Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Simanjuntak, Marguna Jamin (2016) Modality in The Delegation's Speeches of Asia Africa Conference 2015. Masters Thesis, Unimed

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 25

MODALITY IN THE DELEGATION’S SPEECHES OF

ASIA AFRICA CONFERENCE 2015

A Thesis

Submitted to the English Applied Linguistics Study Program


In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of
Magister Humaniora

BY

MARGUNA JAMIN SIMANJUNTAK


Registration Number : 8126112019

ENGLISH APPLIED LINGUISTICS STUDY PROGRAM


POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN
2016
Abstract

Simanjuntak, Marguna Jamin, Registration Number 8126112019. Modality in the


Delegation’s Speeches of Asia Africa Conference 2015. A Thesis, English Applied
Linguistics Study Program, Post Graduate School, State University of Medan.2016

This study explores modality employed in the delegation’s speeches of Asia Africa
Conference 2015. Modality is either expressed as the speaker’s judgement of the probabilities
or the obligation involved what is saying. There are many speeches delivered in the
conference but only four speeches delivered by President Joko Widodo of Indonesia,
President of China Xi Jinping, Prime Minister of Japan Shinzo Abe and President of Iran
Hassan Rouhani as the speakers at Asia Africa Conference 2015 in Jakarta and Bandung that
would be analyzed. The aim of Asia Africa Conference 2015 was to strengthen cooperation
among Asia African countries. There are three problems in this study, namely: types of
modality in Asia Africa Conference delegation’s speeches, the dominant modality and the
explanation on the modality context. The data were taken from the four speeches of Asia
Africa Conference 2015 namely the speech from Indonesian president Joko Widodo, the
President of China Xi Jinping, the Prime Minister of Japan Shinzo Abe, and the President of
Iran Hassan Rouhani. The speech transcriptions were analyzed by applying the theory of
Systemic Functional Linguistics. The occurences of modality were qualitatively analyzed by
changing them into percentages to determine the portions namely modalization and
modulation. The findings of this research can be drawn as follows : (1) All types of modality,
namely modalization with sub-types probability and usuality and modulation with sub-types
obligation and inclination were applied in the four speeches. (2) The modality was used by
describing the value and orientation of modality and modulation-obligation was the dominant
type in the usage. (3) The modality was used in the context of Asia Africa conference 2015 in
which the delegations mostly used modulation-obligation. This can be a way for the
delegations to show the same vision as the leaders of Asian African countries.

i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pages
Abstract ………………………………………………………………………… i

Acknowledgement ……………………………………………………………… ii

Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………. iv

List of Tables …………………………………………………………………… vii

List of Appendixes ……………………………………………………………… viii

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study……………………………………….. 1


1.2 The Problem of the Study………………………………………. 8
1.3 The Objective of the Study……………………………………… 8
1.4 The Scope of the Study…………………………………………. 9
1.5 The Significance of the Study …………………………………… 9

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE

2.1 The Study of Genre……………………………………………… 10


2.2 Speech……………………………………………………………. 12
2.2.1 Theory of Political Speech……………………………………….. 12
2.2.2 Towards a Formal Model of Speech……………………………… 12
2.2.3 Types of Speech…………………………………………………… 13
2.2.3.1. An Informative Speech……………………………………………. 13
2.2.3.1.1. The Main Elements to Writing an Informative Speech…………. 14
2.2.3.1.2. The Structure and Outline of an Informative Speech…………… 14
2.2.3.2. A layout Speech…………………………………………………… 15
2.2.3.3. A Demonstration Speech…………………………………………… 15
2.2.3.4. A Persuasive Speech……………………………………………….. 16
2.3 Textualization of Lexicogrammar ………………………………… 17
2.4 Systemic Funtional Grammar …………………………………….. 19

iv
v

2.5 Metafunction …………………………………………………….. 22


2.5.1 Interpersonal Meaning ..…………………………………………. 24
2.6 Modality ………………………………………………………….. 24
2.6.1 Types of Modality ……………………………………………….. 27
2.6.1.1 Modalization ..……………………………………………………. 29
2.6.1. 2 Modulation …….………………………………………………… 32
2.6.2 Area of Modality ………………………………………………….. 34
2.6.3 Value of Modality ……..………………………………………….. 35
2.6.4 Realization of Modality……………………………………………. 36
2.6.5 Coverage of Modality ……...……………………………………… 37
2.6.6 The Orientation of Modality ………………………………………. 38
2.6.7 Metaphor of Modality ……………….…………………………….. 39
2.6.7.1 Applying the Analytical Framework ……………………………… 41
2.7 Theory of Asia Africa Conference 2015 ..…………………………. 42
2.7.1 Economic Cooperation …... ……………………………………….. 42
2.7.2 Cultural Cooperation ……………….……………………………… 43
2.7.3 Human Rights and Self Determination .…………………………… 43
2.8 The Relevant Study …..……………………………………………. 44
2.9 Conceptual Framework ……………………………………………. 46

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

3.1 Research Design …………………………………………….……… 48


3.2 Data and Source of the Data ………………………………..……… 49
3.3 Technique for Collecting Data……………………………………… 50
3.4 Instrument for Collecting Data……………………………………… 51
3.5 Technique for Analyzing Data ……………………………………… 51
3.6 Trustworthiness of the Data ………………………………………… 52

CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS, AND DISCUSSION

4.1 The Data and Data Analysis ……………………………………….. 54


4.1.1 Types of Modality …………………………………………………. 54
4.1.1.1 Modalization ………………………………………………………. 57
vi

4.1.1.2 Modulation ………………………………………………………… 59


4.1.2 The Use/Realization of Modality in the Speech …………………… 64
4.1.2.1 Types of Modality …………………………………………………. 64
4.1.2.2 The Orientation of Modality ……………………………………….. 70
4.1.3 Reasons Modality is used in Asia Africa Conference Delegations’
Speeches ……………………………………………………………. 73
4.1.4 Findings ……………………………………………………………... 74
4.1.5 Discussion …………………………………………………………… 76

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

5.1 Conclusions ……………………………………………………….. 79


5.2 Suggestions ……………………………………………………….. 80

REFERENCES …….…………………………………………………………… 81

APPENDIX ……………………………………………………………….. …….. 86


LIST OF APPENDIXES

Pages

Appendix 1 ……………………………………………………………….. 86

Speech 1 …………………………………………………………….. 86

Speech 2 …………………………………………………………….. 90

Speech 3 …………………………………………………………….. 95

Speech 4 …………………………………………………………….. 98

Appendix 2 ……………………………………………………………….. 102

Speech 1 …………………………………………………………….. 102

Speech 2 …………………………………………………………….. 105

Speech 3 …………………………………………………………….. 111

Speech 4 …………………………………………………………….. 113

Appendix 3 ……………………………………………………………….. 116

Speech 1 …………………………………………………………….. 116

Speech 2 …………………………………………………………….. 119

Speech 3 …………………………………………………………….. 126

Speech 4 …………………………………………………………….. 129

viii
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

Political speeches are a sub-genre of the genre-colony (Bhatia 2004 in Dedaic 2006 :

700) of diplomatic communication and thus share most of their characteristic features,

including the macro-communicative purpose of persuading the audience to accept the

speaker’s understanding of reality and of supporting the ideologically biased views and

policy he/she suggests. It means that political speeches delivered in a formal forum is one of

diplomatic communication forms besides military, trade, and social cooperations .

Furthermore, political speeches tend to persuade the audiences to accept the political view

and policy made by a country. Drawing on Donahue and Prosser (1997: 4), the rhetorical

genre of diplomatic communique can be defined as epideitic oratory for ceremonial occasions

which may include deliberative aspects; opening addresses presuppose a high level of

personal involvement, they focus on the present, though may refer to past events and to the

future, and involve an evaluative treatment of people, actions and events by emphasising

praise or blame. It can be said that the material of political speeches often contains praise to a

group of people or instituition. For example, President Jokowi’ political speech which praise

the founding fathers of Asia Africa Conference 1955. In contrast, the material of political

speeches sometimes also condemn other people or instituion. For example, President

Jokowi’s speech that blames the policy of Asian Development bank and IMF.

Furthermore, Bhatia (2004) may be insightful for the definition of genre within the

scope of this paper. For the author, the most important feature of genre is that it is

identifiable, sufficiently standardized, and contextualized in a social and institutional

1
2

framework; it is based on a set of accessible conventions shared by most of the members of a

professional, academic or institutional organization.

Still according to Bhatia (2004), studies of genre can be mapped onto three stages of

development, namely textualization of lexico-grammar, organization of discourse and

contextualization of discourse. The first refers to the investigations of microstructures of a

text and their functional values within the framework of a set of restricted aspects of a given

discourse. The second refers to the engagement with the structuring of discourse and focuses

on patterns or regularities of organization in discourse. The third stage seeks to investigate

disciplinary and institutional contexts, as well as professional and social contexts. Based on

the mapping, it can be said that political speech, as a kind of genre, can be analyzed through

lexicogrammar that is the functional values of the text, organization of discourse, that is the

patterns and regularities of the text, and the contextualization of text that is the investigation

of disciplinary context.

Related to lexicogrammar features, one of the functions of language in political

speech as proposed by Halliday is interpersonal function where the language is used to enable

us to participate with communicative acts with other people. That means here in this function

we use language to interact to other, to establish and maintain the social link with them. In

interacting with other, we usually tell things for purpose such as influence people’s

attitude/behavior, provide information, explain our attitude, etc. In other words, we use

language to exchange the transaction between speaker and listener.

Modality is the simplest sense, indicates a speaker’s or writer’s special way of

conceptualizing a world view or ideology (Fowler 1997:76). It means that language does not

allow us to say something without conveying an attitude to that something. In other words,

hardly one can find a piece of written and spoken text as purely, objective, neutral, or value-

free. It is basically the speakers’ point of view, angle of telling, or authorial interest that
3

determines the essence of speech style and that provides the speech with its particular feel

and color. Li (1999 : 21) defined modality as the degrees between right or wrong. It Is a

significant in the expression of argument and opinion by employing modality, people are free

to express ideas that are not facts with various degree of certainty.

Later on, since modality is referred to speaker’s judgment of the probabilities, or the

obligation involved in what is saying (Halliday, 1994). It is seen that modality is related to

commitment which covers the speaker’s judgment and attitude in presenting his ideas and

messages in text. Therefore, modality choices in speech can be seen as part of the process of

texturing self identity in addition who you are is a matter of how people speaker relates to the

world and to the other people. Through modality how the speaker use words in his speech

related to value can be analyzed. Therefore as one of the realizations of interpersonal

function, modality is divided into modalization and modulation. Modalization concerns with

giving some options to express judgments of probability and frequency of proposition. Thus

modalization divided into two types of meaning that are probability (how likely it is to be

true) and usuality (how frequently it is true). On the other hand, modulation deals with option

to express judgment of obligation and inclination.

The explanation above brings us to express "a role relationship between the speaker

and listener" in the sense that "the speaker is taking upon himself a particular communicative

role" through which he determines both his own role as well as the listener's in relation to

each other (Halliday 1970:325). For this reason modality has become one major point out that

has been investigated along politician speech such as speech of president, the council, the

press conference in social political contexts.

This thesis addresses the use of modality in the Delegation speeches of Asia Africa

Conference 2015. As explained above, there are some items contained in the speech, and one

of them is speech characteristics exists to allow the listeners to comment, give view on or
4

draw conclusion from an event. It contains people opinion in the sign of protest, criticism,

even their response toward tangible phenomenon. While modality refers to people’s opinion

and attitude towards the propositions expressed with language. Modality that involved in this

study is modalization and modulation (how valid the information) since it is concerned with

information as the commodity being exchanged.

By taking advantage of the new innovation in the system in circulating speech, speech

now reaches not only certain class people who held meeting but also any body who wants to

convey his or her idea. As the conference involves countries from Asia and Africa, those

colonized in the past and generally known as developing countries, Asia Africa Conference

plays a vital role in the relationship among Asia Africa countries. Asia Africa Conference

delegation members on their speech have considerable meanings while conveying their plan.

By the end of the World War II in 1945, the world condition was still not stabil. The

emerging two superpower countries-United States of America and Soviet Union-as the

winner of the war had triggered a new era in history, namely Cold War era. During the

aforementioned period, the constellation of political world was divided into two blocks;

western block was led by the United States of America, and eastern block under leadership of

the Sovyet Union. They tried to exert a pull on othet countries to join their blocks. The

competition which was initiated by the ideology difference between capitalism and

communism was then prolonged by the contests of military hardware, space technology and

defense pacts establishment. The rivalry also had influenced Asian-African countries’

condition. In the beginning of the 1950s, some Asian-African countries had become the arena

of the struggle of those two blocks (Bandoro: 1955).

Apart from cold war, the world political tension, the world political tension occurred

due to imperialism especially in the area of Asia Africa, namely, Vietnam, Algeria, Tunisia,

and Morocco. Some independent countries also dealt with imperialism remnants, such as
5

Indonesia still faced West Irian problem, India-Pakistan with Kashmir problem and Arab

countries were dealing with Palestine. Essentially, the United Nations (UN) was the authorize

organization that could deal with the matters, however, in reality, the UN still did not

managed them, especially related to the world tension during Cold War era. The situation,

consequently, initiated an idea of holding a conference in which all Asia and Africa countries

were involved.

Owing to the tension of the world political and secure condition, the Indonesian

government determined to take action on alleviating tensions as a result of western and

eastern block rivalry. Indonesia took firm action by issuing independent and active policy and

good neighbor policy as well (Hatta 1953 : 30).

Prime Minister Ali Sastroamidjojo, in front of Temporary House Representative on

August 25, 1953 explained the Indonesian foreign policy (Kemenpen,30). Ali Sastroamidjojo,

in the occurrence, stated that Indonesia’s role in alleviating the world tensions need to be

supported by countries having similar status and situation, namely Asia Africa which also

faced similar interbational problems. Furthermore, Ali Sastroamidjojo explained that,

generally, Asia-Africa countries were the most countries which suffered from cold war

influence. Therefore, concerted efforts were required in order to free Asia-Africa countries

from pressures affected by cold war. The statement had showed an idea and a will of the

Indonesian government to strengthen cooperations among Asia Africa countries

(Sastroamidjojo 1974:458).

From this view it is clear that Indonesia plays an important role in Asia Africa

movement in order to evolve struggles againts colonialism (Feith 1968:387). Based on the

agreement made by the leaders of Asia Afica countries in Colombo in 1954, Indonesia was

absolutely supported to be the host which would conduct Asia Africa Conference (Abdulgani

1980:21).
6

Asia-Africa Conference was conducted in Bandung 18 April 1955 in which twenty

five heads of state/government attended it. Indonesian president, Soekarno, stated on his

speech that all conference delegates were from different nations, as well as different

backgrounds of socials and cultures, religions, political systems, even race. However, the

difference could be bound by bad experience due to colonialism, by the similar intention

namely to maintain and strengthen world peace. In the final communique, it was stated that

Asia Africa Conference would observe the joint interest among Asia Africa countries and had

negotiated the ways of how to cooperate intensely in the field of economy, culture and politic

(Yamin ANRI:645).

The Asia Africa Conference 2015 held in Jakarta on 22 April 2015 brings up to global

bilateral negotiation and discussion. It is aimed at discussing the international economic

growth and other social functions related to contries development in South South.

To sustain the ongoing process during conference, there are some speakers delegated

from KAA representatives to be the speakers in conveying several ideas toward the

conference topics. Dealing with these discussion the speakers are conveying the different

topics as involving economy growth, invesment, social billateral, politics, and health which is

derived by some different speakers.

As explained above, modality, in simplest sense, indicates a speaker’s or writer’s

special way of conceptualizing a world view. According to Fowler in Boyandi (2011),

language does not allow us to say something without conveying an attitude to that something.

In other words it seems that any text, written or spoken is not free, pure, or neutral. It is

basically produced through the writer’s point of view, angle of vision, angle of telling, or

authorial interest that determines the essence of a story style and that provides the story with

its particular feel and color (Simpson, 1993 in Boyandi, 2011).


7

Within this context, the above facts have argued the speaker to analyze further on

modality of Asia Africa Conference Delegation speeches. Some examples of utterances

consisting modalities in Asia Africa Conference 2015 taken the speech of Indonesian

President Joko Widodo are:

1. We must build a new global economic order, that is open to new emerging economic

powers.

2. We can do all that by bringing the Bandung Spirit down to earth

3. We must cooperate closely to eradicate poverty, improve education and health

services, promote science and technology, and provide jobs for ours people.

Here President Joko Widodo used the modality ‘must’ and ‘can’, and it is, of course,

necessary to analyze the whole aspects of it from the view of Systemic Functional

Linguistics proposed by Halliday.

The writer ponders that it is significant to analyze the modality to find out the

speakers ideology from the perspective of modality theory. The types of modality used in

Asia Africa Conference delegation speech that is assumed to make Asia Africa Conference

held in Indonesia on April 2015 need to be revealed and to be convinced. It is necessary to

know the systematic use of the type to support more people to consider speech contents.

Based on the corpus we have collected, this paper employs the theories of modality in

systemic-functional linguistics to analyze modality in speech to reflect complex semantic

connotations and their functions, attempting to reveal specters’ modality.

Therefore the researcher chose the topic of political speech which is analyzed by

modality since the political speech plays crucial role to human intervention which associate a

vital role in global platform especially in political, social, and economical growth and

bilateral cooperation in which Indonesia is targetted to be the issue expansion for those of

bilateral cooperation. Hence, the information based on the political speech are certainly
8

contexted and designed by the speakers in order to convince people or listeners to go on the

information and to accept the ideas of speaker’s speech.

Gazing upon the speech role is to convince the existence of modality to analyze the

certainty degree of those speakers. Furthermore, it is necessary to see whether the theory of

modality obtained from experts’ view is suitable to the real condition in which it is used in

the political speeches in Asia Africa Conference 2015. If the political speeches have power or

not can be evident through the use of modality.

1.2 The Problems of the Study

Based on the background of the study the problems are formulated as in the

following.

1. What types of modality are used in the delegation speeches of the Asia Africa

Conference 2015?

2. How is the modality used in Asia Africa Conference delegation speeches 2015?

3. In what context is the modality used in the way it is?

1.3 The Objectives of the Study

With reference to the problems, the objectives are to

1. identify the modality used on the Delegation Speeches of Asia Africa Conference

2015.

2. describe the modality used on the Delegation Speeches of Asia Africa Conference

2015.

3. contextualize the use of the type of modality used on Delegation Speeches of Asia

Africa Conference 2015.


9

1.4 The Scope of the Study

The concept of modality applied in this study is based on systemic functional

linguistic (SFL) proposed by Halliday. This research will be focused on the occurrences of

modalization covering probability and usuality and modulation covering obligation and

inclination used in delegation speeches of Asia Africa Conference 2015. Thus, there are some

realizations of modality such as modal verb, modal adverb, adjective, etc. Since the speeches

consist of many topics to be discussed, this study focused on the topic of political speech

especially for multiteral cooperation for Asian African countries.

1.5 The Significance of the Study

This reasearch findings are wished to be useful both theoretically and practically.

Theoretically, the findings are useful for linguistics development. It enriches the discussion

about the application of systemic functional grammar in concluding people utterances and

speeches as specific genres. Practically, the findings of modality are expected to be useful for

the students and the teacher with a required knowledge in doing another research on other

genres especially in modality. It is about to investigate relevant topic with politics,

multilateral cooperation, and mass media. This study also supports politician, journalist, and

specter to enhance the development of logic ideas and organized expression of speech or

debate.
CHAPTER V

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

5.1 Conclusions

After analyzing the data, conclusions are drawn as the following.

First, speakers used obligation, inclination and probability in conveying their speeches

at the Asia Africa Conference 2015. Obligation is the most dominant of all types of modality

with 39.81 % then followed to the second dominant is inclination with 31.48%. Probability is

less dominant with 23.15 % and usuality was only found in the second and third speakers

with 6 occurrences (5.56 %) while the others were not.

Second, in realizing the use of modality in their speeches the speakers used

modulation – obligation with medium value. Having this obligation with medium value

indicates that the speakers convey the command in giving their speeches. However, the lack

of uncertainty in the speaker speech is covered by the using of objective implicit orientation

of modality as the most dominant orientation of modality used in the speech that shows the

back up from the point of view of other people.

Finally, having obligation as the dominant indicates the delegation speech on Asia

Africa Conference 2015 speaker has certainty in giving information through the speech. The

use of modality is related with the context of situation and context of culture. In terms of

value, the closeness between medium and high indicated the expressions are both closer to

positive and negative polar. The finding shows that the use of modality is increased when the

speakers conveys about issue of political, economy and cooperation.

79
80

5.2 Suggestions

In relation to the conclusions, suggestions are made as follows:

First, it is suggested that the speech of the government, public leaders or politicians

apply the strategy of modality in their text to deliver their points of view so that they are able

to persuade and ensure the listeners about their points of view and finally make the listeners

accept the ideas.

Second, it is suggested that the students of English department to have a good

comprehension in the theory of modality. Therefore, they are able to see and figure out the

messages in any text from the perspective of functional grammar and more clearly understand

the speech.

Finally, it is suggested that students or other researchers to carry out further research

in modality on other type of speech. It is because different speakers convey different

speeches, or different context of speech. The speech will have different use of modality
REFERENCES

Amidjojo, A. S. 1974. Tonggak-tonggak di Perjalananku.(Jakarta: Kinta)

Abdulgani, R. 1980. The Bandung Connection (Jakarta: Gunung Agung)

Akman, V. (2000) ‘Rethinking context as a social construct.’ Journal of Pragmatics 32, 743-
759.

Bandoro, K.ST. 1955. Asia-Afrika Antara Dua Pertentangan (Jakarta: Penerbit Soeroengan)
Bhatia, V. A. (2002) ‘Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model.’ Ibérica 4, 3-19

Bhatia, V. A. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. New York:


Continuum.

Bloor T and Bloor M. 1995. The Functional Analysis of English . New York: Arnold

Bogdan, R. C. Biklen, S.K. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education. Allyn and Bacon:
Buston

Bogdan, R and Taylor, S J. 1975: Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A


Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New York: A Wiley –
International Publication

Boicu, R. 2007. Modal Verbs and Politeness Strategies in Political Discourse. Bucharest:
University of Bucharest

Boyandi, A. 2011. Linguistic Manifestation of Modality in Newspaper Editorial in


International Journal of Linguistics. www.macrothink.org/ijl. Accessed on September
25th, 2013

Brown, G., Levinson, S. C. (1978) Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage.


Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bryman,A.2006.Triangulation.www.referenceworld.com/sage/socialscience/
triangulation.pdf Accessed on July 15th, 2013

Bunging, B. (2007). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu
Sosial. Jakarta: Kencana Prenama Media Grup.

Cornbleet S. Carter. 2001. The Language of Speech and Writing. London and New York:
Routledge

81
82

Dedaic, M N. 2006. ‘Political Speech and Persuasive Argumentation. In:Keith Brown


(ed)Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol.9. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 700–707.

Drysdale, P and Yunling, Z. 2012. APEC and Liberalisation of the Chinese Economy. The
Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200: ANU E Press

Donahue, Ray T. and Michael H. Prosser. 1997. Diplomatic Discourse: International Conflict
At United Nations – Addresses and Analysis. London: Ablex.

Duranti, A. (1985) ‘Sociocultural dimension of discourse.’ In: Van Dijk, T. (ed.) Handbook of
Discourse Analysis, Vol. 1. London: Academic Press. 273-291.

Eggins, S. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic. London: Continuum

Eggins, S. 2004. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic. 2nd edition. London:


Continuum

Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman Group

Feith, H. 1968. The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia (Ithaca: Cornell


University Press)

Fowler, R. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in Press. London and new
York: Longman

Fowler, R. 1985. Lingustic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1970. Functional Diversity in Language as Seen from a Consideration of


Modality and Mood in English. London: Foundation of Language.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of
Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. Functional Diversity in Language as Seen from a Consideration of


Modality and Mood in English. London: Foundation of Language

Halliday, M.A.K. 1990. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold

Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar (2 nd Ed). London: Edward


Arnold

Halliday, M.A.K. and Christian M.I.M. 2004. Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd Ed).
London: Hodder Arnold
83

Hasan, R. (1989a) ‘The texture of a text.’ In: Halliday M.A.K., Hasan, R. Language, Context
and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. 70-96.

Hatta, M.1953. Dasar-dasar Politik Luar Negeri RI. (Jakarta: Deplu)

Hita, J.A. 2008. Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use. Odense Working Papers in Language
and Communication Vol 29. Accessed in 10th July, 2013

Hoey, M. (2001) Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London,


New York: Routledge.

Holmes, J. (1995) Men, Women and Politeness. London: Longman.

Huang, G. (2001). Theory and Practice of Discourse Analysis: A Research of Advertising


Discourse. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Iwamoto, N. (1998). Modality and Point of View: A Contrastive Analysis of Japanese


Wartime and Peacetime Newspaper Discourse .In B. Parkinson (Ed) Edinburg
working papers in applied linguistics (pp.17-41). University of Edinburg

Kementerian Penerangan RI.wy. Keterangan dan Djawaban Pemerintah atas Program


Kabinet Ali Sastro Amidjojo di DPRS Djakarta. (Jakarta: Percetakan Negara)

Lee, C.J. (ed). 2010. Making a World After Empire: The Bandung Moment and Its Political
Afterlives. Athens: Ohio University Press

Li, Jian. (1999). Modality and Meaning of Modal Auxiliaries. Journal of Foreign Languages.
1999(4): pp19-23.

Lincoln, Y & Guba E. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills California: Sage Publication
Inc. Miles, Matthew B & Huberman, Michael A. 1984. Qualitative Data Analysis,
London. Sage Publication Inc

Lyons, J. 1997. Semantics (Vol 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Martin. R. James. 2003. Grammatical Metaphor Views From Systemic Functional Linguistics.
University of New South Wales: John Benjamins B.V.
Miles, MB. & Huberman, AM. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edition). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Miles, Huberman, & Saldana (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3rd
Edition. Washington, DC: Sage Publications.
84

Miller, C. R. (1994) Rhetorical community: the cultural basis of genre, in A. Freedman, and
P. Medway (eds) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis, 67-78.

Palmer, F.R. 2001. Mood and Modality. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Pandian, A., & Assadi,N. 2010. ABC’s of Functional Grammar.Selengor Darul Ehsan: Oxford
Fajar.

Saragih, A. 2005. Introducing Systemic Functional Grammar. Medan: Unimed (Unpublished)

Sapir. E. 1921. An Introduction to the Study of Speech. Foreign Language Teaching and
Research Press.

Shayegh, K & Nesa, N. 2012. Power in Political Discourse of Barrack Obama. Journal of
Basic and Applied Scientific Research. Accesed on January 10th, 2014.

Shayegh, K. 2012. Modality in Political Discourses of Barak Obama and Martin Luther King.
Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research. 2012
Sidabutar, U. 2014. A Thesis: Modality on the Delegations’Speeches of APEC 2013. Medan:
Unimed (Unpublished)

Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings.


Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2004) Research Genres. Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge


University Press.
Teich, Elke. 1999. Systemic Functional Grammar in Natural Language Generation. London
and New York: Cassell.

Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. New York:
Falmer.

Thompson, G. 1992. Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold

Travers, M. (2001). Qualitative Research through Case Studies. London: Sage

Van De Mieroop, D. (2007) ‘The complementarity of two identities and two approaches:
Quantitative and qualitative analysis of institutional and professional identity.’
Journal of Pragmatics 39, 1120-1142.

Vukovic, M (2014). Strong Epidemic Modality in Parliamentary Discourse. Open Linguistics


1:37-52
85

Watts, R. (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wales, K. (1996) Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge


University Press.

William A. Kretzschmar, Jr. 2009. The Linguistics of Speech. New York: Cambridge
University Press

You might also like