ArbitrationPetition Sahil Brothers
ArbitrationPetition Sahil Brothers
ArbitrationPetition Sahil Brothers
COURT,DELHI
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
Versus
7. STATEMENT OF FACTS:
construction work.
A.
annum from the date they were due to Applicant till the date
B.
remit the payment even after the legal notice and repeated
“Arbitration
If any disputes or differences arise between the
Owner and the Contractor in relation to or out of
this Contract, the same shall be referred to the
arbitration of two arbitrators, one each to be
appointed by the Owner and the Contractor. The
provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 shall
apply for such arbitration. The decision so given
shall be final and binding upon the parties
hereto”.
14. It was further submitted by the Applicant in the legal
reply that he have deducted the TDS, but as per law the
arbitration.
17. It was further stated by the Applicant in their legal
suggest the name of their arbitrator and also refer all the
herewith as Annexure-D.
21. That till today even after the lapse of considerable time
Company.
Order/Agreement.
23. That the Applicant has not filed any other or similar
25. The Applicant also submits that this Hon’ble Court has
PRAYER
graciously pleased to :
Respondent Company;
case.
VERIFICATION:
be true.
APPLICANT
BEFORE THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE ,TIS HAZARI
COURT,DELHI
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
MEMO OF PARTIES
Versus
FILED BY:
April , 2005
BEFORE THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE ,TIS HAZARI COURT,
DELHI
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
Versus
7. STATEMENT OF FACTS:
construction work.
Annexure-A.
Annexure-B.
item 18. The true copy of the legal notice dated 29.7.2003 is
No.1 are inclusive of work done for item No.18 also and no
separate charges were payable for the work done under item
herewith as Annexure-D.
under
Annexure-E.
“Arbitration
If any disputes or differences arise between the Owner
and the Contractor in relation to or out of this Contract,
the same shall be referred to the arbitration of two
arbitrators, one each to be appointed by the Owner and
the Contractor. The provisions of the Indian Arbitration
Act, 1940 shall apply for such arbitration. The decision
so given shall be final and binding upon the parties
hereto”.
2,52,100/- against Item. No. 18, but it was alleged that the same is
contractor to keep the construction work site free from water at its
own costs.
as our client did the Job work after digging out the earth
where the water already stand i.e. 3 ponds and other water
areas. Whereas the Applicant is entitled to get the amount for
notice that as now the dispute has arisen as per the terms
the parties.
adjudication.
by Applicant.
17. That till today even after the lapse of considerable time
20. The Applicant submits that in the light of the facts and
23. That the Applicant has not filed any other or similar
Petition earlier before this Hon’ble Court or any other court
praying the same relief as in the present Petition.
24. The Applicant also submits that this Hon’ble Court has
all the necessary territorial jurisdiction to entertain the
present Petition. It is irrelevant to state that the parties had
mutually decided to subject all differences and/or disputes
arising between them to the court in New Delhi [Clause 19 of
the Work Order/Agreement].
PRAYER
attitude.
[d] Pass any other or such further order/s as may be deemed fit
case.
VERIFICATION:
be true.
APPLICANT
BEFORE THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE ,TIS HAZARI
COURT,DELHI
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
ARB. P. NO. OF 2005
3. ANNEXURE-A
The Work Order/Agreement along with 11 – 47
terms and conditions dated 14.5.2001.
4. ANNEXURE-B 48 – 59
The true copy of the bill dated 15.11.2001.
5. ANNEXURE-C
The true copy of the legal notice dated 60 – 61
29.7.2003.
6. ANNEXURE-D 62 – 64
The true copy of the reply dated 27.8.2003.
7. ANNEXURE-E 65 – 67
The true copy of the Legal Notice dated
1.7.2004.
8. Vakalatnama B
FILED BY:
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
MEMO OF PARTIES
Versus
FILED BY:
April , 2005
BEFORE THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE ,TIS HAZARI
COURT,DELHI
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
ARB. P. NO. OF 2005
Versus
3 ANNEXURE-A
The true copy of the legal notice dated 12 – 14
8.8.2003
4 ANNEXURE-B
The true copy of the reply dated 27.8.2003 15 – 17
to the legal notice dated 8.8.2003.
5 ANNEXURE-C
The true copy of the Legal Notice dated 18 – 20
1.7.2004
6 ANNEXURE-D
True Copy of the reply dated 16.9.2004. 21 – 23
7 Vakalatnama B
FILED BY: