Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Thornton Reading 3

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Thornton’s ‘Dispositions In Action’ Reflection and Response:

(Note: Everything in r​ ed ​is adaptations due to feedback from Cameron, my critical friend)

From Thornton’s (2006) article on the effect dispositions have on practice, the key
characteristics and/or qualities I have identified as essential to being a responsive teacher are:
- Relationship centred,
- Student-learning focussed (​how and why focussed, rather than the basic who and what)
(A focus on students understanding why they are learning what they are learning, and
students understanding the how of topics),
- A desire to push students thinking, which is done through open questions that require
depth of thought,
- Trusting ​and empowering ​students to do the task, within boundaries but giving them
freedom to operate,
- Allowing student creativity to flourish,
- Focus on student agency and student voice,
- Focus on student ​to student​ collaboration,
- Teacher and student cooperation,
- Willingness to relinquish ‘authority’ to allow student voice.

In light of these identified qualities,​ the ​an​ aspect​s​ that I would struggle with is “student-learning
focussed” ​as opposed to transmission focussed​. I ​do not know​ am unsure as to​ what that looks
like across the different year levels, and how to do it effectively. I have nothing to base it off, so
it is a daunting thing. ​Another aspect of the “student-learning focussed” teaching is ​I also
struggle with​ student-teacher collaborative ​and cooperative​ success criteria, as, again, I do not
know what that looks like, how to do it effectively, how much guidance the teacher gives. I want
to see this in practice.
Despite my personal feelings about these aspects, I am willing to learn and give them a try. This
links in with an aspect of the Bethlehem Tertiary Institute Graduate Profile which states that
student-teachers will be teachable, with a growth mindset. I want to have a growth mindset, and
I recognise that I will always be learning new things and ways to incorporate different learning
and teaching practices to encourage effective learning.

During a session of the Professional Inquiry, Personal Integration paper, the class broke up into
small groups and had a discussion around this Thornton article. ​From the small group
discussion in class, it became apparent that even if two teachers have the same values,
pedagogy and content knowledge, their dispositions will affect whether or not they are a
responsive teacher. This reinforces the reading as members of the group were able to identify
teachers they had had in school who made a positive impact on their lives due to their
disposition. I am challenged to try and review my disposition so that I have a positive impact on
students’ learning, as it is blatantly apparent that ​it is this that is the​ ​dispositions are the
game-changer. In light of this discussion and the reading, I am thankful that one of our
assignments for this course is the Research Report, which analyses our own teacher-talk.
Thornton talks about how the only way one’s dispositions are really evident is in the words they
use and the tone. I am excited and nervous to see what my natural dispositions are - whether
responsive or technical.

References:
Thornton, H. (2006). Dispositions in action: Do dispositions make a difference in
practice? ​Teacher Education Quarterly, 33​(2), 53-68.

You might also like