Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    Facts:: Filipina Sy v. Court of Appeals, G. R. No. 127263, April 12, 2000

    Uploaded by

    rhod leyson
    Filipina Sy filed for annulment of her marriage to Fernando Sy on the grounds that the marriage was void from the beginning due to lack of a valid marriage license. The couple obtained their marriage license on September 17, 1972 but did not get married until November 15, 1973, after the license had expired. The Court ruled that a marriage license is a formal requirement and its absence means the marriage is void from the start, making the issue of psychological incapacity moot.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Facts:: Filipina Sy v. Court of Appeals, G. R. No. 127263, April 12, 2000

    Uploaded by

    rhod leyson
    13 views1 page
    Filipina Sy filed for annulment of her marriage to Fernando Sy on the grounds that the marriage was void from the beginning due to lack of a valid marriage license. The couple obtained their marriage license on September 17, 1972 but did not get married until November 15, 1973, after the license had expired. The Court ruled that a marriage license is a formal requirement and its absence means the marriage is void from the start, making the issue of psychological incapacity moot.

    Original Description:

    Case Digest Filipina Sy v. Court of Appeals, G. R. No. 127263, April 12, 2000

    Original Title

    x01 Sy v. CA vs

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Filipina Sy filed for annulment of her marriage to Fernando Sy on the grounds that the marriage was void from the beginning due to lack of a valid marriage license. The couple obtained their marriage license on September 17, 1972 but did not get married until November 15, 1973, after the license had expired. The Court ruled that a marriage license is a formal requirement and its absence means the marriage is void from the start, making the issue of psychological incapacity moot.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    13 views1 page

    Facts:: Filipina Sy v. Court of Appeals, G. R. No. 127263, April 12, 2000

    Uploaded by

    rhod leyson
    Filipina Sy filed for annulment of her marriage to Fernando Sy on the grounds that the marriage was void from the beginning due to lack of a valid marriage license. The couple obtained their marriage license on September 17, 1972 but did not get married until November 15, 1973, after the license had expired. The Court ruled that a marriage license is a formal requirement and its absence means the marriage is void from the start, making the issue of psychological incapacity moot.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Filipina Sy v. Court of Appeals, G. R. No.

    127263, April 12, 2000

    FACTS:

    Filipina Sy and Fernando Sy contracted marriage on November 15, 1973 in Quezon City. On
    September 15, 1983, Fernando left the conjugal dwelling and, since then, they lived separately.
    Petitioner filed for a declaration of absolute nullity of marriage on the ground of psychological
    incapacity. It was denied. On appeal, she raised the issue of their marriage being void ab initio
    for the lack of marriage license. Their marriage license was obtained on September 17, 1972
    while their marriage was celebrated on November 15, 1973. Hence, the marriage license was
    expired already.

    ISSUE:

    W/N the marriage is valid.

    RULING:

    No. Evidence shows that there was no marriage license. A marriage license is a formal
    requirement. Its absence renders the marriage void ab initio. Issue on psychological incapacity
    is hereby mooted.

    You might also like