support ONGC’s major
operations like maintenance, procurement, finance, logistics and would also help in monitoring key
performance parameters.
The project started in 2000 and it went live in 2004. The western offshore business division was one of the
first places where this extensive ERP project was made live. The places which were the hardest like
production and drilling were chosen to go live with first. Hence, the most challenging task was to make the
transition at these offshore and onshore drilling places. The project also involved the transfer of knowledge
about operations of the implemented system to the thousands of users of the system. This transfer of
knowledge was critical to the success of the project and it was done with the utmost care by the SAP
consultants.
References:
1) Cases in Strategic management by Mital
2) Public Sector Reforms in India: A Case Study of ONGC By A. B. Singh
3) Mackenzie: Corporate Restructuring project report
4) Business Process restructuring report by ABB & SAP