White Sell
White Sell
White Sell
www.elsevier.com/locate/msea
Abstract
The solidification microstructure is critical in determining the amount and distribution of porosity that develops during the
freezing of castings. As the solidification velocity Vs increases, the microstructural length scales (primary and secondary dendrite
arm spacings) decrease; thus (1) the mushy zone permeability would be expected to decrease; and (2) nucleated pores would be
increasingly isolated. Although the first effect would tend to increase the observed porosity, the second effect would tend to
decrease the porosity. To better understand these competitive mechanisms, a series of controlled unidirectional solidification
experiments were performed on bars of nickel-base superalloy Mar-M247. Samples were produced with constant dendrite arm
spacing throughout an extended length of each cast bar. The axial thermal gradient and withdrawal velocity imposed on each
casting were varied between castings to produce a range of microstructures from aligned cellular dendritic to aligned dendritic to
mis-aligned dendritic. Macrosegregation effects along the lengths of the bars were evaluated and the resultant impact upon the
density along the length of each casting was also characterized. The density measurements were found to be very sensitive to both
(1) compositional macrosegregation in these castings and (2) internal porosity. Statistical analyses of microporosity in the castings
were based upon metallographic measurements. The development of microporosity in the unidirectionally solidified castings is
shown to be dependent upon the hydrogen gas content of the samples and the imposed solidification velocity through the sample’s
cast microstructures. An optimum intermediate withdrawal velocity of 0.005– 0.01 cm s − 1 was found, which led to closely spaced
dendrite arms, a large number of very small pores and a minimum total porosity level. Lower velocities lead to increased porosity
from larger pores whereas higher velocities lead to macroporosity due to centerline shrinkage. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All
rights reserved.
0921-5093/01/$ - see front matter © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 1 - 5 0 9 3 ( 0 1 ) 0 1 2 6 4 - 3
H.S. Whitesell, R.A. O6erfelt / Materials Science and Engineering A318 (2001) 264–276 265
Table 1
Composition of the samples utilized in this investigation
Element Ni W Co Cr Al Ta Hf Ti Mo C Zr B H N
Wt.% Bal. 10.0 10.1 8.35 5.7 3.07 1.23 0.99 0.80 0.16 0.045 0.015 0.0008 0.0022
H.S. Whitesell, R.A. O6erfelt / Materials Science and Engineering A318 (2001) 264–276 267
over a measured length on a minimum of three well- crostructure is cellular-dendritic with no secondary
aligned dendrite trunks. dendrite arms as verified by the corresponding longitu-
A number of samples were hot-isostatically-pressed dinal micrograph (Fig. 3f). When the samples are with-
(HIP) to close internal porosity. Samples were hot drawn at the highest velocity of 0.1 cm s − 1, cooling
isostatically pressed in a commercial unit using typical curves from in situ thermocouples indicated that freez-
hip parameters of 10393.4 MPa at 12189 3.9°C for ing occurs outside of the adiabatic zone and most of the
4.25 h. heat is extracted in the radial direction. Such cooling
Image analysis of porosity was performed on as-pol- conditions lead to predominantly dendritic growth in-
ished longitudinal sections to determine the number ward from the sample surface to the sample centerline
and shape of pores in a sample. Images were taken by as shown in Fig. 3a and b and such conditions can
a CCD camera mounted to the metallurgical micro- produce extensive centerline porosity. Porosity originat-
scope and connected to a personal computer. Greyscale ing from this mechanism was not the focus of this
8-bit images from the CCD camera were analyzed using work.
image analysis software. On each image, the threshold The primary dendrite arm spacings were measured
was adjusted to remove the light areas and leave only along the lengths of a number of samples and these
the dark pores. Careful manual control of the image data are shown in Fig. 4. Fig. 4 confirms that the
processing assured that carbide shadows were rejected experimental arrangement results in reasonably con-
from the measurements of the pores. Pores under two stant primary dendrite arm spacing over a large portion
pixels in size (i.e. approximately 4.7-mm diameter) were of the casting lengths. The influence of G and V on the
rejected. A total of 48 images were captured and ana- primary and secondary dendrite arm spacing have been
lyzed for each sample corresponding to 40% of the reported in another publication [13] and will not be
polished area. repeated here.
Porosity measurements in castings are sometimes
made by measuring the density of samples followed by 3.2. Density measurements
a comparison with the density determined after hot-iso-
static-pressing. The density of every 3-mm semicircular The density of each semi-circular disc from along the
sample was measured a minimum of five times via length of each sample was measured to compare the
Archimedes principle. The samples were carefully mea- as-cast density against (1) the as-received density of the
sured in air and in absolute ethanol with the tempera- original samples, (2) density measurements obtained
ture monitored by a thermometer. from selected samples after hot isostatic pressing, and
Qualitative compositions of the primary segregating (3) theoretical predictions of the density from measure-
elements along the length of the samples were deter- ments of the composition. The as-received density was
mined on transverse cross-sections using a JEOL 840 determined to be 8.57 g cm − 3. Hot-isostatic-pressing
scanning electron microscope with an Oxford Instru- increased the density only slightly to 8.58 g cm − 3. Fig.
ments energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) system 5a–c show the density versus position from the bottom
with programming to adjust for atomic number, ab- to the top of the unidirectionally solidified bars cast
sorption and fluorescence (ZAF) effects. Quantitative under each condition of withdrawal velocity and ther-
compositions of the primary segregating elements were mal gradient. The standard deviation of each density
determined on selected samples by direct current determination is included in the figures. All three of the
plasma emission spectrometry. Analyses of hydrogen highest velocity samples (Fig. 5a, V= 0.1 cm s − 1)
and nitrogen were performed using the inert gas fusion exhibited density values near the bottom of the bars that
technique. were comparable to the density of the as-received and
hot-isostatically-pressed value. However, all three of the
highest velocity samples exhibited significant reductions
3. Experimental results in density values near the top of the bars. As noted
above, metallographic examination of the tops of the
3.1. Microstructural characterization bars revealed an equiaxed microstructure and signifi-
cant porosity from the development of extensive center-
Fig. 3a–f are typical transverse (a, c, and e) and line shrinkage.
longitudinal (b, d, and f) microstructures for the three Castings withdrawn at 0.01 and 0.005 cm s − 1 were
withdrawal velocities. Transverse micrographs in Fig. 3 considered intermediate velocity samples and their den-
show that the primary dendritic spacing increases as the sity versus distance data exhibited similar trends. As
withdrawal velocity decreases. The samples shown in shown in Fig. 5b for the 0.005 cm s − 1 samples, except
Fig. 3c and d demonstrate that increased solidification for three density datapoints near the tops of the bars
velocities result in secondary and tertiary arm forma- where preferential cooling out the end (top) of the
tion to enhance solute rejection. In Fig. 3e the mi- crucible created a local ‘mini-pipe’ end-effect, each sam-
268 H.S. Whitesell, R.A. O6erfelt / Materials Science and Engineering A318 (2001) 264–276
Fig. 3. Typical microstructures of directionally solidified samples, (a, b) Vs =0.1 cm s − 1, G =19°C cm − 1 (transverse and longitudinal,
respectively); (c, d) Vs = 0.005 cm s − 1, G=39°C cm − 1 (transverse and longitudinal, respectively); (e, f) Vs =0.0005 cm s − 1, G =43°C cm − 1
(transverse and longitudinal, respectively).
ple’s density was essentially constant along the length hot-isostatically-pressed, as-received sample. However,
of the bar. These density values are comparable to the each sample displayed a decreasing density towards the
as-received, hot-isostatically-pressed density value. The top of the sample. The density of the 1400°C sample
density data shown in Fig. 5c for samples solidified at remained constant from the bottom to a position of
V =0.0005 cm s − 1 is extremely interesting. This was approximately 3–4 cm while the density of the 1500°C
the slowest velocity investigated and each sample exhib- sample remained constant from the bottom to a posi-
ited a cellular-dendritic microstructure with no sec- tion of approximately 5–6 cm. The density of the
ondary arm formation (Fig. 3e and f). The density of all 1600°C sample appears to begin to decrease almost
three samples at each furnace setting exhibited a density from the very beginning of solidification (i.e. bottom of
at their bottoms comparable to the density of the the sample). These decreases in density could be due to
H.S. Whitesell, R.A. O6erfelt / Materials Science and Engineering A318 (2001) 264–276 269
Fig. 5. Density along the sample length for samples withdrawn at (a)
Vs =0.1; (b) Vs =0.005; (c) Vs =0.0005 cm s − 1.
plasma emission spectroscopy with standards. In addi- tion along the length of the bars significantly lowers the
tion, selected samples from along the length of the same measured density for the samples grown at 0.0005 cm
castings were also hot-isostatically-pressed. The density s − 1.
of the as-cast bars and the as-cast and hot-isostatically-
pressed samples are shown in Fig. 7. In addition, the 3.4. Metallographic porosity characterization
theoretical density based upon the composition of the
samples was estimated using the methodology of Sung Extensive metallographic measurements of porosity
and Poirier [20] and these data are also shown in Fig. 7 from the bottom and top regions of bars solidified at
for comparison. The as-cast density, the as-cast and V= 0.005 and 0.0005 cm s − 1 and G=25–43°C cm − 1
hot-isostatically-pressed density, and the theoretical es- were also performed. These data are shown in Fig. 8a
timate of the density all decrease with distance from the and b. Fig. 8a shows low levels of porosity along the
bottom of the cast bars. Thus compositional segrega- length of the bars until centerline shrinkage occurs at
Fig. 6. Longitudinal segregation measurements (wt.%) for samples withdrawn at (a) Vs =0.005; (b) Vs =0.0005 cm s − 1.
H.S. Whitesell, R.A. O6erfelt / Materials Science and Engineering A318 (2001) 264–276 271
Table 2
Statistical data on metallographic measurements of porosity in samples withdrawn at 0.005 and 0.0005 cm s−1
n Mean | n Mean |
incipient cases of macropores, perhaps from the begin- ity certainly forms in the 0.0005 cm s − 1 samples to
ning of centerline shrinkage. Additional investigation of overall levels of approximately 0.1–0.4%
the transition from aligned axial dendritic growth to A straightforward capillary flow analysis of the
misaligned and radial dendritic growth is required to 0.0005 cm s − 1 samples provides insight into the pore
assess this possibility.
4. Discussion
Fig. 10. (a) Cross-section of a vertical bar casting where the presence
of an axial thermal gradient creates a tapered liquid pool in the center
to feed the casting (after Sigworth and Wang [1]); (b) cross-section of
a vertical bar casting where lack of an axial thermal gradient and
uneven freezing leaves isolated pools of liquid.
settle to the bottom of the mushy zone. Fig. 13a and b The secondary and tertiary arm development of the
are SEM micrographs showing two typical interden- 0.005 cm s − 1 samples also prevented significant growth
dritic carbide particles associated with porosity (behind and coalescence of micropores that resulted in a larger
the carbides with respect to the direction of dendritic number of smaller pores as compared with the samples
growth). The extensive metallographic characterization grown at 0.0005 cm s − 1. Since the volume of each
of porosity in this investigation revealed that a high isolated micropore would scale as d 3, reducing the size
percentage of pores were located adjacent to carbide of pores dramatically reduces their effect on the mea-
particles. This close association of porosity with car- sured porosity and density of any given sample. As
bides suggests that the particles may be settling to the noted above, Bachelet et al. [16] proposed that there
bottom of the interdendritic spaces during cellular-den- should be optimum casting conditions between fast and
dritic growth and block off the feeding path to feed the slow cooling leading to small evenly distributed microp-
final solidification at the eutectic temperature behind ores. These conditions appear to have been met for the
the carbide particle. Thus interdendritic carbides may samples withdrawn at 0.005 cm s − 1.
create isolated micropools of liquid metal that then
become micropores during final solidification. Addi-
tional studies with varying amounts of carbon and 5. Conclusions
carbide forming elements are required to test this
possibility. As originally proposed by Bachelet et al. [16], there
appears to be an optimum directional solidification
4.3. Intermediate 6elocity samples: Vs = 0.005 cm s − 1 velocity for MAR-M247 of 0.005–0.01 cm s − 1 that
(and 0.01 cm s − 1) leads to small evenly distributed micropores with mini-
mum total porosity. Micropore growth appears to be
Interestingly, none of the samples withdrawn at 0.005 limited by the isolating effects of secondary and tertiary
cm s − 1 exhibited significant density variation with posi- dendrite arms.
tion along the length of the bars. Perhaps the decreased Directional solidification velocities higher than 0.01
permeability of the mushy zone due to secondary and cm s − 1 for MAR-M247 in the present apparatus enable
tertiary arm development prevented significant penetra- solidification outside of the adiabatic zone, radial den-
tion of bulk convection into the mushy zone and al- dritic growth, and severe centerline shrinkage.
lowed microsegregation to develop in a quiescent Directional solidification velocities for MAR-M247
liquid. Additional studies utilizing computational mod- lower than 0.005 cm s − 1 lead to cellular-dendritic
els of the present experiments are necessary to quantify solidification, greater levels of overall porosity, and a
this effect. smaller number of larger pores than at the optimum
velocity. In addition, greater levels of axial macrosegre-
gation are found in these samples as compared with the
higher withdrawal velocity samples. The macrosegrega-
tion levels are great enough to significantly impact
density measurements of the castings.
Applied thermal gradients of 19–34°C cm − 1 for
MAR-M247 in the present apparatus do not appear to
exert significant influence on either macrosegregation or
porosity.
Dissolved hydrogen levels of 5–11 ppm in the bulk
alloy can theoretically produce local hydrogen gas pres-
sures from 65 to 350 kPa in the interdendritic regions.
Such pressures are comparable to the local metallostatic
pressures at the bottom of the mushy zones.
Carbides appear to be highly associated with microp-
ores in MAR-M247. Further studies are required to
assess the statistical significance of this association and
any possible implications regarding cause and effect.
Acknowledgements
Fig. 13. Typical as-cast pores associated with large carbide particles This material is based upon work supported by, or in
(Vs =0.0005 cm s − 1, G =43°C cm − 1). part by, the US Army Research Office under grant
276 H.S. Whitesell, R.A. O6erfelt / Materials Science and Engineering A318 (2001) 264–276
number ARO DAAHO4-96-I-0321 and the National [11] D. Ma, P.R. Sahm, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 29 (1998) 1113.
Aeronautics and Space Administration under coopera- [12] J.D. Hunt, S.Z. Lu, Met. Trans. A 27 (1996) 611.
[13] H.S. Whitesell, L. Li, R.A. Overfelt, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 31
tive agreement number NCC8-128. The samples were (2000) 546.
graciously provided by Howmet Corporation, White- [14] D.R. Poirier, Met. Trans. B 18 (1987) 245.
hall, MI. Technical discussions and the assistance of Dr [15] B. Goyeau, T. Benihaddadene, D. Gobin, M. Quintard, Metall.
Boyd Mueller and Terry Simon of Howmet Corpora- Mater. Trans. B 30 (1999) 613 – 622.
tion in preparing the investment cast precursor bars are [16] E. Bachelet, G. Lesoult, in: D. Coutsouradis (Ed.), High Tem-
perature Alloys for Gas Turbines, Applied Science, London,
especially appreciated. 1978, p. 665.
[17] M. Vijayakumar, S.N. Tewari, J.E. Lee, P.A. Curreri, Mater.
Sci. Eng. A132 (1991) 195.
[18] D.G. McCartney, J.D. Hunt, Acta Metall. 29 (1981) 1851.
References [19] K.L. Zeisler-Mashl, Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan Technological
University, Houghton, MI, 1992.
[1] G.K. Sigworth, C. Wang, Met. Trans. B 24 (1993) 349. [20] P.K. Sung, D.R. Poirier, Mater. Sci. Eng. A245 (1998) 135.
[2] J. Lecomte-Beckers, Met. Trans. A 19 (1988) 2341. [21] C. Mack, Essential of Statistics for Scientists and Technologists,
[3] S.T. Kao, E. Chang, Y.W. Lee, Mater. Sci. Technol. 11 (1995) Plenum Press, New York, 1975, p. 47.
933. [22] P.K. Sung, D.R. Poirier, S.D. Felcelli, E.J. Poirier, A. Ahmed,
[4] C.S. Lin, J.A. Sekhar, J. Mater. Sci. 29 (1994) 5005. personal communication, 2000.
[5] C.T. Ho, C.J. Cheng, J.A. Sekkar, Met. Trans. A 22 (1991) 225. [23] E. Schurmann, M. Sittard, R. Volker, Z. Metall. 78 (1987) 457.
[6] T.S. Piwonka, M.C. Flemings, Trans. Am. Inst. Mater. Eng. 236 [24] E.A. Brandes, Smithells Metals Reference Book, Butterworths,
(1966) 1157. London, 1983, pp. 12 – 15.
[7] J.K. Tien, R.P. Gamble, Mater. Sci. Eng. 8 (1971) 152. [25] J. Chen, J.H. Lee, C.Y. Jo, S.J. Choe, Y.T. Lee, Mater. Sci. Eng.
[8] J.D. Hunt, Solidification and Casting of Metals, The Metals A247 (1998) 113.
Society, London, 1979, p. 3. [26] B. Mueller, Howmet Corporation, personal communication,
[9] W. Kurz, D.J. Fisher, Acta Metall. 29 (1981) 11. 1999.
[10] D. Bouchard, J.S. Kirkaldy, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 28 (1997) [27] P. Bannerjee, R.A. Overfelt, Int. J. Thermophys. 20 (1999) 1791.
651. [28] E.A. Brandes, Int. J. Thermophys. 20 (1999) 14 – 17.