3G Key Optim
3G Key Optim
3G Key Optim
**To reduce speech and packet drop there are simply methode by Adding Neighbor Optimization using GPEH
To Reduce Speech Drop rate after 2G-3G IRAT HO Activation :
Parameter Default Recommendation Units
QSC 7 8
MRSL 16 30
ISHOLEV 99 50
Channel switching parameter tuning that have high PS drop due to FACH congestion (pmNoCellFachDisconnectAbnorm)
PS compressed mode threshold standardization, previous setting is too low so IRAT CC would be very difficult to trigger :
Parameter Default Recommendation Units
serviceOffset2dRscp for ueRc PS -50 0
serviceOffset2dEcNo for ueRc PS -20 0
Congestion control strategy change, the strategy is to disable speech call termination during congestion
minPwrMax and minPwrRl, objective is to give more power per radio link to increase retainability both on PS and Speech.
Drawback would be higher cell power utilization, so need to monitor cells congestion due to power and CSSR.
Parameter Default Recommendation Units
minPwrRl -150 -120
minPwrMax 0 15
Improvement for reducing PS Drop after change parameter value of “rateSelectionPsInteractive_dlPrefRate” from 64 to 16 kbps
Parameter Default Recommendation Units
rateSelectionPsInteractive_dlPrefRate 64 16 Kbps
HSDPA drop rate has been improved after optimize RNC parameter downSwitchTimer and downswitchTimerThreshold to higher value in orde
RNBDG03 commonly has power issue since still many RBS using 20W output power then downswitch to R99 maybe failed due to power admis
Improvement in PS Services has been notice to happened mainly in RNBDG03. PS R99 and HSDPA drop rate has been improved after 2nd carr
Previous improvement on HSDPA drop and trafffic has been made after change channel switching parameters on RNC level (downswitchtimer
Parameter Default Recommendation Units
downswitchtimer 50 30
downswitchtimerthreshold 10 0
After 2nd Carrier Implementations
Besides improvement after integration of 78 2nd carrier cells in RNBDG03 at 3 February 2012, some degradation in SHO success rate has bee
Degraded SHO success rate impacted in speech drop caused by SOHO and speech drop due to congestion has been identifed to be degraded
Planned (and some actions has been taken) to re audite utran relation, includes inter freq. and intra freq. also review congestion resolving para
RNIMY01 shows very good improvement on accessibility in PS and CS services indicstes by increasing RRC success for both PS and CS.
Improvement has been made after admission parameters adjustment related to congestion resolving to reduce rejection due to Lack DL Power,
After conducting consistency check on IRAT relation RNBDG02 and implemented on Feb 13, significant improvement happened at IRAT CS & P
In the other side number of IRAT attempt (CS+PS) considerable declined which good to reduce signaling processing @RNC MP Load.
The idea of reducing MP Load in each of RNC GPB boards, has been realized in trial of RNC MP load balancing by forcing RNC to re-allocate Iub
This trial has been worked for made load more evenly distributed between subracks and reduce RRC rejection MP load caused significantly.
PrimaryCpichPower is constant power used to transmit common pilot channel, which affected in WCDMA signal strength experienced by custo
The decision of increasing 1148 cell’s primary CpichPower to 330 has been verified as good improvement in customer experience in signal stre
DT result is shows several bad RSCP spot improved well inside Bandung City.
RRC Improvement,
Improvement Auxiliary
has been madeUnit
fromRedefined
several sites that indicating degradation of traffic handling ability. This cases has been identified after we
We found unequality of voltage in branch A and branch B (diversity) and it is suspect some auxiliary unit hasn’t been recognized by RBS, this
Severeal sites has been solved, as example (graphics) 3G JAMIKA, 3G CIPENDEUY & 3G CIGANITRI BANDUNG, as can be seen if the RRC conn
VIP
VIP complain
complain in
in one
one of
of XL’s
XL’s dealer
dealer very low HSDPA
has been treatedaccesibility and complain
well. User was retainability
about very low HSDPA accesibility and retainability, the main serv
Investigations has outcome with recommendations of reconfiguring aal2path definition (still ATM), since we found some inconsistency definitio
The result was surprisingly significant in PS drop rate, and the user experience should be much better after this troubleshooting.
After RAC value has been added, specified cells had function normally and absorb R99 and PS HS traffic (traffic significant increased)
After RAC value has been added, PS R99 and PS HS Drop Call Rate has declined to proper level
Beside PS Traffic and DCR had improved, set proper RAC value also improved cell reselection success rate (improve mobility user perceived r
CR batch I not sufficient enough to overcome the problem and therefore CR batch II implemented and the result successfully to reduce conges
Improvement of RRC Total success rate of RNC has been experienced available problem and has been noticed has abnormal behaviour and ba
1. primarycpichpower
2. pwradm & pwroffset
DL Code congestion treatment :
1. Dlcodeadm
2. numspdschcodes
RAB failed due to Lack DL power which improved RRC reject due MP load
Adjustment of admission control parameters mainly for DL Tx Power has been succesfully reduced the number of RAB failed
Counter Related :
- pmNoFailedRabEstAttemptLackDlPwr
- pmNoRejRrcConnMpLoadC
After insertion of additional GP Boards @RNC on Feb 01 - 23:00, MP Load has reduced almost 10%. Monitoring will be continued to see further
After insertion of additional GP Boards @RNC, hourly performance monitoring showed that Paging Success Rate has improved as seen on the
ADCH POWER OPTIMIZATION
The power offset parameters control the relative power of the DPCCH in the transmission
There are 3 different parameters:
- pO1, TFCI power offset
- pO2, TPC power offset
- pO3, Pilot power offset
fficult to trigger :
PS and Speech.
merThreshold to higher value in order to keep HSDPA traffic more longer rather than downswitched to R99 which consume more power
R99 maybe failed due to power admission limit. HSDPA traffic is improved well.
ate has been improved after 2nd carrier implementation on 28 sites which resulting 78 new F2 Cells.
eters on RNC level (downswitchtimer (50 >> 30) and downswitchtimerthreshold (10 >> 0)).
radation in SHO success rate has been identified.
on has been identifed to be degraded as well.
also review congestion resolving parameters (tmcongaction & releaseasedl )
eservation with intention to make RNC to choose better new subrack with lesser load.
pmNoSystemRabReleasePacket.
is cases has been identified after we did some trial to activating antenna system’s supervision in RBS.
hasn’t been recognized by RBS, this symptom began from DT experiences (no RRC setup).
DUNG, as can be seen if the RRC connect Success Rate significantly improved after auxiliary unit redefined in RBS.
sibility and retainability, the main serving cell was 3G SUKASARI that known as the most PS drop worstcell in RNBDG03.
symptom was customer complain about SOS state even in very good coverage of sector 3.
result successfully to reduce congestion and improve RRC success rate for contributor cells
oticed has abnormal behaviour and back to normal after reset the RBS
been escalated
ve "in sync" frames have been received, a "Radio Link failure" has occurred, and the UE goes to idle. The current setting is 3 seconds
t Update Failure before the system releases the call. Currently set to 5 seconds
500 to 1000
0 to 4
10 to 30
256 to 512
8
0
20
6
8
10
Remarks
enable chswitch in UL
bytes threshold upswitch from FACH to HS, set to 500 if RNC have cells with FACH congested
kbps threshold for downswitch from HS/DCH to FACH, can be set to 0 if RNC have cells with FACH congested
bytes threshold upswitch from FACH to HS, set to 256 if RNC have cells with FACH congested
BACKGROUND :
2nd carrier progress status
* Based on latest kget dump (28 Oct 2011):
- Number of Sites in Jabo = 2064
- 1 carrier sites = 94
- 2 carrier sites = 1970
95,4 % sites have been configured with 2 carrier
* Existing Traffic Management strategy was introduced at beginning of 2nd carrier implementation
* Dual Carrier Traffic Management should be evaluated based on current status and traffic profile
Unbalanced utilization F1 / F2
* Existing layering strategy managed to balance HS traffic between 2 carrier (F1 : F2 cells ~ 48% : 52%), as consequence of aggressive HS IFLS from F1
* FACH traffic is still concentrated in F1 (63%), as existing setting still limits F2 idle coverage. FACH drop rate is observed higher in F1, mostly due to cong
* Common case: once finished a session, an HS user in F2 perform FACH reselection to F1, then when another session starts, it is back to F2 through HS
* Speech is mainly concentrated in F1, as existing traffic management strategy prioritize F2 to be used for HS traffic, while speech + R99 traffic are carried
* Speech drop call rate is observed to be higher at F2, lower number of attempt in F2 can be the main reason, another reason can be neighbor definition t
Existing STRATEGY
slight improvement (0.04%) on accessibility, for both speech Congestion event reduced by 16%, both car
and PS utilized
22% relative PS Drop Call Rate improvement, mostly Balanced FACH traffic between F1/F2, less
contributed by HS drop improvement and FACH drop congestion, distributed load
improvement
Result Packet data (PS) traffic trend MORE USERS ON 3G AND BETTER HS EXPERIENCE
16% FACH erlang traffic increment, indicates more users camp 46% HSDPA traffic volume increment, indica
on 3G during idle mode longer in 3G, more satisfied users to use HS
16% FACH erlang traffic increment, indicates more users camp 46% HSDPA traffic volume increment, indica
on 3G during idle mode longer in 3G, more satisfied users to use HS
Result load sharing & compressed mode activity LESS SIGNALING, LESS IRAT TO GSM
76% IFLS activity reduction, while HS IFLS success rate slightly 48% Compressed Mode time reduction, i
improved, it indicates more efficient signaling GSM
BETTER 3G PENETRATION
CLEANER EC/NO AT BOTH CARRIER
REMARKS
Used in XL:
HSCS = HSDPA Cell Selection
IFHO = Inter-Frequency Hand Over
IRAT HO/CC = Inter-Radio Access Technology HO/Cell Change
* iflsHyst
- Current Value: RAB_EST_OR_UPSWITCH_ATT
- Trial Value: RAB_EST
- Description: Configures which RAB switches that can trigger load sharing.
Also applies to non-HSPA load sharing. RAB_EST: Trigger at RAB establishment only; UPSWITCH_ATT: Trigger at upswitch attempts caused by chann
Note that this value will disable non-HSPA load sharing since this feature is only triggered by RAB establishment; RAB_EST_OR_UPSWITCH_ATT: Tri
Expected Result
- Reduced number of IFLS HS / Non HS
- HS / Non HS remains balanced between F1 and F2
- Slight improvement on HS IFLS success rate and DCH IFLS success rate
- Slight improvement in terms of retainability and accessibility
Recommended Value Recommended Range
0 -30 to 30
0 -30 to 30
Looking at current traffic distribution between F1 and F2, there are still some
room for improvements, most of traffic including HS are still concentrated in
F1.
BETWEEN F1 AND F2
F1 and F2 carriers
SPEECH
CESSIBILITY
NABILITY, BALANCED F1 / F2
EMENT
F2 Parameter
DEFAULT
RNC UtrCell uarfcnDl compModeAdm qQualMin qRxLevMin
RNBKS01 345JK3G211074 10788 15 -18 -109
AFTER
qQualMin qRxLevMin sRatSearch
-18 2
-18 2
-18 2
2
2
2
-109 2
-109 2
-109 2
cell carrier
cell carrier
Sectors
URA design & execution
TC2
RNBDG03> lpr ura
PS DCR =100*(pmNoSyste
pmNoSystemRabReleaseP
(pmChSwitchAttemptFachU
pmChSwitchSuccFachUra)
(pmNoNormalRabReleaseP
leasePacket
-pmNoNormalRabRelease
pmNoSystemRabReleaseP
+pmChSwitchSuccFachUra
PS DCR =100*(pmNoSystemRabReleasePacket-
pmNoSystemRabReleasePacketUra-
(pmChSwitchAttemptFachUra-
pmChSwitchSuccFachUra)/
(pmNoNormalRabReleasePacket+pmNoSystemRabRe
leasePacket
-pmNoNormalRabReleasePacketUra-
pmNoSystemRabReleasePacketUra
+pmChSwitchSuccFachUra)
Paging Success Rate below 99% on busy hours. Two steps of rebalancing been taken and the goal achieved
wever still below target which is 99% on busy hours. Within 2 steps of rebalancing the goal achieved
29015
EUL ACTIVATION MONITORING
RNBDG01, RNBDG02, RNIMY01 & RNPWK01, EUL execution was done on May 4th around 12 am.
EUL volume has increased significantly
Accessibility is maintained.
Retainability is maintained, except RNIMY01 suspected due to decreased availability
UL RSSI is maintained
Accessibility
Retainability
Summary
- Majority of the cells now have primaryCpichPower set to 327 (32.7dbm)
- CSSR CS, CSSR PS & HS maintained
- Drop Call Rate CS slightly increased & DCR PS slightly improved
- CQI value is maintained
- HS MAC & User Throughput maintained
- In general traffic volume maintained, except HS traffic slightly declined
- CE Utilization for both DL and UL maintained
- 3G penetration on normal mode increased after NCCR execution
Accesbility
CSSR CS, CSSR PS & HS maintained
Retainability
Drop Call Rate CS slightly increased & DCR PS slightly improved
Average CQI
Average CQI maintained, around 19
Throughput
HS MAC & User Throughput maintained
TRAFFIC
In general traffic maintained, except HS traffic slightly declined
CE Utilization
CE Utilization for both DL and UL maintained
RSCP plot (Lock 3G – Dedicated) --> RSCP performance slightly degraded after NCCR execution
ECNO plot (Lock 3G – Dedicated) --> EcNo performance slightly degraded after NCCR execution
Idle Mode Technology --> 3G penetration on normal mode increased after NCCR execution
Activities COVERAGE ENHANCEMENT TRIAL
TRIAL RESULT
- There is no side impact after reference point moving from antenna (A) to top of cabinet (B)
- EcNo and RSCP from drive test are improved, 3G penetration is also significantly improved
- CQI statistics are improved by 0.6 points
- All the cells now have primaryCpichPower set to 339 (8.5% of the total output power)
- Accessibility is improved during trial, CSSR CS improved from 98.7% to 99.1%, CSSR HS improved from 99.1% to 99.5%
- Drop Call Rate after trial is improved, DCR PS improved from 1.25% to 0.8%, while DCR Speech improved from 2% to 1.1%
- Mac HS Throughput improved after coverage enhancement test case 2 is applied, Throughput is increased from 1140 kbps to 1220 kbps
- Power utilization is increased from 28% (before) to 34% (TC2), but no power congestion observed
- CE Utilization for both DL and UL is maintained
- Traffic is maintained during coverage enhancement trial, high external interference is limiting traffic to go up
RECOMMENDATION
- Apply 0 feeder attenuation for both macro and IBS sites
- Increase cpich power allocation up to 8.5% by setting primaryCpichPower 339 across network with RU 30 watt / cell carrier
- Set maximumTransmissionPower equal to reported maxDlPowerCapability
- Cpich power can be further increase to 350 (35 dB) by implementing dual RUW (2 x 40 watt)
Split RAC into 3 RACs was successful to increase Paging Success Rate significantly and paging attempt was reduced significant as well.
The good impact of paging improvement was speech, PS R99 and HSDPA traffic increased since successful paging will obtain traffic that lost when
Previously RAC under RNBDG03 was split from 1 RAC into 3 RAC and helps Paging Success Rate improved significantly from level 70% to more th
In the other side, number of Paging Re-Attempt declined thanks to disappearing number of Paging Rejection and contribute to reduced MP Load @R
KPI Improvement after RAC Splitting
Decreasing number of Paging Attempt also bring positive impact to lessening MP Load @RNBDG03 and make RRC rejection due to Mp Load not ex
Other KPI improvement after RAC Splitting that monitored were Drop Call improvement, especially on HSDPA Drop Call Rate
lion attempt (dominated by 90% PS Paging) while RNBDG03 only has 1 RAC.
it was decided to split RNBDG03’s RAC into 3 RAC : 50, 52 and 53 (current RAC).
ed significant as well.
will obtain traffic that lost when no paging answered.
antly from level 70% to more than 90% and stay stable.
ntribute to reduced MP Load @RNBDG03
rejection due to Mp Load not exist anymore.
No Behaviour Problem Description
1 Call set-up failure Poor coverage area If problem is poor coverage, this means poor RSCP (<-
95 dBm) thus also the EcNo derades very rapidly (< -12
Call drop dB) when the coverage border is reached.
2 Call set-up failure Poor dominance area. No main server in the area, too many cells with weak
CPICH level.
Call drop
CPICH EcNo is usually very bad even the RSCP is good
e.q. RSCP –80…-90 dBm but EcNo about –10 dB
3 Call set-up failure Pilot Pollution Bad CPICH Ec/Io (<-12 dB) level although CPICH RSCP
level is good. High site in the neighbourhood may cause
Call drop interference.
4 Dropped call/SHO failure Missing neighbour A good usable neighbour is present within cells
coverage area, can cause DL interference if it is not in
the active set.
5 Call set-up Failure High PrxTotal due to UL The PrxTotal level is significantly higher than expected in
External interference no/low load conditions.
Call drop
MHA settings should be checked, see more in reference
[7]
6 Call set-up failure High Prxtotal due to The PrxTotal level is significantly higher than expected in
Installation problems no/low load conditions.
Call drop
7 Cell set-up failure Bad RRC connection RRC connection set-up complete message not heard by
set-up success rate due BTS.
to slow Ue cell
reselection
8 Long call set-up time Long time interval for The value of Parameter N312 is too high: maximum
sync between RNC and number of “in sync” indications received from L1 during
BTS before connection the establishment of a physical channel
9 Dropped call SHO to wrong cell will Overshooting cell come temporarily into active set and
cause drop call. forces a suitable serving cell to be dropped out. Later
RSCP suddenly drops in the “wrong cell” and causes a
dropped call because there is no neighbour defined.
10 Dropped call Cell suffering from UL As the UE Tx power is not enough for target cell
interference = DL synchronisation, the SHO fails which will cause call drop
(CPICH) coverage later.
much bigger than UL
coverage
11 Dropped call DL CPICH coverage <> Cell with lower CPICH power than the surrounding is
having “too good” UL performance, as this cells’ UL
cannot be used efficiently due to SHO is decided upon
DL (CPICH Ec/No).
12 Dropped call Round the corner effect The call drops due to too rapid CPICH coverage
degradation for Cell A, and therefore there is not enough
time for SHO.
13 Dropped call/SHO failure Too many neighbours In SHO area the number of combined neighbouring cells
become more than 31. HO list is created using RNC
algorithm in the final stage some of the neighbours will
randomly be removed
Possible solutions
Check Antenna line installation (antenna position and quality, cable length and quality).
Check that CPICH powers are balanced between the studied cells.
Down tilt antennas to make cells dominant and limit effects of interfering cell(s).
Add a site.
Adjust antenna bearing and down tilt or lower the antenna height (too much tilt will break the
dominance).
In case of MHA is used in BTS check MHA and cables loss parameters, otherwise PrxTotal
value will be too high.
(If MHA parameter is set to ON, Cable loss parameter is used, Cable loss = Real MHA gain =
Feeder loss parameter)
Check the antenna installation as the last alternative in high PrxNoise case.
Use Actix for checking the call set-up delay (L3 messages).
Use call set-up time optimisation feature Dynamic setting of “ActivationTimeOffset” (possible in
RAN1.5.2 ED2) enables 200 to 500ms reduction for set up delay.
Pan away overshooting cell if it is too close to the serving cell, otherwise apply down tilting as
well.
Use cell individual offset (negative value) parameter to balance the DL and UL coverage.
Check traffic direction of in-car UEs to decide which cell requires offsets.
Use cell individual offset (positive value) parameter to balance the DL and UL coverage.
Note: Cell individual offsets are not taken into account when calculating the added cell Tx
power.
Use cell individual offset (positive value) parameter to balance the DL and UL coverage.
Note: Cell individual offsets are not taken into account when calculating the added cell Tx
power.
Delete unnecessary neighbours.
Improve dominance.
PS call performance optimisation aims to maximise the data throughput. Throughput depends very much on the round trip time (RTT, delay from mo
The lower the RTT the greater the potential for higher throughput. Normally RTT is around 200ms.
Also the radio resource efficiency for certain bit rate should be optimised, such that resources will only be allocated when needed, based on the thr
It should be noted that there is no optimum parameters set to be used for all networks for maximising PS throughput, but every networks needs som
Throughput also varies with UEs types.
Below are the throughput and efficiency specific problems and solutions, although the common call performance issues also apply.
No Behaviour Problem
1 Low Throughput The User bit rate is much less than the Radio
Bearer bit rate either in DL or UL.
2 Low Throughput The User bit rate is much less than the Radio
Bearer bit rate in bi-directional file.
3 Low Throughput The User bit rate is much less than the Radio
Bearer bit rate in bi-directional file.
4 Low Throughput The User bit rate is much less than the Radio
Bearer bit rate either in DL or UL.
5 Low Throughput The User bit rate is much less than the Radio
Bearer bit rate in bi-directional file
6 Low Throughput The User bit rate is much less than the Radio
Bearer bit rate in bi-directional file
7 Low Efficiency BTS Power resources are wasted in case high bit
rates are used but throughput is low.
data throughput. Throughput depends very much on the round trip time (RTT, delay from mobile, typically through USB , connector to server and back).
oughput. Normally RTT is around 200ms.
uld be optimised, such that resources will only be allocated when needed, based on the throughput demand. This can be optimised with Dynamic Link Optimisati
set to be used for all networks for maximising PS throughput, but every networks needs some local optimisation.
ms and solutions, although the common call performance issues also apply.
Description
The reason for lower throughput problems in file transfer is in flow control between PC and
UE which could mean that TCP parameter settings are not optimum, which may cause
degradation to the throughput [10]
When uploads and downloads are occurring simultaneously then the TCP ACKs (for the
downloading) are competing with the upload traffic to get across the PPP link between the
PC and UE. This competition in combination with the flow control instigated by the UE will
delay the ACK. Depending on how big the extra delay is will depend on how much TCP will
be forced to slow down.
PC has lots of data to send in uplink direction at a rate faster than the actual radio interface
between UE and BTS (=64 kbit/s). To prevent overflow, UE turns flow control on towards PC
to stop data flow. The problem is that this stops also TCP ACK for downlink data, sent in
uplink direction. This causes downlink throughput reduction, because TCP session (=ftp) is
not receiving ACKs so quickly.
The phenomenon is bigger, if the DL data rate is faster than UL data rate.
The reason for lower throughput problems in file transfer could be wrong parameters in
server.
e throughput demand. This can be optimised with Dynamic Link Optimisation (DyLo) feature parameters.
some local optimisation.
Possible solutions
Measure throughput and RTT.
Increase TCP Window Size - RWIN in case RTT is much more than 200ms and low
throughput has been achieved.
In Windows 2000 the default value is 17520 Bytes.
There are many tools available to change the window size, for example DoctorTCP [13].
Optimal RWIN in client = 32660 B
Optimal RWIN in server = 65535 B
See more in reference [11].
Increase TCP Window Size - RWIN in case RTT is much more than 200ms and low
throughput has been got.
In Windows 2000 this has default value of 17620 Bytes.
Optimal RWIN in client = 32660 B
Optimal RWIN in server = 65535 B
See reference [11].
Increase TCP Window Size- RWIN in case RTT is much more than 200ms and low throughput
has been got.
IWindows 2000 as default value of 17620 Bytes.
Optimal RWIN in client = 32660 B
Optimal RWIN in server = 65535 B
See reference [11].
In general FTP server should be located right after the GGSN (not behind the public internet)
so it would be recommended to have test FTP server located right to the GGSN.
Adjust the PtxDLAbsMax parameter (default value 50 dBm as maximum link power, optimum
setting between 35-37dBm) to trigger DyLo earlier.
No Behaviour Problem Description
1 Dropped call Not enough DL power to maintain CS video connection needs more power to
good quality maintain the SIR target and thus also BLER
target.
2 Call set-up High PrxTotal due to UL External The PrxTotal level is significantly higher than
Failure interference expected in no/low load conditions.
Call drop
Possible solutions
Increase the max DL Radio Link power by decreasing the CPICHtoRefRaBOffset
In case the max power increment is a lot (~3dB) then the minimum power is
increased by 3dB as well which can lead to the minimum power problems (BTS
sending too much power to the UEs close to the BTS and therefore causing
problems to the UE and even dropped call)
Alternatively use spectrum analyser & directive antenna to locate interferer. Inform
operator/regulator about the found conditions.
Vendor: Huawei
Issue: Throughput limited in some sites to a lower-than-configured value
Investigation Outcome: during general checkings Ive found some sites where I couldnt explain why the IuB throughput was limited (see graph) to a value LO
asked many guys from transport network they say "nothing is wrong".
Solution: one transport engineer noted that after re-configuring the site from 4E1s to 2E1s, the MUX´s configuration was not properly reduced to 2E1s.
So many months later they reduce the config in the MUX to 2E1s and voilla!!! it seems it was stucked... who knows... now we have the 3.8Mbps expected in Iu